The men had just begun new lives in Dallas when officers arrived at their home and arrested them. Their relatives deny that they have any connection to the Tren de Aragua gang.
In interviews, relatives of the men insisted they are not members of the Tren de Aragua gang. "If there are people with criminal records, then look for them," Mercedes Yamarte said. "But the innocent shouldn't have to pay for the rest." www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/ ...
-- Max Boot (@maxboot.bsky.social) March 18, 2025 at 8:26 AM
[image or embed]
The Trump administration moved one large step closer to a constitutional showdown with the judicial branch of government when airplane-loads of Venezuelan detainees deplaned in El Salvador even though a federal judge had ordered that the planes reverse course and return the detainees to the U.S.
-- The New York Times (@nytimes.com) March 17, 2025 at 5:32 AM
[image or embed]
So when a Dem is in office, arrest Trump, Elon, and their cronies. Remember, Due Process isn't for traitors and terrorists.
#3 | Posted by Sycophant
Pay attention, because the real world is more complicated than your pea brain can seem to handle.
The law that Trump is using to implement this doesn't require "due process" by the judicial system.
From a previous post of mine
My understanding reading the law as best I could, SCOTUS ruled it has no say in the matter of the Alien Enemies Act.
Just like an airplane, if the pilot (president) deems the the orders are against the safety of the flight (gang members) he/she can disregard those orders.
Under authority of the Act of 1798, the President, on July 14, 1945, directed the removal from the United States of all alien enemies "who shall be deemed by the Attorney General to be dangerous to the public peace and safety of the United States."
As Congress explicitly recognized in the recent Administrative Procedure Act, some statutes "preclude judicial review." Act of June 11, 1946, 10, 60 Stat. 237, 243. Barring questions of interpretation and constitutionality, 164*164 the Alien Enemy Act of 1798 is such a statute.
A war power of the President not subject to judicial review is not transmuted into a judicially reviewable action because the President chooses to have that power exercised within narrower limits than Congress authorized.
scholar.google.com
If you did apply it to the 34 NY felonies case.
#12 | POSTED BY FISHPAW
He didn't care when J6rs were held without charges for months on end.
www.wusa9.com
This is why Lumpers lose in the long game, I wish they would listen to me. Its really unfortunate.
Drudge Retort Headlines
Will DOGE Lose More Money Than It Saves? (62 comments)
US Institute of Peace's Fired CEO Reports DOGE Break In (50 comments)
Navajo Code Talkers Disappear from Military Websites after Trump DEIA Order (39 comments)
Family says U.S. Sent Innocent Young Venezuelan Man to Salvadoran Prison (36 comments)
Putin just Called Trump's Bluff on Ukraine (29 comments)
Trump: Impeach Judge in Deportations Case (23 comments)
Idaho Teacher Ordered to Remove Sign Welcoming Everyone (20 comments)
Tesla Kicked Out of Vancouver Auto Show (18 comments)
Crowd Lets Musk Fanboi Have It at Nebraska Townhall (18 comments)
Putin puts Trump call on hold as he talks to Russian oligarchs: report (17 comments)