Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, March 06, 2026

Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland is expected to release the measure next week as Democratic Party lawmakers search for a sharp economic message to counter last year's Republican tax law.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Maryland) has a plan that he says would ensure roughly half of all U.S. workers pay no federal income taxes. The measure would be paid for by a new surcharge on millionaires.

[image or embed]

-- The Washington Post (@washingtonpost.com) Mar 5, 2026 at 1:00 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Good idea that doesn't have a snowball's chance of becoming law.

#1 | Posted by qcp at 2026-03-05 01:54 PM | Reply

Tax cuts for the wealthy is stupid, so are tax cuts for everyone else.

Cutting taxes is the last thing we should be doing right now.

But it's a lot easier and more immediate than actually trying to fix the systemic problems causing the economic pain in our country.

You know, like corporations in multitudes of fields making billions in profits while claiming they're being forced to lay off workers or raise prices.

If they keep ignoring the central issue of greed and "growth" at any cost, they're just kicking the can down the road.

#2 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-05 04:28 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 2

Everyone should stop paying taxes, we should let America fall apart and turn into Somalia.

Huzzah!

#3 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-06 02:57 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

Taxing millionaires to benefit workers?

The GOP will never allow it to pass.

Great plan though...make them vote against a tax cut for millions of workers.

#2 The structural deficits that the GOP have created have doomed this nation. Their goal has always been to cut taxes to the point where social security will need to be killed to keep the nation from going bankrupt.

#4 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-03-06 08:30 AM | Reply

You guys are right, lets just stick with the current plan of the rich paying nothing and everyone else covering everything. /s

#5 | Posted by qcp at 2026-03-06 08:34 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

This is essentially just increasing the standard deductions.

But normally when someone says "eliminate income taxes" they get called a liar for it because social security taxes are income taxes and this plan doesn't eliminate that tax obligation for these folks.

#6 | Posted by eberly at 2026-03-06 09:04 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

#6 | Posted by eberly

True. That was my first throught. Income taxes at the lower end are kinda negligible compared to payroll taxes.

#7 | Posted by gtbritishskull at 2026-03-06 09:29 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

because social security taxes are income taxes and this plan doesn't eliminate that tax obligation for these folks.

Social security is a payroll tax and only people who earn over $184,500 per year get a break on those.

Lifting the wage cap would make social security solvent.

#8 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-03-06 09:34 AM | Reply

-Lifting the wage cap would make social security solvent.

So, another idea that does nothing except to stick it to middle class folks leaving the uber wealthy untouched.

#9 | Posted by eberly at 2026-03-06 10:00 AM | Reply

You guys are right, lets just stick with the current plan of the rich paying nothing and everyone else covering everything. /s
#5 | Posted by qcp

If only anyone had actually said that. /s

#10 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-06 10:30 AM | Reply

So, another idea that does nothing except to stick it to middle class folks leaving the uber wealthy untouched.

#9 | Posted by eberly

What do you consider to be middle class?

The wage cap is currently $184k. I feel that if you are making $184k then you are probably up past middle class, at least upper middle class.

Though I do agree with you if you are pointing out that most of the wealthy have their income in capital gains. I would be completely in favor of expanding Social Security to include ALL income.

Relatedly, I would also be in favor of treating all income the same. So that there is no special "capital gains" rate, and all income, regardless of source, is taxed under the same progressive rates.

#11 | Posted by gtbritishskull at 2026-03-06 10:32 AM | Reply

-Though I do agree with you if you are pointing out that most of the wealthy have their income in capital gains.

That's my point exactly. Shifting their income to unearned income or capital gains is an easy move for them to avoid SS/self-employment taxes.

I consider middle class to be under $300K in most parts of the country. $400K in NY, California, etc.

$184K in NYC is not that great.

-I would be completely in favor of expanding Social Security to include ALL income.

That would be problematic to collect. Currently, it's an easy transaction with regards to payroll deductions. If you attach rent, interest, and any other type of unearned income.....that would be much more difficult to collect and manage.

I don't disagree with the principle of what you're saying.....I'm just saying it's politically unrealistic to implement.

#12 | Posted by eberly at 2026-03-06 10:53 AM | Reply

Rofl...again liberals have a hard time understanding economics.

1. Why is Trump evil for getting rid of a good amount of income tax requirements for middle- and low-income people? He got rid of taxes on tips and some other things that essentially lower income tax burdens. But liberals still demonize him for it.
2. Any tax on the rich is just like a tariff wherein the costs are passed on to the consumer, or worse. And this is the part liberals TRULY need to finally understand so we can actually move forward with real solutions. The wealthy have very little liquid money. Most of their money is tied up in investments of companies. Any big tax on them means they have to sell their investments in those companies. And when a lot of money is divested from a company, they are forced to raise prices, lay off workers, etc.
2b. This is why investments can't be taxed, on top of it being a net loss for people with investments. I'll try to explain it in a way a typical liberal can understand at a 5th grade level. If I make $100k a year but I have $500k in investments and you tax me on my networth, you tax me on $600k. If you charge me 10%, then I'd pay $10k for my $100k. Yet, if you tax me 10% on my networth at $600k...I now have to pay $60k which is 60% of my actual income that year. Then I have to sell my investments. Every year, I'd end up having to sell more of my investments until eventually I have very little. Nobody, not even middle class, can sustainably live off of that kind of system.

I'm not saying we shouldn't tax the wealthy more or make them contribute more. I'm just saying that so far liberals haven't found a way of doing that that doesn't cause layoffs, price increases, etc. In fact, the one solution that would cause everyone to pay more based on their status is a flat tax but liberals for some reason don't like that.

#13 | Posted by humtake at 2026-03-06 12:38 PM | Reply

" Why is Trump evil for getting rid of a good amount of income tax requirements for middle- and low-income people?"

Because those folks are getting $25-$40/week, while billionaires are getting over a million dollars a week.

We're borrowing new trillions to continue otherwise expiring tax cuts.

#14 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-06 12:42 PM | Reply

Federal sales tax to replace Federal income tax.
Simple: exempt food and drink.
Remove the Federal income tax.
Everything else sold and resold taxed.
Sell a house? Tax
Sell a car? Tax
Sell a boat, plane, etc. Tax.

Direct tax on stocks. Not on the value of the stock trades. A penny for every trade.
Millions of trades daily.
Trade 100 stocks=$1
Trade 1,000,000 stocks=$10,000.
Every trade generates a penny tax.

Every illegal immigrants in the US loses 100% of everything they have gained via asset forfeiture.

#15 | Posted by Petrous at 2026-03-06 01:24 PM | Reply

#7

Payroll taxes ARE income taxes. The baseline federal tax rate for earned income is 15.3% for EVERY earned dollar.

It's a VERY regressive tax, both because it doesn't tax unearned income at all and because it cuts out for ALL income above $184,500.

#16 | Posted by DarkVader at 2026-03-06 05:45 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort