Yet another terrorist attack not perpetrated by a leftist

Has ------- accused this guy of eating pet fishes yet?

Jeff's become a piece of ---- but then again he's always been a piece of ----

@72

You're saying there were bollards at the place this guy drove through that weren't used? That is your position?

My bet is you're wrong

@63

How exactly does one stop access by a truck to a road?

Hey look yet another mass casualty event not caused by a left leaning individual

China has all this influence cause for the past 20 years while America was fighting the GWoT, China has been investing in third world countries. Their investments are paying dividends in access to rare minerals and markets for their supplies.

Now America firsters want to a. bitch about China moving into South and Central America and b. withdraw from the global marketplace.

Magat scum are ------- morons.

Keep calling 50% of the country stupid.

President Leon says you subtards are unemployable.

#7 | POSTED BY REINHEITSGEBOT A

First Lady ------- agrees like the sub beta he is

That's right. Keep calling 50% of the country stupid. Keep thinking they don't have a right to have a country or life like the right you have.

You will keep losing.

#5 | Posted by boaz a

Libs like me are getting tired of carrying you magat scum.

If it were up to me, I'd say ---- you to your -------- states. Let you die from preventable diseases, live in squalor, die years earlier than those who live in non--------- states, let you pray to your spaghetti monsters, have ------- cause immeasurable pain separating families, let his tariffs make you even poorer, etc.

Fortunately for you it ain't up to me.

Unfortunately for you reality seldom comes covered in lube

Enjoy your stupidity. I will be amused, like thinking about magat scum parents of children with cancer losing access to meds and therapies. I suppose they will be comforted over the loss of their children by the thought that a trans person somewhere is treated less than human.

---- you magat scum.

Ever heard of the Peter Principle?

Kamala was the poster child.

#33 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Ever heard of you being a moron?

Peter Principle does not apply to someone voted to an office.

People vote for a person when they accomplish ----.

And the Biden administration was wildly successful, despite what stupid people like you believe.

know it's not your fault but Kamala was a sorry candidate not remotely capable of doing the job.

Does that just not matter to you?

Do you hate America or something?

#26 | Posted by BillJohnson

Prosecutor, State AG, Senator, VP (whose administration brought the American economy from republican lead disaster to the enby of the world).
vs
Conman who bankrupted multiple companies, rapist, insurrectionist, whose last term left a million dead Americans, who is filling his new administration with the worst people on the planet.

You have to have brain damage to post what bill posted.

I suspect you and I disagree on what constitutes moral depravity.

For me moral depravity is insurrection, cruelty to immigrants and stripping rights.

For you I suspect it is showing trans people basic respect.

However, from a judgemental moral failure POV, what we saw could have happened in Pottersville is pretty well on the mark what is happening across much of the US.

#17 | Posted by BillJohnson

You mean the bankers and the wealthy have strip mined our economy resulting in people not being able to provide for themselves? I agree.

I suspect you are a dumber perception of reality.

The abridged version likely had absolutely NOTHING to do with 'sensibilities".

First of all, Amazon does not edit or abridge anything.

It was abridged by a company called Hoopladigital, who likely sold the rights to offer the abridged version to Amazon Prime for sale/rental.

IaWL is derived from a short story called The Greatest Gift

IaWL, in it's entirety has dubious copyright ownership due to mistakes with filing.

The Greatest Gift retains it's copyright.

My best guess is the abridged version is offered to avoid having to pay residuals to the copyright holder of The Greatest Gift, while the full IaWL movie does have to pay them.

The really funny thing is that the FBI criticized the movie upon release for it's negative portrayal of the evil banker-too communist at the time.

Now, the right is criticizing the movie for being too woke for REMOVING the reference to him being evil,

Funny too that Potter was never caught or punished for his theft, something contrary to the Hayes code if effect at the time.

Also, BillJ is simply an idiot.

Reminder it is Christian doctrine that god raped a child and impregnated her

It can't happen. the language in the 14th amendment is very clear. There is no ambiguity.

Their only real way forward would be to amend the constitution. It could be done, but it would be a huge lift. I don't know how much support it would get.

#14 | Posted by madbomber

Nonsense.

the 3rd article of the 14th is pretty clear too, didn't stop the SC from ignoring it.

He will argue an invading army is not entitled to birthright citizenship.

That is the reason he has spent a decade painting undocumented workers as an invasion and they are all rapists and murderers.

Many Americans, too stupid to think for themselves, bought into it.

But then again magat scum really are stupid

Yes

And only a sick ---- even questions why

A consensual BJ used to infuriate you. Now drugs and underage hookers are no big deal.

#26 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

Don't even get them started on pictures of comedians fake groping a sleeping woman.

#32 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2024-12-23 08:13 PM | REPLY

Again. The accurate description is----------

I realize it is hard to think in those terms but that is what it is

Sex with a minor
Underage hookers
Tawdry
---- all those terms All that does is obfuscate the fact he raped a child. Those distractions are used to downplay what he did

We have no idea what coercion or threats or abuse lead these children into this situation. We have no idea of what these children's financial situations they were in that may have lead them to desperate measures

What we know is a 17 year old is a child and cannot consent

We are taking about raping a child. Speak of it in those terms and maybe just maybe Gaetz would not show his punchable face in public

Think about this for a second. The state is not investigating how women died. That is truly amazing. And a failure of governing at the most basic level. The state exists to protect its citizens. That is the essential nature of the social contract We provide resources and respect laws and the state creates and implements laws for the betterment of the collective

That is not socialism btw. That is the nature of society be it communism fascism liberal democracy republicanism even libertarian ffs

These states are choosing to not understand how and why its citizens are dying. I can think of few derelictions of duty more grave than that

The following were also removed

1 allowing cancer kids on Medicaid to cross state lines for treatment
2 allowing pediatric cancer kids to try multiple treatments concurrently
3 assisting small cancer research companies to research cancer treatments

He didn't "have sex with a minor"
He raped a child

What are the odds the president elect could not find Panama on a map?

And btw anyone who has spent time in a pediatric cancer ward knows it is hell on earth.

Children who never had a chance to enjoy life are in agony as they breath their last.

Spending time in one convinced me without a doubt that there is no god

And a society that doesn't prioritize helping cancer kids is a society lost

Yes, Democrats like TruthHurts and Alexandrite were ACTUALLY using childhood cancer as leverage to get all the waste they wanted.

--------.

#41 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

Hey ---------------
Which Republican senator blocked 3 provisions of the pediatric cancer funding?

Specifically
1 allowing cancer kids on Medicaid to cross state lines for treatment
2 allowing pediatric cancer kids to try multiple treatments concurrently
3 assisting small cancer research companies to research cancer treatments

Hint it's Rand Paul. A doctor

A doctor who takes an oath to first do no harm. Does harm

So yeah. All you magat scum parents of children with cancer. Stand up so we can point and laugh at you while you child dies of cancer. You voted to defund programs and treatments and possibly medicines that would save your child.

But no a trans somewhere was going to be treated with respect can't have that. It'll just cost the life of your child

Sucks to be you.

If I had been in your shoes I would have thought long and hard about which party wants to fund stuff like this and which party has shown a distinct lack of ----- about children

Oh well lol at you magat scum

I hope the ashes of your dead children are comforting to you