Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, May 24, 2025

Testing

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

It's screwed up here too Gracie

#1 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-24 09:17 PM | Reply

It's screwed up here too Gracie

#2 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-24 09:18 PM | Reply

This is the end
Beautiful friend
This is the end
My only friend, the end

Of our elaborate plans, the end
Of everything that stands, the end
No safety or surprise, the end
I'll never look into your eyes again

www.youtube.com

#3 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-24 09:37 PM | Reply

This is the end
Beautiful friend
This is the end
My only friend, the end

Of our elaborate plans, the end
Of everything that stands, the end
No safety or surprise, the end
I'll never look into your eyes again

www.youtube.com

#4 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-24 09:37 PM | Reply

Corky,

You and I have the same joined date.

Looks like we've both been posting on here 20 years. Actually, I was using a different name for awhile before I changed to this one.

I considered myself a liberal back then.

The Democratic Party left me long ago, about the same time I quit taking drugs.

I saw liberals utopian value system wasn't sustainable in the real world.

Instead of real solutions I saw idealistic dreams of a perfect world, enforced by engineering society into submission to their twisted values.

#5 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-25 11:06 AM | Reply

"the Democratic Party left me long ago"

We know. They lost you the day gay marriage became legal.

#6 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-05-25 11:37 AM | Reply

- liberals utopian value system wasn't sustainable in the real world

The happiest countries in the world in N Europe would beg to disagree.

And at least trying is much better than succumbing to the Oligarchs' Trump Cult.

But Happy DR Birthday.

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-25 12:51 PM | Reply

Corky,

Nordic nations also enforce border controls, value homogeneity, and reward personal responsibility, which is hardly the liberal free-for-all liberals dream of.

If we're comparing models, let's do it honestly

#8 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-25 05:16 PM | Reply

"value homogeneity"

America's cultural history valued diversity, until you guys decided it was Woke.

Maybe you never valued diversity. You don't value gays in society, for example. You think gays make society worse.

#9 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-25 05:18 PM | Reply

"reward personal responsibility"

If you are talking about making money, you can make more money in the United States.

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-25 05:18 PM | Reply

"Nordic nations also enforce border controls"

I guess Trump doesn't enforce border controls. Good to know.

#11 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-25 05:30 PM | Reply

- let's do it honestly

Yes, lets. Several Nordic nations and others that border Russia are beefing up their security in the face of the authoritarian Russian dictator that your Cult Leader has pampered and aided as he kills children every single day now.

- liberal free-for-all

Damn those liberals who wrote the Constitution!

#12 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-25 05:40 PM | Reply

BillJohnson doesn't care about the Constitution. He voted for Trump. Just sayin

#13 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-25 06:04 PM | Reply

If liberals had stuck to the principles of the Constitution of limited government, free speech, we wouldn't be in this mess.

But today's left pushes censorship, centralized control, and ideological conformity

That's not Jefferson. It's Orwell.

#14 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-25 06:31 PM | Reply

" But today's left pushes censorship, centralized control, and ideological conformity"

What a riot.

Trump is threatening Harvard, renditioning foreign students if they say the wrong things, sapping enforcement agencies of the government while he changes positions on tariffs again and again, and threatening to primary any Republican who doesn't agree in lockstep with him.

That's some CLASSIC projection!

#15 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-05-25 06:38 PM | Reply

#15

Ditto.

The Cult is blind to reality... which is why it's a cult.

#16 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-25 06:55 PM | Reply

today's left pushes censorship, centralized control, and ideological conformity
#14 | POSTED BY BULLJOHNSON

You're ------- retarded.

#17 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-05-25 07:32 PM | Reply

"censorship"
Trump speeches scrubbed from WhiteHouse.gov

"centralized control"
Trump Tariffs.

"ideological conformity"
Does the Constitution apply to People or just Citizens?

#18 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-25 07:42 PM | Reply

@#14 ... If liberals had stuck to the principles of the Constitution of limited government, free speech, we wouldn't be in this mess. ...

So, you describe the Trump Presidency as a "mess?"


Good to know.

#19 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-05-25 08:12 PM | Reply

Dan,

Harvard? I couldn't care less.

Another elite echo chamber pushing groupthink and calling it education.

#20 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-25 10:19 PM | Reply

Trumpthink is worse than groupthink any day of the week.

And cultists worried about 'groupthink'?

haahahahahahhah!

#21 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-25 10:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Corky,

So you're not denying liberal groupthink. You're just claiming Trumpthink is worse.

Interesting admission.

#22 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-25 10:58 PM | Reply

Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon where a group prioritizes harmony and conformity over critical analysis, potentially leading to flawed decision-making.

Which definition has a picture of Trump Cultists next to it.

#23 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-25 11:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#23 ... Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon where a group prioritizes harmony and conformity over critical analysis, potentially leading to flawed decision-making. ...

imo, groupthink is not as bad as cult-think.

MAGA seems to illustrate cult-think, as evidenced by the incompetence of the Trump Cabinet, but the Cabinet members do agree with him, and that seems to be the important aspect..


So, yeah, liberals may think in a similar manner, but do have disagreements. And those disagreements have often been cited as a weakness for Democrats.

But that similar thinking is not nearly as bad as the required adherence to MAGA, and the unfettered obsequious adulation of Pres Trump, that the Trump cult seems to portray.


#24 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-05-25 11:15 PM | Reply

Are Democrats Dysfunctional Or Just Disagreeing? (2021)
fivethirtyeight.com

... Narrow majorities and an ambitious policy agenda have proven to be a tough combination for Democrats. In the past few weeks, congressional Democrats have been involved in a number of talks among party factions and with the Biden administration over the fate of two major bills: their bipartisan infrastructure bill and their $3.5 trillion spending plan. At this point, too, both progressive and more moderate Democrats have threatened to walk away from the deals " one reason why so many headlines are declaring that Democrats are in disarray. Moreover, regardless of the outcome of these specific bills, it is likely that struggles between moderate and progressive members of the party will continue to be an issue going forward.

But does this mean that the internal fault lines in the Democratic Party are likely to be detrimental to its functioning?

Or are we just seeing healthy negotiating in a party that represents a diverse array of constituencies and interests? ...

[emphasis mine]


#25 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-05-25 11:18 PM | Reply

Are Democrats Dysfunctional Or Just Disagreeing?

Dysfunctional we haven't had a valid Democratic primary since Obama.

#26 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-05-25 11:38 PM | Reply

The Democrats are going through what the Republicans went through in 2008. The party is trying to figure out who they are.

The party has no direction. Being servants for corporations lost democrats the working class.

Republicans fell subservient to to oligarchs in 2016 and found themselves.

If democrats can't figure out how to abandon corporations and represent the common person. Republicans will continue to win.

#27 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-05-25 11:46 PM | Reply

@#27 ... The Democrats are going through what the Republicans went through in 2008. The party is trying to figure out who they are.

The party has no direction. ...

I disagree.

It is not that the Democrats have no direction, it is more that they may have too many directions.

And that seems to be pulling the Democrats apart.


The House Divided Against Itself thing.

But I have to ask, will the Democrats find a rudder in time for the 2026 mid-terms?

Time will tell.

#28 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-05-26 12:20 AM | Reply


Maybe you never valued diversity.
~ Snoofy

Diversity has its downside.
x.com

#29 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-05-26 01:04 AM | Reply

" Another elite echo chamber pushing groupthink and calling it education."

They're the leading institution in cancer research.

They're the top-ranked school in the world.

They also have a world-renowned divinity school.

Meanwhile, you'll regurgitate any lie that pleases your ear.

#30 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-05-26 01:07 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#29

Do try harder.

#31 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-05-26 01:16 AM | Reply

Dan,

"you'll regurgitate any lie"

Referring back to my posts, specifically what did I say that was a lie?

Clarify...don't deflect.

#32 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-26 12:50 PM | Reply

Referring back to my posts, specifically what did I say that was a lie?

Clarify...don't deflect.

#32 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Harvard? I couldn't care less.

Another elite echo chamber pushing groupthink and calling it education.
#20 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

LIE

"But today's left pushes censorship, centralized control, and ideological conformity"

LIE

Instead of real solutions I saw idealistic dreams of a perfect world, enforced by engineering society into submission to their twisted values.

#5 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

LIE

All those are lies with no supporting evidence or sources.

Need more examples? Easy. Just post again. Nearly all your posts contain a lie in one form or another.

#33 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-26 01:43 PM | Reply

Donner,

You didn't refute a thing. You just highlighted the comments you disliked and labeled them lies, not because you proved them false, but because they challenge your worldview.

You're doing what liberals often do trying to police and control thought. But here's the reality.

You can't cancel me, and you can't cancel the countless others who think just like I do.

#34 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-26 02:24 PM | Reply

Donner,

I think what's happening with liberals is that the chickens are finally coming home to roost.

Years of pushing ideology over reality, silencing dissent, and mistaking groupthink for truth are catching up with them.

#35 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-26 02:27 PM | Reply

Ok.

Let's take Harvard.

"Another elite echo chamber pushing groupthink and calling it education."

There are factions in any school that can exhibit traits of groupthink.

But Harvard is an institution of higher learning and while there may be factions within it that engage in groupthink the institution itself actively promotes critical thinking and diverse perspectives.

By your "theory", with no supporting evidence, ALL schools of any type by their very nature promote groupthink. So it's not that I "dislike" your lie.

It's misinformation and disinformation and not even true.

Which makes it a lie.

#36 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-26 02:34 PM | Reply

"I think what's happening with liberals is that the chickens are finally coming home to roost."

LOL

What's happening is called FAFO

And America is currently now in the FO phase.

#37 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-26 02:36 PM | Reply

Donner,

"What's happening is called FAFO"

Why don't you clarify what you mean.

Acromyns are lazy.

#38 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-26 02:46 PM | Reply

Why don't you clarify what you mean.

Acromyns are lazy.

#38 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Oh so you live in a cave?

Sorry. Did not know. Ok.

FAFO in this case obviously means F Around and Find Out.

America decided to F around and elected a convicted felon and twice impeached criminally negligent narcissist and now Americans are Finding Out what exactly that means.

And we have a ways to go. So I do hope you enjoy your FAFO America!

#39 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-26 02:57 PM | Reply

Donner,

A 2023 survey by The Harvard Crimson found that over 77% of Harvard faculty identified as "liberal" or "very liberal," while less than 3% identified as conservative.

That alone doesn't prove everything, but it clearly shows a severe ideological imbalance. And when the overwhelming majority of educators share the same political leanings, it raises a fair question if the education is balanced or is it being shaped to fit a particular political worldview?

If Harvard truly valued intellectual diversity, those numbers would look very different.

#40 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-26 02:58 PM | Reply

"That alone doesn't prove everything, but it clearly shows a severe ideological imbalance."

It shows liberals like being in academia more than conservatives do.

Take a survey of oil companies. What does it prove that they are dominated by conservatives? Oil companies are a whole lot richer than Harvard.

#41 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 03:01 PM | Reply

A 2023 survey by The Harvard Crimson found that over 77% of Harvard faculty identified as "liberal" or "very liberal," while less than 3% identified as conservative.
That alone doesn't prove everything, but it clearly shows a severe ideological imbalance. And when the overwhelming majority of educators share the same political leanings, it raises a fair question if the education is balanced or is it being shaped to fit a particular political worldview?
If Harvard truly valued intellectual diversity, those numbers would look very different.
#40 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-26 02:58 PM | Reply

Higher learning has liberal bias naked in because higher learning is a liberal concept. It's no wonder they are overwhelmingly liberal at Harvard. Deal with it.

#42 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-26 03:04 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Also I noticed you just breezed past and ignored post 36.

Not going to bother to explain all your other lies and disinformation to you.

It's not like I am actually going to teach you anything.

Also I find it interesting that you maga maroons can post unsubstantiated lies and disinformation all day long but when someone counters with an unsubstantiated response you suddenly require proof.


To that I can only say.

GFY.

(And I bet everyone else here knows exactly what that means)

#43 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-26 03:05 PM | Reply

"If Harvard truly valued intellectual diversity, those numbers would look very different."

What should they look like, is there any university that passes your purity test?

Why are you in favor of DEI all of a sudden?

#44 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 03:05 PM | Reply

Years of pushing ideology over reality, silencing dissent, and mistaking groupthink for truth
#35 | Posted by BillJohnson

Is this "code" for equal rights for trans people, or is there more on your mind than trans people?

The Reality is trans people exist. The Ideology that trans people deserve equal rights is called democracy. These two go hand in glove, not one pushing out the other.

#45 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 03:08 PM | Reply

Donner,

Maybe things would look different today if Democrats had offered a serious candidate and a better message that actually reached more Americans.

#46 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-26 03:09 PM | Reply

Ok I posted 43 a little too soon.

At least you tried.

But did you notice that when you looked it up you found it wasn't exactly true?

over 77% of Harvard faculty identified as "liberal" or "very liberal," while less than 3% identified as conservative.

Everyone already knows that reality has a liberal bias built right in.

When you believe in lies and then get a dose of reality it tends to upset your conservative and especially religious apple carts.

When you believe in myths it's easy to be convinced to believe in lies.

#47 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-26 03:11 PM | Reply

Maybe things would look different today if Democrats had offered a serious candidate and a better message that actually reached more Americans.

#46 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

I can't not disagree.

Things would look very different today if Americans did not get taken in by a charismatic liar and had elected Kamala, who was obviously way more qualified than Trumpy.

Guaranteed.

#48 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-26 03:14 PM | Reply

Maybe things would look different today if Democrats had offered a serious candidate and a better message that actually reached more Americans.
#46 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

We wouldn't have a traitor in the White House like we do now. That's for sure. Just sayin

#49 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-26 03:17 PM | Reply

Re 42 | POSTED BY LAURAMOHR

Exactly!!

But baked not naked. Though as I think about it naked learning would indeed be much more fun!

#50 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-26 03:17 PM | Reply

BillJohnson, the diversity is that the United States government also supports endeavors where there is heavy Conservative bias.

Equality is achieved through a diversity of opinions, not making every institution be split down the middle.

There aren't many Liberty Universities, and there aren't many for a reason, but they are out there.

It's not Harvard's fault that the Right Wingers tend to be the Book Burners in society.

It's not Harvard's fault that fact is reflected in who goes into Academia and who doesn't.

#51 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 03:18 PM | Reply

OOPSIE DAISY My terrible. Yes baked in.

#52 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-26 03:21 PM | Reply

Maybe things would look different today if Democrats had offered a serious candidate and a better message that actually reached more Americans.
#46 | Posted by BillJohnson

Why should things look different?
Is something wrong with the way things are going under Trump?

#53 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 04:35 PM | Reply

Snoofy,

"Is something wrong with the way things are going under Trump?"

I said "different" not "better".

I think the democratic party is rudderless.

Trump has shaken things up.

I think just like he declared bankruptcy so many times as a way to start over, I'm starting to wonder if that's his plan for the rest of America.

Burn down the house. He seems to be running organized chaos for America.

Tear down the systems that are a waste.

When he said "drain the swamp" he wasn't talking about only Congress.

#54 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-26 05:02 PM | Reply

When he said "drain the swamp"

LOL.

He's built the biggest swamp, ever. Period.

#55 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-26 05:06 PM | Reply

Starting to wonder?

We agree with you. His plan is to burn down the house with us still living inside it.

"Tear down the systems that are a waste."

Cutting Cancer research is an example of Trump burning down he house with us still living inside it.

#56 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 05:07 PM | Reply

"He seems to be running organized chaos for America."

Organized chaos isn't a thing.

Hopefully, you're trying to say he's attempting to overwhelm the very government he is cutting, so he can subdue it and make it his own.

#57 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 05:08 PM | Reply

Steps Hitler took to take over German Government...

www.google.com

That book on Drumpf's nightstand wasn't actually Mein Kampf... it was a book of Hitlers' speeches titled "My New Order" .

www.google.com

#58 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-26 05:19 PM | Reply

Snoofy,

"Organized chaos isn't a thing"?

Actually, it is. Just because you don't understand the phrase doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

If you had any real-world experience managing unpredictable or high-pressure environments, you'd know exactly what it means.

People who've led under fire, figuratively or literally, don't need to Google it. They've lived it. And if they're good at what they do, it's something they instinctively know.

#59 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-26 05:27 PM | Reply

BillJohnson,

"Organized chaos" is not a management philosophy.

It's a term that describes how certain situations appear to play out in real life, especially to an outsider.

organized chaos
a situation in which there seems to be a lot of confusion and no organization, which makes you surprised that the results are good:
The restaurant was very busy, and the kitchens were organized chaos.

#60 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 06:09 PM | Reply

People who've led under fire, figuratively or literally, don't need to Google it. They've lived it. And if they're good at what they do, it's something they instinctively know.
#59 | Posted by BillJohnson

It's fitting that you believe Trump is a good manager.

#61 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 06:12 PM | Reply

"I think just like he declared bankruptcy so many times as a way to start over, I'm starting to wonder if that's his plan for the rest of America.
Burn down the house."

How does this sound like good leadership to anybody?

Explain yourself, BillJohnson.

#62 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 06:15 PM | Reply

Snoofy,

People in leadership make hard decisions. They aren't always pretty. What's the alternative? More of the same? The American voters decided what they want.

They didn't choose what you want.

I'm tired of this pointless banter.

#63 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-26 06:44 PM | Reply

"People in leadership make hard decisions. They aren't always pretty. What's the alternative? More of the same? The American voters decided what they want."

You're dodging the issue.

You are saying burning down the house is better than more of the same.

You don't really believe that so you're left making excuses for it.

#64 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 06:46 PM | Reply

"People in leadership make hard decisions. They aren't always pretty. What's the alternative?"

Not doing tariffs, not doing a trade war, not alienating our allies and trading partners, not using ICE so aggressively we are sending people to camps over paperwork mix-ups.

And you can't condemn any those things.

#65 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 06:48 PM | Reply

People in leadership make hard decisions. They aren't always pretty. What's the alternative? More of the same? The American voters decided what they want.
They didn't choose what you want.
I'm tired of this pointless banter.

Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-26 06:44 PM | Reply

A minority of the American voters chose Trump. He didn't even get 50% of the votes cast. Want to stick with facts of the matter??

#66 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-26 06:49 PM | Reply

Want to stick with facts of the matter?

Of course that idiot doesn't.

He's allergic to facts.

He prefers his highly biased opinions.

#67 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-05-26 06:53 PM | Reply

Changing opinions is hard werk for a 'religious' Trumper.... especially if when you joined here 20 you ago you were a Clownshack look alike.

You mentioned this the other day, BJ. What was your name here as a liberal?

#68 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-26 07:13 PM | Reply

#69!!!

(posted for Lee)

#69 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-26 08:00 PM | Reply

Corky,

I've used the name I use now supporting both democrats and republicans.

#70 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-26 09:35 PM | Reply

Laura,

Trump made significant inroads with latino and black voters in the 2024 election.

He received 46% of the latino vote which was a record for a republican since 1976.

