Transcript from video clip above.

CHARLAMAGNE: I think a lot of your press hits get criticized. Folks say you come off very scripted. They say you like to stick to your talking points -

KAMALA HARRIS: That would be called discipline.

CHARLAMAGNE: -- and some people say you have an inability to fearlessly say who you are and what you believe. I know that's not true, but what do you say to that criticism? And is it fair for SNL to make fun of it?

KAMALA HARRIS: Hasn't Maya Rudolph been wonderful? I have nothing but admiration for the comedy, and I think it's important to be able to laugh at yourself and each other in the spirit of comedy, obviously, and not belittling people as my opponent would do.

CHARLAMAGNE: But what do you say to people who say you stay on the talking points?

KAMALA HARRIS: I would say, you're welcome! I mean, listen, here's the thing: I love having conversations, which is why I'm so happy to be with you this afternoon. The reality is that there are certain things that must be repeated to ensure that everyone knows what I stand for and the issues that I think are at stake in this election. And so it requires repetition.

You know, some people say that until someone has heard the same thing at least three times, it just doesn't stay with them. So repetition is important. And for that reason, yes, at my rallies, I say the same thing when I go to Detroit as I do in Philly, or wherever I am, to make sure that people hear and receive what I think are some of the most critical issues at stake in this election.

Even from those who've criticised her for their past interactions as subordinates, not a single person has ever said that Harris isn't disciplined nor that she doesn't demand the same from those around her. As Trump floats from one verbalized thought cloud to the next - like a child blowing dandelion seeds into the wind - Harris maintains the message discipline that's served her well in her prosecutorial career and now as the head of the Democratic ticket.

Those who call her repetitions as 'talking points' are absolutely correct. But talking points only become definitive memories if they are heard multiple times by those hearing them. This fact is confirmed by the study and application of human psychology. And it takes discipline to make repetition effective.

Nice article from 2019.

Not surprising, Trumpers live in the past because they're so frightened by a future where white privilege is no longer a thing.

It's basically a corollary to Dr. Martin Luther King's greatest speech: They're absolutely apoplectic when they're accurately judged by the "content of their character" since they repeatedly - and often with oblivious pride - continually show that they don't have any of depth by projecting their own hegemony as the targeted goal of those they fear will eventually succeed them.

What does this Kamala Harris' video for the Catholic Al Smith dinner look Iike you Tony?

It looks like Kamala understood the purpose of the Al Smith dinner - levity and humor - unlike donOld Trump who droned on and on about his campaign grievances without any witticism in sight.

Since you know so little about America, let me explain to you what the Al Smith dinner is about. The dinner is supposed to be a political DMZ in the middle of a heated campaign that allows candidates to show humility, self deprecation, and the ability to laugh at the circumstances the American electoral experience forces candidate into.

It's so rich for the same people who've continually and repeatedly gaslit about Kamala lacking intelligence, lacking the ability to respond off-the-cuff, lacking the ability to articulate a message see all of that get blown up right before their very eyes when all they had to do was look accurately back at the past. Yes, Kamala's time was not 2020. Same for every other Democrat not named Joe Biden, but I don't see anyone claiming that Buttigieg, Sanders, Warren, Bennett, or any of the other candidates that Biden defeated are instantly non-viable in the future because they weren't successful then. Only Kamala - who went on to become Vice President and now the party's standard bearer for President, when none of those others threw their hats into the ring - as they could have - when Biden stepped down.

Kamala is 7-0 in elected politics, yet yabobs like Onenut can't recognize political talent when it smacks them in the face. When all is said and done, the political instincts and abilities Kamala has honed over her 3 decades of public service will show that Karl Rove in 2010 knew exactly what she was to become.

They really don't recognize the hard work and talent some one like Kamala has demonstrated her whole life. They think that they all just fall backassword into success like their heroes.

I've tried my level best to post factual information going back to the earliest part of her career, showing people that her 2019 campaign was a self-abort that actually propelled her to where she now is. And the fact she rightly pulled the ripcord when she had no money nor constituency from which to challenge the more popular and better funded Democrats only confirms she's a pragmatic - if not fortunate - politician, not an ego-driven selfish one.

And of course, the ignoranti who only looked at 2019, had no clue as they claimed she was nothing more than a DEI hire and had slept her way to success because she dated Willie Brown in the past. Even if Harris should lose, based on where she started to where her campaign lies today is a remarkable journey of success considering the unprecedented circumstances and political realities she's navigating in real time that no other modern politician has ever traveled before her.

Her besting and spanking Trump during the debate was not fluke. It came from her psychological studies on how to deal with charming sociopathic defendants in criminal courts, where the jury tends to like them. The prosecutors have to use the defendant's own ego and need to dominate others against them without upsetting jurors who otherwise might think the prosecutor is being too personal and harsh.

Trump never saw it coming, or if he did he had no effective counter maneuver, which is why he stood there like a stump when Harris called him things no other person on planet Earth ever had to his face before. And that's why he refuses to share another stage with her again. He knows the same dynamic will again emerge, showing him to be weak and defenseless against a woman who's spent a career incarcerating men just like Trump.