This is like what abraham lincoln did!

During Lincoln's administration several prominent political adversaries were arrested

Eventually Lincoln would suspend habeas corpus across the entire North and arrest tens of thousands of citizens without charges or trial.

So states (or even cities) can deny the Fed re immigration enforcement?
Go gadget States' Rights!
...destined to repeat...

>... Americans overwhelmingly view former President Abraham Lincoln as an "outstanding" leader, while President Trump ranks near the bottom, according to a new poll.

Americans overwhelmingly don't understand much

>All members if the confederacy should have been sh-t d-ad.

All members if the leftist insurrection should be sh-t d-ad.

See how that works?

I think the problem with DJT is he's of the Merchant caste trying to serve as a monarch.
This is a change from the usual Sycophant professional politicians ascending to would-be monarchists, each leaving behind a dynasty of newly minted Privilege for their heirs.
The only stable government is a monarchy in charge of ONE dynasty, so successive temporary pseudo-kings don't drain our common resources building their mini-dynasties.

The choice is between one elite class vs an infinitely increasing number of fresh elitists.

>Confederates or Leftists?

Horseshoe effect. Today's leftists are fighting the Fed as did the Confederates, and before them the Revolutionaries fighting the king.
>Confederates or Leftists?
-Are not so different after all

#25
observing, Clown. Never "cheering" for any of them.

"I am not altogether on anybody's side, because nobody is altogether on my side, if you understand me:..."
-Treebeard

You mean we declared our own nation?

Where can I find it?

#22 | Posted by Zed

[sanctuarystatesmap.jpg]

I have a theory here- you understood, but pretended to not
'the Fed' in this case means 'the Federal government'

The chief difference from the second revolution to the third is:
the confederate states seceded as provided for in the constitution, whereas the leftist modern sanctuary zones instead are using insurrection, which is prohibited.

The second revolution was put down by the Lincoln Dictatorship, and the third will be put down by the DJT Dictatorship.
No cost is too great if the survival of The Union is at risk!

Prepare thy ----, the ----- of consequence seldom arrives lubed

The left will lose their fruitpicker slaves, as did the South.
"We can't survive without our slaves!" They whine AGAIN

Is this "Constitution" in the room with us now?

#44 | Posted by snoofy

Actually it is, and doesn't say anything about secession!
Thanks for prompting me to look it up.

I was probably remembering such as:
What did Thomas Jefferson say about secession?
If any state in the union will declare that it prefers separation with the 1st alternative, to a continuance in union without it, I have no hesitation in saying, "Let us separate."

and

President Buchanan, dismayed and hesitant, denied the legal right of states to secede but held that the Federal Government legally could not prevent them.

and

5: If secession was treason, surely the Constitution would say so. It does not. If secession was treason, surely the United States government would have been delegated the authority to prevent States from leaving. No such authority was or has been delegated.

and even

In his inaugural address, Lincoln attempted to be both firm and conciliatory. He declared secession to be wrong; but he also promised that he would "not interfere with the institution of slavery where it exists." He announced that he would use "the power confided to me...to hold, occupy, and possess the property and places belonging to the Government." But he assured Southerners that "there would be no invasion, no using of force against or among the people anywhere."

(which was of course dishonest)