Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, March 11, 2025

Amy Coney Barrett, the Donald Trump-appointed conservative supreme court justice, has been branded a "DEI judge" by furious rightwing figures, after she voted to reject Trump's attempt to freeze nearly $2bn in foreign aid.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Why MAGA is suddenly calling Justice Amy Coney Barrett a 'DEI' hire www.msnbc.com/top-stories/ ...

[image or embed]

-- MSNBC (@msnbc.com) March 7, 2025 at 1:52 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"She is evil, chosen solely because she checked identity politics boxes. Another DEI hire. It always ends badly," Mike Cernovich, a prominent rightwing influencer and conspiracy theorist, wrote on X, referencing diversity, equity and inclusion policies, which Republicans have demonized.

Fox News host Mark Levin claimed in an online post that Barrett had "deceived people into thinking she was a reliable constitutionalist". He added: "The power has gone to her head. It happens with frightening regularity the last half-century."

Laura Loomer, the rightwing activist who repeatedly traveled with Trump during his 2024 campaign, went even further. She posted a picture of Coney Barrett's family, which includes two adopted Black children, and wrote:

"Amy Coney Barrett was a DEI appointee." Jack Posobiec, a popular Maga figure with more than 3m followers on X, posted that Coney Barrett was a "DEI judge"."

more nasty rwing buffoonery at the thread link

Loyalty to the Lyin' King is Required, Patriots need not apply.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-09 09:56 PM | Reply

Dumb fccks didn't go after Roberts. Oh that's right - he's white and male.

These people are sick. Really sick. We need more of this. The world needs to see these people for who they are.

#2 | Posted by YAV at 2025-03-09 10:28 PM | Reply

If you aren't cis het white males you don't count in MAGA world. That's a fact.

#3 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-03-09 10:46 PM | Reply

MAGATS are ------- -------.

#4 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-03-10 12:26 AM | Reply

White women are just another demographic that need to be put back in their place in order to make America great again.

MAGA!!!

#5 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-10 02:50 AM | Reply

Giving women the right to have their own bank account was a mistake.

MAGA!!!

#6 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-10 02:51 AM | Reply

So she's migrated from St. Amy to Whore of Babylon?
MAGAts are so fickle,
My question: If Old Senescent'thinks for the MAGAts, who thinks for Old Senescent?

#7 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-03-10 05:38 AM | Reply

I gotta admit, I'm pleasantly surprised by Barrett.

Fox News host Mark Levin claimed in an online post that Barrett had "deceived people into thinking she was a reliable constitutionalist".

This idiotic talking nasal passage is still around?

#8 | Posted by jpw at 2025-03-11 09:05 AM | Reply

Those damn Catholics--following Christ's teachings again! Look, I KNOW who Jesus would shoot first, and also KNOW that starving children helps make them stronger, and making enemies around the world gives America more people to fight!
--Phony Christians, each wearing their MAGA hats and red ties

#9 | Posted by catdog at 2025-03-11 09:42 AM | Reply

Amy Coney Barrett is a horrible justice and whichever President nominated her along with the Senators that approved her did a horrible job of vetting her. Seems like whoever that President and those Senators were must have just punted the vetting process to some far-right activist group to handle.

#10 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-03-11 09:49 AM | Reply

That's BS. I'm conservative and fully understand that conservative jurist opinions can occasionally differ, unlike leftists who hate anyone who has an independent thought process that differs an iota from the left.

#11 | Posted by Robson at 2025-03-11 10:01 AM | Reply

She was put on the Court to help overturn Roe. She did that.

#12 | Posted by SomebodyElse at 2025-03-11 11:10 AM | Reply

Judges aren't supposed to deliver political outcomes. She's an intelligent woman and is a serious jurist. Maybe she got this one wrong. Maybe she didn't. But I'm pretty sure she isn't playing politics.

#13 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-11 01:35 PM | Reply

White male > white female = R logic.

#14 | Posted by Brennnn at 2025-03-11 02:06 PM | Reply

Hopefully this will drive her into the arms of the 3 with common sense, decency and no corruption. The men on that kangaroo court suck.

#15 | Posted by Yodagirl at 2025-03-11 03:03 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort