Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, March 25, 2026

President Donald Trump took classified documents related to his private business interests from the White House in 2021, according to materials the Justice Department apparently provided to the House Judiciary Committee. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the committee's top Democrat, suggested in a letter to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi that the new documents were handed over by mistake in a slapdash effort to discredit the dormant criminal case against Trump.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More: "These new disclosures suggest that Donald Trump stole documents so sensitive that only six people in the entire U.S. government had access to them, that the documents President Trump stole pertained to his business interests, and that Susie Wiles, then the CEO of Donald Trump's super PAC, witnessed President Trump showing off a classified map to passengers on his private plane," Raskin said in the letter.

Raskin asked Bondi to tell lawmakers in a classified setting who was on the plane, what the map showed and which of Trump's various business interests were relevant to the documents. The letter includes an image of an aircraft manifest with a redacted passenger list from a 2022 flight from Florida to New York.

A grand jury indicted Trump in 2023 for improperly taking classified documents and obstructing a federal investigation. According to the indictment, the papers included "information regarding defense and weapons capabilities of both the United States and foreign countries; United States nuclear programs; potential vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack; and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack."

The FBI determined some of the documents Trump withheld "would be pertinent to certain business interests" of Trump's, Raskin said, quoting from material he said the Justice Department gave the judiciary committee earlier this month. And a Justice Department memo said "classified documents pertinent to his business interests" established "a motive for retaining them."

Jack Smith, the special counsel overseeing the documents case as well as a separate criminal case against Trump for trying to overturn the 2020 election results, dropped the prosecutions after Trump won the 2024 election. Smith made a public report of the election case, but District Court Judge Aileen Cannon has blocked the release of Smith's report on the documents case.

"Apparently blinded by the frenzied search to find any scrap of evidence that could be twisted and distorted to level an attack against Special Counsel Smith," Raskin wrote, "you have, quite amazingly, missed the fact that some of the documents you provided include damning evidence about your boss's conduct and may well violate the gag order your DOJ and Donald Trump demanded from Judge Aileen Cannon."

#1 | Posted by qcp at 2026-03-25 11:20 AM | Reply

Apparently blinded by the frenzied search to find any scrap of evidence that could be twisted and distorted to level an attack against Special Counsel Smith

Or people on the inside are doing what they can by slipping these things into these document dumps to get the word out and expose Trump as fully as they can.

Problem is nothing comes of any of it other than a few outraged talking heads, a few days discussion by politically savvy voters and then *poof* it's gone.

#2 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-25 11:34 AM | Reply

I've believed and continue to believe the FL documents case against the Buffoon was a serious matter that should by played out in court. That Cannon ducked that seriousness is a sad statement about this Buffoon appointee.

Her attempts to bury Volume II makes it even worse.

The Eleventh Circuit has not yet given me hope.

#3 | Posted by et_al at 2026-03-25 11:47 AM | Reply

Yawn. Lawfare.

#4 | Posted by visitor_ at 2026-03-25 12:15 PM | Reply

Yawn. Idiot.

#5 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-25 12:25 PM | Reply

Seriously, were you born this stupid or did you work at it your entire life?

#6 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-25 12:26 PM | Reply

Another view ...

DOJ may have disclosed secret grand jury material to Congress, violated judicial gag order in Trump classified documents case
courthousenews.com

... A trove of previously undisclosed information related to former special counsel Jack Smith's investigation contained sealed grand jury materials which lawmakers said were illegal for prosecutors to disclose and which ran afoul of an order blocking their release. ...

#7 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-25 12:31 PM | Reply

Biden monetized classified documents that he had no right to access. They were stored unsecured in his garage. No consequence. No one cared. It's like the law only matters when it applies to Trump. In fact statute of limitations are suspended and new laws are invented to get Trump. So yeah, don't care about lawfare. The jury of 75 million have spoken.

#8 | Posted by visitor_ at 2026-03-25 12:52 PM | Reply

@#8 ... They were stored unsecured in his garage. ...

... and fmr Pres Biden returned them when asked to do so.

Just as fmr VP Pence did when he was asked to do so.

#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-25 12:54 PM | Reply

"Biden monetized classified documents"

Huh?

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-25 12:55 PM | Reply

Justice Department says it won't charge Pence over handling of classified documents (June 2023)
apnews.com

... The Department of Justice has informed former Vice President Mike Pence s legal team that it will not pursue criminal charges related to the discovery of classified documents at his Indiana home. ...

What you need to know about the Biden classified documents report and the fallout (February 2024)
www.npr.org

... A year-long investigation into President Biden's handling of classified material will not result in any charges. Special counsel Robert Hur concluded in his report that the evidence investigators uncovered falls short of "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" that Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials. ...


#11 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-25 12:58 PM | Reply

It's like the law only matters when it applies to Trump.

Still trying to sell this bulls*&^ as if we don't know what happened?

You're a f*&^ing idiot. A stupid one at that.

Duhhhh LaWfAiReZ!!! Moron.

#12 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-25 12:58 PM | Reply

"Biden monetized classified documents"

If that was true, Gomer Comer would've had 10 unsuccessful hearings by now.

#13 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-25 12:59 PM | Reply

"Justice Department says it won't charge Pence"

Wow.

It's almost like co-operating, and years-long defiance while forcing others to aid in the obstruction...are different..

#14 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-25 01:06 PM | Reply


"Biden monetized classified documents"
Huh?
#10 | Posted by snoofy

This is what being in the bubble looks like people, don't be in the bubble.

A year-long investigation into President Biden's handling of classified material will not result in any charges.
Justice Department says it won't charge Pence over handling of classified documents (June 2023)


and fmr Pres Biden returned them when asked to do so.
Just as fmr VP Pence did when he was asked to do so.

As did every politician. Politicians in America are immune to the laws, unless you get on the wrong side of your team, then you're thrown under the bus.

This never matters for average Joes, they go to jail.

#15 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-03-25 01:50 PM | Reply

What did the noxious orange chomo do with the missing Russia binder?

#16 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-03-25 01:54 PM | Reply

@#16 ... the missing Russia binder? ...

Timeline of the Trump Documents Inquiry (September 2022)
www.voanews.com

... September 2, 2022

The FBI reveals in a court filing that it recovered more than 11,000 government documents and photographs during the August 8 search of Trump's estate, as well as 48 empty folders labeled as "classified." ...

[emphasis mine]

#17 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-25 02:16 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort