Excerpts from the legal depositions of good-for-nothing DOGE wastrels Justin Fox and Nate Cavanaugh:

"You don't regret that people might have lost important income ... to support their lives?" an attorney asked Nate Cavanaugh about the grant cancellations. "No. I think it was more important to reduce the federal deficit from $2 trillion to close to zero," Cavanaugh bleated. "Did you reduce the federal deficit?" the attorney asked. "No, we didn't," Cavanaugh admitted.

"Do you think it's inappropriate in any way that someone in their 20s with no experience with grants for the federal government was making personal judgment calls about what grants to cancel?" an attorney asked. "Um, no. I don't think it's inappropriate," the overpaid Cavanaugh sniveled, arguing that he did not need formal education or experience to make informed judgments.

"Did you ever find it problematic that you were, alongside Nate, short-listing for termination projects that had hits on words like Black, homosexual, LGBTQ+?" an attorney asked, prompting an objection and follow up question.

"We were identifying wasteful spend in the government based on Trumpf junta direction. That was the whole reason we were there, was to find savings," Justin Fox whined, though he acknowledged the deficit was never reduced.

Hi Snoofy: Per my SOP, "junta" is my substitution for the word 'administration,' otherwise the post is cut and pasted verbatim.

These two pieces of sociopathic pot-smoking----------- are utterly revolting.