Monday, September 30, 2024

Dotard Calls for One Really Violent Day of Policing

Former President Donald Trump on Sunday called for "one real rough, nasty" and "violent day" of police retaliation in order to eradicate crime "immediately." The remarks " delivered by Trump at a rally in Erie, Pennsylvania, just 36 days before the election " did not amount to a new policy proposal, according to a Trump campaign official. "One rough hour " and I mean real rough " the word will get out and it will end immediately, you know? It will end immediately," Trump said. Trump has a long history of endorsing police violence, having said that police reaction to the racial unrest in response to the murder of George Floyd in 2020 "was a beautiful thing to watch. In a 2017 speech, he said: "When you see these thugs being thrown into the back of a paddy wagon, you just see them thrown in, rough. I said, Please don't be too nice.'"

Posted by reinheitsgebot at 12:56 AM | 18 COMMENTS | permalink

Comments

Says the fat, bloated criminal -----.

#1 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-09-30 03:08 AM

I'd start and end with rough justice for the fat orange pedo, his enablers, and the J6 terrorists. That would make America 100% better.

#2 | Posted by _Gunslinger_ at 2024-09-30 04:29 AM

Trump's a bad person

#3 | Posted by hamburglar at 2024-09-30 06:33 AM

I think he's signallinf his MAGAterrorists that if he loses this election he wants the most violent uprising in the U.S. since the Civil War. Hell we have MAGAsheriffs telling MAGAterrorists to make list of homes displaying Harris signs.

#4 | Posted by danni at 2024-09-30 07:54 AM

"Trump's a bad person" - #3 | Posted by hamburglar at 2024-09-30 06:33 AM

Good call, Ham.

That's verbatim to what Reagan's former speechwriter, Peggy Noonan, once said.

#5 | Posted by Hans at 2024-09-30 07:58 AM

Crazier than a Port-o-San-inhabiting rodent.

#6 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2024-09-30 08:25 AM

Asked whether the former president's idea amounted to a new proposal and how such an operation would work, a campaign official said Trump was "clearly just floating it in jest."

Ooh, he was "floating it," alright.

If it was met with praise, it would have been a new policy initiative. Because it wasn't, it was "in jest."

#7 | Posted by jpw at 2024-09-30 10:01 AM

It'll be like Kristallnacht all over again.

This time for his enemies.

#8 | Posted by Corky at 2024-09-30 12:47 PM

... Former President Donald Trump on Sunday called for "one real rough, nasty" and "violent day" of police retaliation ...

For starters, a huge problem with the proposal is that the police are not the Judaical branch of government that determines guilt or innocence, with the innocent until proven guilty right for the accused.

So, fmr Pres Trump is effectively admitting he plans to throw out the Constitution by declaring people guilty and inflicting his level of punishment without a proper trial.


#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-09-30 12:56 PM

effectively admitting he plans to throw out the Constitution

Hardly the first time.

#10 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-09-30 01:03 PM

@#7 ... Ooh, he was "floating it," alright. ...

As your backquote cites, it was the Trump campaign that tried to walk it back, not the source of the quote.

To me, that looks like a campaign that still is struggling to stop its candidate from speaking about what he intends to do, should he win the Oval office.


#11 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-09-30 02:47 PM

"...having said that police reaction to the racial unrest in response to the murder of George Floyd in 2020 "was a beautiful thing to watch"

This immediately requires a consideration as to why this did not stop crime "immediately"

#12 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-09-30 02:52 PM

Trump already got one of those. It was called January 6th and yes there were Rogue cops who knowingly and willingly attacked the Patriotic police officers willing to lay down their lives in defense of the capitol building.

This isn't a dog whistle this is a fire alarm.

#13 | Posted by Tor at 2024-09-30 03:04 PM

Only if it starts with him

#14 | Posted by HeeHaw at 2024-09-30 10:06 PM

@#12 ... This immediately requires a consideration as to why this did not stop crime "immediately" ...

Yup.

Fmr Pres Trump has already had his chance to stop crime "immediately."

(emphasis upon the "fmr" part of that title)

So, why did he?

#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-09-30 10:18 PM

... the murder of George Floyd in 2020 "was a beautiful thing to watch"

I'm surprised Trump has belched out this one. In a WWE context, of course.

#16 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2024-09-30 10:29 PM

* hasn't

#17 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2024-10-01 12:00 AM

To me, that looks like a campaign that still is struggling to stop its candidate from speaking about what he intends to do, should he win the Oval office.

#11 | Posted by LampLighter

Maybe.

To me, you always have an underling do the negative tasks like walking things back. If it was received well, Trump would have been the outward face grabbing all the credit.

#18 | Posted by jpw at 2024-10-01 01:54 AM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Gaetz Withdraws (63 comments)

Texas Offers Trump Huge Ranch for Mass Deportation Plan (63 comments)

Gaetz Sent over $10K in Venmo Payments to Women who Testified (33 comments)

Mike Johnson Institutes Transgender Bathroom Ban for U.S. House (29 comments)

1 in 5 Adults Get Their News from Social Media Influencers (28 comments)

Nikki Haley Trashes Trump Picks RFK Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard (19 comments)

Murdoch's News Corp Accused of Undermining Democracy (19 comments)

RFK Jr. Compared Trump to Hitler (18 comments)

Poll: Americans Remain Divided on Key Campaign Promises (18 comments)

Pam Bondi Picked for AG After Gaetz Withdraws (17 comments)