Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, September 27, 2026

On Monday, SpaceX will attempt to launch Starship to orbit for the first time, allowing it to deploy the inaugural batch of a new generation of Starlink internet satellites.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

WATCH: Elon Musk's SpaceX Starship lifts off in first orbit of Earth[image or embed]

" 8News WRIC Richmond (@wric.com) 9:00 AM Sep 28, 2026

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Sure the ---- it is. KABOOM!!!

#1 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-09-27 11:54 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

So people can get wireless Internet in remote places that still won't be as fast as fiber-optic. How is this worth a trillion dollars again? People seem to be bamboozled stupid by a ketamine snorting hype man

#2 | Posted by hamburglar at 2026-09-28 10:19 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

"At 7:48 a.m. CT, Starship's Super Heavy booster ignited its 33 rocket engines to send the spacecraft on its 14th flight. Two-and-a-half minutes after launch, Starship separated from the booster and continued into space. One of the six engines on Starship failed during ascent, prompting SpaceX to decide whether to continue to orbit. About 22 minutes into the flight, the team decided it was safe to do so."

#3 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-09-28 10:31 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"People seem to be bamboozled stupid by a ketamine snorting hype man"

I'm sure the ulterior motives will come oozing out eventually. My guess it either involves killing people or threatening to kill them.

#4 | Posted by pumpkinhead at 2026-09-28 10:50 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"TO URANUS AND BEYOND!"

#5 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2026-09-28 01:42 PM | Reply

Nice. More space junk. Yay?

Did you know?

SpaceX brings DOWN an average of 1 to 5 Starlink satellites every day, with a cumulative total of more than 1,800 satellites having fallen and burned up in the atmosphere since 2019.

They come down at 17,000 mph. Recently a heavy 2.5-kilogram metal part from a failed Starlink satellite survived re-entry and crashed onto a farm in Saskatchewan, Canada.

But it's our arch enemy Canada so they obviously deserved it.

#6 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-09-28 02:07 PM | Reply

Saskatchewan, Canada.

Is it too hard to aim for the 75% of the planet that is ocean?

#7 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-09-28 02:39 PM | Reply

Nice. More space junk. Yay?

You should lead the movement by refusing to use anything that needs a satellite to operate.

#8 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-09-29 01:13 PM | Reply

Re 8

I don't use any of traitor Elmo's space junk.

I also don't take requests from ignorant maga maroons either.

#9 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-09-29 01:24 PM | Reply

-I don't use any of traitor Elmo's space junk.

So you really don't care about space junk unless it has ties to Musk. Got it.

#10 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-09-29 01:31 PM | Reply

You should lead the movement by refusing to use anything that needs a satellite to operate.

#8 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Hey dumbf*&^, we were fine before Musk began polluting LEO with his trash that benefits nobody but himself.

Stop being such a pathetic knob gobbler for one second and actually think.

via GIPHY

#11 | Posted by jpw at 2026-09-29 06:04 PM | Reply

Battlefield Communication: Ukrainian forces use Starlink terminals because other military-grade satellite networks are expensive or hard to get.
Drone Operations: Troops rely on the low-latency internet to fly long-range drones, share live video feeds, and coordinate attacks.
Civilian and Government Use: The satellite service also keeps hospitals, railways, and local governments online when local infrastructure is destroyed.
Blocking Russian Use: According to WSJ, SpaceX launched an approved "whitelist" system to block unauthorized terminals used by Russian forces on the front lines.
Targeted Attacks: Russian forces have targeted communications hubs and data centers inside Ukraine, such as a facility in Kyiv, to disrupt this network.

#12 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-09-29 06:08 PM | Reply

Kremlin reacts to possible expansion of Ukraine's Starlink access for strikes on Russia

#13 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-09-29 06:10 PM | Reply

In any case, yay! Musk has finally, after tens of billions of tax payer dollars and untold environmental pollution, replicated what was attained in the 1960's after developing the tech from rudimentary, barely able to reach ballistic trajectories to heavy lift capabilities and landing on the moon...

...except that piece of idiotic s*&^ had the entirety of manned space flight knowledge behind him to develop his giant flying d*&^ that has only just reached orbit.

Meanwhile, the Saturn V only flew 13 times with 9 of them being flights to the moon and one a launch of the first space station.

Musk is nothing but an opportunist piece of s*&^ who could speak to idiots for support because he knew they wouldn't know any better. No wonder he inevitably hooked up with Trump to keep his pipeline of government cash free flowing.

#14 | Posted by jpw at 2026-09-29 06:18 PM | Reply

and they don't launch 14 SLS rockets to get to orbit.

but Falcon 9 does land itself and flies to LEO pretty efficiently. Closest anybody else has gotten in Bezos, and the most famous flight for them was by Astronaut Gayle King.

#15 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-09-29 06:29 PM | Reply

and it did not happen in a vacuum (haha). The Ansari X prize competitors, all 26 of them, where are they at now? Not flying reusable rockets.

#16 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-09-29 06:34 PM | Reply

but Falcon 9 does land itself

Yes. But for all his bluster, Musk has done NOTHING to actually advance space flight capabilities. We the tax payers have done little more than fund the R&D of his personal LEO ISP that he's leveraged into global power positions all because he constantly talked out his a&& about mars.

I can only imagine what will happen when he starts getting contracts to launch weapons (if he hasn't already).

#17 | Posted by jpw at 2026-09-29 06:42 PM | Reply

Musk didn't win the Ansari X prize, correct?

#18 | Posted by jpw at 2026-09-29 06:43 PM | Reply

X-37B flies to orbit on Falcon 9. Allegedly the 10,000+ Starlink satellites can use their lasers to blind enemy satellites. SpaceX is a highly successful military contractor and has been across GWB, GWB, Obama, Obama, Trump, Biden, and Trump again. Pretty much the definition of bipartisanship.

SpaceX never competed in the Ansari X-Prize competition at all. iirc, the winner was scaled composites stratolaunch system, and after the competition it disintegrated during descent when the wings were commanded to an incorrect position and killed the crew. Paul Allen privately funded it. It hasn't done much since.

#19 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-09-29 06:56 PM | Reply

The only thing that changed was Musk announcing his politics to the world, and it becoming cool for the same people that adored him as virtue signaling, to now ---- on him as virtue signaling.

#20 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-09-29 06:57 PM | Reply

X-37B flies to orbit on Falcon 9.

So?

Allegedly the 10,000+ Starlink satellites can use their lasers to blind enemy satellites.

So a private company has been launching weapons into orbit for years before it became taboo under this s*&^ administration? That's a dunk how?

SpaceX is a highly successful military contractor and has been across GWB, GWB, Obama, Obama, Trump, Biden, and Trump again. Pretty much the definition of bipartisanship.

Again, so?

people that adored him as virtue signaling, to now ---- on him as virtue signaling.

Except I never "adored" him. I always saw through him as a vapid piece of s*&^ selling other people's ideas as his own.

And all it ever took was listening to that moron open his own mouth in interviews to know what an empty suit he is.

Funny thing is, your position sounds more like the anti-anti-skeptic by sticking to yesterday's trend bucker even after it's been made abundantly clear what a grifting, lying, dumb pile of s*&^ dumbf*&^ he really is. You seen to think sticking with that bucket of worthless s*&^ makes your edgier than the former fan bois who have jumped.

Sorry to tell you, sport, but Musk is s*&. He'll always be s*&^. If you need further proof, watch how his newly shifted grand plans for moon bases slowly dwindles in size, scope and value while Mars landings become unmentionable.

#21 | Posted by jpw at 2026-09-29 07:25 PM | Reply

How much corporate experience do you have?

Because no offense, but you sound like the kind of person who is easily smitten by the latest "thing" and who goes all in on it with a passion and obsession that doesn't allow for consideration of whether or not the hype is real.

You then squeeze what positives you can from the wreckage while ignoring the overwhelming larger amount of negatives or failures.

Which means I can't tell if you're a naive dreamer who hasn't seen enough to know what's really going on or you're a fully committed lifer who believes the narrative no matter how obvious a polished turd it is.

#22 | Posted by jpw at 2026-09-29 07:33 PM | Reply

Because no offense, but you sound like the kind of person who is easily smitten by the latest "thing" and who goes all in on it with a passion and obsession that doesn't allow for consideration of whether or not the hype is real.

#22 | Posted by jpw at 2026-09-29 07:33 PM | Reply | Flag:

I was the only person pointing out the hype over Tesla.

#23 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-09-29 07:34 PM | Reply

became taboo under this s*&^ administration?

WASN'T taboo...

#24 | Posted by jpw at 2026-09-29 07:34 PM | Reply

I was the only person pointing out the hype over Tesla.

#23 | Posted by sitzkrieg

The "only"?

#25 | Posted by jpw at 2026-09-29 07:35 PM | Reply

Yes. This forum was very upset about it.

#26 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-09-29 07:35 PM | Reply

You're gonna need Hans for the citations in support of that blanket statement.

#27 | Posted by jpw at 2026-09-29 07:39 PM | Reply

Nah, lived it. Chief Musk defender was Speaks. He had to get burnt to figure it out. Became a running joke whenever there was a Tesla thread I'd show up to ---- in it.

and you can trace the fall from liberal grace of Musk to one moment, when he told a CA official to go ---- themselves and wouldn't shutdown during Covid.

#28 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-09-29 07:40 PM | Reply

What I could never wrap my head around was how easily people fell for repackaged ideas from Popular Mechanics/Science. Landing rockets at least made sense as an extension of existing research. ------- hyperloop lol.

#29 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-09-29 07:44 PM | Reply

worst culprits, way out of the scope of this place, were the wall street analysts claiming starlink would replace all terrestrial internet infrastructure.

It's cool to have in a car if you drive in places with ---- signal. It's expansive AF but nice in a private jet. Nice if you're one of those overlanding people that likes to camp. Really nice if you are a ukrainian grunt.

Absolutely terrible the first time you have to go outside and knock the snow off of it.

#30 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-09-29 07:46 PM | Reply

I don't use any of traitor Elmo's space junk.

And DonorBot calls himself a progressive.

It's expansive AF but nice in a private jet.

But not in my Cessna 182.... :)

I was the only person pointing out the hype over Tesla.
#23 | POSTED BY SITZKRIEG

Oh please, I sang praises for hybrids when threads were up. But I don't denigrate Musk, you can bash him, but no techbro comes close to the innovation he's done. Complain about the hyper-loop all you want, my guess is it will be used on the Moon (Boring company)

#31 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-09-29 08:49 PM | Reply

Onelumpofs*^% show up to, of course, simp for Trump's lap dog.

"Innovation"

lol what a stupid piece of s*^#.

#32 | Posted by jpw at 2026-09-29 08:53 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort