Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, December 11, 2025

The Trump administration needs to release the legal analysis underpinning its controversial military campaign.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel has already issued a memo that grants immunity from prosecution for US troops involved in the boat-strike killing spree. Courts can override OLC memos, but this one lays out a legal rationale for the killings. www.reuters.com/world/us/doj ...

[image or embed]

-- Jill Piggott (@jillpiggott.bsky.social) Dec 6, 2025 at 2:20 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

These crimes will be investigated when Trumpy is gone and law and order and the rule of Law returns.

Which is why, of course, they are attempting to use apps that do not preserve government documents so that future investigations cannot be refer to them.

#1 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-12-11 12:11 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

Doesn't issuing immunity, by definition, acknowledge that the strikes are illegal?

#2 | Posted by MBlue at 2025-12-11 12:33 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

These crimes will be investigated when Trumpy is gone and law and order and the rule of Law returns.
Which is why, of course, they are attempting to use apps that do not preserve government documents so that future investigations cannot be refer to them.
#1 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-12-11 12:11 PM

Like Obama went after BushCo for 9/11 and the Iraq invasion?

I don't even believe Cheney was mentioned once, even as he was demonizing Iran while Haliburton gained exclusive contracts with them.

The largest gold heist in history.

The largest false flag event with so many parts and no proper NIST explanation for building 7 or even a mention.

No corporate candidate will ever promote democracy. They are all actors.

#3 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-12-11 01:37 PM | Reply

Legal analysis? We don't need no legal analysis...

That analysis will probably look like Der Dotard's EO regarding off-shore wind farms: do it because I said so...

#4 | Posted by catdog at 2025-12-11 01:41 PM | Reply

www.nist.gov

#5 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-12-11 01:42 PM | Reply

The Trump administration needs to release the legal analysis underpinning its controversial military campaign.

Posted by retort at 11:45 AM | 3 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry | It's the same one Obama used at the Baghtu wedding party airstrike, except Trump killed drug dealers.

#6 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-12-11 01:43 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

except Trump killed drug dealers.

#6 | POSTED BY FISHPUD

Nice try. The disgusting------------- killed fishermen.

#7 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-12-11 01:58 PM | Reply

except Trump killed drug dealers.
#6 | POSTED BY FISHPUD

If they were doing anything with drugs at all, which is doubtful, they certainly weren't dealing them.

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-12-11 02:11 PM | Reply

except Trump killed drug dealers.
#6 | POSTED BY FISHPUD

ANY EVIDENCE? YOU RETARDED MAGAT ----

#9 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-12-11 07:06 PM | Reply

Nobody cares

#10 | Posted by THEBULL at 2025-12-11 08:33 PM | Reply

#6 Posted by fishpaw

False equivalencies. Logical fallacies. And the beat goes on. The Baghtu strike complied with LOAC and was conducted under a Congressional AUMF. www.google.com

The Buffoon and minions just decided to start killing random people with no legal justification. None. Get that? No legal justification, none. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.

#11 | Posted by et_al at 2025-12-12 12:23 AM | Reply

#6 Posted by fishpaw Flag: Newsworthy 1

So there are two dumber than dirt. Why am I not surprised.

#12 | Posted by et_al at 2025-12-12 12:27 AM | Reply

except Trump killed drug dealers.
#6 | POSTED BY FISHPUD
Nice try. The disgusting------------- killed fishermen.

#7 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-12-11 01:58 PM | Reply | Flag:

Yes, they were trolling at 60 mph. And those rods and nets were extremely well hidden.

#13 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-12-12 12:14 PM | Reply

#6 Posted by fishpaw Flag: Newsworthy 1
So there are two dumber than dirt. Why am I not surprised.

#12 | Posted by et_al at 2025-12-12 12:27 AM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Right, coming from someone that says the boats were taking people shelling.

#14 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-12-12 12:15 PM | Reply

Fishermen ..,lol! What a bunch of -------.

#15 | Posted by fortfisher at 2025-12-12 12:17 PM | Reply

These MAGA dumfux think those boats were coming to the U.S.
Lol

#16 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-12-12 01:00 PM | Reply

Pentagon Unveils New GenAI Platform, It Immediately Starts Flagging Pete Hegseth's War Crimes

abovethelaw.com

Pickled Pete is a mass murderer.

#17 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-12-12 11:59 PM | Reply

From the article (emphasis added):

"I don't think there's an armed attack" against the U.S. by the drug cartels, John Yoo, a Berkeley law professor, told me.
Yoo's skepticism is especially notable. That's because he was famously one of the drafters of those post-9/11 memos while working at the OLC in the Bush administration and, despite considerable criticism of his analysis, has never changed his position. Even for him, the Trump administration's arguments are hard to accept.

"They're not attacking us because of our foreign policy and our political system," Yoo said, drawing a distinction between al Qaeda and drug traffickers who may be based in Venezuela. "They're just selling us something that people in America want. We're just trying to stop them from selling it. That's traditionally, to me, crime. It's something that we could never eradicate or end."

If that is correct, then the boat strikes constitute murder under federal law and are also illegal under international law. Trump may be immune from criminal prosecution in the U.S. thanks to the Supreme Court, but everyone else involved, in theory at least, faces the risk of federal prosecution in a future administration unless Trump at some point grants some or all of them a pardon.

#18 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-12-13 07:27 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort