#3,

I dont like using certain history to weaponize against today's races. While I understand your point about history, quite frankly there is NO reason to even have this type of article in today's society. The only reason would be to continue to hang the race situation on generations for whom that race situation doesnt apply. I just feel articles like the linked story serve no purpose but to continually divide the races and to keep the race outrage on the shoulders of subsequent younger generations. No one asked for that article. No one needs that article. It's like bringing this to the attention of a younger generation it doesnt affect, to say, "Arent you mad about what was done in the past"? All too often, the current generation blame's people in the current generation for what happened in a previous generation. So the younger people are looking for a way to "get their lick back" or to do "justice" for the prior generation. They also want to feel like they are "victims" of the prior infraction. That's the problem here.

why do you try so hard to seek it out?

I listen to the other side, unlike other ideologies.

whose sockpuppet is this?

Who's name is on it?

How does that harm society?

It keeps racism at the forefront to inflame later generations.

I already explained that.

What "boazrepuked" is advocating for is the suppression of research and education

What? Because I actually read scholarly articles?

There's no way anyone accidentally stumbles on it.

No, I actually read what the "other side" puts out. And I use my own judgement to judge is applicability.

What don't you like about the article you were told to hate?

I wasnt told to hate it. I actually read it and the linked resources. I then used my own judgement to decide my opinion about it.

If you want to pretend to be Boaz, don't write stuff like that. Boaz only listens to stuff he agrees with

Then you didnt know Boaz, or listen to what he was saying...

Can one of you progressives actually comment on #4, or are you going to keep avoiding actually talking about a topic?

You arent listening Snoofy.

Most progressive outlets present material like this to enflame others. When most blacks are getting over racism, and understanding that the 20's to 60's style racism no longer exists, they usually cease to be a puppet of the Democrat/progressive ideology. Continuing to present this material as if it affects blacks today is what's wrong. Making today's blacks think they are a victim of this mode of thought is what's wrong.

So we should just forget My Lai then?

Are we still in the Vietnam war? No? Then why make "research" on it like it happened yesterday?

Keep it in history class like everything else.

How'd you manage to come back even stupider?

Bigger question is, how did you not learn anything while I was gone?

And I do see your point, Snoofy,

BUT,

Reporting the past and "researching" the past and then making a general statement on that past is two different things.

To this day, racial myths persist that harm black people. Do you actually deny this?

There are no racial "myths" that harm blacks. Nothing racial is hurting blacks. Black stereotypes that blacks fulfill are what's hurting blacks. Listening to the Democrat party is what's hurting blacks.

The Myth of "Black-on-Black" Crime

Stopped reading after this stupid comment.

Boazreborn is Boaz IMO.

I really doubt it.

It's me. Want me to prove it?

Wont be talking about Trans anymore.

The owners of this site cant handle truth about Trans.