Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, November 08, 2025

The Great American Heist: How Reagan, Trump, and Their Billionaire Backers Stole the Middle Class A 50-year project to turn the world's strongest democracy into a playground for the rich ...

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

"The simple fact is that back in the 1960s you could rent a small apartment, buy a used car, and put yourself through college on a minimum wage job. I know because I did it (pumping gas, washing dishes, working as a part-time DJ), as did millions of my generation. Just ask your grandparents.

So, what happened?".

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Excepts

"Through most of America's history, our economic life was similar to that of other countries that practiced unregulated capitalism. Charles Dickens wrote about that era in most of his novels, including Christmas Carol.

There was a small 1% that owned about 90% of the nation's wealth. A small middle class of professionals (doctors, lawyers, retail shop owners, etc.) who worked for the 1% making up around 10%-25% of the population. And a very large cohort of the working poor."

---

"Keynes and FDR (and Francis Perkins) had this wild idea that it should be possible to create a nation where at least two-thirds of the people were in the middle class.

They'd do it by heavily taxing the morbidly rich (FDR raised it to 77% in 1936), giving union power to working people (Wagner Act, 1935), and providing a solid social safety net " Social Security (1935), a minimum wage (1933/38), unemployment insurance (1935), and Food Stamps (1939) " to create a middle-class floor."

"Thus, Ronald Reagan came to the White House in 1981 with a simple mandate: cut the middle class down to size to restore social and political stability. To save the nation."

MUCH more at the link... a cogent history of how we got where we are today.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-06 06:21 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

more

"He started by destroying the unions that supported high wages and benefits. A third of us were unionized when Reagan came into office; now it's in single-digits and Trump just de-unionized an additional few-hundred-thousand federal workers.

Then he instituted the first long-lasting freeze on the minimum wage (9 years), cut the top income tax rate from 74% to 27%, "reformed" Social Security by raising the retirement age to 67 and taxing its benefits as income, ended enforcement of the Fairness Doctrine (1987), gutted federal support for colleges, and threw small local businesses to the wolves by abandoning enforcement of 100 years of anti-monopoly laws and securities regulations that forbade stock buy-backs."

Here's the 7 min video version from Thomm

www.youtube.com

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-06 06:45 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1


a cogent history of how we got where we are today.
#1 | POSTED BY CORKY

Not bad, but seems to omit the most significant reason you can't
"you could rent a small apartment, buy a used car, and put yourself through college on a minimum wage job."

Thats due the US getting off the gold standard. The proof of this is the rise in interest rates after the untethering of the US dollar.

destroying the unions that supported high wages and benefits.

Unions were already crumbing do to imports.


Not bad Corky, but you can do better I am sure.

#3 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-11-06 09:57 PM | Reply

#3

You're like Whack a Mole.... you get whacked down every time you stick your head up on different threads.

WWII expansion did more than either the monetary standard change or the New Deal to make the economy great, er, good enough; to increase the size of the Middle Class.

The real point is what Reagan and the Republicans after him, including the current Project 25 Fascists, did to make the Middle Class Smaller Again.

Try to follow along as slowly as makes you feel comfortable.

#4 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-06 10:16 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"The simple fact is that back in the 1960s you could rent a small apartment, buy a used car, and put yourself through college on a minimum wage job. I know because I did it (pumping gas, washing dishes, working as a part-time DJ), as did millions of my generation. Just ask your grandparents. So, what happened?".

The government got involved. Federally secured loans mean that students and homeowners could borrow hundreds of thousands of dollars, even when they might be able to pay those loans. The lenders don't care because they are protected. My daughter's school, University of Arizona, costs around $60k per year. It's probably a good investment if you're going into a field where you're going to make a lot of money. If not, it's a waste of money.

But yeah, that's what happened.

#5 | Posted by madbomber at 2025-11-08 08:29 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"WWII expansion did more than either the monetary standard change or the New Deal to make the economy great, er, good enough; to increase the size of the Middle Class."

That's true, although it was more the post-war years than anything else. After WWII, if you wanted a truck, or cargo ship, or airplane...it was going to be manufactured in the US. And that required lots of labor. Companies didn't care about the costs, as they would simply pass them on to consumers. There was no competition. That began to change as the Asian and European economies rebuilt. Up until the 1970s, have a college degree earned you around a 5% premium compared to someone without a degree.

Anyways, this whole "heist" argument is ridiculous. Median US household income in the US is $83,740 (2024). That's 4th highest in the world. And median household income is dead center of middle-class. And median household income has increased by almost $20k per year since 1990 in inflation-adjusted dollars.

If you want an education on economics, you'll need to look to someone other than Thom Hartmann.

#6 | Posted by madbomber at 2025-11-08 09:11 AM | Reply

- this whole "heist" argument is ridiculous.

Big Beautiful Bill transfers a trillion dollars upwards to the wealthy.

AI Overview
The phrase "Big Beautiful Bill transfers a trillion dollars upwards to the wealthy" refers to the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (P.L. 119-21), a U.S. federal statute passed in July 2025 that includes tax cuts disproportionately benefiting high-income earners, corporations, and the wealthy.

Analysts across the political spectrum agree that the bill's tax cuts benefit the wealthiest households the most, with some projections showing over $1 trillion in tax cuts for the top 1% over the next decade.

The bill also includes other policies, such as temporary increases to the state and local tax (SALT) deduction, which primarily benefit those with higher incomes, and has been associated with cuts to social programs and increased tariffs."

www.google.com

The point is it's still going on.... no matter your lame denials.

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-09 11:57 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"- this whole "heist" argument is ridiculous."

Only if you're using Republican Math.

If you're looking at the actual equation, it's obvious. The richest are getting a MUCH LARGER break than the percentage of taxes they pay.

IOW, they might pay half the income taxes, but they'll get 2/3rds of the cost of Trump 2.0

#8 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-11-09 12:19 PM | Reply

And get it on the backs of the least among us.

I think what MB and most rwingers mean is that they are middle class so it won't be so bad for them... and that's all that matters.

#9 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-09 12:23 PM | Reply

"Companies didn't care about the costs, as they would simply pass them on to consumers."

LOL.
Let's just set the minimum wage at $100.
Companies don't have to care about the costs, they can simply pass that on to consumers.

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-09 12:32 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"The simple fact is that back in the 1960s you could rent a small apartment, buy a used car, and put yourself through college on a minimum wage job. I know because I did it (pumping gas, washing dishes, working as a part-time DJ), as did millions of my generation. Just ask your grandparents. So, what happened?"

The government got involved.
#5 | Posted by madbomber

"The government got involved"
Yes, that's actually what the headline says. The headline you've been arguing with says the same thing you said.

"Federally secured loans mean that students and homeowners could borrow hundreds of thousands of dollars, even when they might be able to pay those loans."

Students can't borrow "hundreds of thousands of dollars" of Federally secured loans. When I started in 1990 I borrowed something like $1,600 for one year. When I went back to school in the 2010s I borrowed about $55K over two and a half years. Medical students can borrow well over the $100k mark but have to turn to private lenders to get there.

And Federally secured home loans offer security for the lender, not the homeowner. The home itself still serves as collateral, will be auctioned off if the mortgagee defaults, and the lender made whole by the FHA.

#11 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-09 12:50 PM | Reply

"And median household income has increased by almost $20k per year since 1990 in inflation-adjusted dollars."

Setting aside that means the median income goes up $20K a year, which is obviously wrong:
How much more has upper quintile household income increased, compared to median income?

I can't quite tell if you're denying there has been $50 trillion of wealth shifted from the bottom 90% to the top 1% in the past forty years, or just saying that the people in the bottom 90% demographic from whom the income has been shifted away shouldn't miss it, or something else.

Let's start with the shift. Do you agree $50 trillion of wealth shifted from the bottom 90% to the top 1% in the past forty years?

#12 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-09 12:55 PM | Reply

They'd do it by heavily taxing the morbidly rich (FDR raised it to 77% in 1936), giving union power to working people (Wagner Act, 1935), and providing a solid social safety net " Social Security (1935), a minimum wage (1933/38), unemployment insurance (1935), and Food Stamps (1939) " to create a middle-class floor."

Exactly!!!

Poor people don't have the money to buy the goods and services that capitalists want to provide. Henry Ford knew it. Why don't today's capitalists? It seems as if today's capitalists want to starve the golden goose. Who, then, will buy their goods/services?

#13 | Posted by FedUpWithPols at 2025-11-09 04:25 PM | Reply

"Who, then, will buy their goods/services?"

It seems like they're counting on wealthy people to purchase YouTube+, Hulu+, Disney+, Apple TV+, Peacock+, Netflix+, and Slingbox+ while the other 80% make do with $20 rabbit ears.

#14 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-09 04:30 PM | Reply

You forgot HBOMax and Paramount+.

#15 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-11-09 04:33 PM | Reply

Madbomber is a proud defender of income inequality.

He sees nothing wrong with the wealthy exploiting the poor.

A lot of republicans agree with him.

Especially those living on government assistance.

#16 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-11-09 04:37 PM | Reply

#13 You are spot on with your post!

How about we start taxing the uber-wealthy who have, for the past 40 years, been able to dodge their financial responsibilities that provide them with a country that protects them and their money and their property?

Not to mention the fact that this country has given them, the uber-wealthy, a nation of publicly educated wage-earners who can afford to buy their products/services?

How about that?

Afterall, ingratitude is a Cardinal Sin.

#17 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-09 04:49 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort