Trump should sue to seize the money to pay his outstanding legal judgment against her.

That said, I really don't believe she has received any threats from Trump supporters. Did she receive calls from -------- hoping to create a stereotype of unhinged Trump supporters? Probably - we have example after example from Jussie Smollet to Adam Kinzinger.

If I were Stormy, I would be in much more fear of being indicted for perjury given her ever changing story. Now, while the -------- run the DOJ, probably nothing to fear. But, I could see a case whereby the Trump DoJ goes after Bragg and Stormy for the NYC farce for CONVICTING Trump of a federal crime without due process and using perjury in an attempt to violate his civil rights - and yes, I see this being a criminal charge as we know Stormy won't pay civil judgments.

"Sue whom?
#7 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER"

Stormy Daniels -------.

"The------------------- is staying true to form by going after Stormy's 13 year old daughter.
#10 | POSTED BY REINHEITSGEBOT"

Hey, I know Biden is spray-tanned pedophile - but this is the first I have heard of him going at Stormy's 13 year old daughter. Maybe she reminds him of Ashley Biden and shower time.

Do you have a link?

"So, I have to ask, what's yer point behind this deflection?
#12 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER"

Are you retarded or just libtarded? The article states Stormy raised ----- - my point is that Trump should seize the money as it is owed to him for her lies.

"what does this case from a year ago in California (which had been discussed here on this most august site at the time) have to do with anything occurring recently?
#15 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER"

She just raised the ----- now - before, she was flat broke so she could not pay her judgment so that alone would make it relevant. But, the bigger connection is the fact that she owes Trump nearly a million dollars in legal fees because the jury found that Trump DID NOT defame her - hence, the jury ruled she lied about sleeping with him.

Now, this is extra relevant because the judge allowed her to fabricate what amounted to a rape story that she told in the 'hush money' trial - which 100% contradicted all of her prior statements and was even called out by Bill Maher - and has ZERO relevance to the actual charges against Trump.

So, my comment is doubly relevant as it deals with both her raising money (which was the point of the article) and that she lied in her most recent trial as evidenced by her already owing Trump nearly $1M - which you clearly did not know about (so, just say thank you for the alleviating you of your ignorance on this matter).

"If she lied about sleeping with trump why did he pay her 130,000 dollars and have her sign a NDA?
you're ridiculous.
#17 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE"

It is a nuisance lawsuit and sometimes it is just cheaper to make the problem go away. But, a court has already ruled on this point and found that Trump did not defame her, so, it means it found that she lied about sleeping with him. Remember, he paid her YEARS after she allegedly slept with him - he paid her because he didn't want to deal with this again so it was the path of least resistance. Pretty common for large companies actually. Similar reason why retail stores like Target let people steal - cheaper than having to pay for nuisance lawsuits if the criminal gets hurt while being detained.

"So using your logic since trump was found to have defamed e jean carrol he raped her.
#19 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE"

That is the exactly logic -------- have been applying since the verdict - correct?

"if losing the defamation suit means stormy is lying, then winning a defamation suit means e jean caroll is telling the truth.
#21 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE"

Again, this is the logic -------- have been applying since the verdict, correct?

"I agree.
She owed money, then she paid what she owed.
#23 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER"

She didn't pay the money - that is the point. That is why Trump should seize it.

"enjoy your rape vote, claudio.
#24 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE"

So, you don't follow that logic? Very strange as all -------- do.

For myself, I believe that ONLY the criminal justice system should be hearing cases on things like rape, kidnapping and murder where the defendant is given full legal protections and must be convicted beyond a reasonable doubt. So, I don't buy into your ------- logic - hence, you have nothing on me. However, -------- such as yourself - CANNOT claim that Trump raped Carroll (WHICH ALL OF YOU CLAIM TO BELIEVE) AND believe Stormy without mental gymnastics.

"Biden isnt an adjucated rapist.
#28 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE"

Neither is Trump as:
1.) THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A CONVICTION IN CIVIL COURT
2.) The jury indicated on their jury form that Trump DID NOT rape her

"where the defendant is given full legal protections and must be convicted beyond a reasonable doubt."
so not your defaming posts about joe biden on drudge retort then? i agree.
#31 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE"

When I file a civil suit against Biden for molesting his daughter - then you may have a point. As it stands, he is alleged to have molested his daughter - BY HIS DAUGHTER - and I choose to believe her. I wish he would face criminal charges for it and he may still be forced to do so. Until then - he IS NOT a convicted child molester - he is a just a credibly accused child molester. He would be free to take me to court for defamation if he wants, but remember the truth is best defense against defamation and exhibit #1 will be Ashley's diary.

"Reins link killed your post, claudio.
#33 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE"

Yeah, maybe if this was the first time this nonsense came up on this website - instead, it is about the 100th and the ACTUAL JURY FORM is what matters. Linked to below for about the 100th time:

""The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was raped' within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump raped'"

------- word salad. Further, he is mixing the concept of a penal/criminal code with civil courts - which is nonsense in itself.

"her as many people commonly understand the word rape,' " Kaplan wrote."

So, he is arguing that the jury was too stupid to understand it?

"Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.
#36 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE"

Trump should sue the ------- for defamation in a West Virginia court.

"Trump put his fingers into E Jean Carrol against her will.
#37 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE"

Using ------- logic - 100%. Which also means that Trump DID NOT sleep with Stormy Daniels by the same ------- logic.

It is not the logic I would use - but I am not a -------.

"what would you call that?
answer you coward.
#42 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE"

I would call that a CRIMINAL allegation.

I would 100% encourage her to file a criminal complaint in NY so this potentially dangerous rapist could be removed from the public if he actually did it. Why doesn't she do that?

"But then there is also a more crucial level that needs to be acknowledged.
#44 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER"

Already addressed in my #6. I have as much concern about this being real as I am about MAGAs attacking Jusie Smollet in Chicago while yelling 'This is MAGA country!'. After all, Stormy is a proven liar by the CA courts AND by her own changing statements so why believe her about this allegation?

"its called rape.
#46 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE"

Rape is a criminal act and should be decided in a criminal court. Now, if Carroll would have pressed charges and Trump was convicted in a criminal court AND THEN sued him in civil court for damages, I could get behind that. But, making a serious allegation of this type AND NOT filing criminal charges is an abuse of the legal system and should be banned.

"@#45 ... Already addressed in my #6. ...
I don't see it."

I don't actually believe them that any threats actually occurred just like I don't believe Jusie Smollet was attached by MAGAs in Chicago.

"And fmr Pres trump has been proven to be a sexul predator by the NY courts."

Under ------- logic, this is true - so, it is not possible for a liberal to simultaneously believe that Trump had sex with Stormy Daniels AND that Trump rapes E Jean Carroll.

"Is your current alias trying somehow to justify the topic of this thread? That supporters of Trump have bombarded her with social media harassment as he seeks a second presidency, including threats to rape and murder her daughter and other family.?"

Not justify - I just highly doubt that it actually happened. Again, this was a known liar as proven in the courts as well as by her prior states making these allegations against Trump supporters in a money grab attempt. And you ------- libs ran to her with your wallets open. You can't fix stupid.

"So, that is the reason your current alias states why it chose to try to deflect this thread?"

My reasons for commenting on this article have been crystal clear since my #6 for anyone with a functioning frontal lobe.

"Of course, that then raises another question, what in in original topic of the thread raised such a concern with your current alias to the point that it determined its tactics to be deflection?
#50 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER"

My tactics of discussing an article? You going to have to expand on that one as I have no clue what you mean here.

"#52 | POSTED BY THEBULL"

Finally, some intelligence is brought to the conversation by someone other than me. Thank you.