Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, September 13, 2025

A while back I put out these rules for the internet. 1. When we disagree, we fight. 2. We have a beer afterward. 3. When we agree, we unite. I got a lot of flack, surprisingly, for the line about the beer. People would ask, "Oh yeah, would you have a beer with Charlie Kirk?!" Well, I did. And I'm glad I did, because now I won't get to. Yes, Charlie and I disagreed a lot and about really important things. But somehow we didn't lose our humanity. We were still fellow Americans.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

---- you.

#1 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-09-13 11:06 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

We were still fellow Americans.

Posted by BellRinger

Are you gay? Kirk wanted you dead without trial; public executions by way of stoning.

I imagine, before the NAZIS achieved full power, that any number of Jews (Being, after all, Germans) had beers with them.

It was a nice gesture. They went to Auschwitz later anyway.

#2 | Posted by Zed at 2025-09-14 08:50 AM | Reply

I just learned that major MAGA television personalities want me dead if I ever don't have enough money.

Brave New World.

#3 | Posted by Zed at 2025-09-14 08:52 AM | Reply

" Are you gay? Kirk wanted you dead without trial; public executions by way of stoning"

You've been lied to. He never said that or anything close to resembling that.

#4 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-14 03:58 PM | Reply

PEDO DONNIE lies every time he opens his stroked out pie-hole, you worthless pile of dog ----.

#5 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-09-14 05:23 PM | Reply

The idea is to craft a one party system, thus the recent talk by Miller of designating the Democrat party a "terrorist organization".

#6 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-09-15 07:12 PM | Reply

Trump has spent the better part of the 21st century doing everything he can to divide and antagonize Americans.

Biden drew hearts and begged republicans to work with him and he got mocked, harassed, attacked and humiliated.

Republicans sunk their own bipartisan border bill in order to avoid looking like they're working with democratic politicians.

Republicans are too steeped in hate to want any unity.

Putin has destroyed America.

#7 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-09-15 07:27 PM | Reply

" Are you gay? Kirk wanted you dead without trial; public executions by way of stoning"

Not Kirk, but this guy certainly does, Steven Bonnell, known as Destiny, calls for conservatives to be killed more often so they will be afraid to attend events or speak out.

Thats the Lumper idea of "unity". People like this are anti-American they are against everything America stands for.

#8 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-09-15 08:58 PM | Reply

Who?

Meanwhile, Kilmeade has suggested we kill all homeless people.

#9 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-09-15 09:07 PM | Reply

Never give a fascist an inch

You are no friend of mine.

Charlie Kirk was a hateful bigot who put a "reasonable, smiling" face on a despicable ideology.

It is beyond disgusting he is being martyred by the right.

Because the right is scum, they are devoid of integrity, they are coming for good Americans

You are either a Patriot or a little Eichman

Fuck all fascists

#10 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-09-15 09:11 PM | Reply

Charlie Kirk did nothing but spit hate.

#11 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-09-15 09:13 PM | Reply

You've been lied to. He never said that or anything close to resembling that.

#4 | Posted by BellRinger

Fuck you lying cunt

Kirk invoked a Bible verse about stoning gay people "to death" on a June 2024 episode of his podcast with Jack Posobiec, calling it "God's perfect law when it comes to sexual matters."

#12 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-09-15 09:13 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Jeff is the one who is lying like usual

www.factcheck.org

In a June 8, 2024, episode of his podcast (at around the 1:00:00 mark), Kirk reacted to Accurso posting a video in which she cited Bible scripture to explain why she had wished a "Happy Pride" that month to people in the LGBTQ+ community.

"My faith is really important to me, and it's also one reason why I love every neighbor," she said in her video. "In Matthew 22, a religious teacher asked Jesus, what's the most important commandment? And Jesus says, to love God and to love your neighbor as yourself.'" "It doesn't say love every neighbor except," she went on to say.

In his reply, Kirk said Accurso left out something else the Bible says. "She's not totally wrong," Kirk said. "The first part is Deuteronomy 6:3"5. The second part is Leviticus 19. So you love God, so you must love his law. How do you love somebody? You love them by telling them the truth, not by confirming or affirming their sin."

He continued: "And it says, by the way, Ms. Rachel, might want to crack open that Bible of yours, in a lesser referenced part of the same part of scripture is in Leviticus 18, is that thou shall lay with another man shall be stoned to death. Just saying. So, Ms. Rachel, you quote Leviticus 19, love your neighbor as yourself. The chapter before affirms God's perfect law when it comes to sexual matters."

That is the despicable scum you are lauding.

Fuck him and fuck all fascists

#13 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-09-15 09:17 PM | Reply

#13 I've seen that clip. What does he say immediately after "God's perfect law when it comes to sexual matters."?

I've looked but haven't been able to find it.

Also, square that with this:

www.youtube.com

#14 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-15 09:20 PM | Reply

Truthhurts,

IF you are open-minded, here is a contextual debate along the lines of what you are quoting. These 2 really get into the weeds but it's far more representative than the 18-second clip that you are citing:

www.youtube.com

#15 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-15 09:32 PM | Reply

-Kirk invoked a Bible verse about stoning gay people

Oh ... ..go on ... .

#16 | Posted by eberly at 2025-09-15 09:35 PM | Reply

-Fuck him and fuck all fascists

I'll bet your dentist is a fascist.

#17 | Posted by eberly at 2025-09-15 09:36 PM | Reply

Conservative Christians aren't Christians but they sure do love to quote verses from the Bible in order to justify hate.

#18 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-09-15 09:37 PM | Reply

-Also, square that with this:

Twoothy is one of the psychos that unfriended that woman on instagram

#19 | Posted by eberly at 2025-09-15 09:42 PM | Reply

If I see a Black pilot, I'm going to be like, boy, I hope he's qualified.

" The Charlie Kirk Show, 23 January 2024
Racist

Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that's a fact. It's happening more and more.

" The Charlie Kirk Show, 19 May 2023
Racist

If I'm dealing with somebody in customer service who's a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?

" The Charlie Kirk Show, 3 January 2024
Racist

If we would have said that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative action picks, we would have been called racists. Now they're coming out and they're saying it for us ... You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person's slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.

" The Charlie Kirk Show, 13 July 2023

Racist

Fuck that dude

#20 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-09-15 09:55 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

We need to have a Nuremberg-style trial for every gender-affirming clinic doctor. We need it immediately.

" The Charlie Kirk Show, 1 April 2024

Fuck that dude

#21 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-09-15 09:55 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

These 2 really get into the weeds but it's far more representative than the 18-second clip that you are citing.
- bellringer

This has been my conclusion too on all these quotes, out of context, over emotional people.

But the fascist truthhurts wants all opinions literally snuffed out.

#22 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-09-15 10:16 PM | Reply

These 2 really get into the weeds but it's far more representative than the 18-second clip that you are citing.
- bellringer

This has been my conclusion too on all these quotes, out of context, over emotional people.

But the fascist truthhurts wants all opinions literally snuffed out.

#23 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-09-15 10:16 PM | Reply

When you use race as a metric for admission, don't be surprised when people use race as a metric when they get out

It's perfectly logical.

#24 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-09-15 10:24 PM | Reply

Truthhurts,

I've given you two videos that are far more illustrative than the one sentence quotes you are providing. Maybe he was all of the things you are saying he was. But to be convincing you need to provide full context, not cherry-picked sentences. If you want to make the accusations you are making, then provide actual context. Selective editing can be, but is not always, extremely deceptive.

#25 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-15 10:24 PM | Reply

22, 23, 24

Nonsense, utter nonsense, and lies.

#26 | Posted by Corky at 2025-09-15 10:33 PM | Reply

Nonsense, utter nonsense, and lies.

aka "Trolling".

#27 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-09-15 10:36 PM | Reply

Video at link:

Adam Parkhomenko
@adamparkhomenko.bsky.social

What the media is NOT covering about who Charlie Kirk was

bsky.app

#28 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-15 10:47 PM | Reply

Judd Legum
@juddlegum.bsky.social

Charlie Kirk was a champion of free speech and anyone who says otherwise will be fired

#29 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-15 10:52 PM | Reply

Here's a video that shows us who Charlie Kirk was.

CHARLIE KIRK (HOST): I know what you're thinking, we've got to get Joe Biden out of the way so we can run against Kammy. Oh my goodness, is she beatable. It's like Black Hillary on steroids. Is she Black? I guess she says she's Caribbean or whatever. ...
She would be a lot easier to beat than Joe Biden. Joe Biden is a bumbling dementia filled Alzheimer's corrupt tyrant who should honestly be put in prison and/or given the death penalty for his crimes against America.

www.mediamatters.org

#30 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-09-15 10:57 PM | Reply

But to be convincing you need to provide full context, not cherry-picked sentences. If you want to make the accusations you are making, then provide actual context. Selective editing can be, but is not always, extremely deceptive.
#25 | Posted by BellRinger

I don't think there is a context in which most of the quotes TH provided or I did in the above post would make those quotes read differently. Since you do, why don't you provide the ameliorating contexts.

#31 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-15 11:02 PM | Reply

30

I've seen that 12 times in the last 4 days

#32 | Posted by eberly at 2025-09-15 11:03 PM | Reply

x.com

Charlie Kirk

@charliekirk11
It's not a Great Replacement Theory, it's a Great Replacement Reality.

Just this year, 3.6 million foreigners will invade America.

10-15 million will enter by the end of Joe Biden's term.

Each will probably have 3-5 kids on average while native born Americans have 1.5 per couple.

You are being replaced, by design. Truly the most depressing story we cover.
1:32 PM Dec 27, 2023

www.snopes.com

Charlie Kirk once said passing the Civil Rights Act was a 'huge mistake'

In 2023, Kirk said "Jews have been some of the largest funders of cultural Marxist ideas and supporters of those ideas over the last 30 or 40 years."

www.snopes.com

#33 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-09-15 11:10 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Joe Biden is a bumbling dementia filled Alzheimer's corrupt tyrant who should honestly be put in prison and/or given the death penalty for his crimes against America."

The comment about giving Biden the death penalty becomes even more damning when you realize he advocated public executions.

www.snopes.com

#34 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-15 11:12 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

www.snopes.com

Charlie Kirk once said prominent Black women didn't have 'brain processing power' to be taken seriously
He was talking specifically about Michelle Obama, Joy Reid, Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

#35 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-09-15 11:13 PM | Reply

"I don't think there is a context in which most of the quotes TH provided or I did in the above post would make those quotes read differently. Since you do, why don't you provide the ameliorating contexts.

#31 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-15 11:02 PM | Reply | Flag"

I've provided 2 videos and I'll provide another in my next post...

#36 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-15 11:19 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

I've provided 2 videos and I'll provide another in my next post...
#36 | Posted by BellRinger

Do the videos provide the context for the quotes TH and I have referred to? Those are the videos I am interested in.

#37 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-15 11:22 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I've seen that 12 times in the last 4 days
#32 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Don't worry Ebby, no one expects you to change your mind about your hero, Charlie Kirk.

Just ignore the hate he was spreading.

It didn't affect you anyway.

#38 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-09-15 11:23 PM | Reply

Do the videos provide the context for the quotes TH and I have referred to? Those are the videos I am interested in.
#37 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday

Actually now that I'm looking at the site, Snopes seems to have done writeups on a number of Kirk's contraversial quotes.

#39 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-15 11:24 PM | Reply

Gal Tuesday,

One at a time. TH is claiming Kirk wanted gays (and trans) to be stoned based upon biblical text, specifically leveticus 20:13.

Here is a clip of Dave Rubin day after the assassination.

www.youtube.com

My point of sharing this video is Rubin and Kirk were clearly good friends based upon what Rubin is saying, to the point they've been to each others houses.

The reason this is relevant is Rubin came out gay in the early 2000's (I think it was 2006) and is married to a man.

How could Kirk have possibly become good friends with a man who is openly gay and is married to a man? If I am to believe his detractors, he would have actually wanted Rubin to be stoned to death.

#40 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-15 11:38 PM | Reply

What a guy, what a mensch, what a saint:

Seth Cotlar
@sethcotlar.bsky.social

Last September Charlie Kirk claimed that Haitian immigrants in Huntsville were "raping your women and hunting you down at night." He said that rural Alabamians faced a future in which Haitian immigrants "will become your masters."

www.mediamatters.org

#41 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-15 11:39 PM | Reply

Gal Tuesday,

Do you believe based upon the evidence I presented and the evidence TH presented, that Kirk was in favor of stoning gays to death?

#42 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-15 11:45 PM | Reply

#41 Did you watch the video clip provided by Media Matters? If you didn't, I recommend that you do.

#43 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-15 11:50 PM | Reply

Here is a clip of Dave Rubin day after the assassination.

He certainly doesn't want to be first on the MAGA retaliatory kill list.

#44 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-09-15 11:51 PM | Reply

#41 | POSTED BY GAL_TUESDAY

He's just referencing what Emily said.

The guest Emily stated this earlier in the show.

#45 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-09-15 11:51 PM | Reply

I'd say he was pretty cavalier about the it, emphasis mine:

In a June 8, 2024, episode of his podcast (at around the 1:00:00 mark), Kirk reacted to Accurso posting a video in which she cited Bible scripture to explain why she had wished a "Happy Pride" that month to people in the LGBTQ+ community.

