Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, November 10, 2024

Two years ago, the FBI raided Donald Trump's home to retrieve government records he had refused to return, including hundreds containing classified information.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Now Trump is poised to be briefed once again on the country's secrets to prepare him to take the reins of government on Jan. 20.

Putin, MBS and Xi couldn't be happier.

#1 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-11-09 03:51 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Yeah, might as well just distribute Nat Def Info directly to all authoritarian leaders worldwide.

And put it on X, of course.

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2024-11-09 05:33 PM | Reply

Well. He's the president of the United States

Americans have put their full faith in him, and republicans, to dismantle the federal government and our nation.

At least we all get to witness, first hand, the death of an empire.

I was too young to remember the downfall of Iran from a westernized, secular nation into an Islamic Republic, shhthole.

But thanks to republicans, I'll get to fully experience the death of America.

#3 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-11-09 05:39 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Just declassify everything so the US citizens can see what our advisories can see.

#4 | Posted by bat4255 at 2024-11-10 07:02 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#3 ... But thanks to republicans, I'll get to fully experience the death of America. ...

I'm not yet at the "Death of America" conclusion.

But the National Security aspects of this thread do raise a significant concern for me.

Pres-elect Trump has shown time and time again that he is not capable of properly handling secured National Security information.

He appoints a Chief of Staff who apparently was not able to pass a background security check.

And his advisors want to eliminate the routine FBI background checks for those who may work in the White House?


With Pres-elect Trump occupying the Oval Office, are we essentially just opening up our National Security information to Pres Putin?



#5 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-11-10 07:13 PM | Reply

I think most people do suspect that when he was Presidebt before he did share secret information with Putin but his supporters wouldn't believe it even if you a video of fim handing documents to a Russian opperative on tape because they believe what they want to bejieve.

#6 | Posted by danni at 2024-11-11 06:01 AM | Reply | Funny: 2

Fatty Bone Spurs deserves credit for not starting a brawl at Arlington National Cemetery on Veteran's Day.

#7 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-11-12 02:08 AM | Reply

Will these briefings be held in the Mar-A-Lardo crapper?

#8 | Posted by anton at 2024-11-12 07:03 AM | Reply

How long until another large group of intelligence assets mysteriously die within days of each other?

#9 | Posted by jpw at 2024-11-12 09:15 AM | Reply

__________
Two years ago, the FBI raided Donald Trump's home to retrieve government records he had refused to return, including hundreds containing classified information.

Yet, national security and foreign policy [implications and dangers] (Iran, North Korea, Russia, Russia, Russia) - the issues where the President actually has the most power and Executive branch apparatus, mostly unencumbered by Congress - weren't visible at all on Harris campaign's agenda... neither were Trump's numerous business failures and utter incompetence (except for making billions selling worthless DJT stocks before bankruptcies), and that Trump and family profited far more from politics and Presidency than he ever did as a "businessman," to counter and blunt his "[Great Businessman] will fix it" / "He made trains run on time" bulls**t...

Outside of "talking to the choir" issues, no dots connected between foreign policy and danger of criminality and recklessness in governance and post-governing ... and implications of someone having a "get out of jail free card" handed out by SCOTUS potentially acting in his own interest instead of country's.

If you have to ask "Why is THIS GUY even close?" it means that what you've been doing isn't working and it's time to find out why and change course, not keep telling people that the NUMBERS look good and they are "ignorant/stupid/deplorable" and should just wait until our "medicine" starts working... any day/week/month now - "you'll see it in the next BLS and BEA reports!"

She never even tried to have a Sister Souljah moment. She ran a nearly substance-free ("I am not Trump" / "I am pro-unions" / "I am against price-gougers") national campaign the way that may work in California, against marketeer who [bought and] sold value-free things his entire life.

Outside of snowflakes - like Washington Post and LA Times editors having hissy-fits about endorsements - people in general, even those who don't like their jobs, do not hate the "rich people" who sign or make it possible (often at a lo$$ for owners, like WaPo's -$77m in 2024 alone) to get their paycheck. They also understand, unlike Whoopi, that "cracking down on price-gouging" and "the rich paying their fair share" are phony "solutions" to their problems. "Bernies / Robin Hoods" are not going to win majority.

Most people generally don't "hate on the rich" and see a hypocrisy when Dem candidates are endorsed, surrounded by and pal around with the glam "rich and famous," including billionaires - talk about "happy happy joy joy" campaign "not listening/hearing, not seeing, not speaking" about real issues for most people... while Trump was trolling them at MickeyD's.

There is only so long that a party can keep selecting crappy candidates (who have to pander to the far left/right in primaries) and then switch course in general because majority of people keep rejecting either/both, when they are unhappy.

We had a choice between two (three?) "failing-up" candidates, who kept being rewarded for/despite their failures, one as politician, another as businessman and politician:

www.bbc.co.uk - 'Failing up': Why some climb the ladder despite mediocrity
__________

#10 | Posted by CutiePie at 2024-11-13 06:14 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort