Supremes: Most Trump Tariffs Illegal

Friday, February 20, 2026

Delivering a major blow to President Donald Trump, the Supreme Court on Friday ruled that he exceeded his authority when imposing sweeping tariffs using a law reserved for a national emergency.

Posted by lee_the_agent at 10:54 AM | 183 COMMENTS | permalink

The justices, divided 6-3 held that Trump's aggressive approach to tariffs on products entering the United States from across the world was not permitted under a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The ruling was authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, who was joined by three liberal justices and two fellow conservatives, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, in the majority.

Comments

A victory for the plain language of the US Constitution.
A disgrace for Traitorous Thomas, Asshat Alito, and Kavanaugh.

#1 | Posted by YAV at 2026-02-20 10:43 AM

"SCOTUS Declares Most Trump Tariffs Illegal "

A decision which Trump will ignore.

#2 | Posted by censored at 2026-02-20 10:48 AM

Womp womp.

#3 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-20 10:54 AM

Goody-goody gumdrop.

#4 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-20 10:59 AM

Now the government pays back businesses who will not refund the consumer who actually paid the tariff.
Yet another government payout to businesses at the cost to the people. Maybe was the plan all along.

#5 | Posted by MBlue at 2026-02-20 11:01 AM

They might have mentioned this sooner... before it cost the public 100's of millions of dollars.

I'm pretty sure that Jeffy Turley will be along soon to tell us how the minority rwing Justices were right.

#6 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-20 11:01 AM

EU carefully analysing' Supreme Court's ruling against Trump's tariffs
www.independent.co.uk

#7 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-20 11:03 AM

"Companies that had to pay the tariffs may be able to seek a refund from the Treasury Department."

And the consumers who paid those companies for the products will see none of it. Trump's illegal decree is turning out to be a huge boost to his biggest donors.

#8 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2026-02-20 11:04 AM

Was there ever a position taken on a 'National Emergency' that they used to justify the tariffs to begin with?

#9 | Posted by schifferbrains at 2026-02-20 11:10 AM

11:04 AM EST

Stocks rebound from earlier losses after Supreme Court knocks down Trump's emergency tariffs: Live updates

www.cnbc.com

#10 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-20 11:10 AM

Justices Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh and Samuel Alito dissented.

No surprise these disgraces would go along with the administration.

#11 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-20 11:12 AM

I'm pretty sure that Jeffy Turley will be along soon to tell us how the minority rwing Justices were right.
#6 | Posted by Corky

LOL

#12 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-20 11:12 AM

Now throw the fat, demented pedophile in prison where he belongs.

#13 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-02-20 11:27 AM

"emergency". What a pathetic, weak, snowflake of a fat bald pedophile turd.

No wonder Jeffy loves him.

#14 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-02-20 11:37 AM

I guess I shouldn't depend on that tariff dividend check.....Not that I ever did think that would really ever happen though I didn't think this Supreme Court would rule against Trump on anything; glad I was wrong.

#15 | Posted by danni at 2026-02-20 11:40 AM

Trump's sick pride won't allow him to let this stand. We all know that, at this minute, the ketchup is flying at the White House.
,
Trump will have his tariffs despite, amusingly enough, getting rid of them might help his midterm chances.

#16 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-20 11:40 AM

Kavanaugh, Thomas and Alito are in the Evangelical pedofascist contingency of SCOTUS.

Thomas is alleged to have spent time at Epstein parties, and Kavanaugh was given the rapist pass ... so that tracks. I bet Alito drank infant blood in a Satanic ritual at this point.

Sounds bonkers, but here we are...

#17 | Posted by chuffy at 2026-02-20 11:41 AM

I didn't think this Supreme Court would rule against Trump on anything

#15 | Posted by dann

In regard specifically to Justice Roberts---

The man is at least frightened for himself and his place in current life and American history.

He's trying to stuff that bugger Trump back up the societal nose.

Oh, he's years too late. Now Trump wants his head and may have the power to get it. Now he's already viewed as the worst Supreme Court Justice in History.

I have no pity for the man. Stupidity is a capital offense, as is venal arrogance.

#18 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-20 11:45 AM

@#8 ... And the consumers who paid those companies for the products will see none of it. Trump's illegal decree is turning out to be a huge boost to his biggest donors. ...

With Trump's tariffs struck down, what happens to the billions collected?
www.scrippsnews.com

... Companies like Costco are filing lawsuits seeking billions in refunds after the Supreme Court struck down Trump tariffs, but the refund process remains unclear. ...

#19 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-20 11:55 AM

@#19

Then there are the small Main Street businesses that did not survive the result of the tariffs, and are no longer in business.

#20 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-20 11:59 AM

What will be really cool, is when Canada and China and all the other countries that imposed retaliatory tariffs simply keep them in place, and we won't be able to export anything of value...

#21 | Posted by chuffy at 2026-02-20 12:03 PM

Who can still support this bloated, incompetent loser?

#22 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-02-20 12:04 PM

"The Supreme Court may have temporarily ended President Trump's Tariffs, but since our chosen King overrides SCOTUS, thankfully the ruling will be struck down with his congressional approved veto power and then our Liberation Day can continue with our 99 cent gas and free eggs."

-FoxNews

#23 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2026-02-20 12:09 PM

@#21 ... What will be really cool, is when Canada and China and all the other countries that imposed retaliatory tariffs simply keep them in place, and we won't be able to export anything of value... ...

World trade is already being rerouted to bypass the US.

China's overall exports are up recently, even though China exports to the US are down.

Canada and the EU are making trade deals that bypass the US.

Even though Pres Trump's emergency tariffs have been shot down, the results of them are going to be long-lasting.

Just another example of Pres Trump's highly-touted short-term tactical moves with negative long-term consequences.

#24 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-20 12:16 PM

Supreme Court rules most of Trumpy's actions are illegal.

Supreme Trumpy passes executive order called "So What?".

#25 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-02-20 12:19 PM

Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh: A REPUBLICAN President can do WHATEVER he wants.

#26 | Posted by Sycophant at 2026-02-20 12:20 PM

Is Justice -----' wife plotting another insurrection?

#27 | Posted by Reinheitsgebot at 2026-02-20 12:25 PM

Who can still support this bloated, incompetent loser?

#22 | Posted by LegallyYourDead

Incompetent losers, bloated or otherwise.

#28 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-20 12:27 PM

Re 21

Sometimes when you start a ridiculous and unnecessary trade war you lose.

When you create conditions where if you win someone has to lose then it's always possible that the loser is gonna be you.

When you create win-win conditions then the rising tide does raise more ships. (Though it still helps to actually afford to have a ship!)

I feel bad for the Ketchup Wall today. (And anyone else who gets in Grumpy Trumpy's way today.)

Looks like someone is about to "go through some things".

#29 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-02-20 12:29 PM

Now will Congress deal with the lopsided tariffs with other nations?

Trade deficits have been a problem for decades.

#30 | Posted by Petrous at 2026-02-20 12:30 PM

First question at work this morning:

What are our plans to refund customers the money we charged them for Tariffs.

Can't you Republicans see how ------ this is for business? We had to scramble to add these tariffs, now we have to scramble to refund them.

Come on, Republicans. Why are you still supporting this disaster of an economic leader? You say you understand business. But you act like complete idiots.

#31 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-20 12:33 PM

Governor Newsom calls for immediate tariff refund checks following Supreme Court ruling against Pedo 47

www.gov.ca.gov

#32 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-02-20 12:34 PM

"Trade deficits have been a problem for decades."

And Trump has already made the trade deficit worse.

#33 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-20 12:35 PM

"Trade deficits have been a problem for decades."

Tariffs don't answer that problem.

#34 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-20 12:50 PM

Justices Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh and Samuel Alito dissented.

What this shows you is that there are 2-3 votes on SCOTUS for literally anything Trump wants to do. When he illegally interferes with our coming elections, be warned that we are maybe 2 justices away from not having a country anymore.

#35 | Posted by JOE at 2026-02-20 12:50 PM

I see Kavanaugh is getting a lot of (well-deserved) heat for his argument that it would be too messy and complicated to unwind and reverse the illegal tariffs.

It reminds me of the arguments that some people make that actual Marriage Equality would be too complicated if it were extended to traditional Mormons and Muslims and others who practice marriages that aren't considered "normal", even though technically they would fall under the exact same logic as when interracial and gay marriage bans were deemed unconstitutional.

#36 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-02-20 12:51 PM

I was rather surprised by Kavanaugh's position on this, especially since he's ruled against Trump in other cases IIRC. He is quite unpredictable.

#37 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-02-20 12:52 PM

Speculation is brewing that Trump will attack Iran because he lost at the SC.

How freaking predictable of him.

#38 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-20 12:56 PM

"Now will Congress deal with the lopsided tariffs with other nations?"

Haha, good one!

I think the Supremes were dragging their feet on this in hopes that Congress would actually step in and do their jobs, but nope, they didn't and aren't going to.

#39 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-02-20 12:58 PM

@#29 ... When you create conditions where if you win someone has to lose then it's always possible that the loser is gonna be you.

When you create win-win conditions then the rising tide does raise more ships. ...

Well said.

#40 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-20 12:59 PM

But my narrative! How will I cling to it! I'm sure that trump owns the sc!

#41 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-02-20 01:01 PM

"I see Kavanaugh is getting a lot of (well-deserved) heat for his argument that it would be too messy and complicated to unwind"

What a coincidence; that's the same reason the Trump DOJ didn't investigate the multiple claims against Keggster.

#42 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-20 01:02 PM

" DOJ didn't investigate the multiple claims against Keggster.

#42 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2026-02-20 01:02 PM | REPLY | FLAG:"

Like Swetnick? Those claims were BS and you know it.

On topic, this is the proper outcome IMO. Tariffs require Congress to create them.

#43 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-20 01:09 PM

"But my narrative! How will I cling to it!"

No worries. You still have your hateful lies to comfort you.

#44 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-02-20 01:10 PM

"Like Swetnick?"

No, like all the others.

What "news" organizations told you Swetnick was the only other one???

#45 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-20 01:11 PM

Who can still support this bloated, incompetent loser?

#22 | Posted by LegallyYourDead

Ballwasher, fistedp^&&*, fortcuck, lfthndcuck, onelumpofs*&^, S*&^S...

There are plenty of morons who will support him no matter what this administration does.

#46 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-20 01:13 PM

" this is the proper outcome IMO. "

And how many anti-tariff threads have you posted?

More, or less than the ones railing against Hunter Biden?

I'm taking the under.

#47 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-20 01:13 PM

Flag:

"I see Kavanaugh is getting a lot of (well-deserved) heat for his argument that it would be too messy and complicated to unwind"

What a coincidence; that's the same reason the Trump DOJ didn't investigate the multiple claims against Keggster.

#42 | Posted by Danforth

Also their same excuse for not prosecuting the epstein monsters.

The swamp is too swampy to drain!
-diaper king

#48 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-02-20 01:27 PM

Trump's on TV bashing the Supreme Court. Calling them all kinds of names.

What a petulant child. He's incredibly unhinged.

#49 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2026-02-20 01:29 PM

SCOTUS Declares Most Trump Tariffs Illegal "

A decision which Trump will ignore.

#2 | POSTED BY CENSORED: No he will not - you must be confusing hi with biden and his attempt to get aroune th SCOTUS ruling concerning 'forgiving' student loans.

There is a Plan B, for President Trump, which can be effective and requires no congressional approval:

"Here's the thing the trade establishment doesn't want to think about: IEEPA doesn't just let the president regulate imports. It lets him prohibit them. And it lets him issue licenses as exceptions to that prohibition. Those aren't implied powers or creative readings. They're right there in the text of the law: the president may "prevent or prohibit" importation and may act "by means of instructions, licenses, or otherwise."

That language points to a mechanism that could reshape the global trade landscape even if every tariff the administration has imposed gets struck down."

: )

#50 | Posted by MSgt at 2026-02-20 01:31 PM

There is a Plan B, for President Trump ...

Plan B sounds way too hard. So I bet we are going straight to Plan C, "Operation Wag The Dog".

#51 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-02-20 01:38 PM

"Tariffs have been used to end 5 of the 8 wars I've settled. I've settled 8 wars, whether you like it or not. Big ones. Nuclear. Could've been nuclear. The prime minister of Pakistan said yesterday that President Trump could've saved 35 million lives."

The brain dead------------------- is on a roll.

#52 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-02-20 01:39 PM

This was a foregone conclusion.

Follow the money.

The tariffs hurt businesses.

There was no other conclusion the corporate court could reach.

Noticing that Keggenaugh, Clearance and Alito backed their daddy on the issue.

Now American consumers have paid BILLIONS in tariffs that will now be refunded to the corporations.

They will not flow back down to the consumers.

Another money grab for corporate America.

#53 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-02-20 01:45 PM

The brain dead------------------- is on a roll.

#52 | Posted by reinheitsgebot

Were you able to understand that speech just gave?

I just heard him viciously damne the Supreme Court for giving him more power.

#54 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-20 01:46 PM

Ana Marie Cox
@anamariecox.bsky.social
3m
Big man, strong man alert! Touring a steel plant, "a very powerful man, very strong man... he said, 'Sir, I want to kiss you'... he said, 'Sir, I want to kiss you so bad.'"

#55 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-02-20 01:46 PM

Republicans call for legislative fix after SCOTUS nixes Trump tariff power
courthousenews.com

... Some lawmakers are demanding Congress pass a bill codifying the president's sweeping regime of import duties --" but such a move might be a tough sell in an election year. ...

#56 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-20 01:48 PM

"Noticing that Keggenaugh, Clearance and Alito backed their daddy on the issue."

Gee...it almost seems like they're being either bribed or extorted.

#57 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-20 01:49 PM

What a petulant child. He's incredibly unhinged.

#49 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

I'm not at all sure that Trump understood anything he just said.

Someone would him up, and/or pulled his string, like a child's toy.

I heard a lot of bragging, and a lot of "eff you, I'll do what I want".

The man's not going to sleep tonight, and by morning we may well be at war.

#58 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-20 01:51 PM

Re 56

Yeah. Now is the perfect time to do that.

No worries. The Real Genius is just playing 5D chess while we only live in a 4D world.

We can't possibly understand the greatness that is Trumpy.

#59 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-02-20 01:52 PM

Pedo 47 announces new 10% global tariff after raging over Supreme Court loss

www.cnbc.com

#60 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-02-20 01:53 PM

#50 | Posted by MSgt

Look at this f*&^ing turd.

First chirps BS talking point that was dead and gone the moment it was first uttered years ago then goes on to cheering for prolonged higher prices and economic decline because he's a sycophantic dumbf*&^.

#61 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-20 01:56 PM

The brain dead------------------- is on a roll.

And stupid f*&^s like MSGT nod their empty heads in sycophantic admiration and agreement.

#62 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-20 01:57 PM

Another money grab for corporate America.

#53 | Posted by Nixon

Windfall is the word I would use.

This is the correct decision. It's not up to the courts to also rule how the refunds would go.

That would up to Congress if we actually had a functional body known as Congress...

#63 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-20 01:59 PM

Pedo 47 announces new 10% global tariff after raging over Supreme Court loss

#60 | Posted by reinheitsgebot

Yeah, he got his fee-fees hurt big name.

Sane people cannot imagine the depth of personal hurt caused by a narcissistic injury.

It was so bad in this case that Donald is compelled to take out his humiliation on the whole world.

#64 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-20 02:01 PM

Even the Cato Institute is for slapping Trump down.

www.cato.org

#65 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-20 02:04 PM

"No worries. The Real Genius is just playing 5D chess while we only live in a 4D world.
We can't possibly understand the greatness that is Trumpy."

It sounds like you really adore him.

#66 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-02-20 02:07 PM

MAGAts who never understood the legal and economic impacts of Trump's unfettered discretion to impose tariffs in the first place, are reeling.

Or, to quote our friend: Bwahaha!

#67 | Posted by moder8 at 2026-02-20 02:12 PM

@#65

CATO said, " ...Even without IEEPA, the president retains ample statutory authority to quickly recreate much of the current trade policy chaos. ..." [emphasis mine]

CATO? Pres Trump's trade policy chaos?

Wow.

#68 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-20 02:14 PM

@#53 ... Now American consumers have paid BILLIONS in tariffs that will now be refunded to the corporations. ...

Not so fast.

Pres Trump said in the news conference that refunds would have to be litigated.

So, don't expect to see refunds occurring anytime soon, or ever.

#69 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-20 02:21 PM

"No worries. The Real Genius is just playing 5D chess while we only live in a 4D world."

I know you're being facetious, but Trump would lose at Tic-Tac-Toe. And then claim it was some conspiracy against him.

#70 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-02-20 02:28 PM

The same SCOTUS that gave Trump immunity? WTF are they going to do about it?

#71 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2026-02-20 02:32 PM

'Cough up' Newsom demands tariff refunds after Supreme Court rules against Trump's policy

CALIFORNIA, USA " California Governor Gavin Newsom has called for American families and businesses to be issued full refunds, following the Supreme Court decision to strike down President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff policy.

Trump told a news conference he's "absolutely ashamed" of justices who voted to strike down his tariffs, calling the decision "deeply disappointing."

"Their decision is incorrect," he said. "But it doesn't matter because we have very powerful alternatives." He did not immediately specify them.

The president also announced during the briefing that his administration would now add a 10% global tariff over and above current tariffs. He said he would sign an executive order imposing the new tariffs after the press conference."

www.abc10.com

;;
Doubling down on Stupid! is just how Herr Drumpf rolls.

#72 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-20 02:34 PM

Ketchup bottles are frightened all over DC. And I imagine there's going to be a massive social media storm tonight.

#73 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2026-02-20 02:40 PM

US Chamber of Commerce hails Supreme Court decision
www.usatoday.com

#74 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-20 02:41 PM

Ketchup bottles are frightened all over DC. And I imagine there's going to be a massive social media storm tonight.

#73 | Posted by Whatsleft

It is impossible to overstate what a miserable excuse for a man we have as president.

#75 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-20 02:45 PM

LIBERATION DAY! /s

#76 | Posted by qcp at 2026-02-20 02:52 PM

More reality he does not like.

#77 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-02-20 03:13 PM

Vance decries ruling as 'lawlessness' by the Supreme Court
www.nbcnews.com

... Vice President JD Vance described the Supreme Court's ruling as "lawlessness" in a post on X.

"Today, the Supreme Court decided that Congress, despite giving the president the ability to 'regulate imports,' didn't actually mean it. This is lawlessness from the Court, plain and simple," he said. ...

#78 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-20 03:17 PM

Trump's on TV bashing the Supreme Court. Calling them all kinds of names.

#49 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

Perhaps he will call in seal team six to correct their perceived error. The Court already authorized him to do so.

#79 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2026-02-20 03:17 PM

"Dummkopf Trumpf blasted Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett when he was asked if he regrets nominating them to the Supreme Court after this decision.

"I think their decision was terrible," he whined. "I think it's an embarrassment to their families, you want to know the truth, the two of them."

#80 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-02-20 03:23 PM

WATCH: Trump claims that Supreme Court was 'swayed by foreign interests' in opposing his tariffs

www.youtube.com

He also said the Justices who opposed him were, "disloyal" and that they were, "barely invited" to the SOTU.

Imagine what he did when young girls turned him down....

#81 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-20 03:25 PM

Try and call the White House. Hi ahead, try it

#82 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-02-20 03:31 PM

TARIFFS AND TAXES....

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

NYC TEACHERS UNION....backed the commie muslim............AND NOW HE'S STEALING THEIR RETIREMENT !!!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

as to tariffs.....whatever.

#83 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2026-02-20 03:32 PM

didn't the brain dead ------ get told by the SC that he couldn't pay the deadbeat's college bill ?

and he did it anyway ?.........thanks for the precedent ------.

#84 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2026-02-20 03:36 PM

@#81 ... Trump claims that Supreme Court was 'swayed by foreign interests' in opposing his tariffs ...

Yeah, Pres Trump claims a lot of things that just are not true.

#85 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-20 03:42 PM

Trump claims that Supreme Court was 'swayed by foreign interests'

Oh no! I hope it wasn't The Hook Noses, and the International Conspiracy of Bankers.

Anyway, when do we start bombing Iran, for Israel?

#86 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-20 03:45 PM

I can destroy the country!' Trump goes ballistic over Supreme Court ruling

www.rawstory.com

Putin's brain dead butt ---- just let the cat out of the bag.

#87 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-02-20 03:57 PM

Why is the content grid broken on yet another thread? I'm trying to read this on my phone, but I have to keep scrolling left and right and resizing my screen because it's no longer responsive.

Is it because of the BWAAHAAA doofus?

#88 | Posted by cbob at 2026-02-20 04:03 PM

Looks fine on my phone. You sure it's this thread?

#89 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-20 04:05 PM

Nevermind I see it now. Yeah I'd just block that guy. It fixes the formatting.

#90 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-20 04:08 PM

Looks fine on my phone. You sure it's this thread?

#89 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2026-02-20 04:05 PM | FLAG:
This is the only thread I see that doesn't fit the available screen space on my phone.

Typing 100 letters consecutively should be grounds for banishment from the site.

#91 | Posted by cbob at 2026-02-20 04:08 PM

Snoofy, I've never killfiled anybody on this site in 21 years here. But you make a strong case!

#92 | Posted by cbob at 2026-02-20 04:12 PM

- Anyway, when do we start bombing Iran, for Israel?

OK, ya'll aren't going to want to hear it, but I've always thought the irony was delicious.

In the story of the AC (whom DJT closely resembles in every way), there is a Covenant of Many; a peace agreement between Israel and many of her neighbors... a 7 year deal.

Half-way through, the leader of the world's most powerful military, who made the deal, breaks it by attacking... wait for it... Israel.

Now, who else would do that? Then he enters the newly built 3rd Temple (possibly complete with Trump Temple and Casino sign!) and claims to be God.

This immediately pisses off actual God, and all hell breaks loose. Literally.

Then Earth and Heaven are united as a Planet of Eden (not just a Garden), and it takes Yeshua his own self 1,000 years to teach us how to govern ourselves... so that was never going to be easy anyway.

So, a New Beginning.

#93 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-20 04:12 PM

Tariff Ruling Kicks Off Fight Over $170 Billion in Refunds
finance.yahoo.com

... Thousands of companies and importers are set to launch what could be a prolonged battle to try to recoup as much as $170 billion in tariffs they've already paid to the US government after the Supreme Court struck down a key tool in President Donald Trump trade policy.

The top court was silent on the topic of refunds when it ruled Friday that Trump didn't have legal authority to impose the duties under an emergency law.

"They take months and months to write an opinion, and they don't even discuss that," Trump said in a news conference after the ruling. "We'll end up being in court the next five years."

The US president said he is planning to immediately impose a fresh 10% global tariff under a different provision. But that won't stop the flood of lawsuits by companies seeking refunds. ...

#94 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-20 04:18 PM

CBob I wasn't happy about it from a spiritual perspective... but you can't argue with results.

#95 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-20 04:24 PM

>SCOTUS says Trump can't use one law for tariffs
>SCOTUS also says Trump can use other laws for tariffs
>this is too complicated for liberals and zoomers
why are you people like this?

#96 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-02-20 04:56 PM

Pritzker demands $8.6 billion for Illinois residents after Supreme Court strikes disgusting pedo's tariffs

chicago.suntimes.com

#97 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-02-20 05:32 PM

SCOTUS smacked pedo 47 hard enough to make Daddysfist yelp.

#98 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-02-20 05:38 PM

Trumpers should demand their money back for all that cheap Chinese junk of his they bought... stuff they could have gotten on Temu for 5 percent of the price.

If that much.

#99 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-20 05:38 PM

this is too complicated for liberals and zoomers
why are you people like this?

#96 | Posted by john_savage2

I'm so glad we have a genius trumper here to explain stuff to all the dumb liberals.

Could you help me out please - I can't figure out why increasing the debt to provide healthcare is gad, but increasing the debt way more to provide tax cuts to the rich is good. Can you explain?

#100 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-02-20 05:40 PM

john_savage2

Is that not like the gayest name on the Retort? (not that there's anything wrong with that!)

www.theguardian.com

www.out.com

#101 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-20 05:51 PM

Joe sixpack will see none of his tariff money. Reserved for corporations.

#102 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-02-20 06:05 PM

Trade deficits have been a problem for decades.
#30 | Posted by Petrous

And they're even worse despite Trump's tariffs. Acknowledge that fact. Then swallow it.

#103 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2026-02-20 06:40 PM

"White House to seek alternative' tariff moves after Supreme Court ruling, Bessent says

"Let's be clear about what today's ruling was and what it wasn't," the administration's top finance official said in prepared remarks.

"Despite the misplaced gloating from Democrats, ill-informed media outlets and the very people who gutted our industrial base, the court did not rule against President Trump's tariffs.

Six justices simply ruled that IEEPA authorities cannot be used to raise even $1 of revenue," Bessent added."

www.dallasnews.com

;;
Doublespeak?

#104 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-20 06:45 PM

I don't ------- care what anyone in this psychotic hothouse of an "administration" says. Every single one of them should be executed for treason.

#105 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-02-20 06:49 PM

#101

Jeff is such a ------- coward he names his sock puppets after his boyfriends.

#106 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-02-20 06:50 PM

why are you people like this?
#96 | Posted by john_savage2

What in the fnkc do you mean "you people," you dirt-rotten cultist?!

#107 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2026-02-20 07:08 PM

Doublespeak?
#104 | Posted by Corky

What Trump is doing is illegal. If anything, that should be the central takeaway regardless of how they move forward. Who would have guessed a felon in the WH would commit illegal acts as POTUS?

#108 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2026-02-20 07:11 PM

#96 | Posted by ~~john_savage~~ ~~john_savage1~~ john_savage2

Who's asking?

#109 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-02-20 07:12 PM

#106 | Posted by LegallyYourDead

John Savage

Bellringer

He's hinting at something and I'm not sure I want to know what it is.

#110 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2026-02-20 07:12 PM

Nice of taco to ---- up the page again.

#111 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-02-20 07:16 PM

When is ICE going to deport the Illegal Tariffs?

#112 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-20 07:24 PM

"A dividend of at least $2,000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone," says the president

There are, of course, a few problems here.

If and when SCOTUS overturns Trump's use of tariffs, the federal government will have to refund that $200,000,000,000.00 to corporations.

Not to those of us who had to spend more because of the tariffs.

Nope. That $200,000,000,000.00 will go to the corporations who imported goods and paid the tariffs.

So, you and I paid more for goods over the past whatever months to corporations who paid the federal government the tariffs.

So, when tariffs are refunded, they go back to the corporations, right?

And, will the corporations be sending checks to you and I, because that would be the right thing to do?

LOL

Just more transfer of wealth from the poor and middle class to the wealthy.

Almost like it was planned.

And then there's THIS problem:

"A dividend of at least $2,000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone," the Trump.

OK, some simple math here

US Population: 342,000,000

US population minus the 10-15% or so ~high-income~ folk: 300,000,000

So, okay, let's go ...

300,000,000 people times $2,000.00 per person is $600,000,000,000.00

Tariff collection so far in 2025 has been around $200,000,000,000.00

But we've already determined that that $200,000,000,000.00 was going to go to corporations, right?

So, where will the $600,000,000,000.00 come from?

#113 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-02-20 07:58 PM

www.out.com
#101 | POSTED BY CORKY AT 2026-02-20 05:51 PM | REPLY | FLAG

That piece was brilliantly written in the layers and application of principle. I'll leave the biblical comparisons to you, but for me they were clear. The relevance to today - right on target.

#114 | Posted by YAV at 2026-02-20 09:12 PM

Obviously, two of Trumps appointees have just been added to his enemies list. Trump is so predictable, we almost know what he's going to do next.

So, the questions still unanswered are:

When is Trump going to start building a case for impeachment? (my guess, immediately)

Which justice is it going to be?

#115 | Posted by Twinpac at 2026-02-20 09:12 PM

I had to laugh when a commentator brought up an oldie but goodie on the news tonight.

He said about Trump: "Give a child a hammer and everything starts looking like a nail."

#116 | Posted by Twinpac at 2026-02-20 09:18 PM

*** Epstein Pal Howard Nutlick and Family Will Cash in on Tariffs Refunds ***

The Epstein Administration figured this all out pretty well, didn't they?

Sources:

bsky.app

#117 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-02-20 11:14 PM

I imported goods and was charged a tariff. The nice French person I bought the wine from specifically said it was for PEDO DONNIE'S tariff nonsense. That fat bald ---- owes me $300.

#118 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-02-20 11:22 PM

Is this not a time to celebrate the fact that two conservatives voted for this? That not all conservatives are in the back pocket of Trump? I mean, I've read numerous comments predicting the doom and gloom of the Supreme Court since Trump got in charge of ---. Sure, not all the conservatives voted for this, but c'mon y'all...this IS a huge deal and maybe should give a bit of hope and damnit...can't anyone acknowledge that there are conservatives AND liberals who together do the right thing?

Good Lord...maybe I missed it, but I didn't even see anyone here acknowledge last December when BOTH parties AND Trump did the right thing when a bill was UNANIMOUSY PASSED and signed by TRUMP making animal cruelty a federal crime and Trump issuing orders to create a task force to enforce it and then also Trump directing the FDA to start enforcing the regulations and laws governing the ethical treatment of animals in research labs or Trump saying he wants to see an end to all animal research, after all AI can do better now anyways. Of course Trump says a lot of bullshht, but when he actually DOES something right, maybe giving some thumbs up might encourage him to do more good things. The media BARELY gave this stuff any coverage and I only found out by accidentally seeing ONE story online by ABC. If the media would have blasted the amazing-ness of it, it would trigger Trump to do more...he craves it when the media has to acknowledge He and both Dems and Repubs did something RIGHT...And let him take all the credit "There's never been a president like me fighting for the animals..." Use his own ego to propel him to do the right things. Just MY opinion.

Is it THAT hard to give credit where credit is due? That's why I'm an independent, even if I can't spell it correctly in my username LOL ;-) Choosing a "side" would make me want to be loyal and ignore the wrongs that my side does and ignore the good when the other side does.

That's what I'm doing...this shows there IS hope....that there are still folks in the Supreme Court who are basing their judgements on the law and not politics.

#119 | Posted by Idependant97 at 2026-02-21 02:42 AM

Trump: "I am allowed to cut off any and all trade ... I can destroy the trade, I can destroy the country, I'm even allowed to impose a foreign country destroying embargo ... I can do anything I want to do to them ... I'm allowed to destroy the country, but I can't charge a little fee."

Nothing to see here.

Just Trump reminding us he can destroy the country.

MAGA, right?

#120 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-21 03:24 AM

I'm not convinced the Supremes have turned over a new leaf yet.

They're known to have as many ulterior motives as Trump himself. This could be a means of shortening the leash on a President who wasn't smart enough to know he was blowing the whole "Plan" apart with his illconceived, ego-driven, bombastic rush to autocracy.

IOW, the death of democracy is a long haul project. An ego-driven Trump was treating it like a sprint.

The Supremes just yanked his choak chain.

#121 | Posted by Twinpac at 2026-02-21 03:40 AM

"MAGA, right?"

Make America Grovel, Amirite?

#122 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-21 04:08 AM

TWINPAC

I never once said that I believed that the Supremes had turned over a new leaf. Go back a re-read, as I can be a TERRIBLE communicator. So let me know if I did imply that please.

What I am saying is to celebrate *THIS*ONE*PARTICULAR* event...

By ALWAYS holding back from acknowleding when things go right because "we don't know if a new leaf is turned over" means the positive energy never gets out there to support them when they do things right...INSTEAD forgot for the moment what the future brings or what the past brought, and go WOO HOO THE CONSERVADICKS GOT IT RIGHT FOR *ONCE* and maybe just maybe if enough people did --- like that it would create some momentum to let the politicians know that it can be worth they're while to do more like this.....

But if they don't get the good feedback FROM THE OTHER SIDE... In other words, if conservative politicians/judges etc got SUPPORT from some liberals acknowledging they liked what they did, they will remember that...

If you NEVER give any positive support they'll hear:

NOTHING.....

CRICKETS from "their other side"

#123 | Posted by Idependant97 at 2026-02-21 04:31 AM

IDEPENDANT

Get used to the idea that not all posts are a response to you.

As it was, I barely scanned your post because it was too long and, presumably, boring.

#124 | Posted by Twinpac at 2026-02-21 06:27 AM

Once again, on topic, it's possible that the Supremes feel that Trump is treating the overthrow of a democratic republic like it's a sprint. The Supremes know, in fact, it's going to be a long and arduous trip.

Therefore, they haven't turned over a new leaf. They only yanked on Fido's choak chain.

#125 | Posted by Twinpac at 2026-02-21 06:58 AM

When the WH is occupied by a criminal rapist traitor to his country, being an Independent means making the right choice on the that person in general, not cherry picking.

#126 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-21 09:18 AM

Guess so many here have forgotten how obama verbally attacked the SCOTUS during his State Of The Union speech over a ruling that they made that pissed him off, where they had to jut sit there and 'take it'. Do nt remember any libbies here that seemed to care at that time.

#127 | Posted by MSgt at 2026-02-21 09:30 AM

Comparing Obama's criticism to Trump's wild rantings, insults, and accusations of being owned by foreign influencees... is something only a deleted Cultist might do.

#128 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-21 09:37 AM

I"m okay with this ruling for two reasons.

so much for your "SC is a rubber stamp and unbridled power....but of course "you people"

being dishonest people, the next time they come out with something you'll revert to the

same BS BS.

and 2)....if a democrat is in the white house ( god forbid) they'll use them to drain

tax money for every climate change scheme on the planet...BUT AGAIN...." you people"

being so dishonest if there is a dem in the white house this fake moral outrage

will disappear as fast as a trans shooter in a school house.

#129 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2026-02-21 10:31 AM

Posted by Corky

riminal rapist traitor cultist....

you got almost all of them in....good for you..ma'am.... and I hope you get paid by the word but here's the thing.

.....not a single one of them means jack squat.....even if you threw in racist, fascist and hitler to appease the

other dishonest residents.

#130 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2026-02-21 10:38 AM

but of course "you people"

being dishonest people, the next time they come out with something you'll revert to the

same BS BS.

wow....stupid effing manure had already started.

Therefore, they haven't turned over a new leaf. They only yanked on Fido's choak chain.

#125 | Posted by Twinpac

#131 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2026-02-21 10:41 AM

Guess so many here have forgotten how obama verbally attacked the SCOTUS during his State Of The Union speech..

Yeah. Them was the days. But that's nothing friend.

Wait until Tuesday.

#132 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-02-21 11:13 AM

"WE GOT HIM THIS TIME">..

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA....economist just wrote...

"SCOTUS's ruling said Trump was using the wrong law for his tariffs, so Trump

just issued the same tariff's under different law and increased them

by 10 %.

WE GOT HIM THIS TIME !!!!>............BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

--suck it.

#133 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2026-02-21 11:16 AM

Do nt remember any libbies here that seemed to care at that time
#127 | Posted by MSgt

So your reason for not caring is... because the Libs didn't. You think you're be better than the Libs. But now you're telling us you're no different.

Trump says he can destroy other countries and you don't care. Trump says he can destroy this country and you don't care about that either. The simple fact is you don't care about anything or anyone but yourself.

Your battery is running down. No real cognition happening any more. Just knew jerk reactions.

#134 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-21 12:17 PM

" No, like all the others.

What "news" organizations told you Swetnick was the only other one???

#45 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2026-02-20 01:11 PM | FLAG: "

Blasey Ford? Her best friend called BS on that AFTER being threatened if she didn't play ball from the hospital room she was in.

But, you be you.

#135 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 01:13 PM

Oh, and then there was a woman who said she saw him hit the woman he was dating and she even had a proximate date for the event. Well, it turns out the judge he was dating at that time saw the allegation and called it out as complete BS. Never happened.

The left's attempt to destroy this guy was beyond disgusting and you really suck for continuing to lie about it.

#136 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 01:16 PM

"you be you."

What a riot.

If the letter after the name was different, you''d be screeching about the FBI not interviewing THE NAMED WITNESS.

And you'd be right.

#137 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-21 01:54 PM

"The left's attempt to destroy this guy was beyond disgusting"

The folks who wanted him confirmed were the same folks leading/limiting the investigation. You wouldn't accept that from anyone but Republicans.

You were told what they wanted you to hear. Lucky for them, you're a slurper.

#138 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-21 01:57 PM

Dude, look in the ------- mirror. The allegations were baseless and you know it. None of them held up under even a modicum of scrutiny. Quite frankly, it's disgusting that you continue to lie about it.

#139 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 02:02 PM

"None of them held up under even a modicum of scrutiny"

Sorry, pal. Not interviewing THE NAMED WITNESS doesn't even come close to the "modicum" level. You don't get that lie of a claim.

"Quite frankly, it's disgusting that you continue to lie about it."

Please explain why you believe skipping over the named witness is acceptable to you.

And do you believe it's okay in all cases, or just ones with an (R) attached?

#140 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-21 02:14 PM

"The allegations were baseless and you know it."

Actually, I don't know it. Neither do you. A full investigation never happened.

Over 4500 tips not followed-up.
www.theguardian.com

#141 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-21 02:19 PM

Danoforth ripping bellringer apart because it's a day that ends with a Y.

Dude, you're so partisan, bell. It's pretty blatant.

#142 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-02-21 02:19 PM

From The Guardian link above:

"The admissions in your letter corroborate and explain numerous credible accounts by individuals and firms that they had contacted the FBI with information highly relevant to ... allegations' of sexual misconduct by Justice Kavanaugh, only to be ignored. "If the FBI was not authorized to or did not follow up on any of the tips that it received from the tip line, it is difficult to understand the point of having a tip line at all," the Democratic lawmakers said...

#143 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-21 02:21 PM

Danforth,

Cite a single allegation you stand behind. Just one.

Alexandrite,

You are a dick bag tool.

#144 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 02:23 PM

" numerous credible accounts"

That's real journalism right there, folks.

#145 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 02:24 PM

Patricide Jeff is getting shredded again.

#146 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-02-21 02:31 PM

Chuckie Cheese has a restraining order on reinheitsgbot.

#147 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 02:34 PM

Patricide Jeff killed his old man to prove his love for a serial------------.

#148 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-02-21 02:37 PM

Nobody buys you BS. You are every bit the internet tough guy that LGH acts out.

#149 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 02:40 PM

#127 - are you shhting me? You actually think the two responses are even close to being equivalent?

#150 | Posted by YAV at 2026-02-21 02:44 PM

"Cite a single allegation you stand behind. Just one."

Not before you directly answer my direct questions above. No hoop-jumping until you give DIRECT ANSWERS.

#151 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-21 02:45 PM

You won't because you can't. The loudest allegations were easily debunked.

#152 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 03:12 PM

"You won't because you can't. "

Fat talk from someone who won't directly answer my direct questions because he can't.

#153 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-21 03:14 PM

Track down 4500 bogus "leads". How stupid do you think the FBI is?

Again, you can't answer my question and we both know why.

#154 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 03:32 PM

" Track down 4500 bogus "leads"."

No, just the credible ones. Of course they couldn't even start with the first lead.

"How stupid do you think the FBI is?"

Not stupid, corrupt. And definitely corrupt if they won't even question the named witness.

You still haven't directly addressed my direct questions. I won't respond to anything else from you until you do.

Stop deflecting. Start with explain explaining why you think it's OK the FBI didn't interview the named witness.

#155 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-21 03:42 PM

Blasey Ford spewed her lies in front of a camera to the entire country. She named 4 people, none of whom had any recollection of the incident. Her best friend, in spite of pressure put on her by zFord's attorneys called BS on her story and did so from a freaking hospital bed. That was the left's "strongest" allegation. It was easily disproved because she so blatantly lied.

Juklie Swetnick. Remember her? She was peddled on us by your man-crush Avenatti. Her story was so ridiculous and she changed it big time when MSM outlets gave her an audience, because, of course they did.

Then there was a woman who after two weeks of presssure concocted a story while at a dorm party, in a room filled with people his friends put Kavanaugh's junk in her hand. That's not even physically possible. Yet, in spite of being on a room full of people nobody else witnessed it. That's a shocker /s

Then I brought up the story about him sticking his date and the woman he was dating at that time of the allegation said it was a flat out lie. He never struck her or treated her badly in any way.

Then the accusation that he assaulted a woman on a boat. Yeah, that one lasted all of two minutes when the accuser recanted.

Disgusting Senate Dems actually entered Swetnick's story into official records.

You lapped it all up and apparently still do. Sorry your leftie buddies' coordinated attack ended up failing. And here you are STILL perpetuating what you know to be lies. It's ridiculous.

#156 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 04:06 PM

BullBringer, Pedophile Protector and Rape Enthusiast!

Quite the twofer.

No wonder you always fantasize about trans men raping underage girls.

It all you fantasize of.

#157 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-21 04:12 PM

#156 | Posted by BellRinger

Anyone recall bellringer ever complaining about right wing media sources giving an audience to liars?

#158 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-02-21 04:13 PM

Says the guy who puts his mom in a full Nelson so his dad can more easily beat her up for touching a cucumber.

#159 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 04:16 PM

#158. I don't watch cable news. Whether it's CNN or Fox. It's mostly agenda driven.

#160 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 04:17 PM

"his friends put Kavanaugh's junk in her hand. That's not even physically possible"

Huh?
What part of this isn't possible?

#161 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-21 04:58 PM

" She named 4 people, none of whom had any recollection of the incident."

How many of those people did the FBI question under oath? Oh that's right, zero.

You still haven't answered my question: why is that OK with you?

#162 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-21 04:58 PM

JeffJ is also okay with the FBI not investigating any of the perpetrators in the Epstein Files.

#163 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-21 05:04 PM

It's ok with me because it was a bogus allegation. This is how an interview would have gone:

Agent: Ms Ford alleges you were present during this incident.

Keyser: I never attended any party with Kavanaugh. I didn't know him at all and no ether did my friend. In fact, I think she made the whole story. Up.

Agent: okay. Thank you for your time.

It was all a left wing game of trying to run out the clock. Dems were hoping to retake the Senate in the midterms and then pre empt the stunt McConnell pulled a couple of years later.

Yet you can't name a single allegation as credible. Other than Swetnick's which I'm guessing you bought hook, line and sinker.

#164 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 05:09 PM

"This is how an interview would have gone"

^
Pure speculation on your part.

Unable to distinguish your own convincing fantasy constructs from the more uncertain reality we live in.

#165 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-21 05:33 PM

"Yet you can't name a single allegation as credible."

How would I, if they were never investigated?

#166 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-21 05:34 PM

"It's ok with me because it was a bogus allegation."

You can't prove that. All that can be proved is the FBI didn't interrogate the sole named witness, either under oath, or otherwise.

It's only a bogus allegation because of your (R)easons. If there was a (D) after the name, you'd be screeching about FBI corruption.

And you'd be right.

"This is how an interview would have gone"

If it was that innocent, it would've happened. And the FBI CHOSE NOT to follow-up on other allegations. The same folks advocating for Kavanaugh's confirmation were the ones "running" the investigation.

In related news, Comey and McCabe both got audited, a statistical near-impossibility, especially in an era with so few audits.

"It's ok with me"

The only honest phrase you've posted.

#167 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-21 07:01 PM

The allegations were complete BS and you know it.

#168 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 07:08 PM

Democrats went scorched earth and lost.

#169 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 07:09 PM

Republicans elected Trump and America lost.

#170 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-21 07:14 PM

"The allegations were complete BS"

You have no proof of that claim. ZERO.

Meanwhile, my claim is clearly true: the FBI NEVER INTERROGATED the named witness. Not a single time.

Only partisan hacks believe that's acceptable. And you're too much of a coward to admit, if the letters were reversed, you'd be having a conniption fit.

#171 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-21 07:14 PM

Proof is for non-Cultists... they don't need no stinking proof.

Just what Trump or one of his more loyal to him than the Law tells them to think.

#172 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-21 07:28 PM

She didn't know the year. It was at a house but none of her named witnesses lived in that house. How does that happen? She didn't know the house. The FBI doesn't waste time investigating BS. ANYONE can make an allegation.

#173 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 08:34 PM

"She didn't know the year."

I couldn't remember the year of my heart attack.

You're pretending that's a barometer of IT NOT HAPPENING.

#174 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-21 08:49 PM

"How does that happen?"

Maybe an investigation would've answered that question.

Meanwhile, if the letters were reversed, the lack of FBI investigation would be unacceptable to you.

And you'd be right.

#175 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-21 08:53 PM

We KNOW it didn't happen. You know it but wont admit it.

#176 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 09:00 PM

She didn't have any actionable information to investigate. Her best friend strath up accused her of lying about the incident that we all know never happened.

Bottom line, Democrats we're trying to run out the clock and they failed, much to your chagrin.

#177 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 09:01 PM

"She didn't have any actionable information to investigate."

^
That's not how knowing things works.
That's not a thing you could know until after it's investigated.

#178 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-21 09:03 PM

#176 | Flag:

Truth in advertising

#179 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-02-21 09:06 PM

"She didn't have any actionable information to investigate."

That's like saying no Covid testing means no Covid.

Your logic is so circular you should serve mustard with the pretzels.

#180 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-21 11:09 PM

"Bottom line..."

...is you would have a 180 degree different reaction if the letters after the name were different, and we all know it.

That's the textbook definition of a partisan hack: your morals change with the parties.

#181 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-21 11:11 PM

I would hope that Republicans wouldn't be stupid enough to believe ridiculous allegations like that if they were directed at a Democrat.

#182 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-02-21 11:21 PM

In other news, the value of the $USD is still trash. Still winninuning

#183 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-02-22 09:22 AM

Drudge Retort Headlines

SCOTUS Rules Against Ban on 'conversion therapy' for Kids (86 comments)

Israel Passes Death by Hanging Law for Palestinians (35 comments)

Iran Accuses US of Plotting Ground Attack (34 comments)

Trump Moves to Create Federal Voter Lists (28 comments)

Trump Shares Renderings of a Towering Presidential Library (24 comments)

'I Think That MAGA Is Dying': Inside the Youth Movement at CPAC (21 comments)

FCC Chair is Openly Cheering the Weakening of the Press (21 comments)

Iran Lawmakers Approve Plan to Impose Tolls on Strait of Hormuz (19 comments)

GOP Weighing Health Care Cuts to Fund Iran War (19 comments)

Gas Price Tops $4 (18 comments)