CA: City Renames Street “Charlie Kirk Way”

Sunday, May 03, 2026

Street signs are going up in the Orange County city of Westminster, California, inexplicably honoring slain good-for-nothing hatemonger Charlie Kirk.

Map

Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 01:21 PM | 36 COMMENTS | permalink

Comments

#1 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-05-03 01:21 PM

#2 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-05-03 01:21 PM

I guess next will be "Benjamin Netanyahu Boulevard" somewhere in Amerikkka.

#3 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-05-03 01:22 PM

I've yet to hear a Republican explain what Charlie Kirk stood for, with examples from Charlie's own life.

#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-03 01:22 PM

They could have gone with "Bleed Out Boulevard", but that would make Erika cry. Again.

#5 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-05-03 01:25 PM

You're that desperate to make a point that you'll compare Charlie Kirk to Netanyahu?

You're that desperate?

#6 | Posted by eberly at 2026-05-03 01:26 PM

"good-for-nothing hatemonger"

He sure as hell hurt you're little feelings.

#7 | Posted by eberly at 2026-05-03 01:27 PM

He sure as hell hurt you're little feelings.

#7 | Posted by eberly

Why are MAGA "men" always such children?

Is finding a gross person gross always "hurt feelings"?

#8 | Posted by jpw at 2026-05-03 01:37 PM

Let me guess, pointing out the extremely basic nature of righty "men" thinking is also because your post hurt my feelings?

#9 | Posted by jpw at 2026-05-03 01:38 PM

Eberly likes to think his feelings aren't at risk of being hurt.
He achieves that degree of emotional security by not having any feelings, mostly.

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-03 01:38 PM

Is finding a gross person gross always "hurt feelings"?
#8 | Posted by jpw

The #1 thing that hurts a White Republican Man's feelings.
Is when we teach White Children about Slavery,
without emphasizing all the Good Things that Whites did for Blacks by enslaving them.

#11 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-03 01:40 PM

-Is finding a gross person gross always "hurt feelings"?

Is naming a street that big of a deal?

It is to ----.

A street. Not a highway, or a school, or an airport. A street. They name streets after high school teachers.

Yes, it's obviously about hurt feelings.

Yours as well, apparently.

#12 | Posted by eberly at 2026-05-03 01:47 PM

They need to name a street after the groyper who ended the racist turd.

#13 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-05-03 02:00 PM

"Is naming a street that big of a deal?"

Is naming a French Fry that big of a deal?

#14 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-03 02:12 PM

They could have gone with "Bleed Out Boulevard", but that would make Erika cry. Again.
#5 | POSTED BY REDIAL

Everyone knows thats MLK Blvd....

#15 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-05-03 02:54 PM

They need one of those sweet statues on Charlie's street.
www.facebook.com

#16 | Posted by Reinheitsgebot at 2026-05-03 03:26 PM

I have no problem naming a street "Charlie Kirk Way" just as long as it is a short, blind, unlit cul-de-sac that ends abruptly at a cliff side with no STOP sign.

Tell all the MAGAts with chronic cases of FOMO to "drive over" as fast as their coal-rolling, f150s can go- cause there's a never-ending MAGA rally at the very end ...

#17 | Posted by NerfHerder at 2026-05-03 04:13 PM

Yes, it's obviously about hurt feelings.

Yours as well, apparently.

#12 | Posted by eberly

No, dips*&^.

Kirk was, above all else, a disingenuous bottom feeder cashing in on social media culture to make huge amounts of money.

Questioning why he would be commemorated AT ALL doesn't remotely suggest hurt feelings you childish buffoon.

#18 | Posted by jpw at 2026-05-03 04:17 PM

"Yes, it's obviously about hurt feelings."

I'll give you this much, Eberly.
Naming a street after Charlie Kirk is 100% about Hurt Feelings.

#19 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-03 05:13 PM

As long as the human race exists, they'll be unavoidable tragedies such as cancer in children and Charlie Kirk worship.

#20 | Posted by NerfHerder at 2026-05-03 05:13 PM

Kirk was all about going to college campuses and bullying kids much younger than him for Christ.... who was embarrassed to death.

It's just an expression.

#21 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-03 05:17 PM

-Questioning why he would be commemorated AT ALL doesn't remotely suggest hurt feelings you childish buffoon.

It's does when you do it.

You and ----.

I wasn't a fan of Kirk either. But you're just special.

You realize you make it obvious you're in a constant state of being unhinged, right.

Comparing him to Netanyahu and then defending the comparison.

Unhinged. Desperate for attention.

"See my pain!!!!!!!!"

#22 | Posted by eberly at 2026-05-03 06:37 PM

Should save costs and just call it Nazi Blvd. Less letters, smaller sign.

#23 | Posted by a_monson at 2026-05-03 08:13 PM

I wasn't a fan of Kirk either. But you're just special.

You realize you make it obvious you're in a constant state of being unhinged, right.

Comparing him to Netanyahu and then defending the comparison.

Except that wasn't me, sport. If you're going to try and troll, at least speak to the right person, yeah?

At the very least, don't be so eager to show how awful you are at reading people.

#24 | Posted by jpw at 2026-05-03 10:29 PM

their street / their business..

your biased and bigoted opinion / who gives a fk.

#25 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2026-05-04 03:34 PM

"who gives a fk."

You mean, aside from you?

#26 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-05-04 03:37 PM

Was racist pez dispenser already taken?

#27 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-05-05 09:16 AM

"Benjamin Netanyahu Boulevard"

That's the name for Trumps ----.

#28 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-05-05 09:16 AM

JPW,

Who in the commentariat/journalist/pundit class on the right do you NOT think is:

" , a disingenuous bottom feeder cashing in on social media culture to make huge amounts of money."

I'd be shocked if you can name one. I'd enjoy being shocked on this but I won't hold my breath.

#29 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-05-05 10:19 PM

" , a disingenuous bottom feeder cashing in on social media culture to make huge amounts of money."

Charlie Kirk.
Canadace Owens.
Tucker Calrson.
Joe Rogan.
Theo Von.

#30 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-05-05 10:30 PM

Who in the commentariat/journalist/pundit class on the right do you NOT think is:

The editors podcast from national review.
George Will.

#31 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-05-05 10:32 PM

I wouldn't call Rogan disingenuous. He doesn't even do politics all that much. I don't get the disdain for podcasts. They span a full spectrum of topics, many of which aren't political.

#32 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-05-05 10:33 PM

#31. Ah, George Will. He's a relic in a very good way. Old school approach.

#33 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-05-05 10:34 PM

Michael Smerconish

#34 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-05-05 10:35 PM

Rogan is playing a character. and he's a -------.

#35 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-05-05 10:36 PM

@#35 ... Rogan is playing a character. and he's a -------. ...

A couple comments ...

I thought Mr Rogan played his character on Newsradio excellently. He nailed it.

But now, what character might he be trying to portray?

One that gains him an audience for his podcast?