His backing among black voters also rose to 20%, up from 13% in 2020.

#71 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-26 09:42 PM | Reply

"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time" is famously attributed to Abraham Lincoln.

We are about to get into that last part here as soon as the economy buckles and the war(s) start.

#72 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-26 09:55 PM | Reply

In the 2024 presidential election, approximately 16% of Black voters supported Donald Trump.

apnews.com

#73 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-05-26 10:58 PM | Reply

If it's posted by a Trump Voter, you know it's a lie.

#74 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-05-26 10:58 PM | Reply

Trump made significant inroads with latino and black voters in the 2024 election.
He received 46% of the latino vote which was a record for a republican since 1976.
His backing among black voters also rose to 20%, up from 13% in 2020.
#71 | Posted by BillJohnson

Trump's Strong Man Populism and the Poorly Educated are a natural match for each other.

#75 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-27 11:32 AM | Reply

Corky,

Let's not pretend this mess started with Trump. The cracks have been forming for years fueled by endless entitlement programs, bloated budgets, pork projects, wasteful spending, and politicians on both sides buying votes with borrowed money.

Honestly, the way you talk about collapse, it sounds less like a warning and more like a wish.

#76 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-27 11:34 AM | Reply

Let's not pretend
#76 | POSTED BY BULLJOHNSON

But, that's all you do.

You pretend you're a heterosexual.

You pretend there are sky fairies watching and judging our every decision.

You pretend mail in voting is corrupt.

You pretend Trump isn't a braindead, petulant child who has delusions of becoming America's first king.

All you do is pretend.

#77 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-05-27 11:38 AM | Reply

"Let's not pretend this mess started with Trump. The cracks have been forming for years fueled by endless entitlement programs, bloated budgets, pork projects, wasteful spending, and politicians on both sides buying votes with borrowed money."

You just had to work in the "Both Sides."
When it's Republicans and Russians who are filling your feed trough with propaganda.

Name any of these so-called "endless entitlement programs" and "bloated budgets" and tell us how much they cost taxpayers.

#78 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-27 11:47 AM | Reply

Clown,

theharvardpoliticalreview.com

Trump support among black and Latinos is rising.

#79 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-27 11:58 AM | Reply

Fascism support among black and Latinos is rising.

#80 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-27 12:04 PM | Reply

Snoofy,

"Fascism support among Black and Latinos is rising."

Framing Black and Latino voters who support Trump as backing "fascism" isn't just inaccurate, it reeks of condescension and carries a racist undertone.

You're implying they're too ignorant or misled to think for themselves.

#81 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-27 01:18 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"You're implying"

Allow me to outright state it, then.

Poorly educated people are usually not very good at thinking.

And that's the same reason so many whites support him!

You aren't exactly an intellectual powerhouse over there. You're a mess; an openly gay man who has a wife instead of a husband to love. Nobody thinks your lid is screwed on properly; not even you since you hate yourself for being gay.

That hatred has come to define who you are.

#82 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-27 01:25 PM | Reply

Snoofy,

Your response says everything I need to know. You didn't just double down, you lost the plot.

Mocking people for their education, race, sexuality, or faith isn't an argument. It's unhinged.

Time to let you go.

#83 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-05-27 01:43 PM | Reply

I'm mocking you for you calling yourself a gay man yet you exclusively have sex with one woman.

What part of that is gay?

#84 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-27 01:48 PM | Reply

It's your intellectual honesty and your understanding of the English language that are on trial here.

If you're gay, but you have sex with only one woman --

How is that really so different from a male in a dress who believes she's a woman?

#85 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-27 01:50 PM | Reply

You believe you're gay.
Is that enough for you to BE gay.
It doesn't matter what you DO.

Okay. So then a male in a dress who believes she's a woman, that person can be a woman to you.

Because of what she believes. It has nothing to do with what she does or whether she can have babies.

#86 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-27 01:52 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort