50% of murderers get away with it - IN DEEP BLUE -------- CITIES. Also, it has little, if anything to due with staffing levels. It is due to gang related killings (which appear more or less random) and a culture in which people that reside in these deep blue -------- cities refuse to talk to the police. Deep blue -------- cities like Chicago and Oakland have clearance rates in the 30's or below.

Further, it should be noted that the % of murders committed by blacks in the US hover around 60% for cases in which a suspect has been identified. Taking into account the case closure rate is MUCH, MUCH lower in deep blue -------- cities with a lot of gang and drug violence, the actual murder rate for blacks in the US are about 70% of all murders. We have huge issue in the US and it starts with the culture being taught in deep blue -------- cities.

"Red state --------- have the highest murder rates because they're run by repug ----------.
#8 | Posted by reinheitsgebot"

There is no such thing as a 'red state' - you have red suburban and rural areas surrounding deep blue -------- cities. Depending on the size and number of deep blue -------- cities that are in a state, the state is qualified by red or blue by stupid people that don't understand the dynamics at play. Take Tennessee for an example - Memphis accounts for 60-70% of all statewide murders (depending on the year) but accounts for under 10% of the population. Memphis voted 2:1 for Harris despite the state voting 2:1 for Trump. So, your biggest issue with this 'red state' is the deep blue -------- that resides within it causing all the problems. Rinse and repeat this for Michigan, etc and even for California and New York.

"#11 | Posted by Reinheitsgebot"

Read #10 again - real slow this time so you can understand it -------.

Let's have some more fun with numbers on the 'red' states. Omaha, Nebraska is known as the 'blue dot' in the otherwise red state. Omaha accounted for a ~45% of all murders despite being under 30% of the total state population and - unsurprisingly, voted for Kamala in 2024.

Again, a pattern that is repeated over and over and over again. Deep blue -------- cities, whether in 'red' states or 'blue' states are crime filled --------s. Red state just have enough normal people to outvote them but is does not change the characteristics of the people residing in the deep blue -------- cities - violent, angry liberal voters.

#13 | Posted by reinheitsgebot"

Tell me the "red" state that does not have a deep blue -------- city OR - in the case of mountain and plains states - widespread Indian reservations disproportionately driving up the murder rates. The 'red' part of the states is not the problem.

"#15 | Posted by reinheitsgebot"

Again with your fake 'red state' vs. 'blue state' --------. Counties won by Kamala represent 65% of all murders and 50% of the US population. For Trump, it is 35% and 50% - counties won by Democrats are more violent at almost a 2:1 ratio - I don't give 2 ----- if the counties are grouped into a 'red state' or 'blue state' - the problem is that murder is committed in Dem voting/controlled areas at shocking rates.

Of course, this is the common sense conclusion as we also know that blacks represent 60%+ of all murders and vote Democrat at an 80% clip.

I would even go further to state that the already ultraviolent Dem counties benefit from a largely non-violent red population as a VAST majority of the crimes in blue counties are committed by Dems or Democrat aligned groups (see the above stats on blacks as evidence for this).

Just stop with the fake 'red state' vs. 'blue state' divide - it is deep blue -------- cities vs. normal people living in red areas.

"#19 | Posted by LegallyYourDead"

You skipped right by the part where the data does not support your ridiculous argument and you admit you are wrong - how about we circle back to that -------?

"#21 | Posted by LegallyYourDead"

What part is racist?

1.) Saying that blacks commit 60%+ of murders in the US?
2.) Saying that blacks vote Democrat at an 80% clip?
3.) Noticing the two points above to be facts?

"None of your so-called "statistics" are true.
#24 | Posted by LegallyYourDead"

"#29 | Posted by LegallyYourDead"

Again - where is the lie -------? It is a lie because it hurts your fee-fee's?

"#31 | Posted by TFDNihilist"

Why don't the state governments in Blue States work on solving their blue cities problem like Oakland or Chicago? Ultimately, politics is local and if a population is so stupid as to continue to vote in those people which tolerate a violent, deep blue -------- to develop, then they are getting what they voted for.

"Which is why the whole red state/blue state dynamic is so stupid.
#33 | Posted by eberly"

I have tried explaining it to them already. Maybe you will have better luck.