DOJ Withheld and Removed Some Epstein Files Related to Trump

Former Beauty Queen: Contestants Were Forced To Greet Trump Even When Not Fully Dressed (2016)
www.cbsnews.com

... As Miss Arizona, Tasha Dixon, then 18, competed in the Miss USA pageant, which was owned by Donald Trump for 19 years, along with the Miss Universe and Miss Teen USA pageants.

"Our first introduction to him was when we were at the dress rehearsal and half naked changing into our bikinis," Dixon recalled. "He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on or any sort of clothing or anything. Some girls were topless. Other girls were naked." ...

then to have the pressure of the people that worked for him telling us to go fawn all over him, go walk up to him, talk to him, get his attention."

Dixon's account is seemingly supported by the Republican presidential nominee himself in a 2005 broadcast on the "The Howard Stern Show." That audio recording was re-released last weekend.

Here is a sample of what was said on the show on April 11, 2005:

Trump: "I'll go backstage before a show and everyone's getting dressed and ready and everything else. And you know, no men are anywhere. And I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant. And therefore, I'm inspecting it. You know I'm inspecting it. I want to make sure everything is good."

Stern: "You're like a doctor."

Trump: "Is everyone OK? You know they're standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women. And so I sort of get away with things like that."

...

So all these pages that are missing and no one has seen according to NPR all have incriminating evidence against Trump according to NPR who haven't seen them. Makes sense, to a liberal.

"The Justice Department has withheld some Epstein files related to allegations that President Trump sexually abused a minor"

MAGAts don't care. As they've freely admitted on this site. Especially they ones who call themselves Christian.

#5 Always interesting when you are outraged if Trump walked into a dressing room but you have no issues with Trans men using woman's locker rooms.

Why were they hidden and or removed? We know what they were about, because we have pages surrounding them that were released... you know, the non-incriminating ones.

" you have no issues with Trans men using woman's locker rooms."

Trans women use stalls, like all the other women in a women's rest room.

Anyone using "trans" as a smokescreen to prey on women didn't need the "trans" part to begin with.

Ya gotta Congrats! FishP for werking in, "But, but... TRANS!" into the thread.

#5 Always interesting when you are outraged if Trump walked into a dressing room but you have no issues with Trans men using woman's locker rooms.
#8 | Posted by fishpaw

Which one of those people did you vote for? And did the trans men (?) arguably have a reason for being in that locker room other than staring at naked underage girls?

And this is about Trump sexually abusing children. Far more than walking into a dressing room. But you voted for the guy who admitted to raping a woman in a dressing room (when he refused to testify at his own trials, which Trump said only guilty people do), so supporting a pedo is probably not much of a leap for you.

#5 Always interesting when you are outraged if Trump walked into a dressing room but you have no issues with Trans men using woman's locker rooms.

#8 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

"Always interesting"? Is that right?

Is it also interesting that, even with the Epstein files redacted and suppressed in violation of law, we still find enough in them to implicate Trump in rape and murder?

I congratulate you for showing up today, though. Most of your friends are laying low, correctly surmising that Donald's State of the Union tonight will be a Sh-- Show.

Donald's State of the Union tonight will be a Sh-- Show.

Kimmel and Colbert are both doing live shows tonight to add to the fun!

#5 Always interesting when you are outraged if Trump walked into a dressing room but you have no issues with Trans men using woman's locker rooms.

#8 | Posted by fishpaw

Trans men don't share trump's record of sexual assault.

#3 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-02-24 12:05 PM | Reply | Flag: Makes Sense

There is no doubt in my mind that the "p tapes" are in fact dotard raping children.

Dummkopf Trumpf is a clean freak, like Jeffrey Epstein was, so this theory is sound.

Christopher Steele collected raw intelligence about Dummkopf Trumpf from his Russian sources, which means there could have been a translation problem, hearsay, speculation, or use of slang from an informant.

Nothing yet has been disproven from the Steele Dossier and raw intelligence must be fine-tuned.

As a single operative, Steele didn't have wiretaps, IMINT, or collateral information to create a polished all-source intelligence product. He was a private investigator using his old contacts from his days as an MI6 officer.

I was tasked with conducting a surveillance overseas many years ago. The information and photography I transmitted was raw and later fine-tuned at DIA HQ by an analyst for her USIC product.

"The Justice Department has withheld some Epstein files related to allegations that President Trump sexually abused a minor"
MAGAts don't care. As they've freely admitted on this site. Especially they ones who call themselves Christian.

#7 | Posted by censored at 2026-02-24 12:29 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

And who has made those allegations? People that have not seen the supposed files that supposedly contain those allegations.

#17

Why were they hidden and or removed? We know what they were about, because we have pages surrounding them that were released... you know, the non-incriminating ones.
#9 | Posted by Corky

But you voted for the guy who admitted to raping a woman in a dressing room (when he refused to testify at his own trials, which Trump said only guilty people do), so supporting a pedo is probably not much of a leap for you.

#12 | Posted by censored at 2026-02-24 12:38 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

He admitted to raping her? Jean Carroll herself admitted he didn't rape her you idiot. And you voted for the guy whose daughter said he took "inappropriate" showers with her. That's more than pedo --- right there.
And back on topic, as I've said over and over, Biden had control of the files for 4 years, you know they combed over them with a microscope trying to find crap on Trump, they couldn't so they resorted to try and bankrupt, jail and kill him.

Why were they hidden and or removed? We know what they were about, because we have pages surrounding them that were released... you know, the non-incriminating ones.
#9 | Posted by Corky
#18 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-24 12:57 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Good question, let's ask Merrick Garland. Most likely more incriminating evidence that Epstein was involved with the Clinton foundation.

Yeah, see because finger rape isn't rape in Republican circles.... he was convicted by a Jury.

How about we not Deflect to Garland and ax' AG Bondi instead?

Oh, we have, and she answered by redacting, withholding, and removing information in the FBI interviews of these victims.

let's ask Merrick Garland.

#22 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

Jesus H. Christ on a Popsicle Stick. FISHPAW.

Why can't we ask the man who HAS them and is COVERING THEM UP?

Most likely more incriminating evidence that Epstein was involved with the Clinton foundation.

#22 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

If it's there then DONALD TRUMP needs to stop covering it up.

I sense your desperation here. But, no. Merrck Garland, Joe Biden, and Bill Clinton won't be able to save Trump now.

2 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

Are you going to watch the Sh-- of the Union Speech tonight and see who Trump threatens?

I'll be there eating literal popcorn.

@#22 ... Most likely more incriminating evidence that Epstein was involved with the Clinton foundation. ...

Fmr Pres Clinton has publicly asked that all references to him in the Epstein files be released unredacted except for the names of the victims.

When will Pres Trump do the same?

Are you going to watch the Sh-- of the Union Speech tonight and see who Trump threatens?

Hmmm.... let's see. Democrats, SCOTUS, Cuba, Iran, Columbia, the EU, the UN, Denmark, Norway, NBC, ABC, the Fed, California, Mexico, Venezuela, the Pacific Ocean, weather...

"with the Clinton foundation."

What a riot.

Foundations are, by their nature, very transparent.

When HRC was about to run for President, she'd been investigated for decades, especially via the Foundation.

And after going through the CF with a fine-toothed comb, Republicans decided to attack her on Benghazi, for not sending in troops to save Americans...despite the fact as Secretary of State, she's nowhere in the military chain of command.

"Some files have not been made public despite a law mandating their release.

These include what appears to be more than 50 pages of FBI interviews, and notes from conversations with a woman who accused Trump of sexual abuse decades ago when she was a minor."

from the thread article

If this is the case, these files MUST be made public.

#1 | POSTED BY BOAZ

I understand that someone recently signed a law to make that happen.

#33,

Yep. And whoever ordered these to be withheld should be held accountable, no matter who it was, if it can be proven.

Biden had control of the files for 4 years, you know they combed over them with a microscope trying to find crap on Trump, they couldn't so they resorted to try and bankrupt, jail and kill him.

#21 | Posted by fishpaw

If dems wanted to lock up trump he'd have been locked up for the 11 counts if criminal obstruction from the mueller investigation.

Biden and Garland stupidly chose to let trump off the hook as an olive branch to make his fascist cult come back to sanity, and it failed.

Zed,

BTW, what's your opinion of Clinton naked in a hot tub with a redacted victim?

Serious question.

Yep. And whoever ordered these to be withheld should be held accountable, no matter who it was, if it can be proven.

#34 | Posted by boaz

What do you need proven? The law says all files must be released. They are not all being released.

BTW, what's your opinion of Clinton naked in a hot tub with a redacted victim?

Serious question.

#36 | Posted by boaz

Clinton is willing to testify under oath to the american people.

Why isn't trump?

Re 21&22

The Deflection is strong in this one!

BTW, what's your opinion of Clinton naked in a hot tub with a redacted victim?

#36 | POSTED BY BOAZ

I agree with many here: let the chips fall.

I am sick to death with people excusing Trump's behavior with reference to Clinton.

That's what my local MAGA Congressman used to do.

The guilty need to hang. The only real question is how quickly and in what order.

@#40 ... I agree with many here: let the chips fall. ...

Exactly.

I care not who may be caught up, whether Democrat, Republican or whoever.

What I do care about, and want to see, is Justice served for the victims.

He admitted to raping her?

Yes, when he refused to testify at his trials by pleading the fifth, which Trump said only guilty people do.

Donald Trump Pleads the Fifth After Saying Only Guilty People Do
www.newsweek.com

Jean Carroll herself admitted he didn't rape her you idiot.
#21 | Posted by fishpaw

Let's check with the judge:

Donald Trump raped E. Jean Carroll even though he was found liable only for 'sexual abuse,' judge rules
www.businessinsider.com

And Trump, by his own arguments, admitted to it when he refused to testify in his own defense.

You have any kids or grandkids you want to offer up to Dear Leader Trump to "not-rape" in a dressing room?

What do you need proven? The law says all files must be released. They are not all being released.

#37 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

Can you read? Unlike an emotional liberal, I say what I mean. Simple reading should be comprehension enough for you.

Clinton is willing to testify under oath to the american people.

Why isn't trump?

#38 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

People like you are the reason there cannot be any conversation anymore.

That's not the subject of what I asked. Answer the ------- question.

BTW, what's your opinion of Clinton naked in a hot tub with a redacted victim?

Was he naked? Was the other a "victim"?

The photo with Clinton and the so-called "Victim."

Does the Victim claim that Clinton is the one doing the victimizing?

Oh, so now they are "so called"?

ROTFLMAO

What would you say if there was a photo of Trump in a hot tub with a redacted out victim?

Does the Victim claim that Clinton is the one doing the victimizing?

Why didnt you ask that about Trump?

Flag:

What would you say if there was a photo of Trump in a hot tub with a redacted out victim?

#48 | Posted by boaz

We'd say wow bondi messed up and accidentally released a file she intended to hide or destroy with the rest of the evidence about trump.

Does the Victim claim that Clinton is the one doing the victimizing?
Why didnt you ask that about Trump?
#49 | Posted by boaz

How could I?

What photo of Trump with a Victim in the reieased Epstein Files are you referring to?

They've covering it up, Boaz.

WATCH LIVE: Epstein survivors join House Democrats ahead of Trump's State of the Union

www.youtube.com

These are some of the same Survivors that in the Bondi Hearing all said that the FBI would not return their calls.

And that Bondi refused to even look at.

The Pres and the AG are now in Violation of the Law.

People like you are the reason there cannot be any conversation anymore.

That's not the subject of what I asked. Answer the ------- question.

#44 | Posted by boaz

Your entire cult can only exist in a state of delusion where the 2020 election was stolen and trump isnt a corrupt pervert.

So go ahead and get mad at anyone who won't join your delusion and cry about how they're the problem.

Hey Boaz,

What do you think about the picture of Donald Rumsfeld and Saddam Hussein shaking hands?

What photo of Trump with a Victim in the reieased Epstein Files are you referring to?

Ah, I bet you know everything about Trump in the files, but you dont know about a simple phot of Clinton sitting in a hot tub with a redacted victim?

#54,

Not the subject of this thread.

Good deflection try though.

Answer my question.

If this is the case, these files MUST be made public.
#32 | Posted by boaz

You think you voted for that. But Trump and the Republicans lied to you.

It's just too painful for a big strong man like you to admit you got suckered.

So instead you deflect to Bill Clinton.

As long as the entire federal government is protecting Trump, no one will ever know the truth about what is in the Epstein files.

"Answer my question."

I did answer your question. I asked, is the Victim a victim of Clinton?

Your question is also a deflection from the fact that Trump has been whitewashed from these files.

Boazo simps for a serial------------.

Ah, I bet you know everything about Trump in the files, but you dont know about a simple phot of Clinton sitting in a hot tub with a redacted victim?
#55 | Posted by boaz

I bet the information about Trump in these files that is illegally being kept secret is worse than anything you could imagine about Clinton.

Clinton didn't even chase after young girls. Clinton chased after trashy women.

WAIT!

Bubba is President again?

Or is someone just making a Whopper Whataboutism that means absolutely nothing?

Or is someone just making a Whopper Whataboutism that means absolutely nothing?

I asked someone else a question, but they want so bad to address me and engage me, they just brought that into the conversation.

As long as the entire federal government is protecting Trump, no one will ever know the truth about what is in the Epstein files.

You think Trump is the only one in the Esptein files? Or is he the only one you care about?

He's the ONLY one who signed a Law to release the Files and now has his DOJ hiding them.

He's also the only one who is POTUS.

You think Trump is the only one in the Esptein files? Or is he the only one you care about?

#64 | Posted by boaz

He's the only one in charge of a powerful nation that is in the epstein files, and is therefore the most concerning. Not to mention he's mentioned the most times of anyone by far.

Only a moron would pretend anything else in the files is as important as the inclusion of the world's most powerful man, who is also fighting desperately to keep them hidden.

Only a moron like you is only interested in one person just because they hold a different worldview than yours.

You have no evidence against Trump. No pictures, unlike Clinton in a hot tub. And many others whom you seem to conveniently forget about until asked about.

Trump has already been investigated in relation to these epstein "files". Nothing has been found. That much we know. Other's we dont know about havent even been looked at, like Whoopie, who, until it was known SHE was in the files said "Well, just because someone's name is in the files doesnt mean they did anything wrong" LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL..

She didnt apply that standard to Trump. But she wants it for herself.

Her name is in the files. You need to call her a pedophile too. Just like you are doing to Trump.

- Trump has already been investigated in relation to these epstein "files". Nothing has been found.

The only people who 'investigated' Trump, if they did at all, are his own Loyal appointees, several of which used to be his Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers.

And, as with the files per this article, FBI investigation files of girls who said he raped and beat them are missing whole pages that the DOJ refuses to release.

The main file for this article of the FOUR times the FBI interviewed the victim, FIFTY PAGES ARE MISSING.

Why is that, Boaz? Why won't Trump let them be released?

"Trump has already been investigated in relation to these epstein "files"."

Bro you can't be this stupid

You can be this brainwashed, but you can't be this stupid.

"You have no evidence against Trump. No pictures, unlike Clinton in a hot tub."

That's because DOJ Withheld and Removed Some Epstein Files Related to Trump

There's a whole thread about it.

You're in the thread, right now.

"You have no evidence against Trump."

Outside of the heavily redacted Epstein Files:

Trump has settled twenty five sexual misconduct lawsuits out of court.

Trump then lost a libel case against a person he denied sexually assaulting.

So those are twenty-six pieces of evidence that you have never, ever taken seriously.

Sexual assault just isn't a serious crime for you, Boaz.

After all: It happened to you, and you turned out fine.

You have no evidence against Trump. No pictures, unlike Clinton in a hot tub. And many others whom you seem to conveniently forget about until asked about.

She didnt apply that standard to Trump. But she wants it for herself.

Her name is in the files. You need to call her a pedophile too. Just like you are doing to Trump.

#67 | Posted by boaz

There are already dozens of photos with trump and epstein out there, many with young women in them.
Either you know this and you're lying, or you are admitting how dumb you are.

Trump's name isn't just "in the files" because he and epstein were at a dinner together at a large event, like a lot of people are. He is in there a million times. And you're so dumb and brainwashed you literally have been trained to overlook it or pretend it is no big deal.

Trump has already been investigated in relation to these epstein "files".

You can't be serious.

Are you serious?

I can't tell if you're being serious or just trolling.

Bro you can't be this stupid

Can't he be?

If this is the case, these files MUST be made public.
#32 | Posted by boaz

Have you tried telling a Grown-Up that the files must be made public?

Ranking Member Robert Garcia Statement After Department of Justice Withheld Epstein Files, Includes Allegation President Donald Trump Sexually Abused a Minor
oversightdemocrats.house.gov

The Epstein Files were available to prosecute Trump.

Sealing records doesn't prevent other prosecutions.

Either prior administrations determined there was nothing to prosecute Trump, or there was and they were complicit to cover up.

#75 | Posted by Petrous

One side is fine with prosecuting anyone involved in a cover up.

@#76 ... One side is fine with prosecuting anyone involved in a cover up. ...

From the cited article ...

... The FBI interviewed this Trump and Epstein accuser four times. That is according to an FBI "Serial Report" and a list of Non-Testifying Witness Material in the Maxwell case that were also released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Only the first interview, conducted July 24, 2019, is in the public database. That interview does not mention Trump.

Of 15 documents listed in a log of the Maxwell discovery material for this first accuser, only seven are in the Epstein files database. Those missing also include notes that accompany three of the interviews. The discrepancy in the file for the Trump accuser was first reported by independent journalist Roger Sollenberger. ...

Interview in 2019? That was during Pres Trump's first term.

Another view ...

Missing Epstein files include interviews with alleged Trump accuser
www.ms.now

... The Justice Department has withheld notes and memos reflecting FBI interviews from its release of the Epstein files, including interviews with a woman who accused President Donald Trump of sexually abusing her when she was a minor, MS NOW has confirmed.

NPR reported on Tuesday that more than 50 pages of notes and memos reflecting FBI interviews with the woman are not found in the Justice Department's publicly released database of documents related to convicted and deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

According to a source who has viewed the unredacted documents, a woman interviewed by the FBI in July 2019 about her Epstein allegations is the same woman who alleged that Trump forced her to perform oral sex on him 35 years ago, when she was 13 or 14 years old, and subsequently hit her.

That allegation appears in a 2025 PowerPoint presentation detailing each of the FBI's Epstein-related investigations and a spreadsheet of unconfirmed tips called into the bureau's National Threat Operations Center reviewed by MS NOW. MS NOW has found that of at least four interviews the FBI conducted with the woman related to the Epstein investigations, only one memo " and no handwritten notes " reflecting such an interview is included on the DOJ site.

At about the same time that the FBI circulated its PowerPoint presentation and spreadsheet of tips, a third FBI document -- an internal email -- stated that "salacious information" about Trump, among others, appeared in the "JE file," and that "one identified victim claimed abuse by Trump but ultimately refused to cooperate." MS NOW cannot confirm that the "identified victim" referred to in that email is the Trump accuser referenced above.

The FBI also interviewed a woman known as "Jane," who testified under oath at the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's longtime associate who was sentenced to 20 years in prison for conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse minors. "Jane" claimed she was introduced to Trump by Epstein at Mar-a-Lago when she was 14 years old.

MS NOW has found that handwritten notes from interviews with "Jane" -- as well as witness statements from at least one person close to her -- about her experience, including with respect to her interaction with Trump, are either not included in the DOJ's release or have since been taken down. ...