Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, May 26, 2024

CREW analyzed over 13,000 of Trump's Truth Social posts from January 1, 2023 to April 1, 2024, and found that while Trump has recently backed off some of his more violent rhetoric, threatening political opponents has been a consistent fixation for Trump.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"Lock her up!"

This has been going on for a while.

HeffyB is outraged I tells ya.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-25 08:00 PM | Reply

I have mixed feelings about this. DC is a --- for tat town. If Dems don't receive some of their own medicine they will be further emboldened.

On the other hand, if Trump does retaliate it pushes us even further into Banana Republic territory.

#2 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-26 10:58 AM | Reply

" If Dems don't receive some of their own medicine they will be further emboldened."

What a riot. You still can't name a single indictment of Trump's you or I could do without fear of legal repercussions. And you've been asked to do so, on at least a dozen occasions.

Until you can, it's not Lawfare, it's law.

#3 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-05-26 11:13 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

#2 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Same old lame --------, different day.

#4 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-05-26 11:40 AM | Reply

#3. The Bragg trial is a joke. I wouldn't fear legal repercussions over a NDA, which are legal.

#5 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-26 11:42 AM | Reply

The Bragg trial is a joke.

#5 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

And the onliest way it could and does go forward was through a massive pedophile conspiracy, amirite?

#6 | Posted by Zed at 2024-05-26 11:44 AM | Reply

if Trump does retaliate

#2 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

"If"?

If Trump retaliates?

Trump is mentally ill, dumbf---.

If he has a chance to retaliate, he will.

#7 | Posted by Zed at 2024-05-26 11:47 AM | Reply

" I wouldn't fear legal repercussions over a NDA, which are legal."

He's not being charged for entering into an NDA.

Try again. You still haven't listed a single indictment you or I could do without fear of legal repercussions.

For example, could I hire a hooker, pay her off to be silent, and write it off on my taxes?

Or would the IRS be engaging in "lawfare"?

#8 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-05-26 11:48 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

it pushes us even further into Banana Republic territory.

#2 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Trump is the Banana Republic.

#9 | Posted by Zed at 2024-05-26 11:48 AM | Reply

#8, the charges have nothing to do with taxes. What is the other crime that Trump furthered by allegedly falsifying his business records?

Here are two instructions the judge gave the jury after allowing inadmissible evidence to be introduced to the jury:

" Neither the non-prosecution agreement, nor the conciliation agreement is evidence of the defendant's guilt, and you may not consider them in determining whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the charged crimes"

And

" Jurors, you have just heard testimony that the Federal Election Commission, the FEC, conducted an investigation into the payment to Stormy Daniels and the responses thereto submitted by Michael Cohen and his attorney. This evidence was permitted to assist you, the jury, in assessing Michael Cohen's credibility and to help provide context of some of the surrounding events. You may consider that testimony for those purposes only. Neither the fact of the FEC investigation nor the responses thereto constitute evidence of the defendant's guilt, and you may not consider them in determining whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the charged crimes.

And of course the judge wouldn't allow the defense to put former FEC commissioner Bradley Smith on the stand to provide the jury with his expertise on FECA.

#10 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-26 12:23 PM | Reply

" the charges have nothing to do with taxes."

It follows he was falsifying the records so he could evade taxes. Especially since he wrote it off as a business expense.

Why are you pretending it has to have something to do with taxes?? All it has to do with is committing the crime, in furtherance of another crime.

It's up to the jury to decide whether writing off hush money payments to hookers is a legitimate business expense. And aren't there two other obvious crimes, including election interference/malfeasance and state tax evasion? The prosecution has given the jury a smorgasbord of choices, any of which count as "furtherance".

One could believe Trump was doing it for his family 100% (One could be an idiot, but I digress ... ), and disagree on that option.

But writing it off as a business expense, while "grossing up" those "legal expenses" to make the middleman whole (it's in the margin notes) can't be hurdled.

#11 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-05-26 12:38 PM | Reply

Jeffy still lying....

"Prosecutors argue that the other crime in this case was violating state election law 17-152 " conspiracy to promote or prevent an election.

That law makes it a misdemeanor when two or more people "conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means.

Prosecutors have said in court that the "unlawful means" at issue in Trump's case were a violation of federal campaign law " meaning that the charges against the presumptive GOP presidential nominee are really a three-step process." more

www.washingtonpost.com

#12 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-26 12:42 PM | Reply

" Why are you pretending it has to have something to do with taxes?"

Has the prosecution alleged tax violations?

#13 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-26 12:53 PM | Reply

I directly quoted the judge and Corky says that is lying.

#14 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-26 12:54 PM | Reply

14

You don't grok what the judge said... the jury has the state law, the testimony of Trump's already convicted accomplice (on the same charges), and the witness and documentary corroboration of that testimony.

They don't need the POLITICAL FEC investigation where the vote was a partisan 2-2 vote.... as you have already been told ad infinitum.

You are just trolling.

#15 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-26 01:00 PM | Reply

UMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

I don't believe the judge has given ANY instructions to the jury.

The lawyers were presenting their arguments for what instructions to give last week I believe and the judge said he would make a decision over the weekend.

#16 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-26 01:21 PM | Reply

Jeff claims no underlying crime.

Cohen was convicted of crimes associated with these falsified documents.

Not sure how to jibe those 2 facts.

#17 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-26 01:22 PM | Reply

www.politico.com

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

could jeff be telling a falsehood?

#18 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-26 01:24 PM | Reply

Stinkerbell is still an idiot and you clowns who continue to feed the troll are pretty damn close behind.

#19 | Posted by Angrydad at 2024-05-26 01:43 PM | Reply

" Has the prosecution alleged tax violations?"

Has the prosecution proven tax violations? Keeping in mind, of course, that is a paper crime.

#20 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-05-26 03:43 PM | Reply

#17. Cohen was a not on trial.

#21 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-26 04:12 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"Cohen was a not on trial."

He already had his trial. He was convicted and went to jail. Remind me of his co-conspirator.

In this case, he brought the literal receipts and recordings. And his testimony was bolstered by everyone from ------ to Costello.

#22 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-05-26 04:35 PM | Reply

Danforth

Please see what I put in bold in #10

#23 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-26 04:47 PM | Reply

" He already had his trial. He was convicted and went to jail. "

He never had a trial. He accepted a plea agreement.

#24 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-26 04:48 PM | Reply

NDA's are not campaign expenditures and campaign money was not used to finance the NDA.

#25 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-26 04:53 PM | Reply

HeffyB wants you to buh-lieve that the hush money payment just before the election had nothing to do with the election.

Fortunately, the NY Jury isn't that stupid, and may well see it as a potential 'intended' violation election laws of NY state law.

Which is enough to convict Trump of the most of the 30-something indictments.

#26 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-26 05:14 PM | Reply

#17. Cohen was a not on trial.

#21 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

You do understand that ------- hiding Cohen's crimes makes his actions felonies. You get that right? That the crime he is hiding does not have to be HIS crime. You understand that right? I mean it has been explained to you numerous times.

So, are you stupid or a liar?

Or

both?

#27 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-26 05:19 PM | Reply

Cohen was found guilty and went to jail for crimes that ------- was an Unindicted Co-consiparator and jeff doesn't think that doesn't matter.

Jeff is an idiot.

#28 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-26 05:21 PM | Reply

Piss off Twoothy. You're a vicious ------. Read #10 as many times as needed for your effete personality to grasp.

#29 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-26 05:26 PM | Reply

Cohen was under indictment for serious tax and bank fraud completely unrelated to Trump. The FECA crime he plead to was tacked on and he was given a paltry sentence given the severity of the tax and bank crimes.

#30 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-26 05:37 PM | Reply

Read #10 as many times as needed for your effete personality to grasp.

#29 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

And yet, to my understanding, the judge hasn't given ANY instructions to the jury, so yeah, we'll need proof

#31 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-26 06:09 PM | Reply

Cohen was under indictment for serious tax and bank fraud completely unrelated to Trump. The FECA crime he plead to was tacked on and he was given a paltry sentence given the severity of the tax and bank crimes.

#30 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

So, let me get this straight, Cohen WAS convicted of crimes associated with the falsified documents (that hid those crimes) but since, ummmm, the crime was tacked on? Like prosecutors just tack on crimes like bows on a present? And since he only got a paltry sentence, it, what, doesn't matter?

You do realize that you just admitted to ------- committing a felony right?

#32 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-26 06:11 PM | Reply

"Read #10"

I did.

Not inferring guilt is the same as not inferring innocence.

Your claim was a lie.

Why did you lie?

#33 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-05-26 06:20 PM | Reply

" NDA's are not campaign expenditures"

Nor are they deductible legal expenses.

#34 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-05-26 06:23 PM | Reply

Here is the lie:

"The FEC has already investigated this and concluded it wasn't a campaign violation."
POSTED BY BELLRINGER AT 2024-05-21 04:21 PM

According to what you posted in #10, that claim is not true.

Why did you lie?

#35 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-05-26 06:35 PM | Reply

jeff didnt lie. hes just very partisan and stupid.

#36 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-05-26 07:30 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"1aWfaRE, dooopy derrrrpp!"

#37 | Posted by hamburglar at 2024-05-26 07:51 PM | Reply

"HeffyB wants you to buh-lieve that the hush money payment just before the election had nothing to do with the election.
#26 | POSTED BY CORKY"

Cohen's testimony was that he was motivated to act to save Melania from embarrassment, not the election - using the patented Liberal deflection, "fine - I will not vote for Melania!"

#38 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-05-26 09:34 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

38

Idiot, liar, or both?

"The ex-fixer also told jurors that Melania Trump again came up days later, during negotiations to pay porn actor Stormy Daniels $130,000 to stay quiet about an alleged affair with Trump, which he denies. Cohen said he asked Trump "how's things going to go upstairs," referring to the future first lady.

"'Don't worry,' he goes," Cohen said of Trump. "He goes: How long do you think I will be on the market for? Not long.'"

The comment bolstered the district attorney's office's claim that the payment to Daniels was tied to the campaign - not to concerns that Melania or Trump's family would be embarrassed, as Trump's lawyers have suggested."

fox59.com

EVEN Fox Gnus not that gullible!

#39 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-26 09:39 PM | Reply

In the final weeks before the 2016 election, Cohen learned that Daniels was shopping her story to tabloids. It was a pivotal moment for the Trump campaign, which was reeling from the release of an audio recording from the TV show "Access Hollywood" in which Trump bragged about grabbing women's --------.

"He said to me, This is a disaster, a total disaster. Women are going to hate me,' Cohen, wearing a dark suit and pink tie, testified Trump had said.

"Guys, they think it's cool, but this is going to be a disaster for the campaign.'"

www.staradvertiser.com

Trump cultists.... can't believe a word they say. It's like they aren't responsible for their own words anymore.

#40 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-26 09:44 PM | Reply

"Former Trump fixer and attorney Michael Cohen testified in court earlier in the day that Trump appeared unfazed by his wife's potential response to learning of his alleged 2006 sexual encounter with porn actor Stormy Daniels. Trump is accused of falsifying business documents during the 2016 election to cover up a payment for Daniels' silence. Trump denies the claims.

Cohen said Trump told him when they were arranging the payment, "How long do you think I'll be on the market for? Not long."

Cohen said Trump "wasn't thinking about Melania" and that the alleged scheme was "all about the campaign."

malaysia.news.yahoo.com

Was never about Melanoma, always about the Campaign, whether it was Stormy or the PGrab tape.

#41 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-26 09:48 PM | Reply

"#39 | POSTED BY CORKY"

Sorry, mis-spoke. I meant to say Costello, who was Cohen's lawyer and knew the story from before Cohen started changing it.

#42 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-05-26 09:50 PM | Reply

"------ told the jury he agreed to be the "eyes and ears" of Trump's campaign, looking out for damaging stories so they could be suppressed. He said he agreed to the role " and to a plan to publish positive stories about Trump and negative stories about his opponents " at an August 2015 meeting with Trump and Cohen."

"------ testified that the company squashed one potential story by paying $30,000 to a Trump Tower doorman. It paid $150,000 to former Playboy model Karen McDougal, to keep her from going public with a claim that she had had a yearlong affair with Trump.

But when Daniels came forward, ------ said, he told Howard: "I am not a bank, and we are not paying out any further disbursements or monies."

Instead, he alerted Cohen that Daniels was shopping a story about Trump, and let the lawyer handle it. Trump denies having sex with either McDougal or Daniels.

When The Wall Street Journal reported, just days before Election Day, that the Enquirer had paid McDougal, ------ said Trump was upset, saying, "How could this happen? I thought you had this under control?"

www.pbs.org

lmao... one supposes that ------ was mistaken when he says all these stories were squashed for the Campaign... not for Melania, right?

And Costello? He was Trump's Double on the stand as Trump was too afraid to testify.
He was the biggest embarrassment for the Defense at the trial.

"Our call ended very abruptly," ------ said. "He didn't say goodbye, which was very unusual."

#43 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-26 09:58 PM | Reply

"A lawyer known for representing people trying to sell celebrity sex tapes or other embarrassing information, Davidson negotiated the hush money deals for McDougal and Daniels.

He gave jurors an inside look at the negotiations and helped corroborate ------- testimony.

At first, Davidson said, the National Enquirer was not interested in acquiring McDougal's story, saying she "lacked documentary evidence." But the tabloid eventually bought it at ------- behest.

Davidson said he understood it would never be published because of "an unspoken understanding that there was an affiliation" between ------ and Trump and that the National Enquirer would not run the story "because it would hurt Donald Trump."

www.pbs.org

The NY Jury won't be fooled like Claudio is.

#44 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-26 10:02 PM | Reply

The NY Jury won't be fooled like Claudio is.

It's almost certain there is a "Claudio" on the jury.

#45 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-05-27 12:16 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

DC is a --- for tat town. If Dems don't receive some of their own medicine they will be further emboldened.

On the other hand, if Trump does retaliate it pushes us even further into Banana Republic territory.

#2 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Of course, this-------- has excuses for why this is ok.

Congrats on being the problem, -------.

#46 | Posted by jpw at 2024-05-27 09:04 AM | Reply

" Of course, this-------- has excuses for why this is ok.

Congrats on being the problem, -------.

#46 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2024-05-27 09:04 AM | REPLY"

This clown wants his cake and eat it too. Weaponized DOJ for me but not for thee.

#47 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-27 12:30 PM | Reply

#45

Yep... and all it takes is one for a hung jury, which is a likely outcome.

But a lot of people will have no excuse now for not knowing what kind of a person he really is.

#48 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-27 12:32 PM | Reply

This clown wants his cake and eat it too. Weaponized DOJ for me but not for thee.

#47 | Posted by BellRinger

The problem with your argument is that you're expressing it as if your claimed lawfare is a fact.

It's not.

It's BS you've been fed to play the victim game.

#49 | Posted by jpw at 2024-05-27 11:44 PM | Reply

He needs to do to them everything that's been done to him

#50 | Posted by THEBULL at 2024-05-28 05:56 AM | Reply

"Trump threatens to use the government to target his political enemies."

You don't think he's going to stop just in the USA, do you?

Let's don't forget that "target his political enemies" also includes the economy of other countries who refuse to acquiesce to his insanity. And it's not just Trump. It's the GOP. Trump or any other GOP president is just the hammer.

The GOP's political enemies aren't limited to politicians and journalists in the United States. That's naive. It includes, I dare say, entire countries anywhere within reach.

Remember: To control the economy is to control the world.

#51 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-05-28 07:39 AM | Reply

Totally Illegal. But when has a little thing like being
TOTALLY ILLEGAL stopped the Enormous ----------- from doing
what he wants...

#52 | Posted by earthmuse at 2024-05-28 10:16 AM | Reply

He needs to do to them everything that's been done to him

#50 | POSTED BY THEBULL

Jesus wept.

#53 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-05-28 10:29 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"He (Trump) needs to do to them everything that's been done to him"-----So we need to do everything to Trump that he's done to us? Sounds fair. I mean, you do want to be fair, don't you? Big moral man and all that.

#54 | Posted by Zed at 2024-05-28 10:35 AM | Reply

He needs to do to them everything that's been done to him
#50 | POSTED BY THEBULL

Is it wrong, what they have done to Trump?
Will two wrongs make it right?

#55 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-05-28 10:50 AM | Reply

I wasn't going to look but curiosity got the best of me.
"trump threatens to use government to target political enemies"
that is SOME funny schite right there now....

---even better !!! is where this stupid fracking manure came from.

--MEDIA MATTERS....a group of punx and prix so incompetent and unnecessary and bigoted liars !!!! that there's

a bloodletting going on inside.

"Media Matters Staffers Announce Sweeping Lay Offs: "

aaaah ahhahahhahahhaaaa....hit the streets !! A-HATS !!

#56 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2024-05-28 11:30 AM | Reply

oops...I forgot....I know....lol....how the leftist-dogma KLAN is so

vigilant and ...AHAHAHA...hard nosed about sources.... BWAAAA !!!!

( just not when you're bloviating. )

so here...

www.yahoo.com

#57 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2024-05-28 11:35 AM | Reply

He needs to do to them everything that's been done to him

#50 | POSTED BY THEBULL

If only something had been"done to him."

#58 | Posted by jpw at 2024-05-28 11:44 AM | Reply

now....

---even better !!! is where this stupid fracking manure came from.

--MEDIA MATTERS....

Are you lost.. again? Translation error?

The article was clearly posted from www.citizensforethics.org

#59 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-05-28 12:16 PM | Reply

"everything that been done to him" ~ LOL

That's just Trump still harping on the 2020 election, ~~ 60+ trials, umpteen recounts, fake electors, disbarred attorneys and convicted co-conspirators ~~ later.

Tell me again what was done to him that wasn't a lie or a figment of his persecution complex.

Now he's crying like a baby because he got caught falsifying business records to cover up a payment for a sexual liaison with a pornographic movie actress ~ which legally amounted to election interference on his part.

And he's still claiming it was somebody else's fault. He's pure as the driven snow and everybody is a liar but him.

#60 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-05-28 02:35 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort