Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Despite a court order, a reporter and photographer from The Associated Press were barred from an Oval Office news conference on Monday with President Donald Trump and his counterpart from El Salvador, Nayib Bukele.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Despite a court order, Donald Trump is still refusing to allow journalists from the Associated Press into the White House press pool. This is a direct assault on the First Amendment, free speech, and freedom of the press.

[image or embed]

-- The New Republic (@newrepublic.com) April 14, 2025 at 5:35 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"The dispute stems from AP's decision not to follow the president's executive order to rename the Gulf of Mexico, although AP style does cite Trump's wish that it be called the Gulf of America.

The AP argued " and U.S. District Judge Trevor N. McFadden agreed last week " that the government cannot punish the news organization for exercising its right to free speech."

;;
.

Free Speech ain't free anymore; you have to pay off the King by only telling his lies, not the objective facts.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2025-04-14 09:09 PM | Reply

This is going to the Supreme Court.

imo.

#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-04-14 09:19 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

That fat ---- is a waste of air

#3 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-04-15 12:07 AM | Reply

When is bellf*&^er gonna swing by and denounce obvious censorship and anti-1A actions by a renegade POTUS?

#4 | Posted by jpw at 2025-04-15 12:03 PM | Reply

"When is bellf*&^er gonna swing by and denounce obvious censorship and anti-1A actions by a renegade POTUS?"

The 12th of Never.

He's got his (R)easons.

#5 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-04-15 12:06 PM | Reply

Trump says he always' abides by court orders as allies lay groundwork to defy them (February 2025)
www.independent.co.uk

... "So yeah, the answer is, I always abide by the courts, always abide by them, and we'll appeal, but appeals take a long time," he added.

Trump's remarks follow a deluge of attacks from Elon Musk, Vice President JD Vance, administration officials and their allies, casting aside checks and balances and falsely suggesting that the presidency has supreme authority over Congress and the judicial branch. ...


#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-04-16 02:24 PM | Reply

Trump is a crazy person.

#7 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-04-16 02:58 PM | Reply

Maybe when Trump violates the 2nd amendment again MAGA will care.

Probably not.

#8 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-04-16 02:59 PM | Reply

Where's that -----, bellringer? Mr. Constitutional expert is busy jacking on a gacy thread instead of commenting on Trump violating the First amendment.

#9 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-04-16 03:12 PM | Reply

Lumpy man-baby all upset ... wah ... wah ... wah.

Eff that ignoramic felon.

#10 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-04-16 03:49 PM | Reply

Trump is not just a crazy person. He is also a stupid person. He is also a bad person.

#11 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-04-16 07:08 PM | Reply

I disagree with what they are doing with the AP. As far as I can tell it is not a violation of the Constitution. AP's 1st amendment rights are not being infringed. Nevertheless this is petty AF.

#12 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-04-16 07:33 PM | Reply

#10:

"Say what you will about Trump, he is not stupid. He is a smart man with a deep understanding of what stupid people want."

Andy Borowitz

#13 | Posted by SomebodyElse at 2025-04-16 07:45 PM | Reply

" As far as I can tell it is not a violation of the Constitution."

What a riot.

If this was Obama banning Fox News, OANN, or Newsmax, you'd have no problem calling it a violation, again and again and again.

Hell, you'd be posting three threads a day on the topic.

#14 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-04-16 08:24 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#14

It is always interesting, and somethings sadly humorous, to see MAGA supporters trying to justify the actions of Pres Trump, when if Pres Obama or Pres Biden had done anything even resolutely similar, the right-wing media propaganda sites would have lit up.

Barack Obama tan suit controversy
en.wikipedia.org

... On August 28, 2014, President Barack Obama held a press conference about the situation regarding ISIS in Syria, and how the U.S. military was planning to respond to it. At the conference, Obama said that the U.S. had yet to develop a plan regarding the removal of ISIS, and talked extensively about his concerns in the region.[6][7] During the conference he wore a tan suit, which until that point was uncommon for Obama.[8]

The light-colored suit was seen by conservative commentator and Fox Business Network host Lou Dobbs as "shocking to a lot of people".[6] ...




#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-04-16 08:46 PM | Reply

@#15

Oops, spell-check error

resolutely

- should be -

remotely

(I now return you to your regularly scheduled program ....)


#16 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-04-16 08:48 PM | Reply

As far as I can tell it is not a violation of the Constitution.

Another one that proudly demonstrates his utter ignorance of all things legal. As the Judge succinctly stated

No, the Court simply holds that under the First Amendment, if the Government opens its doors to some journalists" be it to the Oval Office, the East Room, or elsewhere"it cannot then shut those doors to other journalists because of their viewpoints. The Constitution requires no less ... .
Though you should read the full opinion to get an education from a Buffoon appointed Judges on some aspects of the First Amendment.
storage.courtlistener.com

#17 | Posted by et_al at 2025-04-16 08:54 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

I disagree with what they are doing with the AP. As far as I can tell it is not a violation of the Constitution. AP's 1st amendment rights are not being infringed. Nevertheless this is petty AF.

#12 | Posted by BellRinger

Remember when Jeffy got pissed because Twitter wouldn't PROMOTE fake doctors with fake medical science on Twitter and spent months posting articles about it being censorship?

Yeah, we all remember.

Now we have an actual case of censorship where Trump punishes news organizations he disagrees with and a court order to stop, but Jeff says "It's fine, just petty."

JEFF! You have some orange on your nose.

#18 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-04-17 10:51 AM | Reply

This isn't censorship, moron.

You're trolling is lame.

#19 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-04-17 07:10 PM | Reply

bellringer is okay with trump ignoring court orders because reasons.

#20 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-04-17 07:59 PM | Reply

bellringer is okay with trump ignoring court orders because reasons.

I bet I know what the (R)eason is...

#21 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-04-17 08:03 PM | Reply

#20. No, I'm not okay with it. Doesn't change the fact that this isn't censorship.

#22 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-04-17 09:02 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort