Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, April 22, 2026

A Virginia circuit court judge on Wednesday issued an order blocking the results of a congressional redistricting referendum that could net Democrats four extra seats in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2026. Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones, in a statement, vowed to fight the order issued by Tazewell County Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley, a Republican appointee, a day after Tuesday's referendum approved the newly drawn districts.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Bummer Gaslighter ...

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Oh if there were some way a plaintiff could appeal....

#1 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-04-22 11:00 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Republicans ignoring the will of the voters.

It must be a day that ends in Y.

#2 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-04-23 07:59 AM | Reply

It Won't Stand.

It's a Yokel Judge in Tazewell,the most Primitive Part of the State.

Sure to be Appealed.

I Guess he might be Upheld by the Appeals Courts.

I don't see Why though.

#3 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-04-23 10:00 AM | Reply

FTR: This districting did not "begin in Texas" ... It began in '22 in NEW YORK and, before that, in all of New England (which has 0 GOP seats), Illinois (crazy gerrymander), and Oregon, which in 2020 did an outrageous gerrymander, creating a 5 to 1 map.

#4 | Posted by MSgt at 2026-04-23 10:05 AM | Reply

All Perfectly Legal.

So why isn't this?

The Texas Gerrymander is also Legal.

What's Special about this Virginia Gerrymander?

What makes it Illegal?

Partisan Yokel Judicial Activism.

It Won't Stand.

It's a BS Ruling.

If this stands All the other Gerrymanders are Illegal Too.

Unless there's,"Corruption" in Government.

#5 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-04-23 10:15 AM | Reply

This is the same Judge who tried to block it before.

And he got slapped down TWICE by the state supreme court over it.

#6 | Posted by Sycophant at 2026-04-23 10:34 AM | Reply

#4 looks like this dips*^% got his chain email talking points. At least it's not some sh*^ty screenshot of some stupid lame attempt at a meme ...

#7 | Posted by jpw at 2026-04-23 10:48 AM | Reply

It began in ... Oregon, which in 2020 did an outrageous gerrymander, creating a 5 to 1 map.
#4 | Posted by MSgt

2020 huh.
Wow.
You're only off by two hundred years.

The term gerrymandering is a portmanteau of a salamander and Elbridge Gerry,[a][5] Vice President of the United States until his death, who, as governor of Massachusetts in 1812, signed a bill that created a partisan district in the Boston area that was compared to the shape of a mythological salamander. en.wikipedia.org

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-23 11:37 AM | Reply


All Perfectly Legal.

Apparently not.


So why isn't this?

I am not sure, but I think it had to do with the way the proposition was put in the Ballot.

Per court documents, Virginia Democrats advanced the proposal during the 2024 Special Session of the General Assembly " however, there are strict rules as to what kind of legislation can be considered during these types of sessions. Democrats reportedly violated those rules. As a result, any actions taken to advance the plan would be deemed illegal.

Further, Virginia's constitution dictates that a constitutional amendment like this one is supposed to be passed by two different General Assemblies " with a general election taking place in between " before it is passed down to voters. This did not happen, per the judge.

"The Constitution sets clear rules for how amendments must be advanced. Those rules were not properly followed. Plain and simple. Virginians deserve transparency, fairness, and adherence to the law " not backroom deals"
www.wric.com

Also there was something about the wording "restoring fairness" in the proposition.

Basically it was a procedural error.


And he got slapped down TWICE by the state supreme court over it.

Not slapped down, just allowed to proceed, the Virginia Supreme Court previously ruled that the referendum can move forward as planned, even though there is ongoing litigation.

#9 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-04-23 02:00 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort