"The Israelis should take genocide lessons from the Palestinians."

Are you joking?

Tell us what you think the people who killed 30,000 civilians might learn from the people who killed 28,800 fewer civilians.

Just tell us.

"Palestinians attacking the Tiger with a blowgun"

Really only Hamas doing that.

The Palestinians living under the Hamas terror regime that was backed by Israel for the past quarter century are victims of both Israel and Hamas.

"More mass graves found"

Buy Caterpillar stock.

"So.. how incompetent at genocide are the jews?"

Old Testament much?

"So yeah, CNN and Yahoo are spouting Hamas propaganda"

Always a Victim!

It's the hallmark of a Deplorable.

"They could have it the Strip depopulated in a few days given their capabilities."

It's almost like they don't want to be seen as genocidal maniacs and spoken of in the same breath as Nazis.

I wonder why that is.

Nobody should be surprised when a terror regime does terror regime things.

The thing that is so surprising that lots of people can't quite wrap their head around it, is Israel's support for the Hamas terror regime for the past 25 years. Some people outright deny it. It's unfortunate but understandable. It's like learning that the police have no duty to serve and protect. Even if people know that as a fact, it still doesn't change the way they think about the police.

Was that Genocide?
#39 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

If the answer is yes, will you say Israel is engaged in genocide?
LMFAO

"A call for the elimination of the Jewish state, and the Jews who live within it."

I'm not so sure about that last part...

Either way, Zionists in the Knesset have called for the establishment of Eretz Yisrael. Is that a call for genocide?

"As I see it, both have legitimate claim to the land, and more importantly the former owners-the British-split it up between them."

Israel has expanded since then, into the West Bank, Golan Heights, etc. So, should Israel shrink back down to the borders given to them legitimately by the British split and the UN Resolution?

If not, why bring it up?

"The Palestinians (who have never had self rule in the region, unlike the Jews) had a choice."

If they never had self rule, then they didn't have much of a choice.

"The Jews at least can claim historical self rule."

Ancient history is not the basis for Israel's legitimacy as a state.

Unless you're a Zionist who says Israel belongs to Jews because G-d said so.

And if you say that, you are also saying Jews get all of Palestine and much of Syria too.

"Those areas were captured because they were key terrain utilized by the Syrian Arab Army during a massive attack on Israel. Giving it up to the Syrians would give them a decided battlefield advantage if they ever chose to attack Israel again."

If the security situation was untenable, then Israel should have rejected the UN partition, like the Palestinians did.

You want Israel to have their cake and eat it too.

"The bottom line is that the Golan heights would still be Syrian territory, had they not used it to conduct strikes against Israel."

That argument gives Israel a claim to all of the Levant; they just haven't taken it yet. But when they do, you'll say it's justified to ensure Israel's security.

If the war has gone the other way, would you support the loss of Israeli territory in the name of Syrian Jordanian and Egyptian security?

Or is there a "you started it" thing happening here?

"The root cause of this falls squarely at the feet of the Palestinians."

Palestinians didn't cause Theodor Herzl to be born.
Zionism is European Colonialism for Jews.

"Herzl formed the Zionist Organization and promoted Jewish immigration to Palestine in an effort to form a Jewish state." --Wikipedia

The root cause of this is Western Nation Building, along very familiar British Divide And Conquer lines.

"But for him, it wouldn't be the right thing to do?"

It wasn't the right thing to do... but it was his idea.
The Israeli Constitution gives him credit but you can't?

"Hey you know what works be a good idea after the Jews were almost exterminated? Give them their ancestral homeland"

"Give them" is exactly the problem.

What makes it Britain's to give?
What makes that part of the Middle East Europe's, to give to a bunch of European Jews?

It's a colony of Jews, founded by outsiders. It shouldn't be surprising the indigenous population feels slighted. Because they were.

"Give them their ancestral homeland that just so happens too be vacant"

That is a lie.
"A land with no people, for a people with no land"
Is a Zionist fairy tale you should have outgrown by now

Palestinian villages were bulldozed by Israelis.
Do you really not know that!!??

That is shocking that you don't know that.

The Palestinians could be enjoying full citizenship liner millions of Israeli Arabs.
#63 | POSTED BY ABH

No they couldn't.

About half a million Palestinians fled in terror of, or were forced to flee by, the Zionists.

You probably do know that Israel says the Palestinians who were rum off the land do not have any right to return.

"They have the right to exist PEACEFULLY."

You wouldn't know it.

They have been forcibly, violently expanding into the West Bank for decades.

"Their violence put Israel on the defensive."

Israel was born of Zionist violence.

Exhibit A: King David Hotel.

"That's the only way to look at it. They deserve no sympathy."

That's a great way to look at 30,000 dead Palestinian civilians, 30,000 of whom were born into a situation not of their making.

Your cop attitude is showing.

"You don't think they get to react to that? They don't get to defend themselves?"

Do the Palestinians get to react to Britain turning Palestine into a homeland for foreign European Jews?

"The Palestinians instantly attacked after losing nothing."

Nothing?
They lost half their homeland by UN declaration in 1948.
As you said above, it was given away by Britain to people who didn't even live there.
And you even said it was given because of events that happened in Europe.

Why that should be a burden on Palestinians people is not easy to answer, which is why you fell for the lie that it was a land with nothing in it.

"Israel has been on the DEFENSIVE ever since."

Sure.
The defensive killing of 30,000 Palestinian civilians.

#75 is Zionist mythology they teach Jewish children.

You're denying this happened:

Like, you are obviously not dumb, so what gives?

"That's how they could have obtained the moral high ground."

As a secular construct of the West, Israel ought to have held the moral high ground from the start.

Israel has not lived up to that potential.
They especially have not since 1967.
It got worse after 1995.
It got worse still after Oct 7 2023.

Make all the excuses you want. There's no moral high ground in responding to the outrage of the killing of 1,200 civilians by killing 30,000 civilians.

"they had already attacked for no reason whatsoever .."

You sound as brainwashed as those who said 9/11 came out of nowhere.

Was the King David Hotel attacked for no reason whatever? Then state the reason.

"Yasser Arafat was an Egyptian, born in Cairo and attended King Fouad I / now Cairo University, but KGB created a fake "Palestinian" certificate of birth in Jerusalem, which allowed Arafat to study in Egyptian schools without payment. To many, his constant images in keffiyeh on TV made him just another socialist hero "Che" Guevara."

You have touched on the precise reason Israel has been supporting Islamists in the tradition of the Muslim Brotherhood as early as the 80s.

To drive a wedge between the secular, pro-Soviet PLO and the religious fanatics.

We did the same thing in Afghanistan, creating Al Qaeda and appealing to religious extremism to counter the Godless Soviet.

I'm sure you know all this.

You talk and talk and have nothing new to say.

"In 1942 the rate of extermination of Jews by German Nazis was about 15,000 a day. You would think the Israelis knew how to do it by now, if they ever had any interest in it?"

Follow up question:

You think Israrl doesn't know how to defend from 1,200 Jews killed in one day, if they had any interest in it?

Respond when you're willing to acknowledge Netanyahu is the #1 butcher of Jews in our lifetime.

COL JESSEP (Netanyahu):

You need me on that wall!

Cut to OCT 7

NARRATOR (Morgan Freeman):

When the time came that they needed him the most, he was not on that wall.