DOJ Withheld and Removed Some Epstein Files Related to Trump

Former Beauty Queen: Contestants Were Forced To Greet Trump Even When Not Fully Dressed (2016)
www.cbsnews.com

... As Miss Arizona, Tasha Dixon, then 18, competed in the Miss USA pageant, which was owned by Donald Trump for 19 years, along with the Miss Universe and Miss Teen USA pageants.

"Our first introduction to him was when we were at the dress rehearsal and half naked changing into our bikinis," Dixon recalled. "He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on or any sort of clothing or anything. Some girls were topless. Other girls were naked." ...

then to have the pressure of the people that worked for him telling us to go fawn all over him, go walk up to him, talk to him, get his attention."

Dixon's account is seemingly supported by the Republican presidential nominee himself in a 2005 broadcast on the "The Howard Stern Show." That audio recording was re-released last weekend.

Here is a sample of what was said on the show on April 11, 2005:

Trump: "I'll go backstage before a show and everyone's getting dressed and ready and everything else. And you know, no men are anywhere. And I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant. And therefore, I'm inspecting it. You know I'm inspecting it. I want to make sure everything is good."

Stern: "You're like a doctor."

Trump: "Is everyone OK? You know they're standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women. And so I sort of get away with things like that."

...

So all these pages that are missing and no one has seen according to NPR all have incriminating evidence against Trump according to NPR who haven't seen them. Makes sense, to a liberal.

"The Justice Department has withheld some Epstein files related to allegations that President Trump sexually abused a minor"

MAGAts don't care. As they've freely admitted on this site. Especially they ones who call themselves Christian.

#5 Always interesting when you are outraged if Trump walked into a dressing room but you have no issues with Trans men using woman's locker rooms.

Why were they hidden and or removed? We know what they were about, because we have pages surrounding them that were released... you know, the non-incriminating ones.

" you have no issues with Trans men using woman's locker rooms."

Trans women use stalls, like all the other women in a women's rest room.

Anyone using "trans" as a smokescreen to prey on women didn't need the "trans" part to begin with.

Ya gotta Congrats! FishP for werking in, "But, but... TRANS!" into the thread.

#5 Always interesting when you are outraged if Trump walked into a dressing room but you have no issues with Trans men using woman's locker rooms.
#8 | Posted by fishpaw

Which one of those people did you vote for? And did the trans men (?) arguably have a reason for being in that locker room other than staring at naked underage girls?

And this is about Trump sexually abusing children. Far more than walking into a dressing room. But you voted for the guy who admitted to raping a woman in a dressing room (when he refused to testify at his own trials, which Trump said only guilty people do), so supporting a pedo is probably not much of a leap for you.

#5 Always interesting when you are outraged if Trump walked into a dressing room but you have no issues with Trans men using woman's locker rooms.

#8 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

"Always interesting"? Is that right?

Is it also interesting that, even with the Epstein files redacted and suppressed in violation of law, we still find enough in them to implicate Trump in rape and murder?

I congratulate you for showing up today, though. Most of your friends are laying low, correctly surmising that Donald's State of the Union tonight will be a Sh-- Show.

Donald's State of the Union tonight will be a Sh-- Show.

Kimmel and Colbert are both doing live shows tonight to add to the fun!

#5 Always interesting when you are outraged if Trump walked into a dressing room but you have no issues with Trans men using woman's locker rooms.

#8 | Posted by fishpaw

Trans men don't share trump's record of sexual assault.

#3 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-02-24 12:05 PM | Reply | Flag: Makes Sense

There is no doubt in my mind that the "p tapes" are in fact dotard raping children.

Dummkopf Trumpf is a clean freak, like Jeffrey Epstein was, so this theory is sound.

Christopher Steele collected raw intelligence about Dummkopf Trumpf from his Russian sources, which means there could have been a translation problem, hearsay, speculation, or use of slang from an informant.

Nothing yet has been disproven from the Steele Dossier and raw intelligence must be fine-tuned.

As a single operative, Steele didn't have wiretaps, IMINT, or collateral information to create a polished all-source intelligence product. He was a private investigator using his old contacts from his days as an MI6 officer.

I was tasked with conducting a surveillance overseas many years ago. The information and photography I transmitted was raw and later fine-tuned at DIA HQ by an analyst for her USIC product.

"The Justice Department has withheld some Epstein files related to allegations that President Trump sexually abused a minor"
MAGAts don't care. As they've freely admitted on this site. Especially they ones who call themselves Christian.

#7 | Posted by censored at 2026-02-24 12:29 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

And who has made those allegations? People that have not seen the supposed files that supposedly contain those allegations.

#17

Why were they hidden and or removed? We know what they were about, because we have pages surrounding them that were released... you know, the non-incriminating ones.
#9 | Posted by Corky

But you voted for the guy who admitted to raping a woman in a dressing room (when he refused to testify at his own trials, which Trump said only guilty people do), so supporting a pedo is probably not much of a leap for you.

#12 | Posted by censored at 2026-02-24 12:38 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

He admitted to raping her? Jean Carroll herself admitted he didn't rape her you idiot. And you voted for the guy whose daughter said he took "inappropriate" showers with her. That's more than pedo --- right there.
And back on topic, as I've said over and over, Biden had control of the files for 4 years, you know they combed over them with a microscope trying to find crap on Trump, they couldn't so they resorted to try and bankrupt, jail and kill him.

Why were they hidden and or removed? We know what they were about, because we have pages surrounding them that were released... you know, the non-incriminating ones.
#9 | Posted by Corky
#18 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-24 12:57 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Good question, let's ask Merrick Garland. Most likely more incriminating evidence that Epstein was involved with the Clinton foundation.

Yeah, see because finger rape isn't rape in Republican circles.... he was convicted by a Jury.

How about we not Deflect to Garland and ax' AG Bondi instead?

Oh, we have, and she answered by redacting, withholding, and removing information in the FBI interviews of these victims.

let's ask Merrick Garland.

#22 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

Jesus H. Christ on a Popsicle Stick. FISHPAW.

Why can't we ask the man who HAS them and is COVERING THEM UP?

Most likely more incriminating evidence that Epstein was involved with the Clinton foundation.

#22 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

If it's there then DONALD TRUMP needs to stop covering it up.

I sense your desperation here. But, no. Merrck Garland, Joe Biden, and Bill Clinton won't be able to save Trump now.

2 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

Are you going to watch the Sh-- of the Union Speech tonight and see who Trump threatens?

I'll be there eating literal popcorn.

@#22 ... Most likely more incriminating evidence that Epstein was involved with the Clinton foundation. ...

Fmr Pres Clinton has publicly asked that all references to him in the Epstein files be released unredacted except for the names of the victims.

When will Pres Trump do the same?

Are you going to watch the Sh-- of the Union Speech tonight and see who Trump threatens?

Hmmm.... let's see. Democrats, SCOTUS, Cuba, Iran, Columbia, the EU, the UN, Denmark, Norway, NBC, ABC, the Fed, California, Mexico, Venezuela, the Pacific Ocean, weather...

"with the Clinton foundation."

What a riot.

Foundations are, by their nature, very transparent.

When HRC was about to run for President, she'd been investigated for decades, especially via the Foundation.

And after going through the CF with a fine-toothed comb, Republicans decided to attack her on Benghazi, for not sending in troops to save Americans...despite the fact as Secretary of State, she's nowhere in the military chain of command.

"Some files have not been made public despite a law mandating their release.

These include what appears to be more than 50 pages of FBI interviews, and notes from conversations with a woman who accused Trump of sexual abuse decades ago when she was a minor."

from the thread article

If this is the case, these files MUST be made public.

#1 | POSTED BY BOAZ

I understand that someone recently signed a law to make that happen.

#33,

Yep. And whoever ordered these to be withheld should be held accountable, no matter who it was, if it can be proven.

Biden had control of the files for 4 years, you know they combed over them with a microscope trying to find crap on Trump, they couldn't so they resorted to try and bankrupt, jail and kill him.

#21 | Posted by fishpaw

If dems wanted to lock up trump he'd have been locked up for the 11 counts if criminal obstruction from the mueller investigation.

Biden and Garland stupidly chose to let trump off the hook as an olive branch to make his fascist cult come back to sanity, and it failed.

Zed,

BTW, what's your opinion of Clinton naked in a hot tub with a redacted victim?

Serious question.

Yep. And whoever ordered these to be withheld should be held accountable, no matter who it was, if it can be proven.

#34 | Posted by boaz

What do you need proven? The law says all files must be released. They are not all being released.

BTW, what's your opinion of Clinton naked in a hot tub with a redacted victim?

Serious question.

#36 | Posted by boaz

Clinton is willing to testify under oath to the american people.

Why isn't trump?

Re 21&22

The Deflection is strong in this one!

BTW, what's your opinion of Clinton naked in a hot tub with a redacted victim?

#36 | POSTED BY BOAZ

I agree with many here: let the chips fall.

I am sick to death with people excusing Trump's behavior with reference to Clinton.

That's what my local MAGA Congressman used to do.

The guilty need to hang. The only real question is how quickly and in what order.

@#40 ... I agree with many here: let the chips fall. ...

Exactly.

I care not who may be caught up, whether Democrat, Republican or whoever.

What I do care about, and want to see, is Justice served for the victims.

He admitted to raping her?

Yes, when he refused to testify at his trials by pleading the fifth, which Trump said only guilty people do.

Donald Trump Pleads the Fifth After Saying Only Guilty People Do
www.newsweek.com

Jean Carroll herself admitted he didn't rape her you idiot.
#21 | Posted by fishpaw

Let's check with the judge:

Donald Trump raped E. Jean Carroll even though he was found liable only for 'sexual abuse,' judge rules
www.businessinsider.com

And Trump, by his own arguments, admitted to it when he refused to testify in his own defense.

You have any kids or grandkids you want to offer up to Dear Leader Trump to "not-rape" in a dressing room?

What do you need proven? The law says all files must be released. They are not all being released.

#37 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

Can you read? Unlike an emotional liberal, I say what I mean. Simple reading should be comprehension enough for you.

Clinton is willing to testify under oath to the american people.

Why isn't trump?

#38 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

People like you are the reason there cannot be any conversation anymore.

That's not the subject of what I asked. Answer the fucking question.

BTW, what's your opinion of Clinton naked in a hot tub with a redacted victim?

Was he naked? Was the other a "victim"?

The photo with Clinton and the so-called "Victim."

Does the Victim claim that Clinton is the one doing the victimizing?

Oh, so now they are "so called"?

ROTFLMAO

What would you say if there was a photo of Trump in a hot tub with a redacted out victim?

Does the Victim claim that Clinton is the one doing the victimizing?

Why didnt you ask that about Trump?

Flag:

What would you say if there was a photo of Trump in a hot tub with a redacted out victim?

#48 | Posted by boaz

We'd say wow bondi messed up and accidentally released a file she intended to hide or destroy with the rest of the evidence about trump.

Does the Victim claim that Clinton is the one doing the victimizing?
Why didnt you ask that about Trump?
#49 | Posted by boaz

How could I?

What photo of Trump with a Victim in the reieased Epstein Files are you referring to?

They've covering it up, Boaz.

WATCH LIVE: Epstein survivors join House Democrats ahead of Trump's State of the Union

www.youtube.com

These are some of the same Survivors that in the Bondi Hearing all said that the FBI would not return their calls.

And that Bondi refused to even look at.

The Pres and the AG are now in Violation of the Law.