Judge Cannon Should Be Removed from Trump Case, Watchdog Group Argues in New Legal Filing

Wednesday, September 04, 2024

Judge Aileen Cannon should be reassigned in the federal classified documents case against former President Donald Trump if the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals reverses and remands her decision, according to an amicus brief filed today ...

Posted by lamplighter at 01:36 PM | 11 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry |

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article...

... according to an amicus brief filed today on behalf of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, former United States district judge Nancy Gertner, New York University Law School professor emeritus Stephen Gillers and Hofstra University Law School professor James Sample by Keker, Van Nest and Peters LLP.

Judge Cannon's overwhelming appearance of bias in Trump's favor, her disregard of existing precedent and her inability or unwillingness to avoid delay and move the case forward give the Court more than adequate grounds to reassign the case. ...

#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-09-04 01:28 PM | Reply

Judge fangirl did her job in getting the trial delayed until after the election.

She is now the #1 candidate on the Heritage Foundation list for the next SCOTUS seat available even though she is more corrupt than Lumpy Thomas.

#2 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-09-04 02:02 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

Looks like this topic has been posted on the Front Page.

drudge.com

#3 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-09-04 02:19 PM | Reply

Judicial mediocrity and judicial partisanship almost always seem to go hand in hand. Though I do acknowledge that both Thurgood Marshall and Antolin Scalia were w exceptions in so far as they both were intellectual giants.

#4 | Posted by moder8 at 2024-09-04 03:29 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

#4 | Posted by moder8

Mediocrity? That's generous in her case...

#5 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2024-09-04 04:11 PM | Reply

@#5 ... That's generous in her case... ...

Is it?

Or might she have known exactly what she has been doing to stall, and eventually throw out, the case?

I've not a clue.

#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-09-04 06:41 PM | Reply

Is it just me, or does she look like a robot?

#7 | Posted by igashosparks at 2024-09-04 07:32 PM | Reply

Is it just me, or does she look like a robot?

I was thinking Stepford wife.

#8 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-09-04 07:39 PM | Reply

MODER8 IS TOO GENEROUS IN jUSTICE oRIGINALISM B.S. hIS Bckwards views are still used as ezcuzez for wrobg headwd decisions. The Roberts Court has been the most activist court in many decades even overturninf Roe v Wade that they said was decided law in Senate approval hearings so were they lying then or more recentlt, zzzzzzzthey can't have it both ways. Scalia will always have the soiled reputation he gained in Bush v Gore no precedentm nothing in the Constitutiob to sypport it; just crass paerisan politics for which we can tgank him and others for Georhe W. Bush and the trumped up war for oil in Iraq that they pretebdto have relevance to 9=11 when there wasn't a speck ov evidence to support that.

#9 | Posted by danni at 2024-09-05 02:43 AM | Reply

She needs to go to prison for her judicial crimes. Lock her up!

#10 | Posted by a_monson at 2024-09-05 05:38 AM | Reply

Is there a traffic court in the Federal judicial system? If so, I have a nomination for chief judge...

#11 | Posted by catdog at 2024-09-05 09:36 AM | Reply