MAGA Is Tearing Itself Apart over Jeffrey Epstein
On the right, the Epstein story became the thinking man's version of the QAnon conspiracy theory ...
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
Doc_Sarvis
Joined 2006/01/26Visited 2025/07/14
Status: user
MORE STORIES
MAGA Is Tearing Itself Apart over Jeffrey Epstein (12 comments) ...
FBI's 'Raw' Epstein Prison Video Likely Modified (16 comments) ...
Case Closed on Epstein? Not So Fast (6 comments) ...
AI Robot Removes Pig Gall Bladder (8 comments) ...
Why is Ghislaine Maxwell the Only Enabler in Prison? (17 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Slight--but distinct--hesitation by Epstein's buddy on this video when she asked him about the Epstein files. But he did say he'd release them.[image or embed] -- George Conway (@gtconway.bsky.social) Jul 13, 2025 at 10:21 AM
Slight--but distinct--hesitation by Epstein's buddy on this video when she asked him about the Epstein files. But he did say he'd release them.[image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
"This much we do know," writes David French. "Some of MAGA's most trusted voices " including Patel, Bondi, Bongino and Trump himself " are suddenly telling their movement: Move along, there's nothing to see here. But MAGA does not want to hear what they have to say."
#1 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-07-14 06:18 AM | Reply
"Nothing to see here, folks! Now c'mon, move along. NOW!" svt-vod-6l.akamaized.net
#2 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-07-14 06:29 AM | Reply
They're creating quite an Epstink.
You know who doesn't release a list of pedophiles that paid to rape little girls? A pedophile that paid to rape little girls.
It 1000% tracks for just type of vile disgusting creep that he is.
#3 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-07-14 09:41 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2
You know who doesn't release a list of pedophiles that paid to rape little girls? A pedophile that paid to rape little girls. It 1000% tracks for just type of vile disgusting creep that he is.
#3 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-07-14 09:41 AM | Reply
The files were in the hands of Brennon, Clapper and Comey. So if there was something that incriminated Trump they didn't disclose it because they liked Trump? Makes sense since they tried to bankrupt him, jail him and then have him assassinated. You f-in stooge.
#4 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-07-14 10:51 AM | Reply | Funny: 1
If the Epstein Files exonerated the disgusting orange pedo he'd already be selling copies on Truth Social.
#5 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-07-14 10:54 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 5
So if there was something that incriminated Trump
#4 | POSTED BY FISHPAW
There's something that hurts Trump in those Epstein files.
Or Trump would not be behaving this way.
#6 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-14 11:26 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3
4 | POSTED BY FISHPAW
Come on, man. After all these years you can't tell when Trump is frightened?
#7 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-14 11:27 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
So if there was something that incriminated Trump #4 | POSTED BY FISHPAW There's something that hurts Trump in those Epstein files. Or Trump would not be behaving this way.
#6 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-14 11:26 AM | Reply | Flag:
You have a short memory, the FBI used made up ---- from Hillary for the basis of a 3 year, $41 million investigation to attempt to remove him from office. If there was something on Trump, anything, it would have been leaked since the same people were in charge of the files.
#8 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-07-14 12:35 PM | Reply
#8 | Posted by fishpaw
I don't think there's anything in the world that could change your support for __itler. You've must really enjoy having his mushroom up your ___.
#9 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2025-07-14 12:58 PM | Reply
If there was something on Trump, anything, it would have been leaked since the same people were in charge of the files.
#8 | POSTED BY FISHPAW
Blah blah blah.
Competently run judicial law offices generally do not release information regarding ongoing investigations to the public. They usually even refuse to discuss ongoing investigations. They do not coordinate or conspire with the executive branch. Also Trumpy was a candidate for president so it would been seen as a political ploy to influence the election.
In addition Biden's base was not frothing at the mouth demanding their immediate release.
#10 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-07-14 12:59 PM | Reply
It is far from without the bounds of possibility that something new has been added to, or discovered in these files.
Interest in Epstein is keen within the MAGA base.
Trump doesn't want one-million hyper-aroused amateur detectives rooting around in the Epstein files. They'll find something.
One of those somethings will be Trump's name. Re-printed over and over and over again.
But most alarmingly for Donald, they will find photos of him with Epstein in the company of very young girls.
#11 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-14 01:45 PM | Reply
Some MAGAts may notice the perhaps suspiciously short time - barely two months - that passed between key Jeffrey Epstein witness Virginia Giuffre's suicide and Pam Bondi's nope-nothing here attempt to bury the scandal. (They've tried to run with less.)
#12 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-07-14 04:35 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy