New Evidence Corroborates Claims of Trump-Epstein Accuser

Monday, March 30, 2026

A new investigation has backed up evidence given by a woman who has accused Donald Trump of sexually abusing her when she was 13, according to a report.

Posted by lamplighter at 08:31 PM | 87 COMMENTS | permalink

The Post and Courier used some of my research in their latest article! @postandcourier.bsky.social #EpsteinFiles www.postandcourier.com/news/hilton- ...

[image or embed]
-- Ellie Leonard (@redpencilscript.bsky.social) Mar 30, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Comments

More from the article ...

... A report from South Carolina newspaper The Post and Courier released on Sunday has now corroborated key personal details given by the woman about a third man she claims also sexually assaulted her"named Jimmy Atkins.

Those details are not directly related to her accusations against Trump, but suggest that she was truthful about other matters she raised with the FBI. ...

#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-30 12:35 PM

There is of course new evidence.

Trump did it. Ergo, you can't avoid having evidence.

#2 | Posted by Zed at 2026-03-30 12:47 PM

"Her interviews referencing Trump were initially withheld by the Department of Justice."

In violation of the Epstein Act.

#3 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-30 12:56 PM

"In violation of the Epstein Act."

Let's not forget: the clear reason the interview wasn't available before, is the Trump Administration was trying to protect one of the guilty.

#4 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-30 12:58 PM

Just more proof we need to be starting Wars of Diversion around the world wherever we can!

#5 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-30 01:45 PM

If you don't believe Trump raped those girls, it's because you're brainwashed in the Trump Cult.

#6 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-30 02:07 PM

French Senator Claude Malhuret has delivered a scathing critique of Donald Trump and members of his administration, making a series of controversial remarks, AzerNEWS reports.
"Every time the Epstein affair resurfaces, bombs explode somewhere in the world and cause a distraction!"

www.azernews.az

#7 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-03-30 03:12 PM

The front page of every contemporary daily newspaper ought to print a trigger warning, for those who need a little cushioning from reality.

#8 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-03-30 11:04 PM

Trump raping children is indisputable.

Some people decided they're okay with Trump raping children.

These people need to be culled.

#9 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-30 11:08 PM

Epstein's accountant changed his testimony to Congress because he doesn't Dummkopf Trumpf to sic USAG Pam Bondi him.

#10 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-03-30 11:15 PM

Doesn't matter.

35% of America are okay with a pedophile------------ as president.

35% of America is okay with him being racist.

35% of America is okay with him being a rapist.

35% of America is okay with him trying to steal the 2020 election, stealing billions from the taxpayers, taking bribes from foreign governments.

That is the section of America that have no morals and don't care if Trump doesn't have them either just so long as he hates on the people they hate.

#11 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-03-31 06:52 AM

Sad, but true.

#12 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-03-31 06:59 AM

The Epstein estate paying off the accuser seems to be SOP for Trump who doesn't want his name associated with the payoff. He did the same by having Michael Cohen payoff Stormy Daniels so as to keep his "hands clean". Bank records would probably show the Epstein estate being reimbursed by some Trump affiliated entity.

#13 | Posted by FedUpWithPols at 2026-03-31 07:01 AM

#7 | Posted by reinheitsgebot: Do you suppose we could convince him to run for senate here? Holy -----, what a speech!

#14 | Posted by Yodagirl at 2026-03-31 12:00 PM

Also from your article:

"The woman's claims of assault against Epstein, Trump, and Atkins remain unproven, while no direct evidence backing up the alleged crimes has been uncovered"

#15 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 01:40 PM

Look at Turds, doing his best to protect pedophiles.

What a ------- loser.

#16 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-31 01:44 PM

"The woman's claims of assault against Epstein, Trump, and Atkins remain unproven"

You know Trump raped those girls.
That's what you admire about him.

#17 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-31 01:45 PM

Look at Turds, doing his best to protect pedophiles.

What a ------- loser.

#16 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-31 01:44 PM | Reply | Flag:

I'm actually posting a sentence contained in the article that you ------- raetards seem to have missed or either you cant read. Does it hurt to be that stupid?

#17
Oh look at Snoofy, another ------- moron who cant read basic English.

#18 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 01:52 PM

Pro-Tip

If you're going to use an article to prove guilt of Trump, make sure it doesn't say

"The woman's claims of assault against Epstein, Trump, and Atkins remain unproven, while no direct evidence backing up the alleged crimes has been uncovered"

#19 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 01:56 PM

Oh look at Snoofy, another ------- moron who cant read basic English.
#18 | Posted by lfthndthrds

There's plenty of evidence Trump raped those girls.

I don't know why you keep bothering to deny it.

Everybody here understands you wouldn't dare stop supporting Trump, even if these multiple rapes beyond that of E. Jean Carroll were somehow proven to your satisfaction.

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."

#20 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-31 01:56 PM

Even the headline is a ------- lie. You people are sick

#21 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 01:57 PM

I don't know why you keep bothering to deny it.

#20 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-31 01:56 PM | Reply | Flag:

LMAO That's the thing with you morons. I didn't deny anything, the article GasLighter posted did it for me.

#22 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 01:58 PM

Turds doesn't find anything wrong with grown adults raping children.

It reminds him of when his dad would rape his sister.

Good ol times.

#23 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-31 02:01 PM

I didn't deny anything
#22 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Sure you do.

You deny Trump raped those girls.

Or are you finally waking up to the fact that you don't care whether or not Trump raped them?

I don't think you're strong enough to admit you don't care if Trump raped those girls.

I'm not sure why you can't do it. You seem confident enough in other things.

#24 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-31 02:04 PM

From the article:

"Those details are not directly related to her accusations against Trump, but suggest that she was truthful about other matters she raised with the FBI."

Do you agree that the evidence suggests the woman was truthful with the FBI?

Curious when you try to talk this down from "Rape" to "Sex she regretted afterwards."

Because that's your next move after you accept the incident took place.

#25 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-31 02:08 PM

"but suggest that she was truthful about other matters she raised with the FBI."

#25 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-31 02:08 PM | Reply | Flag:

This story is a hit piece. If there is evidence, then spit it the hell out, and quit with the suggestions.

#26 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 03:16 PM

If there is evidence, then spit it the hell out, and quit with the suggestions.

#26 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

Release the Epstein Files.

It's likely as simple as that.

#27 | Posted by Zed at 2026-03-31 03:52 PM

quit with the suggestions.

#26 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

I would be wonderful if Trump would stop breaking the law and allow us to get rid of the "suggestions".

As things sit, he allows the imagination to run riot.

And, in the case, I think reality will beggar imagination.

#28 | Posted by Zed at 2026-03-31 04:00 PM

If there is evidence, then spit it the hell out, and quit with the suggestions.
#26 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTURDS

There's ample evidence.

Including the fact while forcing her to give him oral, a 13 year old girl bit his dick.

You don't care.

You support pedophiles and protect them.

What you're waiting for are the videos, so you can pleasure yourself while watching Trump rape girls.

No one would be surprised to find out you're a pedophile.

#29 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-31 04:03 PM

Evidentiary Fact has a liberal bias... which is why no rwinger will ever accept the evidence about Trump.

#30 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-31 04:10 PM

Evidentiary Fact has a liberal bias... which is why no rwinger will ever accept the evidence about Trump.
#30 | Posted by Corky

Ding Ding Ding!
He was convicted of 34 felonies and found liable for a sex crime and they still denied it and voted for him.

#31 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2026-03-31 04:16 PM

@#30 ... Evidentiary Fact has a liberal bias... which is why no rwinger will ever accept the evidence about Trump. ...

Release the Epstein Files.

#32 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-31 04:21 PM

#31

His own DOJ lawyers testified under Oath that he threatened to fire them if they didn't help him overturn the Election, so they threatened to quit.

Which is why today's DOJ is run by former Trump Criminal Defense Lawyers Bondi and Blanche.

And Trumpers Approve of that wholeheartedly.

#33 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-31 04:25 PM

"If there is evidence, then spit it the hell out"

Trump has paid settlements in at least twenty-five sexual misconduct civil suits spanning decades.

The reason you don't think that is evidence is the same reason you think Ashley Biden's diary is evidence.

#34 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-31 04:36 PM

www.justice.gov

#35 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-03-31 04:45 PM

#34 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2026-03-31 04:36 PM | REPLY | FLAG:

You do realize why this statement is included in the article, right?

"The woman's claims of assault against Epstein, Trump, and Atkins remain unproven, while no direct evidence backing up the alleged crimes has been uncovered"

It's to keep the garbage news from being sued.

#36 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 06:16 PM

Also, the people who sold Ashley Biden's diary to PV were sentenced to prison. Even Snopes admitted they couldn't cover for shower daddy anymore. Deal with it. You have more evidence that Biden is a sicko than Trump.

#37 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 06:20 PM

The disgusting orange chomo is a serial------------.

#38 | Posted by Reinheitsgebot at 2026-03-31 06:22 PM

"You have more evidence that Biden is a sicko than Trump."

Not at all.

Trump has settled at least 25 sexual misconduct lawsuits.

How many has Biden settled?

That's evidence.

You just don't want it to be.

#39 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-31 06:23 PM

the people who sold Ashley Biden's diary to PV were sentenced to prison

For transporting stolen property across state lines.

#40 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-03-31 06:25 PM

What age do you think the girl in Trump's birthday drawing to Epstein is?

I bet you can't answer, because you're a modern-day Know-Nothing.

#41 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-31 06:26 PM

- What age do you think the girl in Trump's birthday drawing to Epstein is?

The Cult won't even admit it's Trump's drawing or his signature on his infamous and telling Bday Card to his best friend and mutual young model agency owner, much less that it exposes their "secret" that he writes as a caption to said drawing.

;;
"The controversy surrounding the "infamous" birthday card"allegedly sent by Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003"centers on a hand-drawn outline of a naked woman with a signature positioned to mimic pubic hair.

The House Oversight Committee released the card in September 2025 after subpoenaing Epstein's estate, revealing it was part of a birthday book compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell.

Handwriting Experts: Several forensic analysts have stated the signature is authentic to Trump's style from the early 2000s, noting a "gentle downward final stroke" and specific letter formations identical to other verified documents from that era.

Past Precedent: While Trump claims he does not draw, reports from The New York Times highlighted that he frequently doodled or sketched with thick black markers for charity auctions in the 1990s and early 2000s."

www.google.com

Fortunately for them, Cults rarely deal in facts. If they can't pretend they can 'own' them a lib, what fun is it?

And then they wonder why they aren't taken seriously... and then they whine about it.

#42 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-31 06:45 PM

-I bet you can't answer

You can't either. You claim Trump's daughter was abused but you can't substantiate that either. You have a president's own daughter who claims abuse and molestation and you point at Trump. You're all sick. Especially Rine. That's a pedo if I ever saw one

#43 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 07:06 PM

I fully agree, at 14 years of age, Ashley was too old for Joe to be naked in the shower with her, it makes sense she would feel uncomfortable and that it was inappropriate.

By the same token, teenagers competing in pageants, undressing in their changing area, are too young for Trump to walk in on them naked. It makes sense they would feel uncomfortable and that is was inappropriate.

Now consider we have Trump bragging about how he loves to grab women by their pu**ies, tha he can't help himself.

Now, we have women coming forward saying when they were younger Trump grabbed them by their pu**y, that he raped them.

Somehow we have people denying its possibility.

They can't fathom the possibility that the guy who walks in on teenagers undressing and can't control himself around pu**y, would grab girls by their pu**y.

What?????

No way!!!

Impossible!!!!!!

#44 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-31 07:08 PM

You have a president's own daughter who claims abuse and molestation

Never happened.

You can speculate.

But your only argument is one sentence from her diary saying her father was naked in the shower with her.

That's far from your claims and is something she has denied.

This is why you're not taken seriously.

When people say they have been raped, you ignore them because it doesn't fit your ideology.

When people say they haven't been raped, you ignore them because it doesn't fit your agenda.

Trump above America! MAGA!

#45 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-31 07:16 PM

Speculate? LMAO. You may want to do a little reading. ------- idiot who's dad beat his mom's ass for picking up a zucchini.

#46 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 07:26 PM

Curious deflection on this thread.

Why?

What's the problem with releasing the Epstein Files?

#47 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-31 07:35 PM

Speculate?

Are you not sure what that word means?

No where does Ashley say she was molested or abused.

Meanwhile we have several people coming forward saying President "I love to grab pu**y, I can't help myself!" did in fact grab them.

And here you are, defending Trump's pedophilia.

#48 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-31 07:43 PM

@#48 ... And here you are, defending Trump's pedophilia. ...

That's odd ... isn't it?

#49 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-31 07:54 PM

It's to keep the garbage news from being sued.
#36 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

It's too bad we Hoi Polloi have to wait until Trumpy is no longer wrapped in the flag to sue him for slander and defamation of character.

But I would expect a very long line at the courthouses come January 21, 2029

#50 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-31 08:01 PM

Trump has been involved in over 4,000 legal cases, including personal defamation lawsuits and accusations of sexual harassment.

I imagine that figure will double once he is no longer protected by his office and the Supremes.

#51 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-31 08:04 PM

" No where does Ashley say she was molested or abused"

Except where she says it happened.

You're a loser Iranian who makes excuses for his dad who beat his wife and would have executed you for being gay. His alias was Sam. Prove me wrong, -------.

#52 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 08:11 PM

Loser

#53 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 08:12 PM

PEDOs are all losers, pedo.

#54 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-31 08:13 PM

#52 Except she never said any such thing, Left Hind Turds.

#55 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-03-31 08:15 PM

That's odd ... isn't it?

Is it?

Trump has slow rolled his pedophilia in order to allow his cult to have time to come to terms with it.

You should take into consideration Lfthndturds took ivermectin to prevent getting Covid.

He's a full on Trumper.

#56 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-31 08:16 PM

@#36 ... It's to keep the garbage news from being sued. ...

Yeah, but FoxNews was already sued and settled to the tune of $700+ million dollars.

#57 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-31 08:17 PM

Except where she says it happened.

Where's that?

Meanwhile Trump is a pedophile and you're trying so hard to deflect from it.

#58 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-31 08:20 PM

Methinks Lfthndturds doth protest too much

#59 | Posted by hamburglar at 2026-03-31 08:27 PM

Clownshack's dad grew up in an Iranian culture where it was ok to execute a gay man. Prove me wrong

#60 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 08:29 PM

Methinks Lfthndturds doth protest too much

#59 | POSTED BY HAMBURGLAR

Me thinks you're a turd burgular.

#61 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 08:30 PM

Sam I am

#62 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 08:31 PM

Drew

Seniority: 125

Party: Other

Ideology: Other

Private E-mail
Visit Home Page

Joined 2012/10/05
Visited 2026/03/26

Status: user

Yep, a turd burglar.

#63 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 08:39 PM

A turd burglar for sure.

#64 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 08:41 PM

Clownshack wants his digits for sure.

#65 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 08:43 PM

-I bet you can't answer
You can't either.
#43 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Oh, I can answer.

That girl is in the age range that is indicative of hebephilia.

Hebephilia is the strong, persistent sexual interest by adults in pubescent children who are in early adolescence, typically ages 11"14 and showing Tanner stages 2 to 3 of physical development.[1] It differs from pedophilia (the primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children), and from ephebophilia (the primary sexual interest in later adolescents, typically ages 15"18).[1][2][3] While individuals with a sexual preference for adults may have some sexual interest in pubescent-aged individuals,[2] researchers and clinical diagnoses have proposed that hebephilia is characterized by a sexual preference for pubescent rather than adult partners.[2][4] en.wikipedia.org

Now why can't you say that?

Because you lack the moral convictions to speak the truth.

I'll speak the truth about Biden, he took a shower with his daughter. There's not even an allegation that anything more than "a shower" took place. There's also no other allegations against Biden that have been supported by any evidence or withstood any scrutniy.

You can't tell the truth about Trump. For one thing, you'd exceed the 8000 character limit.

But more than that, you can't admit any of it is true. You're working on how to tell us you don't give two ----- if Trump raped those girls or not. But you haven't figured out how to do it yet. Because you're just not smart. And what brains you do have, you prefer to use them imaginining men's penises.

#66 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-31 08:51 PM

@#53 ... Loser ...

Well, since there is no indication of the comment to which it is replying, I would say that the comment being replied to is the immediate prior one.

So, what was comment @52 and what trolling alias authored it?

I saw this ...
@52

... #52 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 08:11 PM ...

Oh, that's gonna leave a mark, apparently calling itself a loser. ...

#67 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-31 09:02 PM

www.youtube.com

#68 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 09:02 PM

The turd burglar has spoken!

#69 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 09:04 PM

@#68

Is your current trolling alias sure it wants to cite that song?

Lyrics excerpt ...

genius.com

... [Verse 1]
I got a bad disease
Up from my brain is where I bleed
Insanity it seems
Has got me by my soul
...

#70 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-31 09:07 PM

Lamp likes up the rear

#71 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-03-31 09:08 PM

"Lamp likes up the rear" - #71 | POSTED BY Left Hind Turds AT 2026-03-31 09:08 PM

Flag: Experience or Longing ???

#72 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-03-31 09:17 PM

FTA:

" "While The Post and Courier has not independently verified a connection between Atkins and Epstein."

"Those details are not directly related to her accusations against Trump,"

"none of the corroborated details directly related to her accusations about Trump."

So, nothing. Click bait trash from The Daily Beast.

I wouldn't be shocked if Trump did sexually assault a minor decades ago. Having said that, give me something tangible. This hit piece isn't the "Eureka" folks are desperately trying to make it be.

#73 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-04-01 12:27 AM

@#73 ... So, nothing. ...

Well, nothing beside new evidence that has not been seen before.

What else yer current trolling alias go?

#74 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-04-01 12:37 AM

Reread my #73. Specifically what I quoted from the embedded article.

#75 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-04-01 12:40 AM

@#73 ... Having said that, give me something tangible. ...

OK, how's this question ...

Why does Pres Trump seem to be so focused upon burying the Epstein Files.

Why the apparent cover-up?

#76 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-04-01 12:41 AM

... and I am the first person to notice a similarity of Pres Trump foray into Iran and the Epstein Files?

I mean ...

Epic Fury.

Epstein Files.

A coincidence of acronyms?

I wish I knew.

#77 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-04-01 12:44 AM

So, nothing. Click bait trash from The Daily Beast.

Eat s*&^, pedo protector.

#78 | Posted by jpw at 2026-04-01 12:49 AM

Lamp likes up the rear

#71 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Apparently so do you based on the frequency of posts about d*&^ in your mouth and stuff up a rear.

Wait wait, are you Kristi Noem's husband?

#79 | Posted by jpw at 2026-04-01 12:50 AM

Reread my #73. Specifically what I quoted from the embedded article.

#75 | Posted by BellRinger

Reread my bulls*&^ post where I justify being a pedo protector by using the typical denier strategy of taking myopic details, "debunking" them and then using that to ignore the totality of evidence.

-pedoringer

#80 | Posted by jpw at 2026-04-01 12:52 AM

@#75 ... Specifically what I quoted from the embedded article. ...

I read that, and I also read that article when it was first posted here.

So, specifically, what part of the article does your current trolling alias want to cite in answer to my #74 comment, "Well, nothing beside new evidence that has not been seen before."

Yer up ...

#81 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-04-01 12:57 AM

" Reread my bulls*&^ post where I justify being a pedo protector by using the typical denier strategy of taking myopic details, "debunking" them and then using that to ignore the totality of evidence.

-pedoringer

#80 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2026-04-01 12:52 AM | FLAG: "

Does anyone here speak gibberish? I could use a translator.

#82 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-04-01 01:21 AM

Is anyone surprise that tin foil hat JPW buys into this just by reading the headline?

#83 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-04-01 01:29 AM

@#82

So, your current trolling alias has nothing in response, beside the usual attack posture.

So, just trolling for replies I see.

Back when I used to run a message board (1990's or so), the message board was subject to what I now call "attacks" by troll farms.

At the time, there was a common concern that those random aliases who were polluting the message boards were paid by how many replies their comments received.

While, at the time, I did not buy into that theory, nowadays it is starting to look more accurate.

#84 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-04-01 01:45 AM

i.ytimg.com

#85 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-04-01 05:53 AM

And Garland did nothing.

Either the evidence is there and Garland was complicit in a cover up or there isn't enough evidence.

Is Garland guilty of a coverup?
If not, then this isn't new, it's not enough.

If it's plenty, then both parties and involved in the scandal.

So, when is the DC Madam's files being released?

When is the House going to release redacted records of their payoffs and will the House give the DOJ access to unredacted copies?

#86 | Posted by Petrous at 2026-04-01 12:03 PM

Hey, it's Petrock... blaming everyone but the perp, Donald Jailbird Trump.