Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, October 29, 2026

A federal judge criticized prosecutors for failing to get proper judicial approval before publicly filing a new criminal complaint against two ex-FBI officials accused of lying to Congress about the government's probes of Hunter Biden.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

"At a hearing on Friday, Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui said it was strange that prosecutors had not sought an indictment in the case." www.nytimes.com/2026/10/23/u ...

[image or embed]

-- Ryan J. Reilly "paints a vivid and urgent portrait of ... disarray" (@ryanjreilly.com) 5:26 PM · Oct 23, 2026

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... A judge on Tuesday sharply criticized federal prosecutors for failing to get judicial approval before filing a new criminal complaint overnight against two ex-FBI officials accused of lying to Congress about investigations of Hunter Biden.

Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui said he would not sign off on the new complaint, which added a charge of obstruction against Nikki Floris and Bradley Benavides in U.S. District Court in Washington.

"I am not going to bless it as a superseding complaint," Faruqui said at a court hearing, after Floris' lawyers filed a motion arguing the new complaint was legally deficient and filed in bad faith.

He told prosecutors that if they wanted to file a superseding complaint, a judge first would have to find probable cause that a crime had been committed, instead of sending him the complaint in the middle of the night and expecting him to sign it.

Faruqui said he did not believe that federal prosecutors had previously sought to file a criminal complaint without a judge's signature.

"It is not our court's practice ... that unsigned complaints are filed in the docket," Faruqui said.

"I'm concerned with your view as to what the law is," the judge told the prosecutors. "Why today, on this one case, have you changed the entire history of how you charge cases?" ...

[emphasis mine]

#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-28 09:38 PM | Reply

Judges are going to have to start jailing some of these people, and imposing fines. It's the only way to stop these cynical game-players.

#2 | Posted by Zed at 2026-10-29 05:59 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort