Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, August 05, 2026

Just over a hundred years ago, the Binet IQ test was developed in France and soon after, brought to the United States, where it was given to public school kids, physicians, and immigrants at Ellis Island. From the 1930s, IQ scores seemed to be inching up -- with each new generation scoring a little higher than the last. Throughout the 20th century, average intelligence scores rose by about 3 points a decade, even when researchers used different tests and metrics.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... Those small gains added up, meaning that someone's genius-level great-grandparents might only be considered a bit smart by their own generation.

This increase was called the "Flynn Effect" after the educator James Flynn, who published about it in 1984. ...

What caused it?

Hypotheses ranged from population-wide changes like better nutrition, fewer siblings, earlier education, more complex environments, and genetic effects (unlikely, since genes take longer than a few generations to change).

Increasing IQ was seen as a positive thing, since it's correlated with higher educational attainment, better jobs, and even a longer, healthier life. ...

It was expected that this increase would keep going, even if at a slower pace, as humanity advanced.

And then people started getting 'dumber'.

Or at least, their scores on an IQ test dropped. In Europe, several countries reported declining intelligence as determined by standardized tests.

To find out whether the same pattern is emerging in the US, social scientist Elizabeth Dworak made that question the topic of her master's thesis at Northwestern University. She and her colleagues analyzed cognitive test scores from nearly 400,000 American adults collected between 2006 and 2018. ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-08-05 08:14 PM | Reply

Computers make people Stupid.

That's the answer.

Nobody wants it to be.

But that's what it is.

Crutches cause Systemic weakness.

Ancient People had better memories before writing was developed.

Similar thing.

#2 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-08-05 11:23 PM | Reply

EFFETEPOSER ... There's some interesting work been done with respect to younger Inuit hunters using GPS. Basically, w/t the GPS they get lost easier, having not learned or forgotten how to "read" a complex and dangerous landscape due to their GPS relianc.

#3 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-08-06 06:12 AM | Reply

#2

For years the US Army operated a "land navigation by night and star course" at the JFKSWC for Special Forces, Rangers, Pathfinders, USMC Force Recon, USN Seals, and USAF parajumpers.

No high-tech equipment allowed.

The use of GPS precluded the need for the course so it was closed down.

But I had heard that the course was re-established because commandos did not want to rely on GPS technology.

#4 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-08-06 09:20 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I can't see how.

30% of Americans still support a child raping felon that has ruined the US reputation in the world in exchange for being comfortable to say n***** in public.

#5 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-08-06 09:53 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Fish rots from the head down, as Cor likes to quote. Brilliant people are getting dumber too.

I just had a terminal-degreed author in her 40s who used abbreviations for her terms--for example, the Drudge Factor would be (DQ), the Politico Factor would be (PQ).

I asked why she was using Q, and wouldn't it be better if the abbreviation was actually consistent with the term it was abbreviating? (God forbid; everyone has an angle.)

She said it was like IQ, but no one really knows that the Q stands for quotient.

?????WTAF?????

Authors are the bane of the publishing industry. Like tech people in the theatre say: If you could just get rid of the ------- actors, this place would run okay.

#6 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-08-06 10:31 AM | Reply

Authors are the bane of the publishing industry.

I dunno, can publishers write a book? It takes a unique type of insanity to work in the arts.

#7 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-08-06 12:40 PM | Reply

Everyone can write a book. Whether they expect to be paid for their efforts is another story. Many legit authors these days are self-publishing in addition to their royalty presses. But working with some self-publishers has reminded me of Joe Stalin's "Paper tolerates anything written on it." Kinda like the webz.

Publishers are no better or worse authors than most. And this isn't pimping my line of work, but the best authors and writers always seek out good copyediting. I work mostly for publishing houses or university presses, so my direct contact with authors is limited. Publishers who are authors would generally be already published authors.

I worked for years for a magazine publisher and syndicated political columnist who would send me his columns twice a week, back in the 1990s-late 2000s. I initially returned my markup by fax. We rarely spoke on the phone. He called me out of the blue once to give me a hard time for not marking his columns up enough. Good author.

A neighbor for years was a contractor. Told me one time, "I could never do what you do."

I said, "Bubba, I'd rather read a book you edited than try to live in a house I built."

#8 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-08-06 01:38 PM | Reply

The effect of 24/7 screen use is yet to be measured, I believe.

#9 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-08-06 01:52 PM | Reply

9. Current neuroscience and lab interest in brain plasticity are all over it.

Film at 11.

Thoughts and prayers for rats and guinea pigs, human and otherwise.

#10 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-08-06 02:00 PM | Reply

When I went thru boot camp we used a map and compass.

I remember it well because my team easily won and completed the course well ahead of the others because I had excellent map and compass and tracking and hunting skills from my time in the Boy Scouts.

Btw- I thought the losers of that competition were pretty dumb then too.

#11 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-08-06 04:25 PM | Reply

11. I once heard that a truly stupid actor could never play a smart character.

Never read the phrase before about 15 years ago, and then it was about some very local politics. "We're never going to improve until we stop electing people who peaked in junior high school."

Printed in the local paper.

#12 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-08-06 04:36 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort