Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, October 05, 2024

It was a stark ultimatum, delivered by President Joe Biden's most senior aide. At 5:30 a.m. Thursday, before the sun had risen above his Washington home, White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients was on a Zoom call with two Cabinet secretaries and the executives of the shipping companies negotiating with workers who had gone on strike at critical docks along the East and Gulf coasts.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

With the nation's economy - and much of the president's legacy - hanging in the balance just weeks before the election, White House chief economist Lael Brainard told management that they needed to come up with a new offer to the striking longshoremen. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg stressed that Hurricane Helene magnified the importance of a deal. Labor Secretary Julie Su expressed optimism that the union would agree to a temporary extension if raises were included.

And then, in a surprising move, as the call was wrapping up, Zients told the board members of the United States Maritime Alliance that he was going to tell Biden in about an hour that they had agreed to propose a new offer to the union. By that point, the shipping executives had agreed to do no such thing. Zients was saying they would.

"I need the offer today - not tomorrow. Today," Zients said on the call. "I'm going to brief the president in an hour that you believe you can get this done today."

Less than 12 hours later, White House officials were celebrating a deal to reopen the ports until January - postponing the issue until after this November's election. The agreement provides collective if temporary relief to skittish Democrats from the White House to Capitol Hill, while buoying Vice President Kamala Harris along with Friday's strong jobs report.

I'm open to theories, but in no alternate universe - and certainly not in this one - would Donald Trump have been able to pull off what Joe Biden and his staff were able to in quickly settling the dockworkers strike, alleviating all fears of what its continuation would have meant for our economy, with the strike's ability to negatively effect every household in America.

This is what happens when you have a wizened leader - not an ego-driven braggart show-off - in charge of the nation's economic well being. Diamond Joe understands the true art of the deal in ways Trump can't even contemplate simply because Joe was acting primarily in this nation's best interests, not just his own and his legacy's.

But I have little doubt that Trump would have stopped the strike quickly as well, the difference being he would have ordered strikers back to work by invoking the Taft-Hartley Act because he could care less about the workers' desires, only caring about the owners' and his own.

#1 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-10-04 03:29 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 5

"Less than 12 hours later, White House officials were celebrating a deal to reopen the ports until January - postponing the issue until after this November's election. The agreement provides collective if temporary relief to skittish Democrats from the White House to Capitol Hill, while buoying Vice President Kamala Harris along with Friday's strong jobs report"

And that's all that was done. The can has been kicked down the road for someone else to have to deal with in Jan. 2025. Money was likely extorted from tax payers (behind closed doors) to keep the LSI members at their current jobs, so that this wouldn't be highlighted as another complete failure of this administration.

#2 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2024-10-05 05:00 PM | Reply

"The can has been kicked down the road for someone else to have to deal with in Jan. 2025."

Yup. Kinda like that Afghanistan withdrawal. Nice poison pill!

Like most of the unfinished business and policies and pandemic messes Trumpy left behind for Brandon to clean up.

You are just bummed you can't use it as a cudgel to bash Biden with.

But no worries. President Harris will be able to handle it with ease and even a bit of joy!

#3 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-10-06 12:27 PM | Reply

So then you're saying Joe was railroaded out.

What is it the Dems were right to insert an unelected candidate because Joe is senile or Joe is still a master statesmen and the DNC inserted their will with a non primaried candidate?

Can't have both.

#4 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2024-10-06 04:33 PM | Reply

How the hell did Tony go from a pretty level poster to a pom pom waiving cheerleader?

#5 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2024-10-06 04:34 PM | Reply

@#1 ... But I have little doubt that Trump would have stopped the strike quickly as well, the difference being he would have ordered strikers back to work by invoking the Taft-Hartley Act because he could care less about the workers' desires, only caring about the owners' and his own. ...

Yup.

All fmr Pres Trump would have cared about was keeping the wealthy happy, screw the workers.

#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-10-06 04:39 PM | Reply

"How the hell did Tony go from a pretty level poster to a pom pom waiving cheerleader? - #5 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2024-10-06 04:34 PM

You're welcome

#7 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-06 04:46 PM | Reply

#4 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2024-10-06 04:33 PM | Reply | Flag: Interesting

#8 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-06 04:51 PM | Reply

Tony is the same one of the best posters he's ever been.

It's people who still think they can be a patriot while supporting Traitor Trump that have changed.

#9 | Posted by Corky at 2024-10-06 04:55 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

In reference: #9 | Posted by Corky at 2024-10-06 04:55 PM

Thank you for that post, Corky.

#10 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-06 05:02 PM | Reply

In reference: #9 | Posted by Corky at 2024-10-06 04:55 PM

Thank you for that post, Corky.

#11 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-06 05:02 PM | Reply

In reference: #9 | Posted by Corky at 2024-10-06 04:55 PM

Thank you for that post, Corky.

#12 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-06 05:02 PM | Reply

:-)

#13 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-06 05:03 PM | Reply

www.youtube.com

#14 | Posted by Corky at 2024-10-06 06:10 PM | Reply

What is it the Dems were right to insert an unelected candidate because Joe is senile or Joe is still a master statesmen and the DNC inserted their will with a non primaried candidate?

You people are far too desperate to be wrong. Kamala Harris IS the elected Vice President of the United States from 2020. Joe Biden cannot fire her, only voters can do that. Her constitutional job is to replace the President if he can no longer perform his duties. That is all she did. She was on the ticket in 2024 as VP and got the very same votes as Biden - again with every single voter in full knowledge that she'd replace Biden if he could not serve.

Primary elections aren't in the constitution. They exist as a mechanism for political parties to determine their ultimate representative, and that only comes after a vote by the party's version of the Electoral College, called their party convention, with selected delegates taking the place of its state's voters. Harris was overwhelmingly elected by the delegates and is as valid a nominee as every other one elected the same way before her. Party delegates and members had the option of stepping forward and running against Harris at the convention, and none did because everyone agreed that she was the best person to lead the ticket and so they voted that way.

#15 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-10-06 07:03 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort