Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, May 28, 2024

Federal Judge Aileen Cannon on Tuesday rejected special counsel Jack Smith's request for a gag order against Donald Trump in the classified documents case, saying that prosecutors' efforts to confer with the defendant was "wholly lacking in substance and professional courtesy."

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

She is gagging on his tiny tiny Orange mushroom.

#1 | Posted by a_monson at 2024-05-28 09:04 PM | Reply

"meaningfully confer with Trump's defense lawyers"

She may mean that the SP didn't write it out in crayon...

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2024-05-28 09:48 PM | Reply

www.law.cornell.edu

18 U.S. Code 3142 - Release or detention of a defendant pending trial

(b) Release on Personal Recognizance or Unsecured Appearance Bond."
The judicial officer shall order the pretrial release of the person on personal recognizance, or upon execution of an unsecured appearance bond in an amount specified by the court, subject to the condition that the person not commit a Federal, State, or local crime during the period of release

www.nycourts.gov

he Court finds Defendant in criminal contempt for willfirlly disobeying a lawfi.rl mandate of this Cout in violation of Judiciary Law Section 750(3).

None of the other 3 judges have done so much as comment on this blatant breach of his release conditions

#3 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-28 09:53 PM | Reply

Legal experts predict this gives a slam dunk reason to have Cannon booted off by The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.

She obviously has her finger on the scales of justice for Trump. Blatantly so.

#4 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2024-05-29 02:56 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Poor Jack ------ seething

#5 | Posted by THEBULL at 2024-05-29 03:15 AM | Reply

Re: #4 AmericanUnity

Inshallah

#6 | Posted by hamburglar at 2024-05-29 06:21 AM | Reply

#4 finger on the scales? I'd say she's jumped her big fat @rse on Trump's side of the
scales.

She is utterly biased in his favor. My only question is, how much proof is needed to
remove her from the case? What is the threshold that needs to be met to get her booted?
I would think that has already been passed, some months ago...

#7 | Posted by earthmuse at 2024-05-29 06:26 AM | Reply

#4 finger on the scales? I'd say she's jumped her big fat @rse on Trump's side of the
scales.

She is utterly biased in his favor. My only question is, how much proof is needed to
remove her from the case? What is the threshold that needs to be met to get her booted?
I would think that has already been passed, some months ago...

#8 | Posted by earthmuse at 2024-05-29 06:26 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

EARTHMUSE

I agree. I don't know what Jack Smith is waiting for. A sure thing? Three strikes and you're out?

What?

#9 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-05-29 06:40 AM | Reply

Legal experts predict this gives a slam dunk reason to have Cannon booted off by The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.

The thing is, once Smith asks for that, there's no turning back. If he loses that bid he's effectively stuck with Cannon after asking for her to be removed, which is a bad place to be. So he's probably going to wait for something worse than some ruling on a gag order before going to the mat like this. It needs to be so outrageous, and probably more outcome-determinative, for him to make that ask to the appeals court.

#10 | Posted by JOE at 2024-05-29 07:09 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Did anyone expect different?

#11 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-05-29 07:17 AM | Reply

Congress needs to pass the Aileen Cannon Act.

No judge shall preside over a civil or criminal trial of a defendant who appointed said judge, or of any defendant involved in any way in the confirmation of said judge, including but not limited to Senators in office at the time of the confirmation hearing, lobbyists who supported or opposed said judge, etc.

#12 | Posted by JOE at 2024-05-29 07:53 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

She is utterly biased in his favor.

Nice to have the judge on your legal team. Worked for Rittenhouse.

#13 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-05-29 10:26 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I would have loved to see ------------ do to jail for 20 years. He deserved it my any moral reading of the case.

The sad thing is the law and morality rarely intersect. But a reading of the law he was right. The last doesn't take in to constrain the last 24 hours. It takes into consternation usually an hour or less of snapshot before the crime. And picking up the video from that angle he was chased and attacked and he defended himself. It sucks.

Yes he went looking for trouble and found it, and yes he should never have had that gun in that state. But ... the law isn't going to stretch that far back.

#14 | Posted by ABH at 2024-05-29 06:01 PM | Reply

@#12 ... Congress needs to pass the Aileen Cannon Act.

No judge shall preside over a civil or criminal trial of a defendant who appointed said judge ...

I disagree.

Many Trump-appointed Judges have ruled against him.

I would not want to taint Judges just because who has appointed them. I want Judges to be, well, judged based upon their rulings.

Granted, Jude Cannon is an interesting example.

But in her ruling on this, effectively that SC Smith ~surprised~ the defense, I have difficulties disagreeing.

So, I'm not yet passing my view until I see how SC Smith reacts.

#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-29 08:37 PM | Reply

Any leftie who wants her to be removed from this case based on any semblance of judicial bias should have Ben clamoring for Merchan's removal in the Bragg case. His actions are WAY more egregious than anything she has done.

#16 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-30 01:30 AM | Reply

16: Well that's 100% false.

#17 | Posted by ABH at 2024-05-30 11:47 AM | Reply

It's interesting to see actual cops tell these Oath Keepers and Three Percenters with their Thin Blue Line flags and Punisher stickers to go kick rocks.

Unfortunately, in cop parlance, Deplorables don't listen.

#18 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-05-30 11:52 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort