George Bush perpetrated an attack on his own country. Then set off on an ME adventure that cost billions and hundreds of thousands of lives.

I read that right here. Over and over and over.

I suggested then that history probably won't agree with this version of the facts.

I had sand in my ears, had no problems with fascism, etc...exact same things being said to me today.

"this country won't survive"

LOL

#83 | Posted by eberly

Our national standing didn't survive. Our national reputation didn't survive. Our international influence didn't survive. Our national unity didn't survive. This country has been on a backslide ever since republicans lied us into iraq. Then your despicable party outdid themselves by electing trump just to accelerate the destruction.

How do you know Omar hasn't committed crimes. You're assuming this is just a witch hunt. I'll wait and see.

#65 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Because our brains are capable of pattern recognition. Yours isn't.

"Yeah yeah...me too."

-Corkytwoothyspeakboyshack

#56 | Posted by eberly

"Im so cool and unbothered by fascism"

-loser

And if you want my real opinion on this Omar nonsense, I'll give it to you. Political retribution should be unbecoming of a President, but that didn't stop Team Slip, Trip and Fall. We don't live in a world where you get to humiliate your political opponents and think nothing will be done in return. Next, you'll be crying over Trump's preemptive pardons on his way out.

#54 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Prosecuting trump's crimes wasn't about humiliating him stupid.
He could have returned his classfied documents like biden did instead of launching a cover up and getting people to lie for him.

And if we don't prosecute people who attempt a coup instead of conceding an election loss, then we're a banana republic.

Biden had to pardon people because an incoming fascist administration had promised to punish them for investigating his crimes.

Trump will pardon people because trump got them to commit crimes.

It is interesting to see the left oppose raising a politician's residence all of a sudden.

#35 | Posted by BellRinger

It's interesting to see the right oppose prosecuting a politician for an attempted coup. Or stealing and hiding classified documents.

-Trump's favorite period in history.

You think?

what about the US between our founding and the Civil War?

Unlike the Holocaust, nobody had to pretend they didn't know what was going on. It was out in the open.....outright slavery and all the benefits that came with it. Wealth, political support, rape, murder, etc......pretty ------- cool time for a guy like him.

#39 | Posted by eberly

His wife said he read hitler's speeches, not american history.

This sounds really familiar.. Where have we seen this before?

#29 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Nazi germany?

"Although Adolf Hitler had been appointed Chancellor in January 1933, the Nazi Party (NSDAP) did not yet hold absolute control. To secure an absolute majority in the Reichstag, the Nazi regime orchestrated a campaign to suppress, criminalize, and silence political opponents."

Wasting government money on digging for outlier cases in order to help pretend that trump didn't screw up covid.

Too bad she didn't resist this legal search.

#2 | Posted by visitor_

"Stop calling us fascists wahhhh!"

This bitch was given a cushy job on the taxpayer's dime in order to break up with Don Jr without spilling any secrets about trump crimes.

She'll get a pardon of course in order to buy her continued silence.

Flag:

Sycophant must be a pedo as it dominates everything that creep types.

#36 | Posted by BellRinger

Your party chose to throw away all it's supposed "principles" to join a cult led by epstein's party pal. You're going to spend the rest of your life defending that terrible decision and wanting to quit talking about it, but we're not going to let you.

Yall aint see nothing yet. Wait til the midterms are over and trump really has nothing to lose.

Trump has really stunk it up this round. But if you asked me if I could go back and hand Kamala Harris my vote, the answer is still a hard no.

#11 | Posted by lfthndthrds

"Just in case you guys were wondering, I'm really really stupid! And my ego is more important than my well being."

"Dictator from day 1 "... and so it all goes....
--you people lied for years about dozens of things so only more illiterate morons believe you now...

.. gesus..you club footed skunk breath toads are so easy to brainwash and manipulate.

#59 | Posted by shrimptacodan

Oh you must have misheard.
It was LOWER INFLATION AND ENDING THE UKRAINE WAR ON DAY 1.
How did that go?

I'm sure rand paul will be all over this....like never.

Flag:

wE'Re aLl gOnNa dIe!!!!

#6 | Posted by lfthndthrds

VacCInEs ArE a HoAx!!!

Of course despite this decisive list, every magat on here will continue to whine about being called nazis, while unable to refute these concrete similarities.

If they don't want to be compared to nazis they should stop saying things nazis said and doing things nazis did.

This is such a dishonest statement. NAZI is a rhetorical device, its been used so much in the past that in 1951 they coined the phrase "Reductio ad Hitlerum", as a variation of the ad hominem fallacy.

SpeaksLikeAnIdiot believes it literally.

The fact that SpeaksLikeAnIdiot keeps using that on every post, just shows how dishonest he is.

#179 | Posted by oneironaut

No moron NAZI was an actual political movement. And if maga wasn't so historically ignorant they might recognize it's slogans and principles.

"Deutschland ber alles" (Germany above all)

MAGA Equivalent: "America First"

Function: Rejects globalism, international treaties, and multilateral institutions in favor of strict national sovereignty and protectionist policies.

"Lgenpresse" (Lying press)

MAGA Equivalent: "Fake News" / "Enemy of the people"

Function: Undermines trust in independent journalism and mainstream media, encouraging followers to rely directly on the leader for information.

"Dolchstolegende" (Stab-in-the-back myth)

MAGA Equivalent: "The Rigged System" / "Deep State"

Function: Attributes national setbacks, policy failures, or election outcomes to internal betrayal by corrupt political elites and hidden bureaucratic cabals.

"Blut und Boden" (Blood and Soil)

MAGA Equivalent: "Remigration" / "Build the Wall"

Function: Frames immigration, demographic shifts, and open borders as existential threats to the nation's identity, security, and culture.

"Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz" (Restoring national power over individual interest)

MAGA Equivalent: "Make America Great Again"

Function: Invokes a nostalgic golden age that was allegedly lost, promising national restoration and renewal through strong collective political action.

"Fhrerprinzip" (Leader principle)

MAGA Equivalent: "I am your voice" / "I alone can fix it"

Function: Positions a single leader as an uncompromised outsider who directly embodies the true will of the people against an entrenched, ineffective establishment.

Key Analytical Context

Ideological Scope: Nazi ideology was built on explicit biological racism, total state control, militaristic territorial expansion, and single-party totalitarianism. MAGA operates within a constitutional republic, drawing on right-wing populism, economic nationalism, border enforcement, deregulation, and anti-establishment conservatism.

Institutional Goals: Nazi rhetoric explicitly aimed to dismantle democratic institutions to establish a dictatorship. MAGA rhetoric frames its goal as reclaiming existing democratic structures and constitutional rights from bureaucratic overreach ("the administrative state").

Any of this ringing a bell you maga moron?

How is it possible the Democrats are worried about being perceived as meanies when, at the same time, the other side is being literally compared to the ACTUAL Nazis?

#166 | Posted by eberly

If they don't want to be compared to nazis they should stop saying things nazis said and doing things nazis did.

Are we supposed to pretend to be stupid and not to notice?

-Nazi saluting sidekicks

easy....that guy in Maine dropped out of the race.

#154 | Posted by eberly

The one in texas is giving 200 million to elect republicans- the preferred party of nazis.

Not if you live in California. I have pointed out 3 times where the people voted for propositions only to-be turned down and ignored by the executive and judicial branches.

The current rules on housing were also never voted upon.

#136 | Posted by oneironaut
Buckle up buttercup:

1. Utah (Medical Cannabis, 2018)

What Voters Passed: Voters approved Proposition 2 to establish a state-regulated medical marijuana system allowing licensed dispensaries and giving patients direct access.

Legislative Action: Before the voter-passed proposition could be fully implemented, Republican state leaders convened a special legislative session to pass a compromise bill (House Bill 3001). The legislature replaced the proposition's regulatory frame, removed the provision for individual home cultivation, limited allowable product formats (eliminating edible gummy options in favor of non-gelatin capsules or blister packs), and restricted the list of qualifying medical conditions.

2. South Dakota (Recreational Cannabis, 2020)

What Voters Passed: Voters approved Constitutional Amendment A, legalizing recreational marijuana for adults 21 and older, alongside Initiated Measure 26 for medical marijuana.

Executive & Judicial Opposition: Republican Governor Kristi Noem supported a legal challenge targeting Amendment A. A circuit judge ruled the amendment unconstitutional, and the South Dakota Supreme Court upheld that decision in 2021 on procedural grounds (finding it violated the state's "single-subject" requirement for constitutional amendments). The voter-approved recreational initiative was completely invalidated before taking effect.

3. Mississippi (Medical Cannabis, 2020)

What Voters Passed: Mississippi voters overwhelmingly approved Initiative 65, a citizen-initiated constitutional amendment establishing a medical marijuana program.

Judicial & Legislative Invalidation: State political leadership challenged the process used to place the measure on the ballot. In 2021, the Mississippi Supreme Court struck down Initiative 65, ruling that the state's ballot initiative rules were outdated and technically impossible to satisfy under current district boundaries. The legislature later drafted its own, more restrictive medical cannabis statute in 2022 to replace what voters had originally approved.

4. Montana (Medical & Recreational Regulations, 2011 & 2021)

What Voters Passed: Montana voters legalized medical marijuana via Initiative 148 in 2004 and recreational marijuana via Initiative 190 in 2020.

Legislative Alterations:

2011 (Medical): The legislature passed Senate Bill 423, which drastically overhauled the voter-approved 2004 medical framework by limiting caregivers to serving a maximum of three patients, effectively closing large-scale dispensaries. (Voters later repealed these legislative restrictions through another ballot initiative in 2016).

2021 (Recreational): Following the 2020 approval of recreational cannabis, conservative lawmakers enacted House Bill 701, altering how revenue from cannabis taxes would be allocated and adding additional local option oversight rules.

5. Ohio (Recreational Cannabis, 2023)

What Voters Passed: Ohio voters approved Issue 2, a statutory ballot initiative legalizing adult-use cannabis, establishing a regulatory framework, and permitting home cultivation.

Legislative Action: Because Issue 2 was an initiated statute (not a constitutional amendment), conservative lawmakers in the state senate immediately proposed legislation aimed at changing tax rates, capping THC potency levels, restricting home cultivation rules, and redirecting tax revenues away from community equity funds and toward law enforcement and state construction projects.

That's not what Trump said.

But I guess context means nothing to progressives.

#20 | Posted by subliberal

You might be right.
It's hard to find context in the verbal diarrhea that dribbles from trumps nonstop mouth.
No one knows what the ---- he thinks he's saying or if he's just trying to keep his dentures from falling out.

curious....what's wrong with voting in person where you live?

#126 | Posted by eberly

Depends on where you live and whether republicans want you to vote or not.

I will always vote in person. It's the most secure way to vote.

#123 | Posted by BellRinger

You'll go stand in your short line in your republican district and cast your vote for people who will keep the iran war (which you "oppose") going, along with god knows what other catastrophes trump will create in the next 2 years.

I will always vote in person. It's the most secure way to vote.

#123 | Posted by BellRinger

You must live in a district where republicans dont intentionally make the lines long as hell in order to discourage you from voting. I'm betting your district is pretty white.