Monday, March 16, 2026

Crowd Gasps as Trump Blurts Out GOP Rep Given Weeks to Live

President Donald Trump drew audible gasps while speaking at the Kennedy Center on Monday after apparently revealing that a GOP lawmaker had received a "terminal" diagnosis and was expected to be "dead by June."

Posted by Reinheitsgebot at 07:32 PM | 97 COMMENTS | permalink

More

Uhh Congressman Neil Dunn apparently was supposed to be "dead by June" according to Trump. According to Mike Johnson Dun had gotten a "pretty grim diagnosis." Johnson called it a "terminal diagnosis." WTAH?

[image or embed]

-- Murshed Zaheed (@murshedz.bsky.social) Mar 16, 2026 at 1:47 PM

Comments

That's quite a shoutout from the 300 lb sack of----------.

#1 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-03-16 01:37 PM

We're all waiting for this gaffe from the morbidly obese draft-dodging silver-spooned golf cheating pedophilic president:

"Dotard Blurts Out Neil Dunn Ghislaine Maxwell Will Be Dead By June by 21 Jan 2029."

#2 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-03-16 02:57 PM

Sociopaths are only able to guess at proper behavior.

#3 | Posted by Zed at 2026-03-16 04:00 PM

We are supposed to trust Trump with national security secrets but he can't even be trusted with private health info?

#4 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2026-03-16 05:17 PM

Neil Dunn needs to be careful.

Trump put a hit out on him.

He's got three months to live.

#5 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-16 05:23 PM

Will Vance after Trump wilts be like Ford after Nixon?

#6 | Posted by South_American at 2026-03-16 11:39 PM

Another day, another thousand appalling words and deeds. He has stripped away the veneer of honor that his party once claimed.

#7 | Posted by cbob at 2026-03-17 06:22 AM

The glee that s*&^bag has in revealing such information is pathetic.

Even more pathetic is that there are still people supporting him.

#8 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-17 10:55 AM

Technically a HIPAA violation, should Congressman Dunn care to execrise his rights under the law.

LOL like he's ever cross Trump, and like Trump's DOJ would ever pursue the case.

But it's a HIPAA violation nonetheless.

Reminds me of when Trump committed the largest act of insider trading in American history. When he tweeted hours before lifting the Liberation Day Tariffs that now is a good time to buy. Tipping like that, is a felony.

#9 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-17 10:58 AM

A Republican lawmaker diagnosed with terminal cancer? We all know a LOT of lefties are sexually aroused hearing this news.

#10 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-17 11:53 AM

Patricide Jeff jerked off into his old man's urn after hearing his child-raping hero cut funding for cancer research.

#11 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-03-17 11:58 AM

A Republican lawmaker diagnosed with terminal cancer? We all know a LOT of lefties are sexually aroused hearing this news.
#10 | Posted by BellRinger

I do more to fight cancer in a day than you'll do in your entire life.

Which isn't saying much, because you haven't done anything, and you never will.

#12 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-17 12:01 PM

Technically a HIPAA violation, should Congressman Dunn care to execrise his rights under the law.
LOL like he's ever cross Trump, and like Trump's DOJ would ever pursue the case.
But it's a HIPAA violation nonetheless.
Reminds me of when Trump committed the largest act of insider trading in American history. When he tweeted hours before lifting the Liberation Day Tariffs that now is a good time to buy. Tipping like that, is a felony.

#9 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-17 10:58 AM | Reply
While it is an ------- move, I don't believe it is a HIPPA violation as Trump is not a health care provider or related business.

#13 | Posted by MBlue at 2026-03-17 01:58 PM

A Republican lawmaker diagnosed with terminal cancer? We all know a LOT of lefties are sexually aroused hearing this news.

#10 | Posted by BellRinger

F*&^ off you stupid piece of s*&^.

#14 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-17 02:07 PM

" F*&^ off you stupid piece of s*&^.

#14 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2026-03-17 02:07 PM | FLAG: "

Take it up with your ilk. I remember how celebratory a ridiculous number of lefties both in public and on this site when Charlie Kirk was murdered.

It was so bad on this site that even you were somewhat disgusted by it. But of course you have a short memory when it comes to crap like that coming from your team.

#15 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-17 05:29 PM

Patricide Jeff is the --------- who celebrated the deaths of the 5 cops who perished because the brain dead------------------- lost an election.

#16 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-03-17 05:35 PM

But of course you have a short memory when it comes to crap like that coming from your team.

#15 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Your momma should have told you that you can't be self-righteous and also be a hypocrite.

#17 | Posted by Zed at 2026-03-17 05:37 PM

I am neither, so there is that.

#18 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-17 05:40 PM

I am neither

#18 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Let's add: spectacularly un-self aware.

#19 | Posted by Zed at 2026-03-17 05:41 PM

I'm extremely self aware and im a fan of self deprecating humor.

#20 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-17 05:59 PM

Take it up with your ilk. I remember how celebratory a ridiculous number of lefties both in public and on this site when Charlie Kirk was murdered.

It was so bad on this site that even you were somewhat disgusted by it. But of course you have a short memory when it comes to crap like that coming from your team.

#15 | Posted by BellRinger

You're the one with the short memory.
Pointing out that he said the 2nd ammendment is worth innocent people dying, and that we should have public executions, is not the same as celebrating.

Stating facts is so offensive to republicans.

#21 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-17 06:12 PM

They were cheering it and that includes some on this site.

#22 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-17 06:14 PM

They were cheering it and that includes some on this site.

#22 | Posted by BellRinger

Shall I take a moment to google a few of the abhorrent things trump has cheered on?

Why do you hold internet commenters to a higher standard than your cult leader?

#23 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-17 06:52 PM

I'm extremely self aware

#20 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

You're a regular Bhodisatva.

#24 | Posted by Zed at 2026-03-17 07:17 PM

B-b-b-b-it Trump is literally your go-to for everything. Trump being a human POS doesn't excuse the despicable actions of others. You can condemn both. It's allowed and even encouraged in polite society.

#25 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-17 07:41 PM

B-b-b-b-it Trump is literally your go-to for everything. Trump being a human POS doesn't excuse the despicable actions of others. You can condemn both. It's allowed and even encouraged in polite society.

#25 | Posted by BellRinger

If you didn't want your standards to be applied to yourself you shouldnt have chosen a man like trump to lead your cult. By choosing trump as your new jesus, you surrendered any ability to credibly complain about decorum, manners, lies, or cruelty.

#26 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-17 08:10 PM

Like I said, you are incapable of calling out despicable behavior if it comes from your perceived team. You constantly use the word "cult" not realizing the term is far more applicable to you than those who you view as your ideological foes.

#27 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-17 08:40 PM

Like I said, you are incapable of calling out despicable behavior if it comes from your perceived team. You constantly use the word "cult" not realizing the term is far more applicable to you than those who you view as your ideological foes.

#27 | Posted by BellRinger

Because as a trump cult member, you lack the credibility to call out despicable behavior.
By joining the cult (and yes it's a cult by any definition of the word) you are declaring to the world that despicable behavior is fine to you.

#28 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-17 08:54 PM

I remember how celebratory a ridiculous number of lefties both in public and on this site when Charlie Kirk was murdered.

Your bubble presented you what your bias wanted to hear.

There were only a few here saying positive things.

Comment stands. You're a moron with massively slanted views of reality.

#29 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-17 09:20 PM

Who should I believe, you or my lying eyes? I know what I saw and witnessed. I watched it all unfold in real time right from the horse's mouths.

#30 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-17 09:21 PM

" 28 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY AT 2026-03-17 08:54 PM | FLAG: "

Know why you know so much about cult behavior? Because you are a cultist.

#31 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-17 09:22 PM

" There were only a few here saying positive things."

I am well aware. Some on this site showed they have a human side. Far too many were absolute ghouls cheering his death and I'm not only talking about LGH.

#32 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-17 09:23 PM

" you are incapable of calling out despicable behavior if it comes from your perceived team."
~Bellringer

I was wondering why my neighbors reported finding exploded pieces of my irony meter.

Aren't you the guy who screeched LAWFARE but could never find it? And now sees it all around him, but can never admit it?

And remember when you were clutching your pearls at the thought of Hunter Biden making (reads notes) one million dollars, while staying silent on Jared's $2 Billion???

#33 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-17 10:36 PM

@#33 ... Aren't you the guy who screeched LAWFARE but could never find it? And now sees it all around him, but can never admit it? ...

Oh, that's gonna leave a mark.

#34 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-17 11:12 PM

Wow, Danforth is always good for a massive deflection and claiming I said or did things I never said.

#35 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-17 11:26 PM

" claiming I said or did things I never said."

You're right. You never said a word....

You never said a word against Trump's LAWFARE.

You never said a word against Trump's CENSORSHIP

You never said a word against Trump's PRESIDENTIAL BRIBERY

You never said a word against the Trump Family's MONETIZING THE WHITE HOUSE

You never said a word against Trump BORROWING NEW TRILLIONS FOR TAX CUTS

Gee...there are A LOT of things you never said!!!

#36 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-17 11:46 PM

"Danforth is always good for a massive deflection "

Pointing out what a raging hypocrite you are on the topic you brought up is hardly a deflection.

#37 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-17 11:49 PM

y.yarn.co

#38 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-03-17 11:51 PM

@#35 ... Wow, Danforth is always good for a massive deflection and claiming I said or did things I never said. ...

Wow, your current trolling alias seems to have sunk to a new low.

Will it celebrate that new low, and revel in it?

#39 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-17 11:57 PM

You know Danforth is desperate to defend his buddies from the indefensible when he has to try and flail and bring up a bunch of unrelated stuff and try and attack the source personally. It's utterly pathetic, but then, that's Danforth in a nutshell.

#40 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-18 10:47 AM

Truth hurts, huh?

Nice dodge. Not unexpected as acknowledging that post means acknowledging your complete and utter lack of principles, values, ideals, morals, convictions, character...

#41 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-18 12:19 PM

You are so lame. Your hyper partisanship knows no bounds.

#42 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-18 12:41 PM

"Your hyper partisanship knows no bounds."

Says the most hyper partisan lying hypocrite on this site.

Unintentional funny flag!

#43 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-18 12:43 PM

JPW

You vociferously support all of the things you claim to oppose when you perceive the other side doing it. Danforth does too. It's peak hypocrisy.

#44 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-18 12:44 PM

" Says the most hyper partisan lying hypocrite on this site."

Maybe runner-up. The top spot belongs to you.

#45 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-18 12:45 PM

The top spot belongs to you.

#45 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

I know you are but what am I? It takes one to know one!

Such well founded and reasoned arguments!

For a kindergartner.

#46 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-18 12:47 PM

It was an appropriate response to your BS. Don't like it? Don't lead with a childish insult. For God's sake, look in the mirror. It's like JPW getting irritated with truck stop references when those r3sponses are on the same level as the feces he hurls.

#47 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-18 12:53 PM

You vociferously support all of the things you claim to oppose when you perceive the other side doing it.
#44 | Posted by BellRinger

Got any examples?

#48 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-18 12:56 PM

"It was an appropriate response to your BS. Don't like it? Don't lead with a childish insult."

When you lie like a rug and get constantly corrected yet continue to lie like a rug.. Expect insults.

#49 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-18 01:07 PM

Don't whine about responses to those insults that are on the same level.

You describe any OPINION you disagree with as a lie. That's because, like far too many other lefties on this site, you view your own opinions as facts when they are not.

#50 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-18 01:10 PM

"You describe any OPINION you disagree with as a lie."

Opinions are like a holes. Everyone has one. Yours stink for sure.

I could care less about your stinky opinions.

But I vociferously disagree with your "facts".

And you hurl insults like a drunken sailor.

So expect to get some back.

#51 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-18 01:24 PM

" And you hurl insults like a drunken sailor. "

Rarely preemptively. Almost always in response to childish crap hurled at me. Thanks for unwittingly proving my point.

#52 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-18 01:49 PM

" and bring up a bunch of unrelated stuff "

The fact you're a roaring hypocrite on the topic is NOT unrelated.

Embarrassing for you, yes, but absolutely not unrelated.

Is this yet ANOTHER instance of you not understanding the definitions of the words you're using???

#53 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-18 02:26 PM

Who should I believe, you or my lying eyes? I know what I saw and witnessed. I watched it all unfold in real time right from the horse's mouths.

#30 | Posted by BellRinger

What did you witness on Jan 6?

What did you witness during the Jan 6 hearings when trump's team members went under oath?

#54 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-18 02:35 PM

Know why you know so much about cult behavior? Because you are a cultist.

#31 | Posted by BellRinger

You can't deny maga is a cult so all you can do is say "no you are!"

If dems were a cult, kamala would have won. But her support for israel was enough to lose liberal wing of her party.

#55 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-18 02:37 PM

" The fact you're a roaring hypocrite on the topic is NOT unrelated."

All you have is personal attacks. I'm not playing your game. You can't counter what I'm saying so you bring in topics wholly unrelated to the thread to try and mask your impotence on the subject matter.

#56 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-18 02:46 PM

" If dems were a cult, kamala would have won. But her support for israel was enough to lose liberal wing of her party.

#55 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY AT 2026-03-18 02:37 PM | REPLY | FLAG:"

That's not why she lost. She didn't lose the Dem vote. She lost the middle. She's vapid and substance less and even in front of the most friendly interviewers cant answer the most basic questions. Non stop word salads.

#57 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-18 02:48 PM

vapid and substance less and even in front of the most friendly interviewers cant answer the most basic questions. Non stop word salads.

#57 | Posted by BellRinger

Funny how you hold those qualities against harris but not against trump.

#58 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-18 02:53 PM

"She's vapid "

What a riot.

You voted for the guy who thought injecting bleach and nuking a hurricane were good ideas, and said noise from windmills causes cancer.

#59 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-18 03:06 PM

She is vapid. We all saw it. She's so bad that a candidate who shouldn't have even qualified for office beat her handily.

#60 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-18 03:30 PM

"All you have is personal attacks."

Who else should get the blame for your partisan hackery?

Regarding the WA guy and his income taxes...who should folks hold responsible for your lie?

#61 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-18 03:47 PM

"She is vapid. We all saw it."

Looking at Trump, vapid is clearly not a disqualifier. What's your (R)eal (R)eason?

And tell us: why is it NO ONE in the White House can explain percentages to the Head Moron? Or who pays tariffs? Just yesterday he posted foreign governments would get the tariffs refunded because of SCOTUS.

#62 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-18 03:57 PM

Flag:

She is vapid. We all saw it. She's so bad that a candidate who shouldn't have even qualified for office beat her handily.

#60 | Posted by BellRinger

There is no metric by which trump was a better option than harris.

But the billionaires who control the media and the algorithms wanted trump, and spoon fed propaganda into weak minds to make you think trump was the better option.

#63 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-18 04:17 PM

Looking at Trump, vapid is clearly not a disqualifier. What's your (R)eal (R)eason?

There's probably several dozen attributes that could be on that list where they're pearl clutching, hyperventilation worthy no gos for a Dem but a mere "meh" for Trump.

#64 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-18 04:35 PM

"There's probably several dozen attributes that could be on that list where they're pearl clutching, hyperventilation worthy no gos for a Dem but a mere "meh" for Trump."

Remember when HRC made $100,000 on cattle futures, and Republican heads exploded? Now, $Melania gets a $28 million bribe, and no Republican makes a peep.

Remember when screechers kept yelling LAWFARE under Biden, but could never identify any? Now, Lawfare abounds (Comey, James, the truth-telling six), and we get radio silence from the right.

Remember when the scandal of the century (Twitter Files and CENSORSHIP!) turned out to be editorial boards doing what editorial boards do? Now Trump openly threatens media outlets with clear First Amendment infringements...and The Party of Responsibility takes no responsibility.

And Remember when the slurpers were aghast at the idea a President's offspring might monetize the Office? Now, Trump's entire family grifts in public...and no GOPushback.

The fastest growing cemetery in history is the one where Republican talking points go to die.

#65 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-18 04:55 PM

" There is no metric by which trump was a better option than harris."

The voters clearly saw it differently.

#66 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-18 11:24 PM

Danforth is a revisionist history clown.

#67 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-18 11:25 PM

A 'clown' that regularly owns your sorry ass, bell.

#68 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-03-18 11:26 PM

" There is no metric by which trump was a better option than harris."
The voters clearly saw it differently.

#66 | Posted by BellRinger

The voters are morally bankrupt idiots. Your example no. 1.

#69 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-03-18 11:28 PM

YOU'RE UGH

#70 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-03-18 11:30 PM

The voters clearly saw it differently.

#66 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

The voters fell for Trumpy's firehose of lies.

So the voters chose to FAFO.

#71 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-18 11:54 PM

The voters clearly saw it differently.

#66 | Posted by BellRinger

His vote count went up by something like 3 million votes. Otherwise, it was the usual group of idiots who support Trump no matter what.

3 million is hardly "the voters." If anything, "the voters" abstained from voting for either candidate, indicating the statement "there is no metric by which trump was a better option than harris" to be correct.

They rejected both.

#72 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-19 09:28 AM

#65 | Posted by Danforth

Could you imagine the response if Biden had purged military brass to install cronies? Then invaded a neighbor and kidnapped their President and months later began another ME war that even the crony brass suggested was a bad idea and resulted in the head of counterterrorism to resign with a letter specifically calling out the new ME war as the reason? The mildest caterwauling would be for impeachment and the most extreme and loud would be for violence to "take our country back" with quotations from The Declaration of Independence as a rationale.

Or better yet, imagine Biden or Obama were named thousands of times in the papers surrounding multiple federal and state level investigations into a pedophile/drug dealing organization only to have them disappear the investigations when getting into office and placing multiple people named in said investigations into positions of power to squelch any further advancement or mention of them?

Or Obama/Biden launching a meme coin or crypto ventures the day before their inauguration that has then gone through multiple pump and dump cycles making Obama/Biden billions of dollars?

Or Obama/Biden wearing campaign merch to a Dignified Transfer ceremony? Checking the time was an indication of Biden clearly hating the military, but hocking merch is what, pure patriotism?

Or Obama/Biden enacting a fake assassination scheme complete with proper flag placement, photographer placement (by staff, not happenstance) and multiple bystander deaths?

Or Obama/Biden starting a war from an empty room of a gaudy resort with multiple security breaches/risks then spending the entire weekend golfing and only flippantly addressing servicemember deaths while making light of more to come?

I feel like we need to make a permanent thread on the back page with these things added in real time as I'm sure there are dozens of instances, I've missed that have already happened and there are certain to be dozens, if not hundreds, more instances to come.

#73 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-19 10:47 AM

" They rejected both.

#72 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2026-03-19 09:28 AM | FLAG: "

That's not how elections work.

Trump won. Kamala lost. It wasn't even close. Cope.

#74 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-19 12:38 PM

" There is no metric by which trump was a better option than harris."

The voters clearly saw it differently.

#66 | Posted by BellRinger

The voters saw what the billionaires who own the media and the algorithms wanted them to see - that trump's coup attempt was no big deal and that kamala had a bad laugh.

So as a voter - what metric did YOU see that made trump the better choice?

#75 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-19 01:00 PM

Trump won. Kamala lost. It wasn't even close. Cope.

#74 | Posted by BellRinger

How come she didn't attempt a coup like trump did when he lost?

#76 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-19 01:01 PM

It wasn't even close. Cope.

You're such a stupid f*&^.

A historically illiterate, math challenged, brainless piece of s*&^ who only survived until adulthood because society allowed you to.

BTW that's how reality works for people able to look at data and draw solid conclusions. Not everyone needs to be spoon fed obvious conclusions like you do.

#77 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-19 01:01 PM

Every metric I saw made Kamala a worse choice. Our choices in the last 3 elections were atrocious.

Hopefully both parties will do better in 2028.

#78 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-19 01:02 PM

It was 2,284,338 votes, or 1.5%.
That's close.
It's not remotely "not even close."

#79 | Posted by YAV at 2026-03-19 01:03 PM

312-226. That was the electoral college numbers. In JPW's mind, that's like eking out a triple overtime win in basketball.

#80 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-19 01:06 PM

Trump won 58% of the EC votes. That is not a close election.

#81 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-19 01:07 PM

15% unemployment is the metric that convinced Patricide Jeff to vote for the bankruptcy-prone------------.

#82 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-03-19 01:07 PM

EC doesn't reflect Americans.

#83 | Posted by YAV at 2026-03-19 01:09 PM

EC is how our elections are decided.

#84 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-19 01:11 PM

Different thing entirely.

#85 | Posted by YAV at 2026-03-19 01:14 PM

Only ballwasher would make the argument he's making.

Gotta keep up the delusion that Trump isn't an unmitigated disaster that he helped usher in because he though Harris would be "worse."

(BTW only an abysmally stupid pile of s*&^ could say that with a straight face before the election, even less so now)

#86 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-19 01:37 PM

Every metric I saw made Kamala a worse choice.

#78 | Posted by BellRinger

You've yet to list a single metric.

#87 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-19 02:03 PM

Harris was and remains an abysmal candidate, JPW. Just deal with it.

Here is a bio of her speech writer

www.youtube.com

#88 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-19 03:18 PM

Here is a bio of her speech writer

www.youtube.com

#88 | Posted by BellRinger

You don't care. If the bio of the candidate's staff was a consideration for you, you'd still have picked harris over trump.

#89 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-19 03:34 PM

Did you watch the bio?

#90 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-19 03:44 PM

Did you watch the bio?

#90 | Posted by BellRinger

No because there's no way it's worse than the bio of trump's campaign manager, who worked installing puppets for putin in democracies across europe before trump hired him.

Or the bio of trump's attorney general, who helped bury the epstein case in florida before trump made her AG.

Or the bios of the dozen members of trump's administration who all appear in the epstein files.

Why do you suppose trump picked those people?

#91 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-19 03:52 PM

Do you have a sense of humor? If you do, you will enjoy the bio.

#92 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-19 03:55 PM

Do you have a sense of humor? If you do, you will enjoy the bio.

#92 | Posted by BellRinger

Do you have a sense of humor about trump surrounding himself with russian assets and epstein island attendees?

It's just hilarious isn't it?

#93 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-19 04:14 PM

You are wound WAY too tight.

Watch the video. It will make you laugh. You need a good laugh.

#94 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-19 04:19 PM

Harris was and remains an abysmal candidate, JPW. Just deal with it.

Deal with what? A position I held and expressed here many times?

Here's the key, though, she wasn't as bad as Trump. And that's not a hindsight 20/20 statement. It was known Trump would be awful and dips*&^s like you voted for him anyway.

#95 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-19 05:07 PM

You are wound WAY too tight.

Hey s*&^bag, the guy you voted for is burning the whole world down and you think people want to joke about politics with you?

Get some f*&^ing self-awareness.

#96 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-19 05:08 PM

You are wound WAY too tight.

Watch the video. It will make you laugh. You need a good laugh.

#94 | Posted by BellRinger

I used to be a lot more lighthearted. Then I realized half my fellow citizens would have supported the nazis in WW2 and are speed-running the apocalypse in multiple ways.

You're so unbothered about it though. Ignorance is bliss.

#97 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-19 06:07 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

ICE Agent who Killed Renee Good in Minneapolis Gets Cushy New Job (35 comments)

SCOTUS Eviscerates Voting Rights Act (34 comments)

Trump Administration Secures New Indictment Against Comey (29 comments)

Trump Portrait to Be Added to US Passports in Unprecedented Move (27 comments)

King Charles III to Address Joint Meeting of US Congress (24 comments)

Jeffries: Trump Impeachment Not a Priority If Dems Win House (15 comments)

Florida's Gerrymandering Proposal (15 comments)

Texas Gov Greg Abbott Panicking over James Talarico (14 comments)

Acting Attorney General Sued for Failing to Release Epstein Files (13 comments)

Judge Asks DOJ: Will You Oppose Trump? (11 comments)