The new case stems from a photograph of seashells on a North Carolina beach.
NEW: Comey has been indicted for his "8647" seashell post. omg ... www.cnn.com/2026/04/28/p ...
-- Mueller, She Wrote (@muellershewrote.com) Apr 28, 2026 at 2:19 PM
[image or embed]
Matt Gaetz insists his use of 86' is distinct' from Comey's threat' as MAGA accused of hypocrisy over term (May 2025)
www.independent.co.uk
... MAGA world erupted in fury on Thursday night over a social media post from former FBI Director James Comey, claiming that his image of seashells spelling out the numbers "8647" constituted a "threat" on President Donald Trump's life.
"He knew exactly what that meant. A child knows what that meant ... That meant assassination,'" Trump fumed in an interview with Fox News anchor Bret Baier on Friday.
Yet, while the Trump administration is investigating Comey and members of the president's cabinet are even saying he "should be behind bars," many of the same people raging that this was a call for assassination had previously used the same term to refer to their political opponents " including Joe Biden.
Matt Gaetz, the former GOP congressman and one-time attorney general nominee who now hosts a show on far-right network One America News, jumped aboard the outrage train over the Comey post. With Republicans and Trump officials falling over each other to express indignation over the ex-FBI director's image, Gaetz retweeted a letter from Rep. Andy Ogles "urging an immediate joint investigation" by the FBI and Secret Service into Comey.
Meanwhile, just last year, Gaetz proudly tweeted that he'd "now 86'd" former Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy, former Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel and Sen. Mitch McConnell from their leadership posts, adding that "better days are ahead for the Republican Party." ...
Doubtful even Trump's chosen justices would be inclined to 86 Watts v United States (1969) (supreme.justia.com). Thomas and Alito, sure, of course, in a New York minute. But the restc(Justice Kegs aside)? Probably not.
#23 | POSTED BY SNOOFY
Were these before or after Comey's instagram photo? It seems interesting given what I think the Comey Indictment is about.
The new case stems from a photograph of seashells on a North Carolina beach.
And more perhaps ..
The indictment had multiple charges.
www.justice.gov
871(a) - threat
875(c) - forfeiture of proceeds
The way indicment appears to be framed as in the context of Comey's marketing for book "FDR Drive" which is about the line between free speech and criminal incitement, or on a First Amendment battle over "incitement". So its kind of comical, in fact he might have been motivated to do this for financial gain.
Similar to Amazon?
Context: Same day as 86image, at the beach, Comey had another image on Insta where he was reading his book "FDR drive".
Not sure of the legality of this all, but
Drudge Retort Headlines
Trump's Iranian Nightmare (38 comments)
Taxpayer-Funded Prayer Gathering (22 comments)
Trump: 'I don't think about Americans' financial situation' (22 comments)
Young Woman Fueling Trump's Wild Midnight Sprees Is Exposed (17 comments)
Trump 'On Verge of Massive Error With China Deal' (15 comments)
Former Top Russian Official Admits the Country is Over Putin (14 comments)
Penile Implant Specialist with History of Far-right Comments Led Hantavirus Presser (13 comments)
Hegseth's $1.5 Trillion Budget Slammed as 'Slush Fund' (13 comments)
Bulgaria Wins Eurovision Amid Protests Against Israel (13 comments)
America in Free Fall (13 comments)