Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, May 16, 2026

"The strings just fell out," says Clifford Cheung, professor of theoretical physics and director of the Leinweber Forum for Theoretical Physics at Caltech. "We didn't start with any assumptions about strings at all, but then the solution contained the cornerstone signatures of strings." Though the work does not amount to experimental evidence for string theory, it is "very suggestive from the theoretical viewpoint, since the general assumptions could have yielded infinite solutions, but they yielded only one," Cheung says.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

One of the key signatures of strings that "fell out" of the team's analysis is known as the string spectrum. Discovered by Italian theoretical physicist Gabriele Veneziano of the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) in the late 1960s, the spectrum is an infinite tower, or ladder, of particles, in which the masses and spins increase in discrete steps.

Other researchers later came to realize that Veneziano's tower of particles corresponds to a harmonic series of a vibrating string. If you pluck a violin string, you'll get a series of notes representing the fundamental note and overtones that follow a similar pattern.

String theory was born, but it was not until 1974 that Caltech's John Schwarz, the Harold Brown Professor of Theoretical Physics, Emeritus, and his colleague Jol Scherk, a French physicist, realized that the theory included gravity, thereby forming the first connection between string theory and general relativity.

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"Why string theory isn't real physics | Roger Penrose, Brian Greene, and Eric Weinstein

The Institute of Art and Ideas
5 mos ago"

www.youtube.com

(not too long, lots up front, rewind to start)

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-16 03:27 PM | Reply

String Theory Explained in a Minute

www.youtube.com

short

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-16 03:33 PM | Reply

String theory resolved

youtu.be

#3 | Posted by Petrous at 2026-05-16 07:14 PM | Reply

"It's not that string theory failed -- it's worse

Sabine Hossenfelder"

www.youtube.com

#4 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-16 08:13 PM | Reply

Idiots should STFU about ---- they're too stupid to understand

#5 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-05-17 12:16 AM | Reply

Sociology, the study of people in groups, has far, far more to say about the future of mankind, sorry, humankind, than does psychology or physics. That is why it is condemned to the backwaters of even the liberal pursuits. While the work on "string theory" went on, we have been herded into competing camps, to be ignored as to our needs to survive the coming debacles of global warming, the end of the fossil fuel age, and the, one expects, death of one person, one vote democracy.

#6 | Posted by Hughmass at 2026-05-17 07:31 AM | Reply

String Theory requires super symmetry. Super symmetry requires super symmetric particles called "sparticles". If sparticles are real, the LHC should have found at least one of them. It did not and thus super symmetry doesn't exist. If super symmetry doesn't exist, then String Theory is wrong. Simple as.

The fact that some physicists spent their life working on a theory that's false doesn't mean that theory hasn't been rather thoroughly disproven.

#7 | Posted by s1l3ntc0y0t3 at 2026-05-17 12:06 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

String
bikinis
are
real.

#8 | Posted by South_American at 2026-05-17 11:10 PM | Reply

@#7 ... String Theory requires super symmetry. ...

OK, I'm still listening ...

How Supersymmetry Saved String Theory (2023)
www.universetoday.com

... Super symmetry requires super symmetric particles called "sparticles". ...

OK, still hanging in there with ya.

But then you note ...

... If sparticles are real, the LHC should have found at least one of them. It did not and thus super symmetry doesn't exist. ...

That's where I have questions.

Fundamentally, the inability to show the existence of something does not necessarily mean that the entity (sparticles) does not exist.


#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-17 11:28 PM | Reply

@#7 ... The fact that some physicists spent their life working on a theory that's false ...

Yeah.

And the Sun was once thought to orbit the Earth.

When did we realize that Earth orbits the Sun? (2024)
www.astronomy.com

#10 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-17 11:31 PM | Reply

Science...had good teachers, had bad teachers but never had a physics class in high school or college that taught me even one thing that was useful in my life. I once made aspirin in Organic Chem, at least if I chose I could have been a good drug maker...
Odd thought, if String theory is wrong...we don't lose a damn thing but patience. If it is right...I am sure physicists will find a way to use it to create a bomb to help our ruling idiocy destroy itself. So, screw string theory.

#11 | Posted by Hughmass at 2026-05-18 07:01 AM | Reply

"When we understand string theory, we will know how the universe began. It won't have much effect on how we live, but it is important to understand where we come from and what we can expect to find as we explore."
Stephen Hawking
www.theguardian.com

Personally, I'm still stuck at the shave and a haircut two bits stage.

#12 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-05-18 07:28 AM | Reply

#7 | Posted by s1l3ntc0y0t3

Most realistic string models do not require "natural" weak-scale SUSY.

Also, if you read the article it's finding string theory signature in scattering experiments at very high energies.

From Grok:

String theory requires supersymmetry at a fundamental (high-energy) level for consistency (e.g., to cancel anomalies, stabilize the vacuum, and remove tachyons in superstring theories). However, it does not predict that superpartners must be light enough to be seen at the LHC.

#13 | Posted by HeliumRat at 2026-05-18 09:37 AM | Reply

It won't have much effect on how we live, but it is important to understand where we come from and what we can expect to find as we explore.

Not sure that's true. It might piss off the "religulous".. they are already panicking about the possibility of aliens. Imagine how bummed they'll be if we can no longer just say a God did it because now we know exactly how it all happened. Also completely understanding the universe will mean we can use that knowledge to our advantage. Or we will just destroy ourselves with it. If AI doesn't do that first.

Btw- MY theory is that it was the angels and the demons to blame. They caused the big bang. They were too close to each other and one kept touching the other until it all exploded in a big fight (bang!).

God has been trying to pull it all back together so we can all be close again but it gonna take a while. Apparently. Has to do with another rule He made. The speed of light.

#14 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-05-18 11:03 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort