Another Million Documents Related to Epstein
Until now, it was thought that there were maybe 100,000 documents related to Jeffrey Epstein in the government's possession.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
A_Friend
Joined 2005/09/21Visited 2025/12/24
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Another Million Documents Related to Epstein (3 comments) ...
Not That Kind of White (3 comments) ...
J. D. Vance Fails a Simple Moral Test (8 comments) ...
Heritage's Crackup; Bari's Blunder (2 comments) ...
Our Mess Is the Fault of the Voters (2 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
More than a million Epstein-related documents discovered; release delayed https://aje.io/uvmk3y[image or embed] -- Al Jazeera English (@aljazeera.com) Dec 24, 2025 at 3:30 PM
More than a million Epstein-related documents discovered; release delayed https://aje.io/uvmk3y[image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
snip ...
The DoJ said that due to the large volume, it will take weeks to vet them all. Deputy AG Todd Blanche said that 200 DoJ attorneys are working on the project. Nominally, they are looking to black out the names of Epstein's victims, but if there are entire pages blanked out, as in Tranche 1, many people are going to assume that it is the perpetrators that the DoJ wants to protect. Some of the documents may stem from the 2008 case against Epstein, but 1 million seems like a lot. It is at least possible that large numbers of the documents may have been taken from Epstein's properties but have absolutely nothing to with his crimes (e.g., his mortgage statements, bills for aviation fuel, invoices from his cleaning company, etc.). It has occurred to us that dumping a million documents out there could be a kind of denial-of-service attack, flooding the zone with so much stuff that no team of reporters could possibly have the ability to go through all of them. On the other hand, the Internet is pretty good at this kind of stuff if people could sign up to examine, say, 100, documents. It would need coordination, though.
#1 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-12-25 10:36 AM | Reply
Unless there is a smoking gun in the files, which is unlikely because the 200 DoJ attorneys will surely make sure any such document never sees the light of day, no matter how many documents are released, some critics are going to say: "How do we know you didn't shred the 20 documents that implicate Trump?" In fact, the complaints have already started. A group of 19 Epstein victims wrote: "The public received a fraction of the files, and what we received was riddled with abnormal and extreme redactions with no explanation." This is not going to let up. (V)
In fact, the complaints have already started. A group of 19 Epstein victims wrote: "The public received a fraction of the files, and what we received was riddled with abnormal and extreme redactions with no explanation." This is not going to let up. (V)
#2 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-12-25 10:37 AM | Reply
Perhaps the PhartPhisher can add this ("This is not going to let up") to his "Epstein hoax" file.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL ............
#3 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-12-25 10:39 AM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy