Trump Calls Judge 'evil' for Releasing Files Before Election

Sunday, October 20, 2024

Donald Trump has called a judge "the most evil person" as she released more than 1,800 pages of evidence in Special Counsel Jack Smith's election conspiracy case against him.

Posted by REDIAL at 04:32 PM | 24 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry |

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

... Donald Trump has called a judge "the most evil person" as she released more than 1,800 pages of evidence in Special Counsel Jack Smith's election conspiracy case against him. ...

So, this is how fmr Pres Trump views our system of Justice?

#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-10-18 11:27 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

Posted by LampLighter | Flag: Important information.

#2 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-18 11:29 PM | Reply

So, this is how fmr Pres Trump views our system of Justice?

It varies. I'm sure he thought the whole "Her E-Mails" thing was fine.

#3 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-10-18 11:30 PM | Reply

@#3

Yeah.

I agree.

like most (all?) everything else...

If the opinion is in favor of him it is good.

Otherwise, it is evil.

#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-10-18 11:57 PM | Reply

#3 | Posted by LampLighter

Flag: How not to look like an idiot when posting on social media sites.

#5 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-18 11:57 PM | Reply

So, if Trump says he is evil for releasing it then there must be something in the release Trump doesn't want people to know efore election day.

#6 | Posted by danni at 2024-10-19 02:00 AM | Reply

They put pads down on couches where he shows up so they don't have to clean up the leaking ----.

#7 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-10-20 12:10 AM | Reply

So, let me see if I understand this...

Fmr Pres Trump appealed, eventually to SCOTUS, about immunity.

SCOTUS sits on the appeal (for months?) apparently wanting to delay.

SCOTUS mostly decided in his favor, and instructed Judge Chutkan to examine the case and decide what parts are subject to immunity.

Judge Chutkan, following SCOTUS' order, asked for briefs.

SC Smith following her order, submitted a brief containing a lot of evidence.

The Judge then released a redacted version of the brief, effectively giving fmr Pres Trump just what he asked for when he started his appeal based upon immunity.

#8 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-10-20 04:47 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

This is part of the calling others what you are yourself... evil.

The tune never changes, only the words.

#9 | Posted by Corky at 2024-10-20 05:28 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Judge Chetkan has generously given Trump's legal team until November 7 to file a response. Two days after the election.

They'd be remiss if they weren't at least preparing for the same eventuality as Judge Chetkan.

#10 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-10-20 06:12 PM | Reply

If Trump loses the election, will he even still be in the country on November 7th?

OCU

#11 | Posted by OCUser at 2024-10-20 06:29 PM | Reply

I've been wondering what his Cunning Plan is to escape his Sec Ser escort to Moscow. Or NK.
Or Saudi.

Then I remembered that he's stupid and prolly doesn't have one.

#12 | Posted by Corky at 2024-10-20 06:45 PM | Reply

I've been wondering what his Cunning Plan is to escape his Sec Ser escort

He can decline SS protection any time he wants. Their job is to protect him, not keep him from skipping the country.

#13 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-10-20 06:50 PM | Reply

Remember when Comey released news of a phony investigation into Clinton 2 weeks before the 2016 election? I do.

Republicans are hypocrites you say?

#14 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-10-20 06:56 PM | Reply

Remember when Comey released news of a phony investigation into Clinton

Yup... that was to knock the P-grabbing tape story out of the news just when it was getting going.

#15 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-10-20 07:00 PM | Reply

#11 | Posted by OCUser

Trump's not going to leave the country. He can keep those appeals going for years. Especially if they ever reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

#16 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-10-20 07:07 PM | Reply

It was the brave of the------------------- to admit to being responsible for the deaths of 5 DC cops.

www.usatoday.com

#18 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-10-20 10:46 PM | Reply

In a biography set to publish a week before the election, Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell backed special counsel Jack Smith and said he hopes former President Trump will pay a price' for his role in Jan. 6th," Axios reports.

Said McConnell: "If he hasn't committed indictable offenses, I don't know what one is."

He added: "There's no doubt who inspired it, and I just hope that he'll have to pay a price for it."

Even turtle wants Putin's bitch to pay for J6.

#19 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-10-20 10:50 PM | Reply

REIN

"Even turtle wants Putin's bitch to pay for J6"

He's a little late for the party. Where was he when the country needed him?

#20 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-10-20 11:47 PM | Reply

I blame Leader McConnell for not unifying the Senate to put country over party after they saw what happened on January 6. I blame McConnell for being singularly responsible for doing nothing while Trump metastasized into the monster we have before us today.

Speaking up now from a safe place is the mark of a coward.

#21 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-10-20 11:59 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Nothing to see here, just more desperate lawfare.

#17 | POSTED BY COMMNOTES

Yeah.

It's only 1,800 pages of evidence of crimes that a candidate for president has committed.

So for maga maroons. Nothing important.

#22 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-10-21 01:05 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

@#21 ... I blame Leader McConnell for not unifying the Senate to put country over party after they saw what happened on January 6. I blame McConnell for being singularly responsible for doing nothing while Trump metastasized into the monster we have before us today. ...

Worth a repeat.

#23 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-10-21 01:25 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Nothing to see here, just more desperate lawfare.

#17 | Posted by commnotes

Lawfare would he hiding a candidate's crimes from voters before an election.

Like the FBI did for trump in 2016.

#24 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-10-21 02:00 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1