Recent Gallup polling indicates a rising percentage of U.S. adults identify as LGBTQ+ with 9.3% of those polled in 2024, which is up more than 1% from 2023.
Nearly one in 10 adults in the U.S. identifies as LGBTQ, according to a large analysis from Gallup released Thursday -- almost triple the share since Gallup began counting in 2012, and up by two-thirds since 2020. nyti.ms/42ZZGIN
-- The New York Times (@nytimes.com) February 20, 2025 at 5:49 PM
[image or embed]
All this shows is more people are admitting it to pollsters. The percentages were identified decades ago, 1940 to be more precise:
"According to Alfred Kinsey's research, approximately 10% of men were considered "more or less exclusively homosexual" for at least three years of their adult lives, which is often cited as the "Kinsey scale" percentage for homosexuality; this figure is based on his studies that showed around 37% of men had at least one homosexual experience to ------."
Women's range is 1%-3%.
Here's a link to a good dissection, multiple studies, databases, etc. on the subject:
It concludes:
"Identity aside, ten per cent of the population, it seems, could well be involved in same sex behaviour after all."
All this shows is more people are admitting it to pollsters.
Your assumption is the rate is constant, and only people are admitting it now.
From a scientific perspective that is an invalid assumption, you can't draw any conclusions because the polls weren't meant to resolve this issue.
Only an increase in those counted, that is it, that is all you can assert with confidence without more data.
Why do you think it's a problem with including LGBTQIA all together?? Are you trying to deny our existence too??
#9 | POSTED BY LAURAMOHR
Not a problem in the larger picture, but if breaking down statistically it would be interesting to see the growth rates of each.
This is from 2021
news.gallup.com
Note how "BI" has grown to 15% for kids, could it be that the Bisexual growth rate accounts for a majority if not all of the growth?
From a scientific perspective that is an invalid assumption, you can't draw any conclusions because the polls weren't meant to resolve this issue.
I didn't draw that conclusion from nowhere. I cited where I got my information, why I said what I said, gave a link to a great piece on the subject, and was all based that and what was the gold standard in sexual expression in 80 years, which I also referenced but did not cite. Do you need a citation for something that is, perhaps, the seminal study on this subject? The work is incredibly interesting.
Otherwise just start with the simple:
kinseyinstitute.org
Drudge Retort Headlines
Republicans Mum as Trump Turns Toward Russia Against Ukraine (127 comments)
'You Could Have Made a Deal': Trump Blames Ukraine (89 comments)
Kash Patel Confirmed (71 comments)
Gallup: More U.S. Adults Identify as LGBTQ+ in 2024 (65 comments)
WaPo: Trump Expected to Take Control of USPS (56 comments)
Will there be a DOGE Dividend Check? (48 comments)
Trump: Russia 'have the Cards' in Peace Negotiations (31 comments)
Musk: I'm 'Looking for the Gold at Fort Knox' (30 comments)
IRS to Lay Off 6,700 Employees (29 comments)
MAGA Is Leading 'the Dumbest Imperial Collapse in History' (25 comments)