Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, December 25, 2025

Until now, it was thought that there were maybe 100,000 documents related to Jeffrey Epstein in the government's possession.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

More than a million Epstein-related documents discovered; release delayed https://aje.io/uvmk3y

[image or embed]

-- Al Jazeera English (@aljazeera.com) Dec 24, 2025 at 3:30 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"redactions to protect victims"

They misspelled Trump.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2025-12-24 05:06 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Names of alleged co-conspirators redacted

Some references to "10 Co-conspirators" in FBI communications in 2019 have also been redacted. One July 7, 2019 email with the subject line "Co-conspirators" redacts what appear to be the names of several co-conspirators, although it names Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as "Wexner" and "Brunel."

The emails come a day after Epstein was arrested on federal sex trafficking charges.

"Of the 10 co-conspirators, 3 have been located in FL and served GJ subpoenas; 1 in Boston, 1 in NYC, and 1 in CT were located and served. 4 of the 10 are outstanding with attempts having been made," another email sent in July 2019 reads, with the names of the sender and recipient redacted.

"In 2019, Trump's DOJ had a list of 10 Epstein co-conspirators," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D, NY) posted on X. "Who are these 10 co-conspirators? Why haven't we seen those memos? Where are the grand jury records? Where are the FBI records? What are they hiding?"

time.com

more

www.youtube.com

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2025-12-24 05:28 PM | Reply

Wow, not only are Trump and Epstein identified in an infanticide reported in the 1984, Thiel and Musk are both named in the Epstein documents.

Beatrice Keul's documentation proves Epstein and Trump were the only "attendees" at Marlago "beauty pagent" parties.

"Anti-Christ", indeed.

#3 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-12-24 05:42 PM | Reply

"Anti-Christ", indeed.

Christ died for our sins = Christ.

Everyone else has to suffer or die for Trumpy's sins = Anti-Christ.

#4 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-12-24 05:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"An FBI intake document dated July 2020 contains a shocking allegation from a woman who says she was trafficked as a child in the UK and taken to abuse "parties" connected to Epstein's network.

SHe says that between the ages of 6 and 8, she was drugged by her father and driven to a private estate in Surrey, where she was hit by a dark blue car driven by Prince Andrew. The impact caused permanent injuries to her ribs, hip, and leg.

She says she later woke up to Prince Andrew standing over her.

She also claims she was taken to another house, identified later as Frogmore Cottage, where she was restrained, tortured with electric shocks by Ghislaine Maxwell, and watched by a group of men.

She says Maxwell beat her with a brook, broke her nose, and told her she "deserved to die."

Medical records are mentioned in the report, but the victim says she was only taken to the hospital after a rugby match to cover the real cause of her injuries."

#5 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-12-24 05:50 PM | Reply

brook is broom.

Source: DOJ doc, EFTA00020457

#6 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-12-24 05:51 PM | Reply

Yeah, apparently this Gang That Couldn't Redact Straight are also terrible at tech... people are opening files the weren't supposed be able to see.

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2025-12-24 05:53 PM | Reply

In spite of what Pres Trump seems to want...

                            The Epstein Files are not going away anytime soon ...

#8 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-12-24 05:54 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#7 ... Yeah, apparently this Gang That Couldn't Redact Straight are also terrible at tech... people are opening files the weren't supposed be able to see. ...

Again as I understand it, the problem is that the redaction of text is done by changing the font and background color of the redacted text to black-on-black. So the black text cannot be seen against the black background.

As the DoJ seems to be finding out that does not make the text ~go away.~ It merely makes the text difficult to be read.

All one has to do is highlight the redacted area, do a copy 'n' paste of the underlying text, and, paste it somewhere without the color attributes tagging along. Or paste it with th black-on-black color attributes, and then change the colors to black-on-white, or whatever floats yer boat.


#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-12-24 06:25 PM | Reply

" people are opening files (they) weren't supposed be able to see."

So basically, Trump's tech people are at the "international spy" level of the "ink roller security" guy.

#10 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-12-24 10:58 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

snip ...

The DoJ said that due to the large volume, it will take weeks to vet them all. Deputy AG Todd Blanche said that 200 DoJ attorneys are working on the project. Nominally, they are looking to black out the names of Epstein's victims, but if there are entire pages blanked out, as in Tranche 1, many people are going to assume that it is the perpetrators that the DoJ wants to protect. Some of the documents may stem from the 2008 case against Epstein, but 1 million seems like a lot. It is at least possible that large numbers of the documents may have been taken from Epstein's properties but have absolutely nothing to with his crimes (e.g., his mortgage statements, bills for aviation fuel, invoices from his cleaning company, etc.). It has occurred to us that dumping a million documents out there could be a kind of denial-of-service attack, flooding the zone with so much stuff that no team of reporters could possibly have the ability to go through all of them. On the other hand, the Internet is pretty good at this kind of stuff if people could sign up to examine, say, 100, documents. It would need coordination, though.

#11 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-12-25 10:36 AM | Reply

snip ...

Unless there is a smoking gun in the files, which is unlikely because the 200 DoJ attorneys will surely make sure any such document never sees the light of day, no matter how many documents are released, some critics are going to say: "How do we know you didn't shred the 20 documents that implicate Trump?"

In fact, the complaints have already started. A group of 19 Epstein victims wrote: "The public received a fraction of the files, and what we received was riddled with abnormal and extreme redactions with no explanation." This is not going to let up. (V)

#12 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-12-25 10:37 AM | Reply

Perhaps the PhartPhisher can add this ("This is not going to let up") to his "Epstein hoax" file.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL ............

#13 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-12-25 10:39 AM | Reply

How long will it take for Bugsy Patel's stooges to redact another million mentions of Doe 174?

#14 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-12-25 07:48 PM | Reply

a million....most likely a million more later.....WHEN dems manufacturer them like

they're doing the blacked out photo BS effing lies..***

anything to take the minds and attention away from billions in graft in pansy arse..closet tampon

salesman-user timmy * I lied about my military service * walz STATE and removing Omar from her office

gained through stolen money from tax payers..........

***manufacturer them like they did 300,000 votes in Georgia in 2020 ##

## can't wait to read some -------- say that was rudy lying.....when we now know rudy was right...
p
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa told ya so morons...

#15 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-12-26 04:36 PM | Reply

#15 Thank you for all your in-kind contributions to the Democratic Party and its candidates, shrimpsizedgenitalshiddenbyataco"Dan"!

With each and every one of your posts you prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you and your ilk are consummate barely literate, mouth breathing knuckle-draggers.

You're a champ.

#16 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-12-26 04:46 PM | Reply

EPSTEIN IS STILL A THING FOR ONE REASON.....even dems are now realizing that with all the lies in photos

coming from the lying scum sucking dems.....pic with his daughter and such that people don't believe them....

THE OTHER REASON IS THEY'RE DESPERATE........to keep this OUT of the public's mind.

Somali run day care in Minnesota received 1.6 million dollars in 2025 from taxpayers

in 2025 licensed for 74 kids. investigators found ZERO ( 0 ) kids in the facility on multiple

visits.....and that's just one facility.......closet tampon tim and Omar are..hopefully...deported/..

him to his hole in minnesota and her to Somalia that she loved so much....even though her father....a general..

is responsible for many of the atrocities going on there...

#17 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-12-26 07:15 PM | Reply

#17 Thank you for your in-kind contributions to the Democratic Party and its candidates, shrimpsizedgenitalshiddenbyataco"Dan"

With "supporters" like you, Democrats will win for as far as the eye can see...

#18 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-12-26 07:25 PM | Reply

*** UK Police Seek FBI Help Over Prince Andrew Abuse Party Claims ***

Surrey UK police are investigating allegations that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor participated in 'paedo ring parties' in the 1990s.

The alleged victim (now aged 35) claimed there were repeated instances of abuse connected to Jeffrey Epstein's network:

" ... didn't just happen in one place, and it didn't involve just one man. I was restrained on a table and tortured with electrical shocks by Ghislaine Maxwell and surrounded by watching men. I remember seeing Prince Andrew's face.'

The victim then described trying to sneak out', but claimed Ghislaine Maxwell caught me and beat me with the bristle end of a broom.'


One royal insider said the controversy was far from over: "It's not going away."

The then Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell are pictured below as the former royal lies on the laps of a row of unidentified women:


Link: Inquistr.com

#19 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-12-27 03:51 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort