Back to Piggy's options
Since continuing the current air campaign will inevitably reach diminishing returns on military targets, i.e. more and more bombing to achieve less and less militarily (though I suspect we are long past that point).
So, if Piggy continues to intensify the air campaign it will INEVITABLY lead to more civilian infrastructure being targeted-manufacturing, transportation-roads and bridges, power system. As the bombing moves down the list you get into far more critical and sensitive areas like water and nuclear facilities.
Any attack along these lines will be met tit-for-tat by Iran. they have responded thusly throughout the war. Israel bombed Iran's steel plant, Iran bombed aluminum plants in the Gulf States, Israel bombs nuclear facilities, Iran bombs Israel's nuclear facilities.
And any targeting of civilian structures will ONLY harden Iran's position and will result in pushing otherwise anti-regime elements to temporarily align with their government. that is inevitable.
This is escalation that will not achieve anything.
So, option 3 ground forces
I honestly don't see that as a viable option, there simply aren't enough forces in theater to achieve anything substantial.
You don't seize a feature like an island with limited force under opposition. An operation like that DEMANDS reinforcements incase things go sideways. We simply don't have those resources in place.
Even if a MEU captures an island or 2, so what? To what end? How will that be exploited-YOU WOULD NEED MORE FORCES.
That will not open the strait, it simply won't
And to be clear, assume every island in the strait and the entire shoreland is captured from the gulf of Oman to the Kuwaiti coast
So what? What will that achieve? Will tankers and VLCC travel through the strait, load up and exit?
Simply put
NO
@#9 ... Only sociopaths devoid of empathy can enjoy causing or seeing this kind of human suffering ...
Then there's this...
Israel to crack down on settler violence in the West Bank
www.euronews.com