Advertisement
The Film Trump Doesn't Want You to See
A new movie about young Donald Trump hits theaters Friday, despite Trump trying to block its release.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
reinheitsgebot
Joined 2006/11/29Visited 2024/11/21
Status: user
MORE STORIES
RFK Jr. Compared Trump to Hitler (8 comments) ...
Hegseth's Sex Assault Accuser 'remembers saying no a lot': police (12 comments) ...
A Trump Judge Just Nixed Overtime Pay For Millions (4 comments) ...
Convicted Jan. 6 Rioter Now Found Guilty of Plotting to Kill FBI Agents (4 comments) ...
Brazilian Police Accuse Bolsonaro of Plotting a Coup (5 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
The child-raping orange jizzfart forbids you from seeing this movie.
#1 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-10-08 11:09 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
... Republicans are calling it election interference. ...
If the film were favorable to fmr Pres Trump, would the Republicans still be calling it election interference?
#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-10-08 01:27 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3
It's cool that the film focuses on how he became such a blowhard liar instead of his obvious crimes in office. Those films can come later.
#3 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-10-09 06:15 PM | Reply
Oh, I thought it was going to be Joker Folie a Deux.
#4 | Posted by sentinel at 2024-10-09 06:29 PM | Reply
His Con-Artist Actor in Training Period. (aka the Reagan Touch)
This film is something his Base may be able to relate to.... I mean, most of what they know about Trump is what they learned while he was firing people on the Apprentice.
Which is that he is a great business man! And therefore great for the economy. Albeit the only economy he is concerned about is the Billionaire Oligarch Economy, which obvious fact they disbelieve.
If it's on TV, though, maybe then they will finally grok that he is a Guinness World Book Quality Liar.
OK, naw.
#5 | Posted by Corky at 2024-10-09 06:29 PM | Reply
Wasn't the 'Citizens United' case about a film that was produced and used against Hillary in 2016?
OCU
#6 | Posted by OCUser at 2024-10-09 06:43 PM | Reply
The trailers indicate this will be a good movie.
The Apprentice Trailer #1 (2024) www.youtube.com
The Apprentice Official Trailer #2 (2024) www.youtube.com
They cast Roy Cohn well with Jeremy Strong. His character in Successsion was a weak, sloped shouldered dude. This one could earn him a Golden Globe if it's as good as the trailer makes his portrayal look.
#7 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2024-10-09 06:47 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2
"Incidentally, I (Ivana) think he (Trump) would make an incredible president."
She's afraid of being buried on a golf course.
#10 | Posted by Zed at 2024-10-09 07:53 PM | Reply
#6 | Posted by OCUser
Yes.
And the Supreme Court specifically decided it was protected speech.
#11 | Posted by gtbritishskull at 2024-10-09 07:55 PM | Reply
"Donald and I are the best of friends and together have raised three children that we love and are very proud of. I have nothing but fondness for Donald and wish him the best of luck on his campaign. Incidentally, I think he would make an incredible president."
#8 | Posted by commnotes
Sounds like the "health report" that called him the healthiest president ever.
#12 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-10-09 08:13 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
Coomondolt doesn't understand word usage either. Ivanka never denied the account in the book. "Without merit" is not a denial, it's a qualification. If she said that the events "never happened," that's a denial.
The definition of merit is as follows: character or conduct deserving reward, honor, or esteem. www.merriam-webster.com
Actually, after reading the definition of merit again, Ivanka practically confirmed the rape account. Her response was that "the story was without merit" and of course there's no "merit" in a story of anyone forcibly attacking their wife. The rest of her message is almost an apology for her allegedly having mentioned it in the first place, because she lists the actual meritorious things she felt that Donald did during the course of their relationship.
And her mentioning that the time of the event in question was one of "high tension" again is a confirmation and excuse for what Donald did.
And if the account were false, Donald would have sued his own biographer for libel. And no one who follows Trump's penchant for lawfare would ever think anything differently.
#13 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-10-09 08:27 PM | Reply
Post a commentComments are closed for this entry.Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable
Comments are closed for this entry.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable