Tuesday, February 24, 2026

DOJ Withheld and Removed Some Epstein Files Related to Trump

The Justice Department has withheld some Epstein files related to allegations that President Trump sexually abused a minor, an NPR investigation finds.

Posted by reinheitsgebot at 11:30 AM | 33 COMMENTS | permalink

More

The Justice Department has withheld some Epstein files related to allegations that President Trump sexually abused a minor, an NPR investigation finds. It also removed some documents from the public database where accusations against Jeffrey Epstein also mention Trump. www.npr.org/2026/02/24/n ...

[image or embed]

-- Molly Jong-Fast (@mollyjongfast.bsky.social) Feb 24, 2026 at 7:22 AM

Comments

Orange Adolf diddling kids. Why is it whom you always suspect?

#1 | Posted by a_monson at 2026-02-24 08:32 AM

Donald Trump will prove to be guilty of everything he is accused of; starting with the rape of children and ending with their murder and burial.

#2 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-24 09:32 AM

Why is it whom you always suspect?

When you look at the connections between Epstein and Putin and how he used the "wonderful secrets" of the UK politicians to get classified intel for Putin it is pretty clear his predatory nature of sexually assaulting women would be used to get blackmail material on him.

There is no doubt in my mind that the "p tapes" are in fact dotard raping children.

Anyone that would boast publicly that he walks into a child's dressing room at a pageant and "inspects" the girls, brags about sexual assault and fantasizes about dating his own daughter clearly has the capacity to do a lot worse.

Worse yet the DOJ is an accomplice to these rapes, tortures and killings by covering them up under the umbrella of if they prosecute all the rapists the entire political system would collapse.

I say any political system that would allow this to happen and then actively cover it up is corrupt to it's very core and deserves to collapse.

Every single week it's a news story of another right wing person getting caught with child porn or abusing children.

With them every accusation is a confession.

They all deserve to burn.

#3 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-02-24 12:05 PM

"Some files have not been made public despite a law mandating their release. These include what appears to be more than 50 pages of FBI interviews, and notes from conversations with a woman who accused Trump of sexual abuse decades ago when she was a minor."

more at the thread link, including hidden files about Maxwell

#4 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-24 12:21 PM

Big Oops! THIS story already up on Front Page.

#5 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-24 12:23 PM

The article includes info on missing files also include another abused girl AND files on Maxwell that are missing.

#6 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-24 12:25 PM

Former Beauty Queen: Contestants Were Forced To Greet Trump Even When Not Fully Dressed (2016)
www.cbsnews.com

... As Miss Arizona, Tasha Dixon, then 18, competed in the Miss USA pageant, which was owned by Donald Trump for 19 years, along with the Miss Universe and Miss Teen USA pageants.

"Our first introduction to him was when we were at the dress rehearsal and half naked changing into our bikinis," Dixon recalled. "He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on or any sort of clothing or anything. Some girls were topless. Other girls were naked." ...

then to have the pressure of the people that worked for him telling us to go fawn all over him, go walk up to him, talk to him, get his attention."

Dixon's account is seemingly supported by the Republican presidential nominee himself in a 2005 broadcast on the "The Howard Stern Show." That audio recording was re-released last weekend.

Here is a sample of what was said on the show on April 11, 2005:

Trump: "I'll go backstage before a show and everyone's getting dressed and ready and everything else. And you know, no men are anywhere. And I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant. And therefore, I'm inspecting it. You know I'm inspecting it. I want to make sure everything is good."

Stern: "You're like a doctor."

Trump: "Is everyone OK? You know they're standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women. And so I sort of get away with things like that."


...


#7 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-24 12:25 PM

So all these pages that are missing and no one has seen according to NPR all have incriminating evidence against Trump according to NPR who haven't seen them. Makes sense, to a liberal.

#8 | Posted by fishpaw at 2026-02-24 12:28 PM

"The Justice Department has withheld some Epstein files related to allegations that President Trump sexually abused a minor"

MAGAts don't care. As they've freely admitted on this site. Especially they ones who call themselves Christian.

#9 | Posted by censored at 2026-02-24 12:29 PM

#5 Always interesting when you are outraged if Trump walked into a dressing room but you have no issues with Trans men using woman's locker rooms.

#10 | Posted by fishpaw at 2026-02-24 12:31 PM

#6

Why were they hidden and or removed? We know what they were about, because we have pages surrounding them that were released... you know, the non-incriminating ones.

#11 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-24 12:34 PM

" you have no issues with Trans men using woman's locker rooms."

Trans women use stalls, like all the other women in a women's rest room.

Anyone using "trans" as a smokescreen to prey on women didn't need the "trans" part to begin with.

#12 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-24 12:35 PM

Ya gotta Congrats! FishP for werking in, "But, but... TRANS!" into the thread.

#13 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-24 12:37 PM

#5 Always interesting when you are outraged if Trump walked into a dressing room but you have no issues with Trans men using woman's locker rooms.
#8 | Posted by fishpaw

Which one of those people did you vote for? And did the trans men (?) arguably have a reason for being in that locker room other than staring at naked underage girls?

And this is about Trump sexually abusing children. Far more than walking into a dressing room. But you voted for the guy who admitted to raping a woman in a dressing room (when he refused to testify at his own trials, which Trump said only guilty people do), so supporting a pedo is probably not much of a leap for you.

#14 | Posted by censored at 2026-02-24 12:38 PM

#5 Always interesting when you are outraged if Trump walked into a dressing room but you have no issues with Trans men using woman's locker rooms.

#8 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

"Always interesting"? Is that right?

Is it also interesting that, even with the Epstein files redacted and suppressed in violation of law, we still find enough in them to implicate Trump in rape and murder?

I congratulate you for showing up today, though. Most of your friends are laying low, correctly surmising that Donald's State of the Union tonight will be a Sh-- Show.

#15 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-24 12:39 PM

Donald's State of the Union tonight will be a Sh-- Show.

Kimmel and Colbert are both doing live shows tonight to add to the fun!

#16 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-02-24 12:42 PM

#5 Always interesting when you are outraged if Trump walked into a dressing room but you have no issues with Trans men using woman's locker rooms.

#8 | Posted by fishpaw

Trans men don't share trump's record of sexual assault.

#17 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-02-24 12:46 PM

#3 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-02-24 12:05 PM | Reply | Flag: Makes Sense

There is no doubt in my mind that the "p tapes" are in fact dotard raping children.

Dummkopf Trumpf is a clean freak, like Jeffrey Epstein was, so this theory is sound.

Christopher Steele collected raw intelligence about Dummkopf Trumpf from his Russian sources, which means there could have been a translation problem, hearsay, speculation, or use of slang from an informant.

Nothing yet has been disproven from the Steele Dossier and raw intelligence must be fine-tuned.

As a single operative, Steele didn't have wiretaps, IMINT, or collateral information to create a polished all-source intelligence product. He was a private investigator using his old contacts from his days as an MI6 officer.

I was tasked with conducting a surveillance overseas many years ago. The information and photography I transmitted was raw and later fine-tuned at DIA HQ by an analyst for her USIC product.


#18 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-02-24 12:49 PM

"The Justice Department has withheld some Epstein files related to allegations that President Trump sexually abused a minor"
MAGAts don't care. As they've freely admitted on this site. Especially they ones who call themselves Christian.

#7 | Posted by censored at 2026-02-24 12:29 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

And who has made those allegations? People that have not seen the supposed files that supposedly contain those allegations.

#19 | Posted by fishpaw at 2026-02-24 12:52 PM

#17

Why were they hidden and or removed? We know what they were about, because we have pages surrounding them that were released... you know, the non-incriminating ones.
#9 | Posted by Corky

#20 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-24 12:57 PM

But you voted for the guy who admitted to raping a woman in a dressing room (when he refused to testify at his own trials, which Trump said only guilty people do), so supporting a pedo is probably not much of a leap for you.

#12 | Posted by censored at 2026-02-24 12:38 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

He admitted to raping her? Jean Carroll herself admitted he didn't rape her you idiot. And you voted for the guy whose daughter said he took "inappropriate" showers with her. That's more than pedo --- right there.
And back on topic, as I've said over and over, Biden had control of the files for 4 years, you know they combed over them with a microscope trying to find crap on Trump, they couldn't so they resorted to try and bankrupt, jail and kill him.

#21 | Posted by fishpaw at 2026-02-24 01:01 PM

Why were they hidden and or removed? We know what they were about, because we have pages surrounding them that were released... you know, the non-incriminating ones.
#9 | Posted by Corky
#18 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-24 12:57 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Good question, let's ask Merrick Garland. Most likely more incriminating evidence that Epstein was involved with the Clinton foundation.

#22 | Posted by fishpaw at 2026-02-24 01:04 PM

Yeah, see because finger rape isn't rape in Republican circles.... he was convicted by a Jury.

#23 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-24 01:05 PM

How about we not Deflect to Garland and ax' AG Bondi instead?

Oh, we have, and she answered by redacting, withholding, and removing information in the FBI interviews of these victims.

#24 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-24 01:07 PM

let's ask Merrick Garland.

#22 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

Jesus H. Christ on a Popsicle Stick. FISHPAW.

Why can't we ask the man who HAS them and is COVERING THEM UP?

#25 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-24 01:14 PM

Most likely more incriminating evidence that Epstein was involved with the Clinton foundation.

#22 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

If it's there then DONALD TRUMP needs to stop covering it up.

I sense your desperation here. But, no. Merrck Garland, Joe Biden, and Bill Clinton won't be able to save Trump now.

#26 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-24 01:16 PM

2 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

Are you going to watch the Sh-- of the Union Speech tonight and see who Trump threatens?

I'll be there eating literal popcorn.

#27 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-24 01:19 PM

@#22 ... Most likely more incriminating evidence that Epstein was involved with the Clinton foundation. ...

Fmr Pres Clinton has publicly asked that all references to him in the Epstein files be released unredacted except for the names of the victims.

When will Pres Trump do the same?



#28 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-24 01:24 PM

Are you going to watch the Sh-- of the Union Speech tonight and see who Trump threatens?

Hmmm.... let's see. Democrats, SCOTUS, Cuba, Iran, Columbia, the EU, the UN, Denmark, Norway, NBC, ABC, the Fed, California, Mexico, Venezuela, the Pacific Ocean, weather...

#29 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-02-24 01:26 PM

"with the Clinton foundation."

What a riot.

Foundations are, by their nature, very transparent.

When HRC was about to run for President, she'd been investigated for decades, especially via the Foundation.

And after going through the CF with a fine-toothed comb, Republicans decided to attack her on Benghazi, for not sending in troops to save Americans...despite the fact as Secretary of State, she's nowhere in the military chain of command.

#30 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-02-24 01:28 PM

"Some files have not been made public despite a law mandating their release.

These include what appears to be more than 50 pages of FBI interviews, and notes from conversations with a woman who accused Trump of sexual abuse decades ago when she was a minor."

from the thread article

#31 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-24 01:28 PM

If this is the case, these files MUST be made public.

#32 | Posted by boaz at 2026-02-24 01:41 PM

If this is the case, these files MUST be made public.

#1 | POSTED BY BOAZ

I understand that someone recently signed a law to make that happen.

#33 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-24 01:44 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Armed Man Shot and Killed by SS Outside Mar-a-Lago (48 comments)

DOJ Withheld and Removed Some Epstein Files Related to Trump (33 comments)

Mexico Tourists are Being Told to Shelter in Place (32 comments)

All Commercial Drivers Will Have to Take Test in English (32 comments)

Blizzard Warnings Expand for New York City, Northeast (31 comments)

U.S. Wins First Hockey Gold Since 1980 'Miracle on Ice' (30 comments)

6 in 10 Disapprove of Trump (28 comments)

Trump Curious Why Iran Has Not 'capitulated' (23 comments)

DOGE Bites Taxman (21 comments)

Full Cost of War Act: Tie Force Decisions to Veteran Funding (19 comments)