Monday, August 04, 2025

Nuclear Reactor on the Moon

This is the first major agency effort by the interim NASA administrator, who is also the Transportation secretary and a former Fox News host.

Posted by reinheitsgebot at 06:39 PM | 19 COMMENTS | permalink

More

EXCLUSIVE: Sean Duffy will announce expedited plans to build a nuclear reactor on the moon, his first major action as interim NASA administrator.[image or embed]

— Politico (@politico.com) Aug 4, 2025 at 5:03 PM

Comments

Yeah, and Trump said we were going to Mars.

These people sit on the john, take craps, and think they have ideas.

#1 | Posted by Zed at 2025-08-04 06:25 PM

These people sit on the john, take craps, and think they have ideas.
#1 | POSTED BY ZED

Almost, These people sit on the john, take craps, and express ideas, and you Lumpers go ------- ballistic.

#2 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-08-04 06:46 PM

Never going to happen under this "president,

#3 | Posted by Zed at 2025-08-04 07:01 PM

"Never going to happen under this "president,"
y President
Because the idea is insane!

#4 | Posted by danni at 2025-08-04 07:05 PM

MTG is going to the moon?

Like Alice Kramden?

#5 | Posted by Corky at 2025-08-04 07:09 PM

Sure whatever.

Right after you release the Epstein files.

#6 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-04 07:16 PM

How is this important?

It's not. Just more distractions thrown at the wall from the DIC, the distractor-in-chief.

We should probably have a real scientist in charge of NASA anyway. Not some goofball from Fixed News.

#7 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-04 07:26 PM

I support Moon Bsse Epstein.

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-04 07:31 PM

Like Alice Kramden?

#3 | POSTED BY CORKY

lol. That took a second.

To the Moon Alice!

#9 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-04 07:32 PM

This will happen two weeks after the------------- lowers the cost of prescription drugs by 1500%.

#10 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-08-04 07:44 PM

#6

jajaja!

#11 | Posted by Corky at 2025-08-04 08:00 PM

youtu.be

#12 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-08-04 08:23 PM

I believe they will do it.

I believe they are serious.

There is no law on the moon and they can continue raping children up there.

#13 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-08-04 10:00 PM

It will make use of that smokestack that's already there. A win win to be sure.

#14 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-08-04 10:33 PM

Why not go solar?

#15 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2025-08-05 07:33 AM

#15 According to Donnie Yamsack it is too dark on the moon.

#16 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-08-05 11:34 AM

Can smokestacks be far behind?

#17 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-08-05 11:42 AM

Why not go solar?

#15 | POSTED BY DBT2

Because that would be logical and cheap.

And because no one in the Trump regime really wants to go to the Moon anyway.

#18 | Posted by Zed at 2025-08-05 02:20 PM

My question: If so, what are they planning to do there that they will need to power. I would prefer a permanently manned station there for scientific research.

#19 | Posted by MSgt at 2025-08-06 02:37 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Homeowner Shoots 2 Men in Masks Claiming to Be Cops (29 comments)

FBI Plans to Lower Hiring Standards (27 comments)

Greene Issues Scathing Rebuke of Conditions in Gaza (26 comments)

Vance Mocked for WWII History Blunder (25 comments)

Invisible Hand Meet Tiny Hand (23 comments)

WTTC: U.S. Only Major Nation to See Decline in Tourism (13 comments)

GOP Lawmakers (Privately) Oppose Trump Tariffs (13 comments)

Blue States Prepare for 'Soft Succession' (11 comments)

Only 8 People Show Up to Nancy Mace Speech (11 comments)

DOJ Sent Congress Epstein Files That Were Already Public (10 comments)