Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, March 29, 2026

Russia took satellite images of a U.S. air base in Saudi Arabia three times in the days before Iran attacked the site and wounded American troops, according to a summary of Ukrainian intelligence shared with NBC News by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

WSJ: An Iranian missile struck the Prince Sultan air base in Saudi Arabia on Friday, wounding 10 American servicemembers, two seriously, and damaging several U.S. refueling aircraft, according to U.S. and Saudi officials familiar with the strike.

[image or embed]

-- MeidasTouch (@meidastouch.com) Mar 27, 2026 at 6:27 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Russia is killing and maiming American servicemen.

If our president were a man he'd do something about it.

#1 | Posted by Zed at 2026-03-29 10:53 AM | Reply

i.insider.com

#2 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-03-29 11:07 AM | Reply

How many Russians has US NATO assistance in Ukraine killed?

Askin' for a Friend.

#3 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-03-29 12:35 PM | Reply

This is what effetepustule supports.

www.nbcnews.com

#4 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-03-29 12:50 PM | Reply

That's 4 years old. It's a Little Out of Date.

Trump just bombed and killed 180 Schoolgirls in a DOUBLE TAP War Crime.

This Month. A War that was every bit as "Unprovoked" as the Ukraine War.

Even the Russians didn't kill Zelinsky and most of his Family in a Sucker Punch attack while "Negotiations" were Ongoing.

Stick yer Sanctimony where the Sun Don't Shine.

Russia has Interests, they aren't American Interests. Why should they Be?

If you Wage Aggressive Wars you need to be ready for some of Your Own to Die.

Russia isn't a ----- about it like the US is.

#5 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-03-29 01:00 PM | Reply

Effetepustule supports----------. What a ------- loser.

#6 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-03-29 01:13 PM | Reply

- How many Russian INVADERS has US NATO assistance in Ukraine killed?

ft/nc

And many Russians would phrase that, how may Russians has Putin killed with his invasion?

"Estimates of the number of Russian soldiers killed during Vladimir Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine vary widely, but recent reports from early 2026 suggest the number is between 243,000 and 352,000.

This does not include wounded soldiers or fighters from the separatist regions."

www.google.com

Which is why the internet is turned off in Russia, and Putin is making himself scarce.

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-29 01:27 PM | Reply

#6 How do you get to that?

Child Rape? No Way, I don't even support the SMO.

Or the War in Iran either.

I'm antiWar.

#8 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-03-29 01:28 PM | Reply

You're a degenerate Putin fanboi.

#9 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-03-29 01:32 PM | Reply

If 250,000 Americans Die in Iran would Trump be in Charge at the Time?

Would Americans tolerate that kind of losses?

Askin' for a Friend.

#10 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-03-29 01:32 PM | Reply

#10

Yes! Trump would be just as guilty as Putin is, Moneywar.

And you would still not blame Putin.

#11 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-29 01:34 PM | Reply

I Blame Putin Now. The SMO is Stupid.

They should have recognized the breakaway Oblasts and strengthened the Internal Lines.

Not Invaded Ukraine.

I was Never in favor of Invading Ukraine.

Only Strengthening and Protecting the Oblasts in Rebellion from Ukraine.

Which was Killing it's own People.

Not "Ukrainian" Enough.

But oh, No, there are No Nazis in Ukraine.

#12 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-03-29 01:44 PM | Reply

No one I know ever said there were 'No Nazis' in Ukraine.

The fact is that only 2 percent of the vote in their last election before the war were 'Nazis', and as I documented for you yesterday, that movement was run by Russian Intelligence.

#13 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-29 01:51 PM | Reply

The have far more influence than that number would imply.

Jews are less than 2% of Americans, they are 30% of Congress and AIPAC holds strong influence on American Political Life.

I Know,.. It's Anti Semetic to Notice.

#14 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-03-29 02:00 PM | Reply

Russian drone strikes destroy Ukraine maternity hospital full of newborns: This was pure terror'
nypost.com

Effetepustule approves.

#15 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-03-29 02:04 PM | Reply

What influence did Nazis have in Ukraine before the Russian invasion?

"In the 30 years since Ukraine's declaration of independence, Mierzejewski-Voznyak wrote, "its radical right's national electoral support only rarely exceeded 3 percent of the popular vote.

Radical right parties typically enjoyed just a few wins in single-mandate districts, and no far right candidate for president has ever secured more than 5 percent of the popular vote in an election."

The far right did, however, for the first time win a proportional share of the parliamentary government in 2012 when it won 10.4% of the popular vote. Since then, the far right's share in parliamentary elections fell to 6% in 2014 and then to 2% in 2019.

"The claim that neo-Nazi or far-right groups hold any significant power in Ukraine is absurd," Jared McBride, an adjunct history professor at UCLA whose work specializes in nationalist movements and mass violence and genocide in Russia and Ukraine, told us via email.

"The most well-known far-right wing party, Svoboda (similar to say [Marine] Le Pen's party or other corollaries in Europe) won 2.15 percent of the vote in 2019 election and holds one seat in the Rada " meaning they are politically irrelevant." (Le Pen is the leader of the French far-right party the National Rally.)"

www.factcheck.org

Putin invaded Ukraine because he wanted Ukraine, not because he was saving Ukraine from Nazis.... and you look foolish each time you make that claim.

#16 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-29 02:10 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Correction: approximately 6% of Congress in Jews.

My Mistake, this Correction confirms that about 2% of Americans are Jewish.

So 3 Times their number, not 15 times over representation.

Big Difference. My Apologies for posting without confirming numbers.

I don't Wanna get on A Kill list or Something.

#17 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-03-29 02:11 PM | Reply

Total Russian casualties - dead and injured - total nearly 1.3 million.

#18 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2026-03-29 02:37 PM | Reply

"Askin' for a Friend." - #10 | Posted by Effeteposer

Actually, no you're not.

#19 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-03-29 04:00 PM | Reply

Putin invaded Ukraine because he wanted Ukraine, not because he was saving Ukraine from Nazis.... and you look foolish each time you make that claim.

#16 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-29 02:10 PM

Putin invaded Ukraine because Russians are, understandably, a bit sensitive about being invaded and because Sec State James Baker promised Gorbachev that NATO would never border Russia, which was a pre-condition for Russia not committing a bloodbath when the Warsaw Pact was breaking up. A buffer zone, under Russian influence. When NATO started making overtures to Ukraine, the Russians didn't roll over, instead securing their Black Sea Fleet base in Crimea. Then, the Ukrainians went and elected Zelensky and Russian influence in Kiev went Keyser Soze on them. "And, poof, it was gone.'
Unlike Americans, other countries actually study History.

#20 | Posted by morris at 2026-03-29 05:53 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

#20 | Posted by morris

Excellent breakdown morris, expect to be called a Putin puppet by CorkyFromOcala.

Americans are taught about the ColdWar standoff called the CubanMissileCrisis with Russia over Cuba. They cheer JFK over the blockade. Yet can't understand Russia feeling the same way about their hemisphere & border, via NATO expansion.

#21 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-03-29 06:41 PM | Reply

Morris,

"Putin had decided that he wanted war to achieve his aims by late 2021, and no diplomatic offering from the West or Kyiv short of surrendering to his maximalist demands would have convinced Putin to abandon the historic opportunity he thought he had.

Putin has long tried to accomplish two distinct objectives: breaking up NATO and seizing full control over Ukraine.

Putin's core objectives from the start of his rule have been preserving his regime, establishing an iron grip on Russia domestically, reestablishing Russia as a great power, and forming a multipolar world order in which Russia has a veto over key global events.[1]

Establishing control over Ukraine and eroding US influence have always been essential to these core objectives."
- Institute for the Study of War

understandingwar.org

Putin was going to go after Ukraine no matter what NATO was doing; they really only supplied an excuse... much like the imaginary Nazi control of Ukraine.

Same for Crimea and several other former SU states, thought he tends to refer the former Soviet Union as, "historic Russia'.

- 1Nut

I'm really sorry that you only have one nut, really I am... but you could at least try not to prove it so often.

#22 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-29 06:55 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#20 ... Putin invaded Ukraine because Russians are, understandably, a bit sensitive about being invaded ...

So, a Russia is sensitive about being invaded?

Yet Russia invaded and took over Crimea in 2014.

The problem is that Pres Putin thinks that Ukraine should be a part of Russia, and he has stated as much.

Is Putin Ready to Move Against Ukraine? (2021)
nationalinterest.org

... Russian President Vladimir Putin has published his hotly-anticipated essay on Ukraine, "On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians." The six-thousand-word treatise garnered no shortage of attention in the West, and for good reason: Putin's comments bear direct if not immediate implications for the ongoing Donbass conflict, which has lasted longer than World War II and claimed thousands of casualties on both sides. But the article carries a deeper set of political connotations that predated Putin by centuries, and may resonate in Russian-Ukrainian relations long after Putin's presidency.

Putin's epic opens with a protracted historical exposition, describing the ethnogenesis of the eastern slavic peoples. Present day Russians, Belorussians, and Ukrainians, notes Putin, are all descendants of Kievan Rus, a loose 9th century federation founded by the Scandinavain-derived Rurik Dynasty. As Putin guides the reader through the Mongol occupation, rivalries between Boyar clans, and the establishment of the Russian Tsardom, a common strand emerges: the peoples who have lived in these lands are inextricably linked by a common faith and language. Russian and Ukrainian are merely dialects of the same underlying language, Putin adds: "Many centuries of fragmentation and living within different states naturally brought about regional language peculiarities, resulting in the emergence of dialects. The vernacular enriched the literary language."

