Here comes dem dose receipts, VISITOR_, you dirt rotten cultist:

The response to the alias known as VISTIOR_ is largely accurate and provides a well-reasoned argument against the comparison of Social Security to a Ponzi scheme. Let's break down the key points:

1. Social Security as an equilibrium equation: This is correct. Social Security is designed to balance income from current workers with payouts to current retirees[1][5].

2. Historical surplus: The statement about Reagan changing percentages and creating a surplus is accurate. The 1983 reforms under Reagan did increase payroll taxes and created a surplus in the Social Security trust fund[1].

3. Predictability of challenges: The response correctly points out that the strain on Social Security due to Baby Boomer retirements was anticipated well in advance. This long-term planning and transparency are in stark contrast to Ponzi schemes[1][3].

4. Potential for balance: The suggestion that adding 1 percentage point each to employer and employee contributions could balance Social Security for 75 years is a simplification, but it accurately reflects that the system can be adjusted to maintain solvency, unlike Ponzi schemes[3][5].

5. Transparency vs. opacity: The response correctly highlights that Social Security is transparent, with clear formulas and regular reporting, while Ponzi schemes are intentionally opaque[3][5].

6. Structural differences: The response accurately points out that Social Security, unlike Ponzi schemes, can be brought into balance through adjustments[3][5].

The only minor inaccuracy is the specific year mentioned for Social Security going "underwater." The exact timing of trust fund depletion has varied in projections over the years, but recent estimates suggest it will occur in the mid-2030s, not 2012[1][3].

In conclusion, the response provides an accurate and well-informed rebuttal to the claim that Social Security is like a Ponzi scheme, highlighting key structural and operational differences between the two.

More reading for your cultist pleasure: