Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, October 29, 2024

From Bezos to Musk, America's richest are using media control to shape politics and grow profits ...

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"By 1880, Rockefeller's Ohio-based company controlled over 90 percent of the nation's oil, owned 4000 miles of pipelines, and employed over 100,000 people.

As Rockefeller's oil empire got larger and larger, eating alive hundreds of smaller operations, ruthlessly driving up prices, destroying his competitors, and throwing workers out of a job, public outrage grew."

/

As President Grover Cleveland " the only Democrat elected during that period " proclaimed in his 1887 State of the Union address:

"As we view the achievements of aggregated capital, we discover the existence of trusts, combinations, and monopolies, while the citizen is struggling far in the rear or is trampled to death beneath an iron heel.

Corporations, which should be the carefully restrained creatures of the law and the servants of the people, are fast becoming the people's masters."
'

There was a broad consensus across American society that those "Robber Barons" were feathering their own nests at the expense of the American public, hurting both working class people and small businesses.

The Supreme Court endorsed breaking up Standard Oil in 1911, and even broke up the Associated Press in 1944."

.

Much more at the Link about Today's New Gilded Age of the Musks, Leonards, and Thiels.

Video version:

www.youtube.com

(especially for Lightbringer)

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2024-10-28 07:28 PM | Reply

No Democrat cared about all this when all of social media and billionaires that owned them were in their pocket censoring Conservatives.

#2 | Posted by Robson at 2024-10-28 08:17 PM | Reply | Funny: 3

Posted by Robson | Flag: A proud Russian bot since 2006 (perhaps)

#3 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-28 08:19 PM | Reply

That's all SO Nineteenth Century.

Today We Love our Oligarchs.

Reagan taught us All to Worship the Rich.

Trump is a Johnny Come Lately, to Pandering to the Rich at the Expense of EveryOne Else.

America is ready to go to the Next Level.

Open Oligarchy and the Tax Exempt Status of the Most Wealthy.

It'll be a Gas.....

#4 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-10-28 10:03 PM | Reply

5. Reagan taught us to worship the rich.

Another silly laughable ideologue.

Conservatives worship and respect values. We respect only the rich that produce worthwhile accomplishment.

Democrats are group thinkets who worship frivolous celebrities and pretenders, sleaze, criminality and believe biological men can and should compete and excel over women. Their fundamental beliefs are about supporting anything that disrupts a cohesive responsible society.

#5 | Posted by Robson at 2024-10-29 08:53 AM | Reply | Funny: 2

Democrats are group thinkets who worship frivolous celebrities and pretenders, sleaze, criminality and believe biological men can and should compete and excel over women. Their fundamental beliefs are about supporting anything that disrupts a cohesive responsible society.

#5 | POSTED BY ROBSON AT 2024-10-29 08:53 AM | REPLY

Has anyone written a more self unaware sentence in the history of writing?

Who again is the Republican nominee for president?

Oh and you're still upset about the 40 trans athletes of the what, 200,000 college athletes?

------- pathetic

#6 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-10-29 09:14 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Democrats are group thinkets ..." -

#5 | Posted by Robson | Flag: A proud Russian bot since 2006 (perhaps)

How to Tell if You Have Trump Derangement Syndrome (aka: "TDS")
  1. Wearing adult diapers (when you don't need them)

  2. Wearing a black ----- on your face

  3. Showing off your JD Vance ---- Cup

  4. Getting a Trump tattoo (here and here)

  5. Worshiping a golden idol

  6. Believing in Trump for Sexual Purity

  7. Believing Trump has excellent parenting skills

  8. Believing Trump is Good for the Working Man (and woman)

  9. Believing Trump is a Successful Businessman (here, here, here, and here)

  10. Believing Trump won in 2020
TDS: Pray for a cure

#7 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-29 09:26 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

#8 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-29 09:26 AM | Reply

Robson is a proud -------- who kisses Putin or Xi's ass upon the commands from Trump! Quite sure a few years ago he did the same for Dubya and the Iraq War which accomplished what? That bunch was so stupid they didn't even get the oil that they invaded the country for. Today, even thw worstNeocons hate Trump because, bad as they were, they didn't want Putin to own our President. Can't even say that for these MAGA LUNATICS.

#9 | Posted by danni at 2024-10-29 03:50 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

"Democracy Dies in Darkness."

And it's getting very dark these days at the Washington Post.

#10 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-10-29 04:08 PM | Reply

The New Gilded Age Oligarchs are the same Robber Baron types as the old ones.

TR busted their monopolies, and FDR leveled the playing field for Americans... and we need to do it all over again now after Nixon screwed up the laws and Reagan screwed up the economy, eventually creating the New Oligarchs of today.

Russia merely followed the Reagan Ultra Capitalists to get the repressive society they have now under the Tyrant Putin and his Oligarchs.

Which is what we'll have with the Trump Oligarchs in charge.

#11 | Posted by Corky at 2024-10-29 04:50 PM | Reply

@#4 ... Today We Love our Oligarchs. ...

Maybe in Putin's Russia.


#12 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-10-29 06:22 PM | Reply

@#11 ... TR busted their monopolies ...

...trust-busting
United States history ...

www.britannica.com

... Learn about this topic in these articles:

In Theodore Roosevelt: The Square Deal of Theodore Roosevelt

... pursued this policy of "trust-busting" by initiating suits against 43 other major corporations during the next seven years. (See primary source document: Controlling the Trusts.) Early in his term, he also sought the creation of an agency that would have the power to investigate businesses engaged in interstate commerce ... ...


#13 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-10-29 06:26 PM | Reply

And...there would have been crickets from this same group of handwringers had been directed to endorse Harris.

What a bunch of steaming -------. Handwringers getting pissy because a newspaper is directed to be apolitical.

Don't worry. You still have Mother Jones. Is the Daily Kos still around?

#14 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-10-30 02:35 AM | Reply

@#14 ... Handwringers getting pissy because a newspaper is directed to be apolitical. ...

While the reporting of a newspaper should be directed to be apolitical. I agree with that view 100%

That aside ... what say ye about the editorial opinion content of the newspaper?

What is the issue with the opinion part of the newspaper expressing opinions?



#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-10-30 02:44 AM | Reply

"What is the issue with the opinion part of the newspaper expressing opinions?"

In this case, their boss did not want his paper presenting a political opinion. There is nothing wrong with that. I like it.

I don't see it as being terribly different from the prohibitions on military personnel wearing their uniforms and political events.

#16 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-10-30 02:57 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

@#16 ... In this case, their boss did not want his paper presenting a political opinion. There is nothing wrong with that. I like it. ...

Or is it that the billionaire owner did not want his paper to present an opinion in the opinion section that he did not agree with?

Taking a step back, this is not about the news reporting, this is about the opinion section.

Why should not the editors, who are intimately exposed to the news each day, be allowed to express their opinions in the section of the newspaper that is set aside for such opinions?

I mean, what is the fear here?

That people will not be able to understand the difference between the OpEd section and the news section?

Is that the fear here?

An OpEd in the opinion section that does not adulate fmr Pres Trump?



#17 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-10-30 03:16 AM | Reply

"Or is it that the billionaire owner did not want his paper to present an opinion in the opinion section that he did not agree with?"

Very likely, but there is nothing wrong with that. Would you have objections if a paper wanted to endorse Trump and the owner refused to let the staff use the paper as their own personal sounding board?

And it's also important to note that he did not make them endorse a candidate he disagreed with-he very well may have done the same if they had chosen to support Trump-he told them they could not use his paper as a vehicle to voice their opinions. And I don't think "billioniare" has anything to do with it...other than the fact that "billionaire" is one of the negative buzzwords that progressive like to use to throw around to signal their dislike for something. A publicly traded news outlet would be equally smart to do the same.

"Why should not the editors, who are intimately exposed to the news each day, be allowed to express their opinions in the section of the newspaper that is set aside for such opinions?"

IRT the Washington Times, it was about the paper, not the individuals, endorsing a candidate. I cannot speak for Jeff Bezos, but I have seen nothing to believe that he would have fired staffers who endorsed any candidate...speaking for themselves. And they can still do that.

"I mean, what is the fear here?"

What's the fear in remaining apolitical? It's not like the paper is endorsing Trump instead.

I think the anger come from the fact that the paper's owner has prohibited it from being used for an explicitly political purpose.

#18 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-10-30 02:00 PM | Reply

Xitter is perfect now.

No Elmo bashing!:[ #ThiccMusk

#19 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2024-10-30 06:29 PM | Reply

Bezos or a Grasping Turd.

He sees the potential toMAKE BANK if Trump Wins....

But First he Has to Tongue Him Some Trump Ass...

Then the Gravy Comes...

#20 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-10-30 06:54 PM | Reply

Not one of the Republicans who post here even so much as question Musk's self-serbing economic plans enen when he admits it will cause economic hardships" pn millions of Americans while, at the same time, giving billionaires tax cuts and cutting SS and Medicare. More tax cuts for the rich will increase inflation as the previous ones did. And then let's slap a new national sales tax on all the things working families need to buy for their families! The is just plain unadulterated a personality cult built around Putin, Trump and Musk! Pure insanity from the "what could possibly go wrong" Republicans who brought the Iraq invasion and the housing bubble that burst in 2007! People who have huge egos but also track records of disastrous failures!

#21 | Posted by danni at 2024-10-31 02:10 AM | Reply

Think about how much more unified and civil this country was before murdoch created fox news.

#22 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-10-31 11:43 AM | Reply

What's the fear in remaining apolitical? It's not like the paper is endorsing Trump instead.

#18 | Posted by madbomber

Choosing to suddenly became APOLITICAL when there's a russian puppet who attempted a coup on the ballot is strange timing dontcha think?

#23 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-10-31 11:44 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort