Advertisement
Mike Johnson Mansplains Religion to Pope Leo
Mike Johnson put on his theologian hat and broke down scripture for the Vicar of Christ: "So you want me to give you a theological dissertation? All right. I tell you what. I'll post it on my website later today ... "
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
reinheitsgebot
Joined 2006/11/29Visited 2026/02/05
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Republican State Rep Blames Trump Regime for Party Exodus (7 comments) ...
Mike Johnson Mansplains Religion to Pope Leo (16 comments) ...
45-year-old Man Wearing MAGA Hat Arrested after High School Girls Attacked (32 comments) ...
Farm Leaders Warn of 'collapse of American Agriculture' (20 comments) ...
Republicans Freaking Out About Hispanic Voters (65 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
in which Mike Johnson attempts to scripture-splain to the [checks notes] Pope[image or embed] -- Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) Feb 3, 2026 at 2:40 PM
in which Mike Johnson attempts to scripture-splain to the [checks notes] Pope[image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
HE LIKEY THE YOUNG BLACK BUCK, UMMM-HMMMM
#1 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-02-04 12:47 AM | Reply
... let me give you a quick summary," Johnson responded ...
imo, less of an explanation, and more of the usual politician's comment, ~let me get out of here~ comment.
imo Spkr Johnson is a wuss. No, let me correct my opinion. A lame wuss.
All he seems to do is follow Pres Trump's orders.
Totally ignoring the Constitution's co-equal government dictum.
imo, he has failed the requirements of the most respected position he occupies.
And, if I may add as a corollary ...
What does that say about the Republicans who put him in that position?
Asked differently, Spkr Johnson is the best and the brightest of the GOP in the House of Representatives?
#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-04 12:53 AM | Reply
Arch blasphemer and shoddy frontispiece for America's super-wealthy oligarchs Republican Mike Johnson knows more about theology than Pope Leo XIV?
#3 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-02-04 01:54 AM | Reply
Talk about hubris.
#4 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-02-04 04:08 AM | Reply
It's weird, but I really do think Pope Leo has a firmer grasp of the Bible (especially the New Testament, the part Christians didn't appropriate from another people with another religion) than Bossier Parish's very own wannabe Elmer Gantry (but lacking Gantry's fire and wisdom).
#5 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-02-04 06:11 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
For a guy on video explaining he doesn't know things, Johnson sure thinks he knows things.
I think he's just a lying wuss.
#6 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-02-04 06:16 AM | Reply
The fake plastic Christian giving a half a&&ed "lesson" to a guy who has spent his entire life studying this stuff...
Must be why the Pope cites New Testament while dips*&^ fake plastic Chreestian cites Old Testament.
#7 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-04 01:10 PM | Reply
Mikey is speaking with his lower rear mouth.
New converts to Christianity were not expected to be circumcised, nor to follow Jewish food and other laws... as a matter of fact, neither were Jews who converted.
And the his mealy-mouthed talk about immigrants (or sojourners in the bible) is the polar opposite of the truth.
#8 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-05 12:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
The Pope and Johnson have a common problem ... pedophiles in their power structure.
#9 | Posted by chuffy at 2026-02-05 04:07 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2
#9 | Posted by chuffy at 2026-02-05 04:07 PM | Reply | Flag: Can't Argue With That
Remarkable that the Christian villains target young goyim, while the Jewish villains target young shiksas
What a mystery story to write or comic book to illustrate.
#10 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-02-05 04:17 PM | Reply
Why doesn't Trump respond to the Pope? Trump is after all the White Christian Nationalist Messiah.
#11 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2026-02-05 04:25 PM | Reply
I wouldn't put it past Johnson to be IN the files.
#12 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-02-05 04:26 PM | Reply
My first impession of the rather fey gent was this is the kind of political animal that steadfastly believes his de regure knee-jerk piety grants him carte blanch to nakedly and repeatedly fib to the American public, despite any credible or factual push-back to the contrary. It's a Bronze Age zombie yarn some have historically found useful in controling those with little to no ability to recognize how "bad" Angry Sky Daddy can be in determining who makes society's on-going pact with itself fair & just for everyone. $20 says he has a Grindr account.
#13 | Posted by dutch46 at 2026-02-05 04:48 PM | Reply | Funny: 1
De rigeur. I should have looked it up. My apologies...I've become lazy in my old age.
#14 | Posted by dutch46 at 2026-02-05 04:57 PM | Reply | Funny: 1
Spkr Johnson cited Romans 13.
Other times Romans 13 was cited in American History ...
Should we always obey the government? (2018) www.psephizo.com
... Adding to the emotion and confusion in this situation, the Attorney General Jeff Sessions cited Paul's words in Romans 13 to deflect criticism and suggest that Christians should simply accept the Government's approach: "I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes," Sessions said during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Ind. "Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful." What is odd about Sessions reaching for this text is that it was previously called upon in two key moments of US history: "There are two dominant places in American history when Romans 13 is invoked," said John Fea, a professor of American history at Messiah College in Pennsylvania. "One is during the American Revolution [when] it was invoked by loyalists, those who opposed the American Revolution." The other, Fea said, "is in the 1840s and 1850s, when Romans 13 is invoked by defenders of the South or defenders of slavery to ward off abolitionists who believed that slavery is wrong. I mean, this is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made." The current use (and previous use in Europe to justify loyalty to Adolf Hitler in pre-war Germany) might suggest that the Bible is useless as a guide for anything, since its texts are so pliable and can be used to support opposite positions. ...
"I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes," Sessions said during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Ind. "Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful."
What is odd about Sessions reaching for this text is that it was previously called upon in two key moments of US history:
"There are two dominant places in American history when Romans 13 is invoked," said John Fea, a professor of American history at Messiah College in Pennsylvania. "One is during the American Revolution [when] it was invoked by loyalists, those who opposed the American Revolution." The other, Fea said, "is in the 1840s and 1850s, when Romans 13 is invoked by defenders of the South or defenders of slavery to ward off abolitionists who believed that slavery is wrong. I mean, this is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made."
"One is during the American Revolution [when] it was invoked by loyalists, those who opposed the American Revolution."
The other, Fea said, "is in the 1840s and 1850s, when Romans 13 is invoked by defenders of the South or defenders of slavery to ward off abolitionists who believed that slavery is wrong. I mean, this is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made."
The current use (and previous use in Europe to justify loyalty to Adolf Hitler in pre-war Germany) might suggest that the Bible is useless as a guide for anything, since its texts are so pliable and can be used to support opposite positions. ...
#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-05 06:41 PM | Reply
- to justify loyalty to Adolf Hitler in pre-war Germany)
America Firsters have been with us for a while... here they are at a rally in Madison Sq Garden:
www.youtube.com
They just call themselves MAGA now.
- since its texts are so pliable and can be used to support opposite positions. ...
That could be true of most writings sans any context.
#16 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-05 06:50 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy