"I used to draw nudes when I was in Junior High..."
That's the point though, in the not-too-distant future you will be able to create movie quality porn of anyone. But at what point is it criminal? Where is the line of an actual crime? Is an AI generated image similar to thought crime like the To Catch a Predator stings? If you add a mole or tattoo or a few freckles to a person's face and it is otherwise photo realistic, is that the same as a photograph?
So, you have to ask, do people have a right to their own image. Or consider it another way, does one have a right to privacy or bodily autonomy?
If I am in public people can take a picture of me, and with AI they can use me for advertising, for their sexual pleasure, for homework, for a movie script or a news article all without my consent.
Any pictures of me on the internet can achieve the same goal. -----, I would imagine that AI can reproduce say TruthHurts right here on the DR. Or say you have someone who has a large online social media presence. AI can essentially clone that person. They can use AI to commit identity theft (already a crime), BUT AI can be used to market or sell products with that person's image or essence as created by AI.
Where does your privacy come in? Oh wait we no longer have an inherent right to that.
Is it plagiarism for AI to use my thoughts and writings for advertising or for a thesis or for a movie script?
A woman is not entitled to do with her body should she become pregnant. What gives that woman the right to damages if someone uses her image to create porn?