Putin hastens to add that the attempts to challenge this underlying unity came not from within, but from without: first, by Polish elites thirsting for eastward expansion, and centuries later, by Austro-Hungarian officials seeking to undermine the Russian Imperial war effort in WWI by stoking anti-Russian sentiment in Galicia. The late 1910s disintegration of the Russian Empire briefly left Ukraine at the mercy of German Imperial designs, but it wasn't long before Poland made its move by supporting nationalist leader Symon Petliura in exchange for territorial rights to Galicia.

Then came what Putin sees as perhaps the greatest betrayal of all: the early Bolsheviks poisoned eastern slavic unity with their policy of "Ukrainization," foisting a contrived Ukrainian national identity onto people who were essentially Russian. "The Bolsheviks treated the Russian people as inexhaustible fodder for social experiments," he wrote. "So they drew borders at will and handed out generous territorial gifts.' In the final analysis, it no longer matters what guided the Bolshevik leaders in cutting up the country. One can argue about details, the causes and the logic off certain decisions. One thing is obvious: Russia was essentially robbed."

With the historical background sorted, Putin arrives at his denouement: the contemporary Western powers have now picked up where the Poles, Austro-Hungarians, and Bolsheviks left off, latching onto old theories of Ukrainian nationhood to turn post-Soviet Ukraine into a kind of "anti-Russia."

Putin notes that these efforts culminated with the 2014 Euromaidan revolution, which placed Kiev under western suzerainty: "In the anti-Russia project, there is no place either for a sovereign Ukraine or for the political forces that are trying to defend its real independence," he wrote. ...

[emphasis mine]

#23 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-29 06:55 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#23 ... 2014 Euromaidan revolution ...

Revolution of Dignity
en.wikipedia.org

... The Revolution of Dignity (Ukrainian: , romanized: Revoliutsiia hidnosti), also known as the Maidan Revolution or the Ukrainian Revolution,[2] took place in Ukraine in February 2014[a] at the end of the Euromaidan protests.[1] Scores of protesters were killed by government forces during clashes in the capital Kyiv. Parliament then voted to remove President Viktor Yanukovych, return to the 2004 Constitution of Ukraine, and call new elections. The revolution prompted Russia to occupy Crimea, starting the Russo-Ukrainian war.[1][2]

In November 2013, a wave of large-scale protests known as "Euromaidan" began in response to President Yanukovych's sudden decision not to sign a political association and free trade agreement with the European Union (EU), instead choosing closer ties to Russia. Euromaidan soon developed into the largest democratic mass movement in Europe since 1989.[29] The Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainian parliament) had overwhelmingly approved finalizing the EU association agreement;[30] Russia had pressured Ukraine to reject it.[31] The scope of the protests widened, with calls for the resignation of Yanukovych and the Azarov government.[32] Protesters opposed what they saw as widespread government corruption and abuse of power, the influence of Russia and oligarchs, police brutality, human rights violations,[33][34] and repressive anti-protest laws.[33]

A large, barricaded protest camp occupied Independence Square in central Kyiv throughout the 'Maidan Uprising'. In January and February 2014, clashes between protesters and Berkut special riot police resulted in the deaths of 108 protesters and 13 police officers,[20] and the wounding of many others. The first protesters were killed in fierce clashes with police on Hrushevsky Street on 19"22 January. Following this, protesters occupied government buildings throughout the country. Ukraine's government resigned on 28 January. Most of the slain protesters were killed on 18"20 February, during the most severe violence in Ukraine since it regained independence.[35] Thousands of protesters advanced towards parliament, led by activists with shields and helmets, and were fired on by police snipers.[20]

On 21 February, Yanukovych and the opposition signed an agreement to bring about an interim unity government, constitutional reforms and early elections. Police abandoned central Kyiv that afternoon. Yanukovych secretly fled the city that evening.[36] On 22 February, the Ukrainian parliament unanimously voted to remove Yanukovych from office. About 73% of the parliament and members of all parties voted to remove him.[37][38][39][40]

Yanukovych claimed this vote was illegal and asked Russia for help.[41] Russian propaganda described the events as a "coup".[42][43][44]

Pro-Russian, counter-revolutionary protests then began in parts of south-eastern Ukraine. Russia occupied and then annexed Crimea,[45][46] while armed Russian-backed separatists seized government buildings and proclaimed the independent states of Donetsk and Luhansk, sparking the Donbas war.

The Ukrainian parliament restored the 2004 amendments to the Ukrainian constitution.[47] An interim government, led by Arseniy Yatsenyuk, signed the EU association agreement and disbanded the Berkut. Petro Poroshenko became president after winning the 2014 presidential election. The new government began a removal of civil servants associated with the overthrown regime.[48][49][50] There was also widespread decommunization and de-Sovietization of the country. ...



#24 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-29 07:12 PM | Reply

Russian drone strikes destroy Ukraine maternity hospital full of newborns: 'This was pure terror'
nypost.com

#15 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-03-29 02:04 PM | Reply | Flag: "Vladimir Netanyahu Trumpf": Baby and Children Killers


#25 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-03-29 07:14 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort