Re 5

There are two separate prominent contempt-of-court situations involving ICE agents and judges in 2025: one in Boston where the charge was dismissed, and ongoing proceedings in Washington D.C. where the judge is continuing a probe into alleged defiance of his orders.

In the Boston case:
The U.S. Attorney argued that the Supremacy Clause immunizes federal officers from state court prosecution for actions taken in their official duties.

In DC the proceedings are moving forward after an appeals court lifted a hold that had been in place.

Judge Boasberg has indicated he will proceed with the remaining aspects of the contempt probe to determine who gave the orders to defy his ruling and whether officials deliberately misled the court. He plans to take sworn testimony from current and former officials.

Stay tuned..

"She had a removal order since 2015? "

This statement came from ICE and you believe it without question?

What a Commie Spyboy thing to do.

Has that ICE statement been verified by at least 2 RELIABLE sources?

No? Then it's most likely a lie.

Her attorney has also said the documents he has said her case was closed in 2017.

Regardless it was a violation of a court order. Another illegal order by ICE.

"Why not make it ridiculously expensive for the Executive branch to deport people."

Welcome to America.

Freedom is not free and always needs defending from haters, traitors, Commies and Spyboys like you.

Re 7

YW!

:)

"Can you tell me what the status of an illegal immigrant becomes when a judge says they can't be deported?"

That is a very good question. This is where AI shines. So. I took your question and put it to AI.

And as you can see it's not a simple answer. And depends on many variables.

AI Overview

+4
If an immigration judge says a person cannot be deported, their legal status changes depending on the reason the case was terminated. If the judge grants relief like asylum or adjusts their status to lawful permanent residence, they become legal. If the government fails to meet its burden of proof, the case may be terminated without prejudice, but this doesn't grant legal status and they could be put into removal proceedings again.

Possible outcomes and status changes

Case termination: The case is ended. The individual is no longer in removal proceedings, but this does not grant legal status by itself.

Adjusting status: The individual may be able to adjust their status to a lawful permanent resident (green card holder) through a family member or employer.

Asylum or other relief: The individual may be granted protection from deportation through asylum or other forms of relief, which can lead to permanent residency after a certain period.

Stay of removal: In some cases, even if a final removal order is issued, the government might grant a "stay of removal" for humanitarian reasons. This is not the same as legal status, but it allows the person to remain in the U.S. and may come with a work permit and an order of supervision.

Potential for re-initiation: If the judge's termination is "without prejudice," the government can file a new "Notice to Appear" and start a second attempt at removal.

I am going to have to learn about this AI thing.

#31 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

You really should. AI is already learning all about you.

Re 37

Eff em. They're not serious. They're not capable of learning. They're not patriots. They're not decent human beings. Stop trying to reason with them.

POSTED BY CBOB