"My faith is really important to me, and it's also one reason why I love every neighbor," she said in her video. "In Matthew 22, a religious teacher asked Jesus, what's the most important commandment? And Jesus says, to love God and to love your neighbor as yourself.'" "It doesn't say love every neighbor except," she went on to say.

In his reply, Kirk said Accurso left out something else the Bible says. "She's not totally wrong," Kirk said. "The first part is Deuteronomy 6:3"5. The second part is Leviticus 19. So you love God, so you must love his law. How do you love somebody? You love them by telling them the truth, not by confirming or affirming their sin."

He continued: "And it says, by the way, Ms. Rachel, might want to crack open that Bible of yours, in a lesser referenced part of the same part of scripture is in Leviticus 18, is that thou shall lay with another man shall be stoned to death. Just saying. So, Ms. Rachel, you quote Leviticus 19, love your neighbor as yourself. The chapter before affirms God's perfect law when it comes to sexual matters."

www.factcheck.org

#46 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-15 11:51 PM | Reply


He certainly doesn't want to be first on the MAGA retaliatory kill list.
#44 | POSTED BY REDIAL

You should ask TruthHurts what that list looks like, I am sure he's on the TransDiscord making that list now.

#47 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-09-15 11:52 PM | Reply

#46 | POSTED BY GAL_TUESDAY

Whats the transcipt Gal ... thanks.

#48 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-09-15 11:52 PM | Reply

He's just referencing what Emily said.
The guest Emily stated this earlier in the show.
#45 | Posted by oneironaut

Yeah, so? This is what he said on the topic:

KIRK: And I don't wanna get there yet, Emily. But, Emily, just so we're clear, the Haitians that are in Huntsville that are raping your women and hunting you down at night--it's only gonna get worse if--unless Donald Trump wins. A new report from Fox News shows that across the border, 13,000 people convicted of murder, 15,000 people convicted of rape on the non-detained list--meaning they're currently roaming free around our country. So right now, roaming free on the interior of the United States are 13,000 convicted murderers, 15,000 convicted rapists. And they're just--they're having a field day, and they're coming for your daughter next.

www.mediamatters.org

#49 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-15 11:56 PM | Reply

#46 Again, that is the same 18 second clip that all of his detractors have been bandying around. What does he say immediately after this:

"The chapter before affirms God's perfect law when it comes to sexual matters.".....

I've tried to find a more extensive version of that and haven't been successful. I've also provided 3 contextual video clips that really do disabuse any notion that he actually favored killing gays.

My video clips have been completely ignored, at least so far.

#50 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-15 11:56 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

POSTED BY REDIAL

You misspelled DIALAGAIN. Calm down. Focus.

#51 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-09-15 11:57 PM | Reply

bell- i dont think kirk wanted to kill gay people.

#52 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-09-15 11:58 PM | Reply

He does advocate this in a 45 second clip:

youtu.be

taking care of trans people like we did in the 50s. wtf

#53 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-09-16 12:03 AM | Reply

"I've tried to find a more extensive version of that and haven't been successful. I've also provided 3 contextual video clips that really do disabuse any notion that he actually favored killing gays."

In the link I provided there is a link to Kirk's website that has the entire conversation from that day.

#54 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-16 12:06 AM | Reply

"taking care of trans people like we did in the 50s. wtf

#53 | Posted by Alexandrite"

I don't even know what that means. Again, like so many other instances, I really want to see more of the clip so I can get the full context. I had the same reaction to that Kilmeade comment due to when the video was cut off. Then I saw him backtracking and apologizing and that signaled to me that no additional context was necessary.

#55 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-16 12:07 AM | Reply

Gal Tuesday,
Do you believe based upon the evidence I presented and the evidence TH presented, that Kirk was in favor of stoning gays to death?
#42 | Posted by BellRinger

I don't know what he thought because he doesn't say. He could have said, God says to stone gay people, but I don't feel that way. I have a very close gay friend, and I certainly don't think he should be stoned.

#56 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-16 12:12 AM | Reply

"In the link I provided there is a link to Kirk's website that has the entire conversation from that day.

#54 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday"

You didn't provide a link to any video regarding Kirk advocating the killing of gays and trans based upon biblical scripture.

I watched the 3+ minute clip you provided by Media Matters and encouraged you to watch the video clip as well.

In the interest of moving things forward, are you done talking about the Kirk wants to stone gays accusation?

#57 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-16 12:12 AM | Reply

Then I saw him backtracking and apologizing and that signaled to me that...

...his producer was in his earpiece.

#58 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-09-16 12:13 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"taking care of trans people like we did in the 50s. wtf
#53 | Posted by Alexandrite"
I don't even know what that means.

It sounds like he meant someone should have beat the trans athletes up the way they would have back in the 50s when men were men and not low testosterone sissies.

#59 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-16 12:14 AM | Reply

You didn't provide a link to any video regarding Kirk advocating the killing of gays and trans based upon biblical scripture.

No, the clip I was talking about was the one where he says that Haitians were raping women in Alabama.

#60 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-16 12:17 AM | Reply

"I don't know what he thought because he doesn't say. He could have said, God says to stone gay people, but I don't feel that way. I have a very close gay friend, and I certainly don't think he should be stoned.

#56 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday"

Why would he? It's such an absurd allegation in the first place. It's why I asked a question such as this:

"How could Kirk have possibly become good friends with a man who is openly gay and is married to a man? If I am to believe his detractors, he would have actually wanted Rubin to be stoned to death.

#40 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-15 11:38 PM |"

You come across as an intelligent and reasonable woman. Please re-read what I just reproduced and apply some logic to the question I posed. To add further, in the video where he is debating that young man with a British accent, he repeatedly brings up an unbroken chain of tradition. Throughout it's history where the Protestant church has had any degree of state power when was the last time an execution was carried out by the Protestant church for the sole sin of being gay?

#61 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-16 12:17 AM | Reply

more.

www.mediamatters.org

#62 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-09-16 12:19 AM | Reply

"It sounds like he meant someone should have beat the trans athletes up the way they would have back in the 50s when men were men and not low testosterone sissies.

#59 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-16 12:14 AM"

That's one interpretation. Another is that real men simply never would allowed a male to compete against women and accessed women only spaces.

#63 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-16 12:19 AM | Reply

"Why would he?"

I know why he wouldn't. Because that wouldn't have gotten him the big bucks in conservative circles. Maybe that gay guy was the token gay guy in Kirk's circle of friends. It happens.

#64 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-16 12:21 AM | Reply

"No, the clip I was talking about was the one where he says that Haitians were raping women in Alabama.

#60 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-16 12:17 AM |"

Well, I watched that clip in its entirety and given he brought numbers from Biden's head of ICE his comments made sense to me.

#65 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-16 12:21 AM | Reply

"I know why he wouldn't. Because that wouldn't have gotten him the big bucks in conservative circles."

Are you actually suggesting that if he had gone on the record of being against gays being executed for being gay it would have cost him in conservative circles?

Actually, it might have but for a completely different reason than what you are implying.

#66 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-16 12:24 AM | Reply


"taking care of trans people like we did in the 50s. wtf
#53 | Posted by Alexandrite"

Were there "Trans" people in the 50s? idk but I think there's a difference between a transvestite, and todays transgender individual.

Better living through chemistry?


"It sounds like he meant someone should have beat the trans athletes up the way they would have back in the 50s when men were men and not low testosterone sissies.

#59 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday

You mean like today "trandgenders" are threatening women who complain about them competing in womens sports?

Just this weekend ... its near me ...

"Go suck a sawed-off shotgun."
"You're a Nazi piece of shit."
"We kill Nazis"

That's Connor Wolfe's response to women holding "No males in female cycling" signs
x.com

I mean the trans people are off the rails at this point, its about time Democrats disown them.

#67 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-09-16 12:25 AM | Reply

Because that wouldn't have gotten him the big bucks in conservative circles.

Bankrolling "Heil Kyle" Rittenhouse's speaking tour did.

#68 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-09-16 12:26 AM | Reply

Well, I watched that clip in its entirety and given he brought numbers from Biden's head of ICE his comments made sense to me.
#65 | Posted by BellRinger

Seriously? You believe there were Haitians hunting down women and raping them in Huntsville and LE in the are/state where just standing idly by and doing nothing to stop them? smdh

"But, Emily, just so we're clear, the Haitians that are in Huntsville that are raping your women and hunting you down at night . . . And they're just--they're having a field day, and they're coming for your daughter next."

#69 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-16 12:28 AM | Reply

That's Connor Wolfe's response to women holding "No males in female cycling" signs

WTH is Connor Wolfe?

#70 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-16 12:30 AM | Reply

"Are you actually suggesting that if he had gone on the record of being against gays being executed for being gay it would have cost him in conservative circles?"

No, the exact opposite. If he had said gays shouldn't be stoned, that would have cost him in some conservative circles.

#71 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-09-16 12:33 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort